S&P 500   3,619.65 (+1.18%)
DOW   29,980.25 (+1.31%)
QQQ   290.70 (+0.11%)
AAPL   113.62 (-0.20%)
MSFT   210.33 (+0.10%)
FB   271.90 (+1.29%)
GOOGL   1,731.35 (+0.22%)
AMZN   3,105.00 (+0.21%)
TSLA   545.00 (+4.44%)
NVDA   518.69 (-1.31%)
BABA   276.33 (+2.30%)
CGC   26.93 (+8.94%)
GE   10.71 (+6.36%)
MU   63.48 (-1.09%)
AMD   84.22 (-1.28%)
T   29.12 (+1.75%)
NIO   54.21 (-2.11%)
F   9.47 (+6.88%)
ACB   8.78 (+22.28%)
NFLX   478.26 (+0.34%)
GILD   60.37 (+0.80%)
BA   219.69 (+3.86%)
DIS   149.26 (+2.25%)
S&P 500   3,619.65 (+1.18%)
DOW   29,980.25 (+1.31%)
QQQ   290.70 (+0.11%)
AAPL   113.62 (-0.20%)
MSFT   210.33 (+0.10%)
FB   271.90 (+1.29%)
GOOGL   1,731.35 (+0.22%)
AMZN   3,105.00 (+0.21%)
TSLA   545.00 (+4.44%)
NVDA   518.69 (-1.31%)
BABA   276.33 (+2.30%)
CGC   26.93 (+8.94%)
GE   10.71 (+6.36%)
MU   63.48 (-1.09%)
AMD   84.22 (-1.28%)
T   29.12 (+1.75%)
NIO   54.21 (-2.11%)
F   9.47 (+6.88%)
ACB   8.78 (+22.28%)
NFLX   478.26 (+0.34%)
GILD   60.37 (+0.80%)
BA   219.69 (+3.86%)
DIS   149.26 (+2.25%)
S&P 500   3,619.65 (+1.18%)
DOW   29,980.25 (+1.31%)
QQQ   290.70 (+0.11%)
AAPL   113.62 (-0.20%)
MSFT   210.33 (+0.10%)
FB   271.90 (+1.29%)
GOOGL   1,731.35 (+0.22%)
AMZN   3,105.00 (+0.21%)
TSLA   545.00 (+4.44%)
NVDA   518.69 (-1.31%)
BABA   276.33 (+2.30%)
CGC   26.93 (+8.94%)
GE   10.71 (+6.36%)
MU   63.48 (-1.09%)
AMD   84.22 (-1.28%)
T   29.12 (+1.75%)
NIO   54.21 (-2.11%)
F   9.47 (+6.88%)
ACB   8.78 (+22.28%)
NFLX   478.26 (+0.34%)
GILD   60.37 (+0.80%)
BA   219.69 (+3.86%)
DIS   149.26 (+2.25%)
S&P 500   3,619.65 (+1.18%)
DOW   29,980.25 (+1.31%)
QQQ   290.70 (+0.11%)
AAPL   113.62 (-0.20%)
MSFT   210.33 (+0.10%)
FB   271.90 (+1.29%)
GOOGL   1,731.35 (+0.22%)
AMZN   3,105.00 (+0.21%)
TSLA   545.00 (+4.44%)
NVDA   518.69 (-1.31%)
BABA   276.33 (+2.30%)
CGC   26.93 (+8.94%)
GE   10.71 (+6.36%)
MU   63.48 (-1.09%)
AMD   84.22 (-1.28%)
T   29.12 (+1.75%)
NIO   54.21 (-2.11%)
F   9.47 (+6.88%)
ACB   8.78 (+22.28%)
NFLX   478.26 (+0.34%)
GILD   60.37 (+0.80%)
BA   219.69 (+3.86%)
DIS   149.26 (+2.25%)
Log in
NASDAQ:PENN

Penn National Gaming Competitors

$74.75
+2.76 (+3.83 %)
(As of 11/24/2020 10:40 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$72.01
Now: $74.75
$74.75
50-Day Range
$53.03
MA: $64.21
$72.75
52-Week Range
$3.75
Now: $74.75
$76.62
Volume39,120 shs
Average Volume9.46 million shs
Market Capitalization$11.61 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.59

Competitors

Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) Vs. LVS, MGM, CZR, WYNN, CHDN, and WMS

Should you be buying PENN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "casinos & gaming" are considered alternatives and competitors to Penn National Gaming, including Las Vegas Sands (LVS), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Caesars Entertainment (CZR), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Churchill Downs (CHDN), and Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS).

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) and Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Penn National Gaming's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Las Vegas Sands$13.74 billion3.25$2.70 billion$3.2617.91
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.19$43.90 million$0.37202.03

Las Vegas Sands has higher revenue and earnings than Penn National Gaming. Las Vegas Sands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.59, indicating that its share price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Penn National Gaming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Las Vegas Sands-12.67%-12.97%-3.03%
Penn National Gaming-21.16%-15.63%-1.80%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

36.5% of Las Vegas Sands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of Las Vegas Sands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Las Vegas Sands and Penn National Gaming, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Las Vegas Sands071202.63
Penn National Gaming241102.53

Las Vegas Sands currently has a consensus target price of $55.3750, indicating a potential downside of 5.13%. Penn National Gaming has a consensus target price of $66.8947, indicating a potential downside of 9.65%. Given Las Vegas Sands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Las Vegas Sands is more favorable than Penn National Gaming.

Summary

Las Vegas Sands beats Penn National Gaming on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Penn National Gaming's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International$12.90 billion1.07$2.05 billion$0.7736.19
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.19$43.90 million$0.37202.03

MGM Resorts International has higher revenue and earnings than Penn National Gaming. MGM Resorts International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.2% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for MGM Resorts International and Penn National Gaming, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MGM Resorts International411101.81
Penn National Gaming241102.53

MGM Resorts International currently has a consensus target price of $19.2667, indicating a potential downside of 30.84%. Penn National Gaming has a consensus target price of $66.8947, indicating a potential downside of 9.65%. Given Penn National Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Penn National Gaming is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Risk & Volatility

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Penn National Gaming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MGM Resorts International20.81%-12.08%-4.10%
Penn National Gaming-21.16%-15.63%-1.80%

Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) and Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Penn National Gaming's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesars Entertainment$2.53 billion4.63$81 million$1.4747.30
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.19$43.90 million$0.37202.03

Caesars Entertainment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Penn National Gaming. Caesars Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

72.7% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Caesars Entertainment and Penn National Gaming, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Caesars Entertainment03802.73
Penn National Gaming241102.53

Caesars Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $60.4091, indicating a potential downside of 13.04%. Penn National Gaming has a consensus target price of $66.8947, indicating a potential downside of 9.65%. Given Penn National Gaming's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Penn National Gaming is more favorable than Caesars Entertainment.

Risk & Volatility

Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 2.97, suggesting that its stock price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Penn National Gaming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Caesars Entertainment-47.29%-56.40%-7.39%
Penn National Gaming-21.16%-15.63%-1.80%

Summary

Penn National Gaming beats Caesars Entertainment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) and Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Wynn Resorts and Penn National Gaming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wynn Resorts-25.71%-96.61%-7.68%
Penn National Gaming-21.16%-15.63%-1.80%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Wynn Resorts and Penn National Gaming, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wynn Resorts07802.53
Penn National Gaming241102.53

Wynn Resorts currently has a consensus target price of $108.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.24%. Penn National Gaming has a consensus target price of $66.8947, indicating a potential downside of 9.65%. Given Wynn Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Wynn Resorts is more favorable than Penn National Gaming.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Wynn Resorts and Penn National Gaming's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wynn Resorts$6.61 billion1.63$122.99 million$2.6138.23
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.19$43.90 million$0.37202.03

Wynn Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Penn National Gaming. Wynn Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

69.5% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Wynn Resorts has a beta of 2.32, suggesting that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Penn National Gaming beats Wynn Resorts on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Penn National Gaming and Churchill Downs, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Penn National Gaming241102.53
Churchill Downs01202.67

Penn National Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $66.8947, suggesting a potential downside of 9.65%. Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $173.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.62%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Penn National Gaming.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.4% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Penn National Gaming and Churchill Downs' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Penn National Gaming-21.16%-15.63%-1.80%
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%

Risk and Volatility

Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Penn National Gaming and Churchill Downs' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.19$43.90 million$0.37202.03
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion5.66$137.50 million$4.4343.05

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Penn National Gaming. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Penn National Gaming on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) and Advanced Drainage Systems (NYSE:WMS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.7% of Advanced Drainage Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.59, meaning that its share price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Advanced Drainage Systems has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Penn National Gaming and Advanced Drainage Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Penn National Gaming241102.53
Advanced Drainage Systems11402.50

Penn National Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $66.8947, suggesting a potential downside of 9.65%. Advanced Drainage Systems has a consensus price target of $60.40, suggesting a potential downside of 13.90%. Given Penn National Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Penn National Gaming is more favorable than Advanced Drainage Systems.

Profitability

This table compares Penn National Gaming and Advanced Drainage Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Penn National Gaming-21.16%-15.63%-1.80%
Advanced Drainage Systems5.71%19.10%4.33%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Penn National Gaming and Advanced Drainage Systems' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.19$43.90 million$0.37202.03
Advanced Drainage Systems$1.67 billion2.95$-193,170,000.00($3.21)-21.84

Penn National Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Advanced Drainage Systems. Advanced Drainage Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Penn National Gaming beats Advanced Drainage Systems on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Penn National Gaming Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Las Vegas Sands logo
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
1.3$58.38+2.9%$43.30 billion$13.74 billion-58.97
MGM Resorts International logo
MGM
MGM Resorts International
1.9$27.87+6.2%$12.92 billion$12.90 billion9.95Decrease in Short Interest
Caesars Entertainment logo
CZR
Caesars Entertainment
1.4$69.53+3.8%$11.27 billion$2.53 billion-7.12
Wynn Resorts logo
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
1.7$99.78+4.3%$10.30 billion$6.61 billion-9.55
Churchill Downs logo
CHDN
Churchill Downs
1.8$190.72+2.0%$7.37 billion$1.33 billion-79.14
Advanced Drainage Systems logo
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems
1.7$70.12+2.2%$4.83 billion$1.67 billion57.48
Boyd Gaming logo
BYD
Boyd Gaming
1.4$39.64+3.9%$4.24 billion$3.33 billion-68.34
Scientific Games logo
SGMS
Scientific Games
1.2$40.24+1.8%$3.76 billion$3.40 billion-9.70
International Game Technology logo
IGT
International Game Technology
1.5$13.50+2.0%$2.70 billion$4.79 billion-4.67
Monarch Casino & Resort logo
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort
1.3$51.38+2.4%$916.26 million$249.17 million66.73
This page was last updated on 11/24/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.