Go Pro

Canterbury Park (CPHC) Competitors

Canterbury Park logo
$15.34 -0.21 (-1.35%)
As of 03:54 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CPHC vs. INSE, MRDN, FLL, BRAG, and CNTY

Should you buy Canterbury Park stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Canterbury Park with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Canterbury Park include Inspired Entertainment (INSE), Meridian (MRDN), Full House Resorts (FLL), Bragg Gaming Group (BRAG), and Century Casinos (CNTY). These companies are all part of the "casinos & gaming" industry.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Inspired Entertainment?

Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) and Inspired Entertainment (NASDAQ:INSE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Canterbury Park has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Inspired Entertainment. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Inspired Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.33-$530K-$0.01N/A
Inspired Entertainment$304.10M0.53-$17M-$0.33N/A

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -3.34%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canterbury Park-0.10% -0.07% -0.05%
Inspired Entertainment -3.34%-30.08%0.92%

76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.4% of Inspired Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 225.63%. Given Inspired Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Inspired Entertainment is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Inspired Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Inspired Entertainment had 5 more articles in the media than Canterbury Park. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Inspired Entertainment and 1 mentions for Canterbury Park. Inspired Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.00 indicating that Inspired Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Canterbury Park
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Inspired Entertainment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Inspired Entertainment beats Canterbury Park on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Meridian?

Meridian (NASDAQ:MRDN) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Meridian currently has a consensus price target of $21.60, indicating a potential upside of 62.90%. Given Meridian's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Meridian is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Meridian
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Canterbury Park had 1 more articles in the media than Meridian. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Canterbury Park and 0 mentions for Meridian. Meridian's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.00 indicating that Meridian is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Meridian Positive
Canterbury Park Neutral

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Meridian's net margin of -41.41%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Meridian's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Meridian-41.41% -117.87% -58.87%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Meridian. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meridian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Meridian$182.86M0.92-$89.90M-$6.74N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.33-$530K-$0.01N/A

Meridian has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

2.7% of Meridian shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. 24.0% of Meridian shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Meridian on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Full House Resorts?

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Full House Resorts had 12 more articles in the media than Canterbury Park. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Full House Resorts and 1 mentions for Canterbury Park. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.00 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full House Resorts
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canterbury Park
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Full House Resorts. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full House Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts$305.86M0.30-$40.20M-$1.02N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.33-$530K-$0.01N/A

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -12.06%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts-12.06% -473.31% -5.78%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

Full House Resorts currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 40.56%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Full House Resorts on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Bragg Gaming Group?

Bragg Gaming Group (NASDAQ:BRAG) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

4.0% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Bragg Gaming Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Bragg Gaming Group's net margin of -6.27%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Bragg Gaming Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bragg Gaming Group-6.27% -10.65% -6.92%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bragg Gaming Group. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bragg Gaming Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bragg Gaming Group$119.98M0.42-$9.18M-$0.31N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.33-$530K-$0.01N/A

Bragg Gaming Group presently has a consensus price target of $5.33, suggesting a potential upside of 219.36%. Given Bragg Gaming Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bragg Gaming Group is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bragg Gaming Group
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Bragg Gaming Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bragg Gaming Group had 1 more articles in the media than Canterbury Park. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bragg Gaming Group and 1 mentions for Canterbury Park. Bragg Gaming Group's average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat Canterbury Park's score of 0.00 indicating that Bragg Gaming Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bragg Gaming Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canterbury Park
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Bragg Gaming Group beats Canterbury Park on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Canterbury Park compare to Century Casinos?

Century Casinos (NASDAQ:CNTY) and Canterbury Park (NASDAQ:CPHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Canterbury Park has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Century Casinos. Canterbury Park is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Century Casinos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Century Casinos$572.97M0.06-$61.42M-$1.93N/A
Canterbury Park$59.57M1.33-$530K-$0.01N/A

Century Casinos presently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 144.90%. Given Century Casinos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Century Casinos is more favorable than Canterbury Park.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Century Casinos
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Canterbury Park
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Canterbury Park has a net margin of -0.10% compared to Century Casinos' net margin of -9.62%. Canterbury Park's return on equity of -0.07% beat Century Casinos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Century Casinos-9.62% -3,789.52% -4.89%
Canterbury Park -0.10%-0.07%-0.05%

66.4% of Century Casinos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Century Casinos shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Canterbury Park shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Century Casinos has a beta of 1.68, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canterbury Park has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Century Casinos had 6 more articles in the media than Canterbury Park. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Century Casinos and 1 mentions for Canterbury Park. Canterbury Park's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Century Casinos' score of -0.32 indicating that Canterbury Park is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Century Casinos
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canterbury Park
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Canterbury Park beats Century Casinos on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Canterbury Park News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CPHC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CPHC vs. The Competition

MetricCanterbury ParkHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$79.00M$8.20B$13.39B$12.94B
Dividend Yield1.80%3.85%53.98%10.20%
P/E Ratio-1,534.0022.1546.5424.76
Price / Sales1.33340.1491.25108.50
Price / Cash22.8522.3019.3137.44
Price / Book0.934.974.546.42
Net Income-$530K$261.42M$443.65M$347.27M
7 Day Performance1.32%0.28%0.62%2.52%
1 Month Performance-3.35%-0.01%1.82%-1.00%
1 Year Performance-13.16%-2.53%2.92%23.29%

Canterbury Park Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CPHC
Canterbury Park
0.9511 of 5 stars
$15.34
-1.4%
N/A-12.0%$79.00M$59.57MN/A1,096
INSE
Inspired Entertainment
3.5181 of 5 stars
$6.95
+1.2%
$15.00
+115.8%
-21.4%$183.26M$304.10MN/A1,020
MRDN
Meridian
2.4414 of 5 stars
$14.01
-2.3%
$21.60
+54.2%
N/A$181.62M$182.86MN/A1,200
FLL
Full House Resorts
2.062 of 5 stars
$2.22
-2.6%
$4.00
+80.2%
-32.7%$82.68M$302.38MN/A1,847
BRAG
Bragg Gaming Group
2.8268 of 5 stars
$1.69
+0.6%
$5.33
+215.6%
-59.0%$51.20M$119.98MN/A290

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CPHC) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners