Free Trial

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

Churchill Downs logo
$85.76 +0.20 (+0.23%)
Closing price 05/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$85.91 +0.15 (+0.17%)
As of 08:05 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CHDN vs. BYD, WMS, WYNN, MGM, and CZR

Should you buy Churchill Downs stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Churchill Downs with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Churchill Downs include Boyd Gaming (BYD), Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), MGM Resorts International (MGM), and Caesars Entertainment (CZR). These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Boyd Gaming?

Boyd Gaming (NYSE:BYD) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.84% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.21%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boyd Gaming44.84% 25.63% 8.99%
Churchill Downs 13.21%43.50%6.10%

Boyd Gaming pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Boyd Gaming pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Boyd Gaming has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Churchill Downs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Boyd Gaming is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Boyd Gaming currently has a consensus target price of $92.08, suggesting a potential upside of 15.81%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.08%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Boyd Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boyd Gaming
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

In the previous week, Boyd Gaming had 4 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Boyd Gaming and 3 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Boyd Gaming's score of 0.81 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Boyd Gaming
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Boyd Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill Downs. Boyd Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Boyd Gaming$4.09B1.44$1.84B$22.813.49
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.04$383M$5.4015.88

Summary

Boyd Gaming beats Churchill Downs on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Advanced Drainage Systems?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Advanced Drainage Systems (NYSE:WMS) are both casinos & gaming companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Advanced Drainage Systems has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Advanced Drainage Systems has a net margin of 15.75% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.21%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Advanced Drainage Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.21% 43.50% 6.10%
Advanced Drainage Systems 15.75%27.72%12.31%

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Advanced Drainage Systems had 5 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Advanced Drainage Systems and 3 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Advanced Drainage Systems' score of 1.08 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Advanced Drainage Systems
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Advanced Drainage Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Drainage Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.04$383M$5.4015.88
Advanced Drainage Systems$2.90B3.75$450.17M$6.0123.28

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus target price of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.08%. Advanced Drainage Systems has a consensus target price of $190.29, suggesting a potential upside of 36.01%. Given Churchill Downs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Advanced Drainage Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Advanced Drainage Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Advanced Drainage Systems pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Churchill Downs pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Advanced Drainage Systems pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Advanced Drainage Systems has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Advanced Drainage Systems beats Churchill Downs on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.21% compared to Wynn Resorts' net margin of 5.14%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Wynn Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.21% 43.50% 6.10%
Wynn Resorts 5.14%-42.03%3.53%

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Wynn Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Churchill Downs pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Wynn Resorts has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Wynn Resorts had 23 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Wynn Resorts and 3 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Wynn Resorts' score of 0.19 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Wynn Resorts
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wynn Resorts. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wynn Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.04$383M$5.4015.88
Wynn Resorts$7.14B1.39$327.33M$3.3528.49

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus target price of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.08%. Wynn Resorts has a consensus target price of $140.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.70%. Given Churchill Downs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Wynn Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Wynn Resorts
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Wynn Resorts on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MGM Resorts International had 6 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for MGM Resorts International and 3 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat MGM Resorts International's score of 0.58 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MGM Resorts International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MGM Resorts International. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.04$383M$5.4015.88
MGM Resorts International$17.54B0.54$205.86M$0.7251.14

Churchill Downs currently has a consensus target price of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.08%. MGM Resorts International has a consensus target price of $47.12, suggesting a potential upside of 27.95%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
MGM Resorts International
4 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.21% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 1.03%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.21% 43.50% 6.10%
MGM Resorts International 1.03%24.43%2.02%

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats MGM Resorts International on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Caesars Entertainment?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Churchill Downs currently has a consensus target price of $139.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.08%. Caesars Entertainment has a consensus target price of $33.27, suggesting a potential upside of 22.48%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Caesars Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.21% compared to Caesars Entertainment's net margin of -4.19%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 43.50% beat Caesars Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.21% 43.50% 6.10%
Caesars Entertainment -4.19%-7.88%-0.95%

In the previous week, Churchill Downs and Churchill Downs both had 3 articles in the media. Caesars Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Churchill Downs' score of 1.24 indicating that Caesars Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Caesars Entertainment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B2.04$383M$5.4015.88
Caesars Entertainment$11.49B0.48-$502M-$2.37N/A

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Caesars Entertainment on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill Downs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHDN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHDN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHDN vs. The Competition

MetricChurchill DownsGAMING IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.96B$6.11B$7.14B$12.37B
Dividend Yield0.51%1.98%2.95%5.35%
P/E Ratio15.8826.9218.1325.63
Price / Sales2.042.813.6176.59
Price / Cash8.7820.5814.6056.33
Price / Book5.456.153.676.97
Net Income$383M-$18.42M$247.44M$333.62M
7 Day Performance-2.69%-0.88%-1.59%1.09%
1 Month Performance-6.77%0.50%12.86%3.08%
1 Year Performance-12.35%-11.26%17.78%35.68%

Churchill Downs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHDN
Churchill Downs
4.9465 of 5 stars
$85.76
+0.2%
$139.00
+62.1%
-13.2%$5.96B$2.93B15.889,000
BYD
Boyd Gaming
4.0672 of 5 stars
$82.80
-2.0%
$92.08
+11.2%
+4.7%$6.36B$4.09B3.6316,009
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems
4.402 of 5 stars
$140.66
-4.5%
$190.29
+35.3%
+14.5%$11.47B$2.90B23.406,000
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
4.7702 of 5 stars
$103.44
-2.4%
$137.93
+33.3%
-2.1%$11.03B$7.14B34.4828,500
MGM
MGM Resorts International
4.536 of 5 stars
$38.24
-0.7%
$47.12
+23.2%
+5.4%$9.85B$17.54B53.1162,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHDN) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners