S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
Log in
NASDAQ:AMWD

American Woodmark Competitors

$96.66
-0.76 (-0.78 %)
(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$94.19
Now: $96.66
$97.59
50-Day Range
$87.31
MA: $93.77
$100.67
52-Week Range
$35.30
Now: $96.66
$117.70
Volume76,794 shs
Average Volume80,841 shs
Market Capitalization$1.64 billion
P/E Ratio25.44
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.28

Competitors

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) Vs. MAS, FBHS, LII, TREX, AOS, and OC

Should you be buying AMWD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "building products" are considered alternatives and competitors to American Woodmark, including Masco (MAS), Fortune Brands Home & Security (FBHS), Lennox International (LII), Trex (TREX), A. O. Smith (AOS), and Owens Corning (OC).

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Woodmark02402.67
Masco161202.58

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Masco has a consensus price target of $58.5526, indicating a potential upside of 4.39%. Given Masco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than American Woodmark.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Woodmark3.95%14.88%6.48%
Masco21.27%1,966.88%14.89%

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Woodmark$1.65 billion1.00$74.86 million$6.5914.67
Masco$6.71 billion2.19$935 million$2.2524.93

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Masco beats American Woodmark on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Woodmark02402.67
Fortune Brands Home & Security161002.53

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $83.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.77%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Woodmark3.95%14.88%6.48%
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Fortune Brands Home & Security's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Woodmark$1.65 billion1.00$74.86 million$6.5914.67
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.13$431.90 million$3.6024.53

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats American Woodmark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Lennox International (NYSE:LII) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Lennox International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Woodmark02402.67
Lennox International311101.87

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Lennox International has a consensus price target of $255.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.39%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than Lennox International.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Lennox International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Woodmark3.95%14.88%6.48%
Lennox International9.95%-176.45%17.78%

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Lennox International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Woodmark$1.65 billion1.00$74.86 million$6.5914.67
Lennox International$3.81 billion2.83$408.70 million$11.1925.15

Lennox International has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Lennox International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Lennox International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lennox International beats American Woodmark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Trex (NYSE:TREX) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Trex, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Woodmark02402.67
Trex012402.25

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Trex has a consensus price target of $69.5667, indicating a potential downside of 23.68%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than Trex.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Trex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Woodmark3.95%14.88%6.48%
Trex21.41%36.64%27.12%

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trex has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Trex's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Woodmark$1.65 billion1.00$74.86 million$6.5914.67
Trex$745.35 million14.16$144.74 million$1.2473.51

Trex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of Trex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Trex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trex beats American Woodmark on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and A. O. Smith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Woodmark3.95%14.88%6.48%
A. O. Smith11.25%19.29%10.75%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and A. O. Smith, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Woodmark02402.67
A. O. Smith17402.25

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. A. O. Smith has a consensus price target of $51.25, indicating a potential downside of 9.82%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and A. O. Smith's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Woodmark$1.65 billion1.00$74.86 million$6.5914.67
A. O. Smith$2.99 billion3.07$370 million$2.2225.60

A. O. Smith has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

A. O. Smith beats American Woodmark on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Woodmark3.95%14.88%6.48%
Owens Corning-7.94%11.99%4.98%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for American Woodmark and Owens Corning, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Woodmark02402.67
Owens Corning112702.30

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $111.4737, indicating a potential upside of 34.35%. Given Owens Corning's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than American Woodmark.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Owens Corning's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Woodmark$1.65 billion1.00$74.86 million$6.5914.67
Owens Corning$7.16 billion1.25$405 million$4.5418.28

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Owens Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

American Woodmark beats Owens Corning on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


American Woodmark Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Masco logo
MAS
Masco
2.2$56.09-0.9%$14.68 billion$6.71 billion10.37Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Fortune Brands Home & Security logo
FBHS
Fortune Brands Home & Security
2.2$88.32-1.1%$12.27 billion$5.76 billion25.16Analyst Report
Lennox International logo
LII
Lennox International
1.8$281.44-1.1%$10.78 billion$3.81 billion30.33Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
Trex logo
TREX
Trex
1.5$91.15-0.9%$10.55 billion$745.35 million63.52Analyst Report
A. O. Smith logo
AOS
A. O. Smith
2.4$56.83-1.0%$9.18 billion$2.99 billion29.14Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Owens Corning logo
OC
Owens Corning
2.4$82.97-0.5%$8.98 billion$7.16 billion-16.56
Builders FirstSource logo
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
1.8$40.87-1.5%$4.77 billion$7.28 billion22.46Analyst Report
Simpson Manufacturing logo
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing
1.6$99.49-1.5%$4.32 billion$1.14 billion27.26Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
Armstrong World Industries logo
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
1.5$83.76-0.9%$4.01 billion$1.04 billion-53.35Increase in Short Interest
AAON logo
AAON
AAON
1.1$70.44-0.6%$3.68 billion$469.33 million48.25
UFP Industries logo
UFPI
UFP Industries
1.9$56.67-0.2%$3.47 billion$4.42 billion17.82Unusual Options Activity
Heavy News Reporting
Gibraltar Industries logo
ROCK
Gibraltar Industries
1.0$96.05-0.9%$3.12 billion$1.05 billion40.19Heavy News Reporting
Patrick Industries logo
PATK
Patrick Industries
2.1$69.85-2.9%$1.63 billion$2.34 billion25.68
PGT Innovations logo
PGTI
PGT Innovations
1.4$22.64-0.4%$1.33 billion$744.96 million36.52
Griffon logo
GFF
Griffon
2.6$23.36-0.6%$1.31 billion$2.41 billion19.97Analyst Upgrade
Apogee Enterprises logo
APOG
Apogee Enterprises
2.0$36.79-1.9%$956.83 million$1.39 billion13.88Dividend Increase
Quanex Building Products logo
NX
Quanex Building Products
1.9$25.57-3.4%$839.41 million$851.57 million21.67Insider Selling
Insteel Industries logo
IIIN
Insteel Industries
1.2$24.41-4.1%$471.46 million$472.62 million24.91Upcoming Earnings
Heavy News Reporting
This page was last updated on 1/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.