NASDAQ:CHDN

Churchill Downs Competitors

$220.66
+2.95 (+1.36 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$217.87
Now: $220.66
$222.52
50-Day Range
$217.21
MA: $232.73
$254.33
52-Week Range
$85.24
Now: $220.66
$258.32
Volume175,242 shs
Average Volume213,123 shs
Market Capitalization$8.50 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield0.29%
Beta1.37

Competitors

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) Vs. LVS, MGM, CZR, PENN, WYNN, and WMS

Should you be buying CHDN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "casinos & gaming" are considered alternatives and competitors to Churchill Downs, including Las Vegas Sands (LVS), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Caesars Entertainment (CZR), Penn National Gaming (PENN), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), and Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS).

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Las Vegas Sands and Churchill Downs, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Las Vegas Sands071102.61
Churchill Downs01402.80

Las Vegas Sands presently has a consensus price target of $58.0938, indicating a potential downside of 4.76%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.00%. Given Las Vegas Sands' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Las Vegas Sands is more favorable than Churchill Downs.

Volatility & Risk

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

37.3% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Churchill Downs' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Las Vegas Sands$13.74 billion3.39$2.70 billion$3.2618.71
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81

Las Vegas Sands has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Las Vegas Sands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Churchill Downs' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Las Vegas Sands-12.67%-12.97%-3.03%
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Las Vegas Sands on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Dividends

MGM Resorts International pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. MGM Resorts International pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MGM Resorts International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for MGM Resorts International and Churchill Downs, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MGM Resorts International311502.11
Churchill Downs01402.80

MGM Resorts International presently has a consensus price target of $29.5625, indicating a potential downside of 26.57%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.00%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Churchill Downs' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International$12.90 billion1.54$2.05 billion$0.7752.29
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81

MGM Resorts International has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Churchill Downs' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MGM Resorts International20.81%-12.08%-4.10%
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%

Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 3.15, suggesting that its share price is 215% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Caesars Entertainment and Churchill Downs, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Caesars Entertainment031202.80
Churchill Downs01402.80

Caesars Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $80.4688, indicating a potential downside of 14.07%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.00%. Given Churchill Downs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Churchill Downs' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesars Entertainment$2.53 billion7.71$81 million$1.4763.70
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesars Entertainment. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesars Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.7% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Churchill Downs' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Caesars Entertainment-47.29%-56.40%-7.39%
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Caesars Entertainment on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Penn National Gaming and Churchill Downs' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.95$43.90 million$0.37270.11
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Penn National Gaming. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.79, suggesting that its share price is 179% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.5% of Penn National Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Penn National Gaming and Churchill Downs, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Penn National Gaming241202.56
Churchill Downs01402.80

Penn National Gaming currently has a consensus price target of $95.6842, indicating a potential downside of 4.26%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.00%. Given Penn National Gaming's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Penn National Gaming is more favorable than Churchill Downs.

Profitability

This table compares Penn National Gaming and Churchill Downs' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Penn National Gaming-19.86%-8.73%-1.10%
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Penn National Gaming on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Churchill Downs and Wynn Resorts' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81
Wynn Resorts$6.61 billion2.23$122.99 million$2.6148.77

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wynn Resorts. Wynn Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wynn Resorts has a beta of 2.32, meaning that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.5% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Churchill Downs and Wynn Resorts, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Churchill Downs01402.80
Wynn Resorts29702.28

Churchill Downs currently has a consensus target price of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.00%. Wynn Resorts has a consensus target price of $108.4375, indicating a potential downside of 14.80%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Wynn Resorts.

Profitability

This table compares Churchill Downs and Wynn Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%
Wynn Resorts-25.71%-96.61%-7.68%

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Wynn Resorts on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Advanced Drainage Systems (NYSE:WMS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends and valuation.

Dividends

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Advanced Drainage Systems pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Churchill Downs pays out 14.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Advanced Drainage Systems pays out -11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Advanced Drainage Systems has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Advanced Drainage Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Churchill Downs and Advanced Drainage Systems' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81
Advanced Drainage Systems$1.67 billion4.95$-193,170,000.00($3.21)-36.45

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Advanced Drainage Systems. Advanced Drainage Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Advanced Drainage Systems has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.7% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Churchill Downs and Advanced Drainage Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Churchill Downs01402.80
Advanced Drainage Systems02302.60

Churchill Downs currently has a consensus target price of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.00%. Advanced Drainage Systems has a consensus target price of $99.50, indicating a potential downside of 14.96%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Advanced Drainage Systems.

Profitability

This table compares Churchill Downs and Advanced Drainage Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%
Advanced Drainage Systems5.71%19.10%4.33%

Summary

Advanced Drainage Systems beats Churchill Downs on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Churchill Downs Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Las Vegas Sands logo
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
1.3$61.00+0.5%$46.60 billion$13.74 billion-61.62Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
MGM Resorts International logo
MGM
MGM Resorts International
1.8$40.26+1.4%$19.93 billion$12.90 billion14.38
Caesars Entertainment logo
CZR
Caesars Entertainment
1.4$93.64+0.5%$19.50 billion$2.53 billion-9.59Analyst Report
Penn National Gaming logo
PENN
Penn National Gaming
1.7$99.94+0.8%$15.64 billion$5.30 billion-14.65Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Wynn Resorts logo
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
1.4$127.28+0.5%$14.72 billion$6.61 billion-12.18Analyst Upgrade
Advanced Drainage Systems logo
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems
1.5$117.00+3.2%$8.29 billion$1.67 billion95.90Analyst Downgrade
Boyd Gaming logo
BYD
Boyd Gaming
1.4$65.62+0.7%$7.35 billion$3.33 billion-113.14Analyst Report
News Coverage
Scientific Games logo
SGMS
Scientific Games
1.3$47.40+5.3%$4.52 billion$3.40 billion-8.57Unusual Options Activity
International Game Technology logo
IGT
International Game Technology
0.8$17.00+0.2%$3.48 billion$4.79 billion-4.23Decrease in Short Interest
Monarch Casino & Resort logo
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort
1.3$67.46+0.3%$1.24 billion$249.17 million87.61Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.