Does the media favor BYD or CHDN?

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 24 more articles in the media than Boyd Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 4 mentions for Boyd Gaming. Boyd Gaming's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that Boyd Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Boyd Gaming 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Churchill Downs 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MGM or CHDN?

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 12 more articles in the media than MGM Resorts International. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 16 mentions for MGM Resorts International. MGM Resorts International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that MGM Resorts International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MGM Resorts International 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Churchill Downs 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor CHDN or WMS?

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 10 more articles in the media than Advanced Drainage Systems. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 18 mentions for Advanced Drainage Systems. Advanced Drainage Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that Advanced Drainage Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Churchill Downs 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Advanced Drainage Systems 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CHDN or WYNN?

In the previous week, Wynn Resorts had 19 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Wynn Resorts and 28 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Wynn Resorts' score of 0.60 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Churchill Downs 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Wynn Resorts 17 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CHDN or CZR?

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 16 more articles in the media than Caesars Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 12 mentions for Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that Caesars Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Churchill Downs 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Caesars Entertainment 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

$87.86 +0.98 (+1.13%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$86.58 -1.29 (-1.46%)

As of 07:50 PM Eastern

Compare

CHDN vs. BYD, MGM, WMS, WYNN, and CZR

Should you buy Churchill Downs stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Churchill Downs with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Churchill Downs include Boyd Gaming (BYD), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), and Caesars Entertainment (CZR). These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Boyd Gaming?

Boyd Gaming (NYSE:BYD) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.34% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.82%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Boyd Gaming	44.34%	22.52%	8.80%
Churchill Downs	13.82%	42.16%	6.31%

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 24 more articles in the media than Boyd Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 4 mentions for Boyd Gaming. Boyd Gaming's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that Boyd Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Boyd Gaming	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Churchill Downs	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Boyd Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Boyd Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Boyd Gaming	$4.09B	1.48	$1.84B	$22.72	3.67
Churchill Downs	$2.93B	2.09	$383M	$5.83	15.07

Boyd Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $94.69, suggesting a potential upside of 13.58%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $136.88, suggesting a potential upside of 55.79%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Boyd Gaming.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Boyd Gaming	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Churchill Downs	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Boyd Gaming pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Boyd Gaming pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Boyd Gaming has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Churchill Downs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Boyd Gaming is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Boyd Gaming beats Churchill Downs on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 12 more articles in the media than MGM Resorts International. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 16 mentions for MGM Resorts International. MGM Resorts International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that MGM Resorts International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MGM Resorts International	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Churchill Downs	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

68.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MGM Resorts International presently has a consensus target price of $52.49, suggesting a potential upside of 18.08%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $136.88, suggesting a potential upside of 55.79%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MGM Resorts International	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Churchill Downs	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MGM Resorts International. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International	$17.54B	0.64	$205.86M	$1.65	26.94
Churchill Downs	$2.93B	2.09	$383M	$5.83	15.07

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 2.40%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MGM Resorts International	2.40%	23.30%	1.90%
Churchill Downs	13.82%	42.16%	6.31%

Summary

Churchill Downs beats MGM Resorts International on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Advanced Drainage Systems?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Advanced Drainage Systems (NYSE:WMS) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Churchill Downs currently has a consensus target price of $136.88, indicating a potential upside of 55.79%. Advanced Drainage Systems has a consensus target price of $188.38, indicating a potential upside of 30.57%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Advanced Drainage Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Churchill Downs	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Advanced Drainage Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Advanced Drainage Systems has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Advanced Drainage Systems pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Advanced Drainage Systems pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Advanced Drainage Systems has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Advanced Drainage Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Drainage Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs	$2.93B	2.09	$383M	$5.83	15.07
Advanced Drainage Systems	$3.05B	3.62	$426.46M	$5.44	26.52

Advanced Drainage Systems has a net margin of 14.00% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.82%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Advanced Drainage Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Churchill Downs	13.82%	42.16%	6.31%
Advanced Drainage Systems	14.00%	28.28%	12.30%

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 10 more articles in the media than Advanced Drainage Systems. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 18 mentions for Advanced Drainage Systems. Advanced Drainage Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that Advanced Drainage Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Advanced Drainage Systems	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Advanced Drainage Systems beats Churchill Downs on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wynn Resorts. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wynn Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs	$2.93B	2.09	$383M	$5.83	15.07
Wynn Resorts	$7.41B	1.44	$327.33M	$4.03	25.44

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Wynn Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Wynn Resorts has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Wynn Resorts' net margin of 6.05%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Wynn Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Churchill Downs	13.82%	42.16%	6.31%
Wynn Resorts	6.05%	-45.05%	3.62%

In the previous week, Wynn Resorts had 19 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Wynn Resorts and 28 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Wynn Resorts' score of 0.60 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Wynn Resorts	17 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus target price of $136.88, suggesting a potential upside of 55.79%. Wynn Resorts has a consensus target price of $134.19, suggesting a potential upside of 30.86%. Given Churchill Downs' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Wynn Resorts.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Churchill Downs	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Wynn Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Wynn Resorts on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Caesars Entertainment?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus price target of $136.88, indicating a potential upside of 55.79%. Caesars Entertainment has a consensus price target of $30.71, indicating a potential upside of 1.94%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Churchill Downs	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Caesars Entertainment	1 Sell rating(s)	16 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.05

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 16 more articles in the media than Caesars Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Churchill Downs and 12 mentions for Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Churchill Downs' score of 0.64 indicating that Caesars Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Caesars Entertainment	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Caesars Entertainment's net margin of -3.99%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Caesars Entertainment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Churchill Downs	13.82%	42.16%	6.31%
Caesars Entertainment	-3.99%	-7.64%	-0.89%

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs	$2.93B	2.09	$383M	$5.83	15.07
Caesars Entertainment	$11.49B	0.53	-$502M	-$2.28	N/A

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Caesars Entertainment on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill Downs News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHDN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CHDN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Churchill Downs	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$6.06B	$8.24B	$13.27B	$12.86B
Dividend Yield	0.50%	3.84%	53.64%	10.09%
P/E Ratio	15.07	22.19	46.76	25.05
Price / Sales	2.09	341.91	91.18	88.13
Price / Cash	8.91	21.95	26.21	49.72
Price / Book	4.57	5.31	4.59	6.21
Net Income	$383M	$262.81M	$443.86M	$342.45M
7 Day Performance	4.22%	1.53%	2.02%	4.33%
1 Month Performance	1.89%	0.56%	2.13%	-1.02%
1 Year Performance	-14.01%	-2.13%	3.26%	22.54%

Churchill Downs Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CHDN Churchill Downs	4.8444 of 5 stars	$87.86 +1.1%	$136.88 +55.8%	-15.1%	$6.06B	$2.93B	15.07	9,000
BYD Boyd Gaming	3.6976 of 5 stars	$89.36 +2.7%	$94.69 +6.0%	+1.1%	$6.47B	$4.09B	3.93	16,009
MGM MGM Resorts International	4.2022 of 5 stars	$46.33 +1.7%	$52.31 +12.9%	+27.5%	$11.65B	$17.72B	64.34	62,000
WMS Advanced Drainage Systems	4.9128 of 5 stars	$143.13 +0.9%	$187.00 +30.6%	+30.7%	$10.87B	$3.05B	26.31	6,425	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast
WYNN Wynn Resorts	4.7902 of 5 stars	$99.70 +2.9%	$135.44 +35.8%	-5.3%	$10.06B	$7.14B	29.76	28,500	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast Options Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CHDN) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

CHDN vs. BYD, MGM, WMS, WYNN, and CZR

How does Churchill Downs compare to Boyd Gaming?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to Advanced Drainage Systems?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to Caesars Entertainment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHDN vs. The Competition

Churchill Downs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

CHDN vs. BYD, MGM, WMS, WYNN, and CZR

How does Churchill Downs compare to Boyd Gaming?

Is BYD or CHDN more profitable?

Does the media favor BYD or CHDN?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BYD or CHDN?

Do analysts rate BYD or CHDN?

Which has more risk & volatility, BYD or CHDN?

Is BYD or CHDN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BYD or CHDN?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

Does the media prefer MGM or CHDN?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGM or CHDN?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MGM or CHDN?

Do analysts prefer MGM or CHDN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MGM or CHDN?

Is MGM or CHDN more profitable?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to Advanced Drainage Systems?

Do analysts prefer CHDN or WMS?

Which has more risk and volatility, CHDN or WMS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CHDN or WMS?

Is CHDN or WMS a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CHDN or WMS?

Is CHDN or WMS more profitable?

Does the media favor CHDN or WMS?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CHDN or WYNN?

Is CHDN or WYNN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CHDN or WYNN?

Is CHDN or WYNN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CHDN or WYNN?

Do analysts prefer CHDN or WYNN?

Which has more volatility & risk, CHDN or WYNN?

Summary

How does Churchill Downs compare to Caesars Entertainment?

Do analysts prefer CHDN or CZR?

Does the media refer more to CHDN or CZR?

Is CHDN or CZR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CHDN or CZR?

Which has more volatility and risk, CHDN or CZR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CHDN or CZR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHDN vs. The Competition

Churchill Downs Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools