Do analysts rate IMOS or CLFD?

Clearfield has a consensus target price of $43.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.58%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Clearfield 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.57

Does the media favor IMOS or CLFD?

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 4 mentions for Clearfield. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.22 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chipmos Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Clearfield 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer POET or CLFD?

In the previous week, POET Technologies had 23 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for POET Technologies and 4 mentions for Clearfield. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat POET Technologies' score of 0.06 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment POET Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 25 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Clearfield 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer SHLS or CLFD?

In the previous week, Shoals Technologies Group had 2 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Shoals Technologies Group and 4 mentions for Clearfield. Shoals Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Clearfield's score of 0.43 indicating that Shoals Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Shoals Technologies Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Clearfield 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor CLFD or SKYT?

In the previous week, Clearfield and Clearfield both had 4 articles in the media. SkyWater Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Clearfield's score of 0.43 indicating that SkyWater Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Clearfield 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral SkyWater Technology 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CLFD or AMBQ?

Clearfield has higher revenue and earnings than Ambiq Micro. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ambiq Micro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Clearfield $150.13M 3.55 -$8.05M -$0.62 N/A Ambiq Micro $72.51M 25.81 -$36.46M -$20.69 N/A

Is CLFD or AMBQ more profitable?

Clearfield has a net margin of -5.41% compared to Ambiq Micro's net margin of -46.86%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat Ambiq Micro's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Clearfield -5.41% 1.03% 0.90% Ambiq Micro -46.86% -45.10% -16.29%

Does the media refer more to CLFD or AMBQ?

In the previous week, Clearfield had 1 more articles in the media than Ambiq Micro. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Clearfield and 3 mentions for Ambiq Micro. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Ambiq Micro's score of 0.00 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Clearfield 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ambiq Micro 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Clearfield (CLFD) Competitors

$39.26 -0.18 (-0.44%)

As of 11:17 AM Eastern

Compare

CLFD vs. IMOS, POET, SHLS, SKYT, and AMBQ

Should you buy Clearfield stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Clearfield with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Clearfield include Chipmos Technologies (IMOS), POET Technologies (POET), Shoals Technologies Group (SHLS), SkyWater Technology (SKYT), and Ambiq Micro (AMBQ). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Clearfield compare to Chipmos Technologies?

Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Clearfield. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chipmos Technologies	$762.90M	2.81	$17.55M	$0.74	82.37
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.55	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -5.41%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat Clearfield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 4 mentions for Clearfield. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.22 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chipmos Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Clearfield has a consensus target price of $43.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.58%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 2.08, meaning that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chipmos Technologies beats Clearfield on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clearfield compare to POET Technologies?

POET Technologies (NASDAQ:POET) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, POET Technologies had 23 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for POET Technologies and 4 mentions for Clearfield. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat POET Technologies' score of 0.06 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
POET Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	25 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

POET Technologies has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

POET Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 38.23%. Clearfield has a consensus target price of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 11.58%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Clearfield is more favorable than POET Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
POET Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

2.0% of POET Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of POET Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Clearfield has higher revenue and earnings than POET Technologies. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than POET Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
POET Technologies	$1.41M	1,408.86	-$62.96M	-$0.72	N/A
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.55	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A

Clearfield has a net margin of -5.41% compared to POET Technologies' net margin of -5,786.60%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat POET Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
POET Technologies	-5,786.60%	-27.24%	-20.63%
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%

Summary

Clearfield beats POET Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clearfield compare to Shoals Technologies Group?

Shoals Technologies Group (NASDAQ:SHLS) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of 6.27% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -5.41%. Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 10.03% beat Clearfield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Shoals Technologies Group	6.27%	10.03%	6.63%
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%

In the previous week, Shoals Technologies Group had 2 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Shoals Technologies Group and 4 mentions for Clearfield. Shoals Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Clearfield's score of 0.43 indicating that Shoals Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Shoals Technologies Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Shoals Technologies Group has higher revenue and earnings than Clearfield. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoals Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Shoals Technologies Group	$475.33M	3.57	$33.57M	$0.20	50.69
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.55	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A

Shoals Technologies Group currently has a consensus price target of $9.71, indicating a potential downside of 4.18%. Clearfield has a consensus price target of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 11.58%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Shoals Technologies Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Shoals Technologies Group	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 2.08, suggesting that its share price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

88.7% of Clearfield shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Shoals Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Shoals Technologies Group beats Clearfield on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clearfield compare to SkyWater Technology?

Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) and SkyWater Technology (NASDAQ:SKYT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

SkyWater Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Clearfield. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SkyWater Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.55	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A
SkyWater Technology	$442.14M	4.20	$118.91M	$2.33	16.19

Clearfield currently has a consensus target price of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 11.58%. SkyWater Technology has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.15%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Clearfield is more favorable than SkyWater Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
SkyWater Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

SkyWater Technology has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -5.41%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat SkyWater Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%
SkyWater Technology	21.04%	-7.88%	-1.93%

88.7% of Clearfield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of SkyWater Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of Clearfield shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.6% of SkyWater Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Clearfield and Clearfield both had 4 articles in the media. SkyWater Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Clearfield's score of 0.43 indicating that SkyWater Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
SkyWater Technology	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Clearfield has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SkyWater Technology has a beta of 3.32, indicating that its share price is 232% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SkyWater Technology beats Clearfield on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clearfield compare to Ambiq Micro?

Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) and Ambiq Micro (NYSE:AMBQ) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Clearfield has a net margin of -5.41% compared to Ambiq Micro's net margin of -46.86%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat Ambiq Micro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%
Ambiq Micro	-46.86%	-45.10%	-16.29%

In the previous week, Clearfield had 1 more articles in the media than Ambiq Micro. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Clearfield and 3 mentions for Ambiq Micro. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Ambiq Micro's score of 0.00 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ambiq Micro	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

88.7% of Clearfield shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of Clearfield shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Clearfield has higher revenue and earnings than Ambiq Micro. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ambiq Micro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.55	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A
Ambiq Micro	$72.51M	25.81	-$36.46M	-$20.69	N/A

Clearfield currently has a consensus price target of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 11.58%. Ambiq Micro has a consensus price target of $52.80, indicating a potential downside of 39.67%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Ambiq Micro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Ambiq Micro	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Summary

Clearfield beats Ambiq Micro on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Clearfield News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLFD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLFD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Clearfield	Wireless Equipment Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$530.17M	$21.68B	$39.79B	$12.31B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.07%	3.16%	5.66%
P/E Ratio	-62.92	26.45	81.75	24.76
Price / Sales	3.55	43.21	634.44	168.32
Price / Cash	51.10	22.51	49.02	37.92
Price / Book	2.11	11.18	9.97	6.90
Net Income	-$8.05M	$504.82M	$1.07B	$337.45M
7 Day Performance	-4.60%	-1.10%	1.66%	2.84%
1 Month Performance	-9.86%	2.59%	7.47%	4.78%
1 Year Performance	3.15%	65.82%	163.77%	33.08%

Clearfield Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLFD Clearfield	2.9666 of 5 stars	$39.26 -0.4%	$43.75 +11.5%	+3.7%	$531.64M	$150.13M	N/A	1,130	Gap Down
IMOS Chipmos Technologies	0.7563 of 5 stars	$56.48 -2.0%	N/A	+221.8%	$2.03B	$762.90M	76.84	5,747	News Coverage Short Interest Increase
POET POET Technologies	0.5542 of 5 stars	$12.28 +3.5%	$8.00 -34.9%	+200.5%	$1.89B	$1.41M	N/A	53
SHLS Shoals Technologies Group	2.5461 of 5 stars	$10.88 +0.6%	$9.64 -11.4%	+104.1%	$1.81B	$475.33M	54.40	1,480	Positive News Gap Up
SKYT SkyWater Technology	2.627 of 5 stars	$36.85 +5.4%	$32.00 -13.2%	+347.0%	$1.72B	$442.14M	15.82	1,551	News Coverage Positive News Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CLFD) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Clearfield (CLFD) Competitors

CLFD vs. IMOS, POET, SHLS, SKYT, and AMBQ

How does Clearfield compare to Chipmos Technologies?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to POET Technologies?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to Shoals Technologies Group?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to SkyWater Technology?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to Ambiq Micro?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLFD vs. The Competition

Clearfield Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Clearfield (CLFD) Competitors

CLFD vs. IMOS, POET, SHLS, SKYT, and AMBQ

How does Clearfield compare to Chipmos Technologies?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of IMOS or CLFD?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, IMOS or CLFD?

Is IMOS or CLFD more profitable?

Does the media favor IMOS or CLFD?

Do analysts rate IMOS or CLFD?

Which has more volatility & risk, IMOS or CLFD?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to POET Technologies?

Does the media prefer POET or CLFD?

Which has more risk & volatility, POET or CLFD?

Do analysts rate POET or CLFD?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of POET or CLFD?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, POET or CLFD?

Is POET or CLFD more profitable?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to Shoals Technologies Group?

Is SHLS or CLFD more profitable?

Does the media prefer SHLS or CLFD?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SHLS or CLFD?

Do analysts rate SHLS or CLFD?

Which has more volatility & risk, SHLS or CLFD?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SHLS or CLFD?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to SkyWater Technology?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CLFD or SKYT?

Do analysts prefer CLFD or SKYT?

Is CLFD or SKYT more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CLFD or SKYT?

Does the media favor CLFD or SKYT?

Which has more risk & volatility, CLFD or SKYT?

Summary

How does Clearfield compare to Ambiq Micro?

Is CLFD or AMBQ more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CLFD or AMBQ?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CLFD or AMBQ?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CLFD or AMBQ?

Do analysts rate CLFD or AMBQ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLFD vs. The Competition

Clearfield Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools