Go Pro

Bollinger Innovations (BINI) Competitors

Bollinger Innovations logo
$0.08 +0.03 (+60.00%)
As of 08/14/2026 03:52 PM Eastern

BINI vs. ECDA, ECDAW, FFIEW, GGROW, and LOTWW

Should you buy Bollinger Innovations stock or one of its competitors? Bollinger Innovations's main competitors and comparable companies include ECD Automotive Design (ECDA), ECD Automotive Design (ECDAW), Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (FFIEW), Gogoro (GGROW), and Lotus Technology (LOTWW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automobiles" industry.

How does Bollinger Innovations compare to ECD Automotive Design?

ECD Automotive Design (NASDAQ:ECDA) and Bollinger Innovations (NASDAQ:BINI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, ECD Automotive Design's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bollinger Innovations'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ECD Automotive Design Neutral
Bollinger Innovations Neutral

ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bollinger Innovations has a beta of -1.34, indicating that its stock price is 234% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ECD Automotive Design
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bollinger Innovations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

94.8% of ECD Automotive Design shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of ECD Automotive Design shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ECD Automotive Design has higher revenue and earnings than Bollinger Innovations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECD Automotive Design$24.50M0.00-$10.77M-$53.00N/A
Bollinger Innovations$9.34M0.00-$457.06MN/AN/A

ECD Automotive Design has a net margin of -33.06% compared to Bollinger Innovations' net margin of -5,005.77%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ECD Automotive Design-33.06% N/A -52.37%
Bollinger Innovations -5,005.77%N/A -318.48%

Summary

ECD Automotive Design beats Bollinger Innovations on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bollinger Innovations compare to ECD Automotive Design?

Bollinger Innovations (NASDAQ:BINI) and ECD Automotive Design (NASDAQ:ECDAW) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

ECD Automotive Design has higher revenue and earnings than Bollinger Innovations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bollinger Innovations$9.34M0.00-$457.06MN/AN/A
ECD Automotive Design$24.50MN/AN/AN/AN/A

11.7% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bollinger Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ECD Automotive Design'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bollinger Innovations Neutral
ECD Automotive Design Neutral

ECD Automotive Design has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bollinger Innovations' net margin of -5,005.77%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bollinger Innovations-5,005.77% N/A -318.48%
ECD Automotive Design N/A N/A N/A

Summary

ECD Automotive Design beats Bollinger Innovations on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bollinger Innovations compare to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric?

Bollinger Innovations (NASDAQ:BINI) and Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (NASDAQ:FFIEW) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

11.7% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bollinger Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Faraday Future Intelligent Electric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bollinger Innovations Neutral
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Neutral

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bollinger Innovations' net margin of -5,005.77%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bollinger Innovations-5,005.77% N/A -318.48%
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric N/A N/A N/A

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bollinger Innovations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bollinger Innovations$9.34M0.00-$457.06MN/AN/A
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric$537KN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Bollinger Innovations beats Faraday Future Intelligent Electric on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bollinger Innovations compare to Gogoro?

Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGROW) and Bollinger Innovations (NASDAQ:BINI) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Gogoro had 1 more articles in the media than Bollinger Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gogoro and 0 mentions for Bollinger Innovations. Gogoro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Bollinger Innovations' score of 0.00 indicating that Gogoro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gogoro Very Positive
Bollinger Innovations Neutral

Gogoro has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bollinger Innovations' net margin of -5,005.77%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GogoroN/A N/A N/A
Bollinger Innovations -5,005.77%N/A -318.48%

Gogoro has higher revenue and earnings than Bollinger Innovations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gogoro$280.77MN/AN/AN/AN/A
Bollinger Innovations$9.34M0.00-$457.06MN/AN/A

11.7% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Bollinger Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gogoro beats Bollinger Innovations on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bollinger Innovations compare to Lotus Technology?

Bollinger Innovations (NASDAQ:BINI) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOTWW) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends and valuation.

11.7% of Bollinger Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Bollinger Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lotus Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Bollinger Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lotus Technology and 0 mentions for Bollinger Innovations. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Bollinger Innovations' score of 0.00 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bollinger Innovations Neutral
Lotus Technology Very Positive

Lotus Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bollinger Innovations' net margin of -5,005.77%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bollinger Innovations-5,005.77% N/A -318.48%
Lotus Technology N/A N/A N/A

Lotus Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Bollinger Innovations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bollinger Innovations$9.34M0.00-$457.06MN/AN/A
Lotus Technology$519.10MN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Bollinger Innovations on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bollinger Innovations News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BINI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BINI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BINI vs. The Competition

MetricBollinger InnovationsAutomobiles IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$40K$43.92B$13.23B$13.09B
Dividend YieldN/A2.89%54.81%10.45%
P/E RatioN/A11.2646.7525.27
Price / Sales0.0025.6691.0370.86
Price / CashN/A11.4126.4050.90
Price / BookN/A2.544.336.24
Net Income-$457.06M$1.24B$443.58M$347.60M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.91%-0.43%1.06%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.21%1.52%0.81%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-20.32%0.69%20.90%

Bollinger Innovations Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BINI
Bollinger Innovations
N/A$0.08
+60.0%
N/A-100.0%$40K$9.34MN/A120
ECDA
ECD Automotive Design
N/A$0.01
flat
N/AN/A$16K$24.50MN/AN/A
ECDAW
ECD Automotive Design
N/A$0.00
flat
N/AN/A$0.00$24.50MN/AN/A
FFIEW
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric
N/A$0.00
flat
N/AN/A$0.00$537KN/A740
GGROW
Gogoro
N/A$0.01
-10.0%
N/A-73.3%$0.00$280.77MN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BINI) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners