Go Pro

Churchill Downs (CHDN) Competitors

Churchill Downs logo
$82.65 +2.05 (+2.54%)
Closing price 09/16/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$83.89 +1.24 (+1.50%)
As of 07:35 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CHDN vs. FLUT, DKNG, MGM, WYNN, and SGHC

Should you buy Churchill Downs stock or one of its competitors? Churchill Downs's main competitors and comparable companies include Flutter Entertainment (FLUT), DraftKings (DKNG), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), and Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Flutter Entertainment?

Flutter Entertainment (NYSE:FLUT) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flutter Entertainment. Flutter Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flutter Entertainment$16.38B1.04-$310M-$4.30N/A
Churchill Downs$2.93B1.97$383M$5.8314.18

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Flutter Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Flutter Entertainment's net margin of -4.39%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Flutter Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flutter Entertainment-4.39% 7.27% 2.33%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

Flutter Entertainment presently has a consensus target price of $156.88, indicating a potential upside of 60.54%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $134.89, indicating a potential upside of 63.20%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Flutter Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flutter Entertainment
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Churchill Downs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 9 more articles in the media than Flutter Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Churchill Downs and 4 mentions for Flutter Entertainment. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Flutter Entertainment's score of 0.79 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Flutter Entertainment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Flutter Entertainment on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to DraftKings?

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

DraftKings currently has a consensus target price of $34.39, indicating a potential upside of 41.34%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $134.89, indicating a potential upside of 63.20%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than DraftKings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DraftKings
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
30 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Churchill Downs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

In the previous week, DraftKings and DraftKings both had 13 articles in the media. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat DraftKings' score of 0.58 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DraftKings
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DraftKings. DraftKings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DraftKings$6.05B1.99$3.71M-$0.38N/A
Churchill Downs$2.93B1.97$383M$5.8314.18

DraftKings has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to DraftKings' net margin of -2.68%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat DraftKings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DraftKings-2.68% -11.26% -1.61%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

37.7% of DraftKings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 47.2% of DraftKings shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats DraftKings on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to MGM Resorts International?

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 7 more articles in the media than MGM Resorts International. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Churchill Downs and 6 mentions for MGM Resorts International. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat MGM Resorts International's score of 0.44 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MGM Resorts International
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Churchill Downs
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

68.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MGM Resorts International. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Resorts International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International$17.54B0.55$205.86M$1.6523.28
Churchill Downs$2.93B1.97$383M$5.8314.18

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 2.40%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MGM Resorts International2.40% 23.30% 1.90%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

MGM Resorts International currently has a consensus price target of $53.25, suggesting a potential upside of 38.66%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $134.89, suggesting a potential upside of 63.20%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MGM Resorts International
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Churchill Downs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Summary

Churchill Downs beats MGM Resorts International on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Wynn Resorts?

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Wynn Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Wynn Resorts has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Wynn Resorts had 8 more articles in the media than Churchill Downs. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Wynn Resorts and 13 mentions for Churchill Downs. Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Wynn Resorts' score of 0.08 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill Downs
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Wynn Resorts
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
8 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Churchill Downs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wynn Resorts. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wynn Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill Downs$2.93B1.97$383M$5.8314.18
Wynn Resorts$7.14B1.21$327.33M$4.0320.90

Churchill Downs currently has a consensus target price of $134.89, indicating a potential upside of 63.20%. Wynn Resorts has a consensus target price of $133.35, indicating a potential upside of 58.34%. Given Churchill Downs' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Wynn Resorts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill Downs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Wynn Resorts
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95

82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Wynn Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill Downs has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Wynn Resorts' net margin of 6.05%. Churchill Downs' return on equity of 42.16% beat Wynn Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill Downs13.82% 42.16% 6.31%
Wynn Resorts 6.05%-46.52%3.60%

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Wynn Resorts on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill Downs compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Super Group (SGHC) (NYSE:SGHC) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Super Group (SGHC) presently has a consensus price target of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 40.51%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $134.89, suggesting a potential upside of 63.20%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Super Group (SGHC).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Super Group (SGHC)
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Churchill Downs
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Super Group (SGHC) has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill Downs has higher revenue and earnings than Super Group (SGHC). Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Super Group (SGHC), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Super Group (SGHC)$2.23B3.02$217M$0.7218.50
Churchill Downs$2.93B1.97$383M$5.8314.18

Super Group (SGHC) pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Churchill Downs pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Super Group (SGHC) pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill Downs pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill Downs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years.

Super Group (SGHC) has a net margin of 15.22% compared to Churchill Downs' net margin of 13.82%. Super Group (SGHC)'s return on equity of 47.37% beat Churchill Downs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Super Group (SGHC)15.22% 47.37% 29.05%
Churchill Downs 13.82%42.16%6.31%

5.1% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.6% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Churchill Downs had 6 more articles in the media than Super Group (SGHC). MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Churchill Downs and 7 mentions for Super Group (SGHC). Churchill Downs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Super Group (SGHC)'s score of 0.77 indicating that Churchill Downs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Super Group (SGHC)
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Churchill Downs
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Super Group (SGHC) on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill Downs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHDN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHDN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHDN vs. The Competition

MetricChurchill DownsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.62B$7.51B$12.49B$14.93B
Dividend Yield0.54%3.91%59.87%12.31%
P/E Ratio14.1821.1244.3225.33
Price / Sales1.97339.7593.1887.33
Price / Cash8.2721.3528.4750.90
Price / Book5.714.483.966.24
Net Income$383M$262.26M$445.74M$358.55M
7 Day Performance-0.12%-1.71%-1.04%-1.20%
1 Month Performance-7.86%-6.33%-4.62%-4.26%
1 Year Performance-14.00%-7.33%-7.54%5.47%

Churchill Downs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHDN
Churchill Downs
4.8543 of 5 stars
$82.65
+2.5%
$134.89
+63.2%
-14.0%$5.62B$2.93B14.189,000
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment
4.0515 of 5 stars
$100.32
+0.2%
$156.88
+56.4%
-65.1%$17.37B$16.38BN/A28,518
DKNG
DraftKings
4.1127 of 5 stars
$24.01
flat
$34.36
+43.1%
-43.3%$11.92B$6.05BN/A5,500
MGM
MGM Resorts International
3.6174 of 5 stars
$41.19
-0.1%
$53.37
+29.6%
+8.6%$10.37B$17.54B24.9662,000
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
4.7263 of 5 stars
$91.54
flat
$133.82
+46.2%
-30.2%$9.43B$7.14B22.7128,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHDN) was last updated on 9/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners