Free Trial

This company has been marked as potentially delisted and may not be actively trading.

China Lending (CLDC) Competitors

CLDC vs. ARBK, WHLR, FPAY, CMCT, and SVVC

Should you be buying China Lending stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of China Lending include Argo Blockchain (ARBK), Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust (WHLR), FlexShopper (FPAY), Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT), and Firsthand Technology Value Fund (SVVC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does China Lending compare to Argo Blockchain?

China Lending (NASDAQ:CLDC) and Argo Blockchain (NASDAQ:ARBK) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Argo Blockchain had 1 more articles in the media than China Lending. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Argo Blockchain and 0 mentions for China Lending. China Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Argo Blockchain'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Lending Neutral
Argo Blockchain Neutral

Given China Lending's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe China Lending is more favorable than Argo Blockchain.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Argo Blockchain
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

0.3% of China Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Argo Blockchain shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of China Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Argo Blockchain has higher revenue and earnings than China Lending.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Lending$260K0.00-$94.13MN/AN/A
Argo Blockchain$15.52M0.08$5.08M-$117.39N/A

China Lending has a beta of -0.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Argo Blockchain has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its share price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China LendingN/A N/A N/A
Argo Blockchain N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Argo Blockchain beats China Lending on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Lending compare to Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust?

China Lending (NASDAQ:CLDC) and Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust (NASDAQ:WHLR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust has a net margin of 11.86% compared to China Lending's net margin of 0.00%. China Lending's return on equity of 0.00% beat Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China LendingN/A N/A N/A
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust 11.86%-78.92%1.90%

In the previous week, Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust had 3 more articles in the media than China Lending. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust and 0 mentions for China Lending. Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat China Lending's score of 0.00 indicating that Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Lending Neutral
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust Positive

Given China Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe China Lending is more favorable than Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China Lending has a beta of -0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than China Lending.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Lending$260K0.00-$94.13MN/AN/A
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust$99.44M0.00$8.77M-$14.99 thousandN/A

0.3% of China Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of China Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust beats China Lending on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Lending compare to FlexShopper?

China Lending (NASDAQ:CLDC) and FlexShopper (NASDAQ:FPAY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

0.3% of China Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of FlexShopper shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of China Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.2% of FlexShopper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, FlexShopper had 1 more articles in the media than China Lending. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FlexShopper and 0 mentions for China Lending. China Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FlexShopper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Lending Neutral
FlexShopper Neutral

FlexShopper has higher revenue and earnings than China Lending.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Lending$260K0.00-$94.13MN/AN/A
FlexShopper$139.80M0.00-$180K-$0.23N/A

FlexShopper has a consensus target price of $0.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FlexShopper
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China LendingN/A N/A N/A
FlexShopper N/A N/A N/A

China Lending has a beta of -0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FlexShopper has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FlexShopper beats China Lending on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Lending compare to Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation?

Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCT) and China Lending (NASDAQ:CLDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

28.3% of Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of China Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.9% of Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of China Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation had 1 more articles in the media than China Lending. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation and 0 mentions for China Lending. Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat China Lending's score of 0.00 indicating that Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation Very Positive
China Lending Neutral

Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation has higher revenue and earnings than China Lending.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation$116.67M0.00-$39M-$7.44 thousandN/A
China Lending$260K0.00-$94.13MN/AN/A

Given China Lending's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe China Lending is more favorable than Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
China Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

China Lending has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation's net margin of -33.43%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation-33.43% N/A -4.46%
China Lending N/A N/A N/A

Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Lending has a beta of -0.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation beats China Lending on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Lending compare to Firsthand Technology Value Fund?

Firsthand Technology Value Fund (NASDAQ:SVVC) and China Lending (NASDAQ:CLDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Firsthand Technology Value Fund has a net margin of 653.79% compared to China Lending's net margin of 0.00%. Firsthand Technology Value Fund's return on equity of 200.81% beat China Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firsthand Technology Value Fund653.79% 200.81% 37.32%
China Lending N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Firsthand Technology Value Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Lending'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firsthand Technology Value Fund Neutral
China Lending Neutral

52.7% of Firsthand Technology Value Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of China Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Firsthand Technology Value Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of China Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Firsthand Technology Value Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Lending.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firsthand Technology Value Fund-$30.13M0.00-$29.35M-$0.15N/A
China Lending$260K0.00-$94.13MN/AN/A

Firsthand Technology Value Fund has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Lending has a beta of -0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Firsthand Technology Value Fund beats China Lending on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Lending News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLDC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLDC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLDC vs. The Competition

MetricChina LendingBusiness Credit IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$253K$8.13B$13.62B$12.15B
Dividend YieldN/A2.76%5.74%5.24%
P/E RatioN/A5.7923.2227.01
Price / SalesN/A4.60186.0977.56
Price / CashN/A35.6220.6654.08
Price / BookN/A0.422.206.89
Net Income-$94.13M$800.83M$1.11B$333.00M

China Lending Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLDC
China Lending
N/AN/AN/AN/A$253K$260KN/A20
ARBK
Argo Blockchain
0.3699 of 5 stars
$3.26
+7.2%
N/A-95.6%$1.01M$15.52MN/A40
WHLR
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust
0.6455 of 5 stars
$1.96
+8.3%
N/A-98.8%$365K$99.45MN/A40
FPAY
FlexShopper
1.1898 of 5 stars
N/A$0.50
+∞
N/A$150K$139.80MN/A140
CMCT
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation
0.1415 of 5 stars
$5.52
+6.6%
N/A-99.1%$140K$116.67MN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CLDC) was last updated on 5/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners