Free Trial

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

Churchill Downs logo
$86.92 +0.76 (+0.88%)
Closing price 06/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$86.94 +0.02 (+0.02%)
As of 06/5/2026 07:25 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CHDN vs. BYD, WMS, WYNN, MGM, and CZR

Should you buy Churchill Downs stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Churchill Downs with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Churchill Downs include Boyd Gaming (BYD), Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), MGM Resorts International (MGM), and Caesars Entertainment (CZR). These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Boyd Gaming?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Boyd Gaming (NYSE:BYD) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.84% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.21%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.21% 43.50% 6.10%
Boyd Gaming 44.84%25.63%8.99%

In the previous week, Boyd Gaming had 11 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Boyd Gaming and 4 mentions for Churchill Downs. Boyd Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.63 indicating that Boyd Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Boyd Gaming
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Boyd Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Boyd Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.07$383M$5.4016.10
Boyd Gaming$4.10B1.59$1.84B$22.813.85

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus price target of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.92%. Boyd Gaming has a consensus price target of $92.08, suggesting a potential upside of 4.90%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Boyd Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Boyd Gaming
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Boyd Gaming pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Churchill Downs pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boyd Gaming pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Boyd Gaming has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Boyd Gaming is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Boyd Gaming beats Churchill Downs on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Advanced Drainage Systems?

Advanced Drainage Systems (NYSE:WMS) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both casinos & gaming companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Advanced Drainage Systems has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Advanced Drainage Systems has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.21%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Advanced Drainage Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Advanced Drainage Systems13.98% 26.63% 11.80%
Churchill Downs 13.21%43.50%6.10%

In the previous week, Advanced Drainage Systems and Advanced Drainage Systems both had 4 articles in the media. Advanced Drainage Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.63 indicating that Advanced Drainage Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Advanced Drainage Systems
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Advanced Drainage Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Drainage Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Advanced Drainage Systems$3.05B3.26$426.46M$5.4423.88
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.07$383M$5.4016.10

Advanced Drainage Systems pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Advanced Drainage Systems pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Advanced Drainage Systems has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years.

89.8% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Advanced Drainage Systems currently has a consensus target price of $187.00, suggesting a potential upside of 43.92%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.92%. Given Churchill Downs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Advanced Drainage Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Advanced Drainage Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Summary

Advanced Drainage Systems beats Churchill Downs on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Wynn Resorts has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.21% compared to Wynn Resorts' net margin of 5.14%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Wynn Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wynn Resorts5.14% -42.03% 3.53%
Churchill Downs 13.21%43.50%6.10%

In the previous week, Wynn Resorts had 2 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Wynn Resorts and 4 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Wynn Resorts' score of 0.04 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wynn Resorts
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.6% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wynn Resorts. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wynn Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wynn Resorts$7.14B1.52$327.33M$3.3531.19
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.07$383M$5.4016.10

Wynn Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $140.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.00%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $139.00, indicating a potential upside of 59.92%. Given Churchill Downs' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Wynn Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wynn Resorts
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Wynn Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Wynn Resorts pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wynn Resorts has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Churchill Downs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Wynn Resorts on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus target price of $139.00, indicating a potential upside of 59.92%. MGM Resorts International has a consensus target price of $49.76, indicating a potential upside of 4.59%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
MGM Resorts International
4 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MGM Resorts International. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.07$383M$5.4016.10
MGM Resorts International$17.54B0.69$205.86M$0.7266.09

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.21% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 1.03%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.21% 43.50% 6.10%
MGM Resorts International 1.03%24.43%2.02%

In the previous week, MGM Resorts International had 60 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 64 mentions for MGM Resorts International and 4 mentions for Churchill Downs. MGM Resorts International's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.63 indicating that MGM Resorts International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MGM Resorts International
27 Very Positive mention(s)
11 Positive mention(s)
17 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats MGM Resorts International on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Caesars Entertainment?

Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

91.8% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesars Entertainment$11.56B0.51-$502M-$2.37N/A
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.07$383M$5.4016.10

Caesars Entertainment presently has a consensus price target of $32.80, indicating a potential upside of 12.33%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $139.00, indicating a potential upside of 59.92%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesars Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.16
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.21% compared to Caesars Entertainment's net margin of -4.19%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Caesars Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesars Entertainment-4.19% -7.88% -0.95%
Churchill Downs 13.21%43.50%6.10%

In the previous week, Caesars Entertainment had 16 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Caesars Entertainment and 4 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Caesars Entertainment's score of 0.48 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caesars Entertainment
4 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Caesars Entertainment on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill Downs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHDN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHDN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHDN vs. The Competition

MetricChurchill DownsGAMING IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$6.01B$6.20B$7.23B$12.42B
Dividend Yield0.51%1.10%2.93%5.34%
P/E Ratio16.1028.6820.2623.63
Price / Sales2.072.093.73137.68
Price / Cash8.8420.8114.9057.17
Price / Book6.006.643.626.35
Net Income$383M$34.30M$248.11M$337.59M
7 Day Performance-0.33%-4.18%-2.47%-2.51%
1 Month Performance-5.78%-3.23%-1.05%-0.69%
1 Year Performance-11.38%-16.17%14.73%25.37%

Churchill Downs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHDN
Churchill Downs
4.8692 of 5 stars
$86.92
+0.9%
$139.00
+59.9%
-9.5%$6.01B$2.93B16.109,000
BYD
Boyd Gaming
3.6886 of 5 stars
$79.39
+0.1%
$92.08
+16.0%
+19.9%$5.90B$4.09B3.4816,009
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems
4.6773 of 5 stars
$132.97
0.0%
$189.83
+42.8%
+13.2%$10.36B$3.05B24.446,000
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
4.4275 of 5 stars
$97.24
flat
$140.00
+44.0%
+25.5%$10.09B$7.14B29.0328,500
MGM
MGM Resorts International
3.2391 of 5 stars
$38.44
+0.1%
$47.12
+22.6%
+52.0%$9.82B$17.54B53.3962,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHDN) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners