Boyd Gaming (BYD) Competitors

In the previous week, Boyd Gaming had 10 more articles in the media than Crocs. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Boyd Gaming and 2 mentions for Crocs. Boyd Gaming's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Crocs' score of 0.85 indicating that Boyd Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Boyd Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Crocs. Crocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crocs has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Crocs shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Crocs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.84% compared to Crocs' net margin of -2.58%. Crocs' return on equity of 48.29% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity.

Boyd Gaming currently has a consensus target price of $94.15, indicating a potential upside of 7.17%. Crocs has a consensus target price of $125.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.85%. Given Boyd Gaming's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Boyd Gaming is more favorable than Crocs.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Caesars Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Boyd Gaming had 7 more articles in the media than Caesars Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Boyd Gaming and 5 mentions for Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Boyd Gaming's score of 1.01 indicating that Caesars Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Boyd Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $94.15, indicating a potential upside of 7.17%. Caesars Entertainment has a consensus target price of $31.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.82%. Given Boyd Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Boyd Gaming is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.84% compared to Caesars Entertainment's net margin of -4.19%. Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 25.63% beat Caesars Entertainment's return on equity.

Boyd Gaming has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caesars Entertainment. Caesars Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Boyd Gaming has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PENN Entertainment. PENN Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Boyd Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $94.15, suggesting a potential upside of 7.17%. PENN Entertainment has a consensus target price of $22.63, suggesting a potential upside of 9.99%. Given PENN Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PENN Entertainment is more favorable than Boyd Gaming.

In the previous week, PENN Entertainment had 2 more articles in the media than Boyd Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for PENN Entertainment and 12 mentions for Boyd Gaming. Boyd Gaming's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat PENN Entertainment's score of 0.98 indicating that Boyd Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PENN Entertainment has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of PENN Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of PENN Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.84% compared to PENN Entertainment's net margin of -13.55%. Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 25.63% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity.

76.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Red Rock Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 22.8% of Boyd Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Red Rock Resorts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Boyd Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $94.15, suggesting a potential upside of 7.17%. Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $69.81, suggesting a potential upside of 7.82%. Given Red Rock Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Red Rock Resorts is more favorable than Boyd Gaming.

Boyd Gaming pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Red Rock Resorts pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Boyd Gaming pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Red Rock Resorts pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Boyd Gaming has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Boyd Gaming had 6 more articles in the media than Red Rock Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Boyd Gaming and 6 mentions for Red Rock Resorts. Boyd Gaming's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Red Rock Resorts' score of 0.81 indicating that Boyd Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Boyd Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Red Rock Resorts. Boyd Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Red Rock Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 44.84% compared to Red Rock Resorts' net margin of 9.21%. Red Rock Resorts' return on equity of 61.67% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity.