Conduent (CNDT) Competitors

Conduent has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Upwork has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Upwork has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conduent. Conduent is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Upwork, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Upwork has a net margin of 13.81% compared to Conduent's net margin of -5.04%. Upwork's return on equity of 17.92% beat Conduent's return on equity.

77.3% of Conduent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.7% of Upwork shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Conduent shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Upwork shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Upwork had 6 more articles in the media than Conduent. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Upwork and 0 mentions for Conduent. Upwork's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Conduent's score of 0.00 indicating that Upwork is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Upwork has a consensus target price of $15.50, suggesting a potential upside of 76.94%. Given Upwork's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Upwork is more favorable than Conduent.

90.3% of Upbound Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Conduent shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Upbound Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Conduent shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Upbound Group currently has a consensus target price of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 71.50%. Given Upbound Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Upbound Group is more favorable than Conduent.

Upbound Group has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Conduent's net margin of -5.04%. Upbound Group's return on equity of 35.56% beat Conduent's return on equity.

Upbound Group has higher revenue and earnings than Conduent. Conduent is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Upbound Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Upbound Group had 7 more articles in the media than Conduent. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Upbound Group and 0 mentions for Conduent. Upbound Group's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Conduent's score of 0.00 indicating that Upbound Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Upbound Group has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduent has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Conduent has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ACV Auctions has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

ACV Auctions has a consensus target price of $10.14, indicating a potential upside of 79.28%. Given ACV Auctions' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ACV Auctions is more favorable than Conduent.

ACV Auctions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conduent. ACV Auctions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Conduent has a net margin of -5.04% compared to ACV Auctions' net margin of -7.97%. ACV Auctions' return on equity of -5.52% beat Conduent's return on equity.

77.3% of Conduent shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of ACV Auctions shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Conduent shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of ACV Auctions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ACV Auctions had 7 more articles in the media than Conduent. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for ACV Auctions and 0 mentions for Conduent. Conduent's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat ACV Auctions' score of -0.18 indicating that Conduent is being referred to more favorably in the media.

14.9% of Emerald shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Conduent shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Emerald shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Conduent shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Emerald has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduent. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Emerald has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduent has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Emerald presently has a consensus target price of $5.03, suggesting a potential upside of 0.90%. Given Emerald's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Emerald is more favorable than Conduent.

Conduent has a net margin of -5.04% compared to Emerald's net margin of -8.24%. Conduent's return on equity of -7.08% beat Emerald's return on equity.

In the previous week, Emerald had 1 more articles in the media than Conduent. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Emerald and 0 mentions for Conduent. Emerald's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conduent'saverage media sentiment score.