Go Pro

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

Churchill Downs logo
$86.51 -1.06 (-1.21%)
Closing price 08/27/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$87.00 +0.49 (+0.57%)
As of 08/27/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CHDN vs. FLUT, DKNG, MGM, WYNN, and SGHC

Should you buy Churchill Downs stock or one of its competitors? Churchill Downs's main competitors and comparable companies include Flutter Entertainment (FLUT), DraftKings (DKNG), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), and Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Flutter Entertainment?

Flutter Entertainment (NYSE:FLUT) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Flutter Entertainment's net margin of -4.39%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Flutter Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flutter Entertainment-4.39% 7.27% 2.33%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

Flutter Entertainment presently has a consensus price target of $159.13, indicating a potential upside of 67.36%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $136.88, indicating a potential upside of 58.22%. Given Flutter Entertainment's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Flutter Entertainment is more favorable than Churchill Downs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flutter Entertainment
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Flutter Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flutter Entertainment. Flutter Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flutter Entertainment$17.16B0.96-$310M-$4.30N/A
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.06$383M$5.8314.84

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 6 more articles in the media than Flutter Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Churchill Downs and 4 mentions for Flutter Entertainment. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Flutter Entertainment's score of 0.85 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Flutter Entertainment
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Flutter Entertainment on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to DraftKings?

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to DraftKings' net margin of -2.68%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat DraftKings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DraftKings-2.68% -11.26% -1.61%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

DraftKings has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

DraftKings presently has a consensus price target of $34.11, indicating a potential upside of 40.83%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $136.88, indicating a potential upside of 58.22%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than DraftKings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DraftKings
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
29 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, DraftKings had 6 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for DraftKings and 10 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat DraftKings' score of 0.79 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DraftKings
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

37.7% of DraftKings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.2% of DraftKings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DraftKings. DraftKings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DraftKings$6.05B1.99$3.71M-$0.38N/A
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.06$383M$5.8314.84

Summary

Churchill Downs beats DraftKings on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

MGM Resorts International currently has a consensus target price of $53.37, indicating a potential upside of 24.49%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $136.88, indicating a potential upside of 58.22%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MGM Resorts International
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 2.40%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MGM Resorts International2.40% 23.30% 1.90%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

In the previous week, MGM Resorts International had 10 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for MGM Resorts International and 10 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat MGM Resorts International's score of 1.24 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MGM Resorts International
16 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MGM Resorts International. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International$17.54B0.62$205.86M$1.6525.98
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.06$383M$5.8314.84

68.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats MGM Resorts International on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Wynn Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Wynn Resorts pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wynn Resorts has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Wynn Resorts' net margin of 6.05%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Wynn Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wynn Resorts6.05% -46.52% 3.60%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wynn Resorts. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wynn Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wynn Resorts$7.14B1.35$327.33M$4.0323.23
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.06$383M$5.8314.84

Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Wynn Resorts currently has a consensus target price of $134.19, suggesting a potential upside of 43.35%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $136.88, suggesting a potential upside of 58.22%. Given Churchill Downs' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Wynn Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wynn Resorts
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, Wynn Resorts had 14 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Wynn Resorts and 10 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Wynn Resorts' score of 0.85 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wynn Resorts
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.6% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Wynn Resorts on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Super Group (SGHC) (NYSE:SGHC) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Super Group (SGHC) has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Super Group (SGHC) pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Super Group (SGHC) pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years.

Super Group (SGHC) has a net margin of 15.22% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.82%. Super Group (SGHC)'s return on equity of 47.37% beat Churchill Downs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.82% 42.16% 6.31%
Super Group (SGHC) 15.22%47.37%29.05%

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 6 more articles in the media than Super Group (SGHC). MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Churchill Downs and 4 mentions for Super Group (SGHC). Super Group (SGHC)'s average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Churchill Downs' score of 1.32 indicating that Super Group (SGHC) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Super Group (SGHC)
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus target price of $136.88, suggesting a potential upside of 58.22%. Super Group (SGHC) has a consensus target price of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 35.41%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Super Group (SGHC).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Super Group (SGHC)
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Churchill Downs has higher revenue and earnings than Super Group (SGHC). Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Super Group (SGHC), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.06$383M$5.8314.84
Super Group (SGHC)$2.23B3.13$217M$0.7219.19

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Super Group (SGHC) on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill Downs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHDN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHDN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHDN vs. The Competition

MetricChurchill DownsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$6.10B$8.29B$13.13B$12.78B
Dividend Yield0.50%3.72%56.32%11.03%
P/E Ratio14.8422.9446.5425.71
Price / Sales2.06338.2392.61107.30
Price / Cash8.9822.2729.0753.57
Price / Book4.504.775.936.26
Net Income$383M$260.60M$445.86M$348.07M
7 Day Performance-7.68%-1.67%-0.96%0.47%
1 Month Performance-3.04%0.44%-0.38%5.19%
1 Year Performance-15.90%-4.50%-2.59%16.68%

Churchill Downs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHDN
Churchill Downs
4.9636 of 5 stars
$86.51
-1.2%
$136.88
+58.2%
-18.5%$6.10B$2.93B14.849,000
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment
3.9367 of 5 stars
$96.44
-4.9%
$159.13
+65.0%
-68.9%$17.60B$16.38BN/A28,518
DKNG
DraftKings
4.2144 of 5 stars
$25.30
-3.2%
$34.11
+34.8%
-49.3%$12.98B$6.22BN/A5,500
MGM
MGM Resorts International
4.6199 of 5 stars
$43.71
-0.9%
$53.37
+22.1%
+7.8%$11.10B$17.76B26.4962,000
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
4.8784 of 5 stars
$102.79
+0.3%
$134.19
+30.5%
-24.0%$10.56B$7.14B25.5128,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHDN) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners