NASDAQ:BURGChanticleer Competitors & Alternatives

Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers (NASDAQ:RRGB) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Chanticleer and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.42, suggesting that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Chanticleer and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $22.7143, suggesting a potential upside of 134.41%. Given Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more favorable than Chanticleer.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Chanticleer and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer. Chanticleer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers beats Chanticleer on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RCI Hospitality (NASDAQ:RICK) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

RCI Hospitality has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RCI Hospitality and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

RCI Hospitality has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer. Chanticleer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RCI Hospitality, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares RCI Hospitality and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

43.6% of RCI Hospitality shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of RCI Hospitality shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for RCI Hospitality and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

RCI Hospitality beats Chanticleer on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Potbelly (NASDAQ:PBPB) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Potbelly and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Potbelly and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Chanticleer has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Potbelly. Potbelly is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chanticleer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

56.0% of Potbelly shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Potbelly shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Potbelly and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.

Potbelly currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Potbelly's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Potbelly is more favorable than Chanticleer.

Volatility and Risk

Potbelly has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Potbelly beats Chanticleer on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kura Sushi USA (NASDAQ:KRUS) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kura Sushi USA and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kura Sushi USA has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer. Chanticleer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kura Sushi USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kura Sushi USA and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Kura Sushi USA and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kura Sushi USA presently has a consensus target price of $20.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 88.74%. Given Kura Sushi USA's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kura Sushi USA is more favorable than Chanticleer.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

40.6% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kura Sushi USA beats Chanticleer on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) and J Alexanders (NYSE:JAX) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Chanticleer and J Alexanders' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.8% of J Alexanders shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of J Alexanders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Chanticleer and J Alexanders, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Chanticleer and J Alexanders' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

J Alexanders has higher revenue and earnings than Chanticleer.

Risk & Volatility

Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, J Alexanders has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

J Alexanders beats Chanticleer on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.3% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Chanticleer shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Chanticleer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for FAT Brands and Chanticleer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Chanticleer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FAT Brands and Chanticleer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chanticleer. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chanticleer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

FAT Brands beats Chanticleer on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.