Go Pro

Canterbury Park (CPHC) Competitors

Canterbury Park logo
$15.83 -0.06 (-0.38%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$15.86 +0.04 (+0.22%)
As of 07/20/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CPHC vs. GDEV, DOYU, SKLZ, MYPS, and FLL

Should you buy Canterbury Park stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Canterbury Park with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Canterbury Park include GDEV (GDEV), DouYu International (DOYU), Skillz (SKLZ), PLAYSTUDIOS (MYPS), and Full House Resorts (FLL). These companies are all part of the "gaming" industry.

How does Canterbury Park compare to GDEV?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and GDEV (NASDAQ:GDEV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of GDEV shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 86.6% of GDEV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GDEV has a net margin of 17.15% compared to Canterbury Park's net margin of -0.10%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat GDEV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canterbury Park-0.10% -0.07% -0.05%
GDEV 17.15%-62.88%31.21%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
GDEV
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

GDEV has higher revenue and earnings than Canterbury Park. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GDEV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.37-$530K-$0.01N/A
GDEV$404.35M0.54$69.33M$3.753.23

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GDEV has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 3 more articles in the media than GDEV. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Canterbury Park and 0 mentions for GDEV. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat GDEV's score of 0.00 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park Positive
GDEV Neutral

Summary

GDEV beats Canterbury Park on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to DouYu International?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and DouYu International (NASDAQ:DOYU) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DouYu International. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DouYu International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.37-$530K-$0.01N/A
DouYu International$546.09M0.26-$4.16M$0.3613.17

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 3 more articles in the media than DouYu International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Canterbury Park and 0 mentions for DouYu International. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat DouYu International's score of 0.00 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park Positive
DouYu International Neutral

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DouYu International has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

DouYu International has a consensus price target of $5.20, suggesting a potential upside of 9.70%. Given DouYu International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DouYu International is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DouYu International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

DouYu International has a net margin of 2.11% compared to Canterbury Park's net margin of -0.10%. DouYu International's return on equity of 4.60% beat Canterbury Park's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canterbury Park-0.10% -0.07% -0.05%
DouYu International 2.11%4.60%2.94%

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of DouYu International shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of DouYu International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

DouYu International beats Canterbury Park on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Skillz?

Skillz (NYSE:SKLZ) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

19.4% of Skillz shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.4% of Skillz shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Skillz has a beta of 4.58, suggesting that its stock price is 358% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Skillz's net margin of -48.49%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Skillz's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skillz-48.49% -52.81% -20.87%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 3 more articles in the media than Skillz. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Canterbury Park and 0 mentions for Skillz. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Skillz's score of 0.00 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skillz Neutral
Canterbury Park Positive

Skillz currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.54%. Given Skillz's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Skillz is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skillz
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Skillz. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Skillz, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skillz$104.50M1.33-$70.41M-$3.48N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.37-$530K-$0.01N/A

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Skillz on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to PLAYSTUDIOS?

PLAYSTUDIOS (NASDAQ:MYPS) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 2 more articles in the media than PLAYSTUDIOS. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Canterbury Park and 1 mentions for PLAYSTUDIOS. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat PLAYSTUDIOS's score of 0.00 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PLAYSTUDIOS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canterbury Park
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PLAYSTUDIOS. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PLAYSTUDIOS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PLAYSTUDIOS$235.10M0.45-$28.64M-$0.28N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.37-$530K-$0.01N/A

PLAYSTUDIOS has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

37.5% of PLAYSTUDIOS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of PLAYSTUDIOS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to PLAYSTUDIOS's net margin of -15.79%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat PLAYSTUDIOS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PLAYSTUDIOS-15.79% -14.38% -11.27%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

PLAYSTUDIOS presently has a consensus price target of $1.25, suggesting a potential upside of 53.07%. Given PLAYSTUDIOS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe PLAYSTUDIOS is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PLAYSTUDIOS
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Canterbury Park beats PLAYSTUDIOS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Full House Resorts?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.98%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$302.38M0.29-$40.20M-$1.07N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.37-$530K-$0.01N/A

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.79%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.79% -473.31% -5.99%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 1 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Canterbury Park and 2 mentions for Full House Resorts. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.76 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Canterbury Park
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Full House Resorts on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Canterbury Park News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CPHC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CPHC vs. The Competition

MetricCanterbury ParkGAMING IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$81.84M$6.50B$7.22B$12.28B
Dividend Yield1.76%1.36%2.95%9.39%
P/E Ratio-1,583.0028.5820.0523.94
Price / Sales1.372.733.9691.94
Price / Cash23.3620.4615.3547.25
Price / Book0.967.303.736.14
Net Income-$530K$34.24M$247.04M$331.74M
7 Day Performance0.06%-0.47%0.09%-1.81%
1 Month Performance1.15%-0.98%-0.18%-1.44%
1 Year Performance-14.50%-22.12%-0.28%16.33%

Canterbury Park Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CPHC
Canterbury Park
1.091 of 5 stars
$15.83
-0.4%
N/A-13.9%$81.84M$59.57MN/A1,096
GDEV
GDEV
1.9586 of 5 stars
$12.88
+8.6%
N/A-20.1%$215.08M$404.35M3.43810
DOYU
DouYu International
2.2761 of 5 stars
$4.52
-2.0%
$5.20
+15.0%
-40.9%$139.13M$3.69B12.562,160
SKLZ
Skillz
1.7114 of 5 stars
$8.90
+0.7%
$15.00
+68.5%
+27.7%$138.93M$104.50MN/A650
MYPS
PLAYSTUDIOS
2.2266 of 5 stars
$0.78
+6.7%
$1.25
+60.3%
-30.2%$93.82M$230.80MN/A510

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CPHC) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners