Log in

NASDAQ:BURGChanticleer Competitors & Alternatives

$3.38
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 08/7/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.22
Now: $3.38
$3.53
50-Day Range
$2.64
MA: $3.49
$4.38
52-Week Range
$0.30
Now: $3.38
$2.95
Volume1.59 million shs
Average Volume962,916 shs
Market Capitalization$41.92 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.15

Competitors

Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) Vs. RRGB, RICK, PBPB, KRUS, JAX, and FAT

Should you be buying BURG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "eating places" are considered alternatives and competitors to Chanticleer, including Red Robin Gourmet Burgers (RRGB), RCI Hospitality (RICK), Potbelly (PBPB), Kura Sushi USA (KRUS), J Alexanders (JAX), and FAT Brands (FAT).

Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers (NASDAQ:RRGB) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Chanticleer and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Chanticleer-27.61%-338.80%-32.21%
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers-15.10%-25.04%-6.60%

Risk and Volatility

Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Chanticleer and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Chanticleer00103.00
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers15202.13

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $22.7143, suggesting a potential upside of 134.41%. Given Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more favorable than Chanticleer.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Chanticleer and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chanticleer$30.14 million1.39$-17,730,000.00($1.45)-2.33
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers$1.32 billion0.10$-7,900,000.00$0.6215.63

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer. Chanticleer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers beats Chanticleer on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RCI Hospitality (NASDAQ:RICK) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

RCI Hospitality has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RCI Hospitality and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RCI Hospitality$181.06 million0.70$19.17 million$2.315.98
Chanticleer$30.14 million1.39$-17,730,000.00($1.45)-2.33

RCI Hospitality has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer. Chanticleer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RCI Hospitality, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares RCI Hospitality and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
RCI Hospitality4.57%12.26%5.66%
Chanticleer-27.61%-338.80%-32.21%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

43.6% of RCI Hospitality shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of RCI Hospitality shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for RCI Hospitality and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
RCI Hospitality0000N/A
Chanticleer00103.00

Summary

RCI Hospitality beats Chanticleer on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Potbelly (NASDAQ:PBPB) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Potbelly and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Potbelly-11.22%-32.90%-6.32%
Chanticleer-27.61%-338.80%-32.21%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Potbelly and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Potbelly$409.71 million0.22$-23,990,000.00($0.10)-37.60
Chanticleer$30.14 million1.39$-17,730,000.00($1.45)-2.33

Chanticleer has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Potbelly. Potbelly is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chanticleer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

56.0% of Potbelly shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Potbelly shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Potbelly and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Potbelly02002.00
Chanticleer00103.00

Potbelly currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Potbelly's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Potbelly is more favorable than Chanticleer.

Volatility and Risk

Potbelly has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Potbelly beats Chanticleer on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kura Sushi USA (NASDAQ:KRUS) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kura Sushi USA and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kura Sushi USA$64.25 million1.42$1.46 million$0.2740.56
Chanticleer$30.14 million1.39$-17,730,000.00($1.45)-2.33

Kura Sushi USA has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer. Chanticleer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kura Sushi USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kura Sushi USA and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kura Sushi USA-16.43%-16.12%-8.85%
Chanticleer-27.61%-338.80%-32.21%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Kura Sushi USA and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kura Sushi USA11502.57
Chanticleer00103.00

Kura Sushi USA presently has a consensus target price of $20.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 88.74%. Given Kura Sushi USA's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kura Sushi USA is more favorable than Chanticleer.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

40.6% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kura Sushi USA beats Chanticleer on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) and J Alexanders (NYSE:JAX) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Chanticleer and J Alexanders' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Chanticleer-27.61%-338.80%-32.21%
J Alexanders-10.66%-6.51%-3.28%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.8% of J Alexanders shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of J Alexanders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Chanticleer and J Alexanders, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Chanticleer00103.00
J Alexanders0000N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Chanticleer and J Alexanders' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chanticleer$30.14 million1.39$-17,730,000.00($1.45)-2.33
J Alexanders$247.27 million0.27$8.82 millionN/AN/A

J Alexanders has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer.

Risk & Volatility

Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, J Alexanders has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

J Alexanders beats Chanticleer on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for FAT Brands and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FAT Brands01002.00
Chanticleer00103.00

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FAT Brands-12.14%-55.18%-3.22%
Chanticleer-27.61%-338.80%-32.21%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands$22.50 million1.71$-1,020,000.00($0.09)-36.00
Chanticleer$30.14 million1.39$-17,730,000.00($1.45)-2.33

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chanticleer. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chanticleer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

FAT Brands beats Chanticleer on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers logo
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
1.6$9.69flat$121 million$1.32 billion-0.68Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
RCI Hospitality logo
RICK
RCI Hospitality
1.8$13.82flat$118.63 million$181.06 million15.89Upcoming Earnings
Potbelly logo
PBPB
Potbelly
1.4$3.76flat$94.16 million$409.71 million-2.28Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Kura Sushi USA logo
KRUS
Kura Sushi USA
1.8$10.95flat$86.91 million$64.25 million-9.78Increase in Short Interest
J Alexanders logo
JAX
J Alexanders
1.4$4.43flat$64.10 million$247.27 million-2.97Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
FAT
FAT Brands
1.2$3.24flat$44.25 million$22.50 million-14.73
One Group Hospitality logo
STKS
One Group Hospitality
1.4$1.39flat$39.78 million$120.68 million2.73Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Luby's logo
LUB
Luby's
1.0$1.18flat$35.83 million$323.47 million-0.77
ARKR
Ark Restaurants
1.2$9.55flat$33.27 million$162.35 million10.85Upcoming Earnings
Famous Dave's of America logo
DAVE
Famous Dave's of America
1.8$3.13flat$28.98 million$54.89 million9.23Heavy News Reporting
Good Times Restaurants logo
GTIM
Good Times Restaurants
2.1$1.14flat$13.60 million$110.76 million-0.74Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Biglari logo
BH
Biglari
0.8$75.50flat$0.00$668.84 million-0.25High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
This page was last updated on 8/8/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.