Go Pro

GameSquare (GAME) Competitors

GameSquare logo
$0.35 +0.02 (+5.55%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GAME vs. CURI, SEAT, GAMB, PUSA, and CNVS

Should you buy GameSquare stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GameSquare with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GameSquare include CuriosityStream (CURI), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), and Cineverse (CNVS).

How does GameSquare compare to CuriosityStream?

GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) and CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

CuriosityStream has higher revenue and earnings than GameSquare. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GameSquare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GameSquare$45M0.82-$40.10M-$0.59N/A
CuriosityStream$71.73M2.07-$6.43M-$0.13N/A

CuriosityStream has a net margin of -11.26% compared to GameSquare's net margin of -87.56%. CuriosityStream's return on equity of -18.46% beat GameSquare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GameSquare-87.56% -42.48% -15.43%
CuriosityStream -11.26%-18.46%-10.83%

GameSquare has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CuriosityStream has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

64.3% of GameSquare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of GameSquare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CuriosityStream has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 138.85%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than GameSquare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GameSquare
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 2 more articles in the media than GameSquare. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CuriosityStream and 0 mentions for GameSquare. CuriosityStream's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat GameSquare's score of 0.00 indicating that CuriosityStream is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GameSquare Neutral
CuriosityStream Positive

Summary

CuriosityStream beats GameSquare on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GameSquare compare to Vivid Seats?

GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

GameSquare has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. GameSquare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GameSquare$45M0.82-$40.10M-$0.59N/A
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.15-$429.30M-$69.61N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 6 more articles in the media than GameSquare. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for GameSquare. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat GameSquare's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GameSquare Neutral
Vivid Seats Neutral

GameSquare has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $9.43, suggesting a potential upside of 18.15%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than GameSquare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GameSquare
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

64.3% of GameSquare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of GameSquare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vivid Seats has a net margin of -82.25% compared to GameSquare's net margin of -87.56%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat GameSquare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GameSquare-87.56% -42.48% -15.43%
Vivid Seats -82.25%68.65%5.92%

Summary

Vivid Seats beats GameSquare on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GameSquare compare to Gambling.com Group?

GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, GameSquare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gambling.com Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GameSquare Neutral
Gambling.com Group Neutral

Gambling.com Group has a consensus price target of $7.13, suggesting a potential upside of 278.99%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than GameSquare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GameSquare
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

64.3% of GameSquare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of GameSquare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gambling.com Group has higher revenue and earnings than GameSquare. Gambling.com Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GameSquare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GameSquare$45M0.82-$40.10M-$0.59N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

GameSquare has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -27.44% compared to GameSquare's net margin of -87.56%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat GameSquare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GameSquare-87.56% -42.48% -15.43%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats GameSquare on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GameSquare compare to Aureus Greenway?

GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) and Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

GameSquare has a net margin of -87.56% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Aureus Greenway's return on equity of -17.49% beat GameSquare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GameSquare-87.56% -42.48% -15.43%
Aureus Greenway -167.57%-17.49%-16.56%

GameSquare has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aureus Greenway has a beta of 5.1, suggesting that its share price is 410% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GameSquare
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

64.3% of GameSquare shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of GameSquare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.6% of Aureus Greenway shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aureus Greenway has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GameSquare. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GameSquare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GameSquare$45M0.82-$40.10M-$0.59N/A
Aureus Greenway$2.96M20.14-$3.68M-$0.31N/A

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 5 more articles in the media than GameSquare. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 0 mentions for GameSquare. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat GameSquare's score of 0.00 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GameSquare Neutral
Aureus Greenway Neutral

Summary

Aureus Greenway beats GameSquare on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GameSquare compare to Cineverse?

GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

64.3% of GameSquare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of GameSquare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cineverse had 1 more articles in the media than GameSquare. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cineverse and 0 mentions for GameSquare. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat GameSquare's score of 0.00 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GameSquare Neutral
Cineverse Neutral

Cineverse has higher revenue and earnings than GameSquare. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GameSquare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GameSquare$45M0.82-$40.10M-$0.59N/A
Cineverse$65.73M0.89-$8.84M-$0.52N/A

Cineverse has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 261.45%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than GameSquare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GameSquare
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Cineverse has a net margin of -13.44% compared to GameSquare's net margin of -87.56%. GameSquare's return on equity of -42.48% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GameSquare-87.56% -42.48% -15.43%
Cineverse -13.44%-45.60%-19.83%

GameSquare has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cineverse beats GameSquare on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GameSquare News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GAME and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GAME and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GAME vs. The Competition

MetricGameSquareMedia IndustryCommunication Services SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$36.89M$3.11B$33.54B$12.70B
Dividend YieldN/A5.35%5.34%10.03%
P/E Ratio-0.6136.5720.2125.14
Price / Sales0.8227.21314.5479.78
Price / CashN/A19.8219.5834.82
Price / Book1.137.7010.586.20
Net Income-$40.10M-$30.65M$1.11B$347.60M
7 Day Performance-1.02%1.71%1.07%0.81%
1 Month Performance-2.83%-3.70%-0.39%-3.65%
1 Year Performance-55.60%18.61%5.56%20.30%

GameSquare Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GAME
GameSquare
0.8624 of 5 stars
$0.35
+5.5%
N/A-58.6%$36.48M$45MN/A110
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.3052 of 5 stars
$2.45
-1.8%
$6.00
+145.4%
-48.1%$144.18M$71.66MN/A90
SEAT
Vivid Seats
1.6046 of 5 stars
$7.50
-7.1%
$9.43
+25.8%
-73.4%$80.78M$570.78MN/A430
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
3.7825 of 5 stars
$1.88
+2.2%
$7.13
+279.0%
-81.5%$65.98M$165.25MN/A230
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.2451 of 5 stars
$2.88
+3.2%
N/A+2.4%$62.21M$2.96MN/A40

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GAME) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners