Do analysts prefer CPHC or MRDN?

Meridian has a consensus target price of $21.60, indicating a potential upside of 54.95%. Given Meridian's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Meridian is more favorable than Canterbury Park. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Canterbury Park 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Meridian 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media prefer CPHC or MRDN?

In the previous week, Canterbury Park and Canterbury Park both had 4 articles in the media. Meridian's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Meridian is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Canterbury Park 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Meridian 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate CPHC or INSE?

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 237.27%. Given Inspired Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Inspired Entertainment is more favorable than Canterbury Park. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Canterbury Park 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Inspired Entertainment 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer CPHC or INSE?

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 2 more articles in the media than Inspired Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Canterbury Park and 2 mentions for Inspired Entertainment. Inspired Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Inspired Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Canterbury Park 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Inspired Entertainment 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts prefer CPHC or FLL?

Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.90%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Canterbury Park 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Full House Resorts 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Do analysts rate CPHC or BRAG?

Bragg Gaming Group has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 242.47%. Given Bragg Gaming Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bragg Gaming Group is more favorable than Canterbury Park. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Canterbury Park 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Bragg Gaming Group 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer CPHC or BRAG?

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 1 more articles in the media than Bragg Gaming Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Canterbury Park and 3 mentions for Bragg Gaming Group. Bragg Gaming Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Bragg Gaming Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Canterbury Park 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bragg Gaming Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CPHC or CNTY?

Century Casinos has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 136.22%. Given Century Casinos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than Canterbury Park. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Canterbury Park 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Century Casinos 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Canterbury Park (CPHC) Competitors

$15.91 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 08/28/2026 01:40 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$15.88 -0.03 (-0.16%)

As of 03:59 AM Eastern

Compare

CPHC vs. MRDN, INSE, FLL, BRAG, and CNTY

Should you buy Canterbury Park stock or one of its competitors? Canterbury Park's main competitors and comparable companies include Meridian (MRDN), Inspired Entertainment (INSE), Full House Resorts (FLL), Bragg Gaming Group (BRAG), and Century Casinos (CNTY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Meridian?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and Meridian (NASDAQ:MRDN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Canterbury Park and Canterbury Park both had 4 articles in the media. Meridian's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Meridian is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Meridian	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Meridian shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.0% of Meridian shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Meridian. Meridian is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park	$59.57M	1.38	-$530K	$0.02	795.50
Meridian	$182.86M	0.97	-$89.90M	-$6.74	N/A

Meridian has a consensus target price of $21.60, indicating a potential upside of 54.95%. Given Meridian's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Meridian is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Canterbury Park	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Meridian	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Meridian's net margin of -41.41%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Meridian's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Canterbury Park	0.20%	0.14%	0.10%
Meridian	-41.41%	-117.87%	-58.87%

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meridian has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Meridian on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and Inspired Entertainment (NASDAQ:INSE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 237.27%. Given Inspired Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Inspired Entertainment is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Canterbury Park	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Inspired Entertainment	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -3.34%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Canterbury Park	0.20%	0.14%	0.10%
Inspired Entertainment	-3.34%	-30.08%	0.92%

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Inspired Entertainment. Inspired Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park	$59.57M	1.38	-$530K	$0.02	795.50
Inspired Entertainment	$304.10M	0.51	-$17M	-$0.33	N/A

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 2 more articles in the media than Inspired Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Canterbury Park and 2 mentions for Inspired Entertainment. Inspired Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Inspired Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Inspired Entertainment	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Canterbury Park and Inspired Entertainment tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Full House Resorts?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 3 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Canterbury Park and 1 mentions for Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park	Positive
Full House Resorts	Very Positive

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park	$59.57M	1.38	-$530K	$0.02	795.50
Full House Resorts	$305.86M	0.24	-$40.20M	-$1.02	N/A

Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.90%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Canterbury Park	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Full House Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Canterbury Park	0.20%	0.14%	0.10%
Full House Resorts	-12.06%	-473.31%	-5.78%

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Full House Resorts on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and Bragg Gaming Group (NASDAQ:BRAG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bragg Gaming Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 1 more articles in the media than Bragg Gaming Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Canterbury Park and 3 mentions for Bragg Gaming Group. Bragg Gaming Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.62 indicating that Bragg Gaming Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bragg Gaming Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bragg Gaming Group has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 242.47%. Given Bragg Gaming Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bragg Gaming Group is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Canterbury Park	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Bragg Gaming Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.0% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Bragg Gaming Group's net margin of -7.48%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Bragg Gaming Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Canterbury Park	0.20%	0.14%	0.10%
Bragg Gaming Group	-7.48%	-12.70%	-8.22%

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bragg Gaming Group. Bragg Gaming Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park	$59.57M	1.38	-$530K	$0.02	795.50
Bragg Gaming Group	$103.03M	0.43	-$9.18M	-$0.36	N/A

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Bragg Gaming Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Century Casinos?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and Century Casinos (NASDAQ:CNTY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Casinos has a beta of 1.68, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

Century Casinos has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 136.22%. Given Century Casinos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Canterbury Park	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Century Casinos	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Century Casinos. Century Casinos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canterbury Park, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park	$59.57M	1.38	-$530K	$0.02	795.50
Century Casinos	$572.97M	0.06	-$61.42M	-$1.93	N/A

Canterbury Park has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Century Casinos' net margin of -9.62%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of 0.14% beat Century Casinos' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Canterbury Park	0.20%	0.14%	0.10%
Century Casinos	-9.62%	-3,789.52%	-4.93%

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.4% of Century Casinos shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Century Casinos shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 2 more articles in the media than Century Casinos. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Canterbury Park and 2 mentions for Century Casinos. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Century Casinos' score of 0.44 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park	Positive
Century Casinos	Neutral

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Century Casinos on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Canterbury Park News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CPHC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Canterbury Park	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$82.41M	$8.20B	$13.11B	$12.89B
Dividend Yield	1.76%	3.74%	56.99%	11.27%
P/E Ratio	795.50	23.02	47.01	25.45
Price / Sales	1.38	319.43	88.35	103.75
Price / Cash	23.39	22.18	19.00	36.03
Price / Book	0.97	4.83	4.30	6.36
Net Income	-$530K	$260.47M	$445.55M	$349.79M
7 Day Performance	1.73%	-1.49%	-0.54%	-0.40%
1 Month Performance	1.66%	0.61%	0.05%	4.24%
1 Year Performance	-4.16%	-4.31%	-2.22%	15.13%

Canterbury Park Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CPHC Canterbury Park	0.8866 of 5 stars	$15.91 flat	N/A	-4.2%	$82.41M	$59.57M	795.50	1,096
MRDN Meridian	1.8894 of 5 stars	$13.83 +0.2%	$21.60 +56.2%	N/A	$175.23M	$182.86M	N/A	1,200
INSE Inspired Entertainment	3.329 of 5 stars	$5.83 -0.3%	$20.00 +243.0%	-36.2%	$154.47M	$304.10M	N/A	1,020	Positive News
FLL Full House Resorts	3.0935 of 5 stars	$2.12 +0.1%	$3.50 +64.9%	-43.7%	$78.76M	$302.38M	N/A	1,847	Positive News
BRAG Bragg Gaming Group	2.7561 of 5 stars	$1.51 +3.3%	$5.00 +230.9%	-45.9%	$46.04M	$119.98M	N/A	290	News Coverage Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CPHC) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Canterbury Park (CPHC) Competitors

CPHC vs. MRDN, INSE, FLL, BRAG, and CNTY

How does Canterbury Park compare to Meridian?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Full House Resorts?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Century Casinos?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CPHC vs. The Competition

Canterbury Park Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Canterbury Park (CPHC) Competitors

CPHC vs. MRDN, INSE, FLL, BRAG, and CNTY

How does Canterbury Park compare to Meridian?

Does the media prefer CPHC or MRDN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CPHC or MRDN?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CPHC or MRDN?

Do analysts prefer CPHC or MRDN?

Is CPHC or MRDN more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CPHC or MRDN?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Do analysts rate CPHC or INSE?

Is CPHC or INSE more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CPHC or INSE?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CPHC or INSE?

Does the media prefer CPHC or INSE?

Which has more risk & volatility, CPHC or INSE?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Full House Resorts?

Which has more risk & volatility, CPHC or FLL?

Does the media prefer CPHC or FLL?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CPHC or FLL?

Do analysts prefer CPHC or FLL?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CPHC or FLL?

Is CPHC or FLL more profitable?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Which has more risk & volatility, CPHC or BRAG?

Does the media prefer CPHC or BRAG?

Do analysts rate CPHC or BRAG?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CPHC or BRAG?

Is CPHC or BRAG more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CPHC or BRAG?

Summary

How does Canterbury Park compare to Century Casinos?

Which has more risk & volatility, CPHC or CNTY?

Do analysts prefer CPHC or CNTY?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CPHC or CNTY?

Is CPHC or CNTY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CPHC or CNTY?

Does the media refer more to CPHC or CNTY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CPHC vs. The Competition

Canterbury Park Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools