American Woodmark Competitors

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Masco has a consensus price target of $58.5526, indicating a potential upside of 4.39%. Given Masco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than American Woodmark.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Masco beats American Woodmark on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as reported by MarketBeat.

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $83.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.77%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Fortune Brands Home & Security's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats American Woodmark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Lennox International (NYSE:LII) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Lennox International, as reported by MarketBeat.

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Lennox International has a consensus price target of $255.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.39%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than Lennox International.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Lennox International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Lennox International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lennox International has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Lennox International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Lennox International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lennox International beats American Woodmark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Trex (NYSE:TREX) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and Trex, as reported by MarketBeat.

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Trex has a consensus price target of $69.5667, indicating a potential downside of 23.68%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than Trex.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Trex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trex has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Trex's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Trex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of Trex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Trex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trex beats American Woodmark on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and A. O. Smith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for American Woodmark and A. O. Smith, as reported by MarketBeat.

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. A. O. Smith has a consensus price target of $51.25, indicating a potential downside of 9.82%. Given American Woodmark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe American Woodmark is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and A. O. Smith's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

A. O. Smith has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

A. O. Smith beats American Woodmark on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Woodmark (NASDAQ:AMWD) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

American Woodmark has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.3% of American Woodmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of American Woodmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares American Woodmark and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for American Woodmark and Owens Corning, as reported by MarketBeat.

American Woodmark currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.65%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $111.4737, indicating a potential upside of 34.35%. Given Owens Corning's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than American Woodmark.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares American Woodmark and Owens Corning's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than American Woodmark. American Woodmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Owens Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

American Woodmark beats Owens Corning on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.