Go Pro
→ A “bloodbath” Is Coming (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free MF Stock Alerts

U-BX Technology (MF) Competitors

U-BX Technology logo
$16.49 -0.61 (-3.57%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

MF vs. SCOR, GRSD, IZEA, GAME, and CREX

Should you buy U-BX Technology stock or one of its competitors? U-BX Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include comScore (SCOR), Gambling.com Group (GRSD), Izea Worldwide (IZEA), GameSquare (GAME), and Creative Realities (CREX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "advertising" industry.

How does U-BX Technology compare to comScore?

U-BX Technology (NASDAQ:MF) and comScore (NASDAQ:SCOR) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

42.2% of comScore shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of U-BX Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of comScore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

U-BX Technology has a beta of -5.19, suggesting that its stock price is 619% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, comScore has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, comScore had 1 more articles in the media than U-BX Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for comScore and 2 mentions for U-BX Technology. U-BX Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat comScore's score of 0.27 indicating that U-BX Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U-BX Technology Positive
comScore Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U-BX Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
comScore
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

U-BX Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than comScore.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U-BX Technology$29.67M0.84-$2.72MN/AN/A
comScore$357.47M0.20-$10M$4.101.14

comScore has a net margin of 24.01% compared to U-BX Technology's net margin of 0.00%. comScore's return on equity of 133.03% beat U-BX Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U-BX TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
comScore 24.01%133.03%24.12%

Summary

comScore beats U-BX Technology on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U-BX Technology compare to Gambling.com Group?

U-BX Technology (NASDAQ:MF) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GRSD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

U-BX Technology has a beta of -5.19, suggesting that its share price is 619% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

U-BX Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gambling.com Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U-BX Technology$29.67M0.84-$2.72MN/AN/A
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.32-$32.93M-$1.04N/A

U-BX Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -22.36%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 13.87% beat U-BX Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U-BX TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Gambling.com Group -22.36%13.87%5.33%

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of U-BX Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gambling.com Group has a consensus price target of $6.43, indicating a potential upside of 325.73%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than U-BX Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U-BX Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Gambling.com Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 2 more articles in the media than U-BX Technology. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 2 mentions for U-BX Technology. U-BX Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.34 indicating that U-BX Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U-BX Technology Positive
Gambling.com Group Neutral

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats U-BX Technology on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U-BX Technology compare to Izea Worldwide?

U-BX Technology (NASDAQ:MF) and Izea Worldwide (NASDAQ:IZEA) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

U-BX Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Izea Worldwide's net margin of -9.36%. U-BX Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Izea Worldwide's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U-BX TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Izea Worldwide -9.36%-5.10%-4.41%

Izea Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than U-BX Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U-BX Technology$29.67M0.84-$2.72MN/AN/A
Izea Worldwide$31.24M1.40$40K-$0.14N/A

15.6% of Izea Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of U-BX Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Izea Worldwide shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U-BX Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Izea Worldwide
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

U-BX Technology has a beta of -5.19, indicating that its share price is 619% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Izea Worldwide has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Izea Worldwide had 1 more articles in the media than U-BX Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Izea Worldwide and 2 mentions for U-BX Technology. U-BX Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Izea Worldwide's score of 0.84 indicating that U-BX Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U-BX Technology Positive
Izea Worldwide Positive

Summary

Izea Worldwide beats U-BX Technology on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U-BX Technology compare to GameSquare?

GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) and U-BX Technology (NASDAQ:MF) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

U-BX Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GameSquare.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GameSquare$45M0.89-$40.10M-$4.96N/A
U-BX Technology$29.67M0.84-$2.72MN/AN/A

GameSquare has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U-BX Technology has a beta of -5.19, indicating that its share price is 619% less volatile than the broader market.

64.3% of GameSquare shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of GameSquare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of U-BX Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, GameSquare had 3 more articles in the media than U-BX Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for GameSquare and 2 mentions for U-BX Technology. U-BX Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat GameSquare's score of 0.86 indicating that U-BX Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GameSquare Positive
U-BX Technology Positive

U-BX Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to GameSquare's net margin of -96.06%. GameSquare's return on equity of 7.97% beat U-BX Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GameSquare-96.06% 7.97% 3.14%
U-BX Technology N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GameSquare
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
U-BX Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

GameSquare beats U-BX Technology on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U-BX Technology compare to Creative Realities?

U-BX Technology (NASDAQ:MF) and Creative Realities (NASDAQ:CREX) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

U-BX Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Creative Realities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U-BX Technology$29.67M0.84-$2.72MN/AN/A
Creative Realities$57.23M0.60-$8.28M-$2.11N/A

Creative Realities has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 214.96%. Given Creative Realities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Creative Realities is more favorable than U-BX Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U-BX Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Creative Realities
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

U-BX Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Creative Realities' net margin of -29.29%. U-BX Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Creative Realities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U-BX TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Creative Realities -29.29%-88.21%-13.51%

41.3% of Creative Realities shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of U-BX Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Creative Realities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

U-BX Technology has a beta of -5.19, meaning that its share price is 619% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Creative Realities has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Creative Realities had 1 more articles in the media than U-BX Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Creative Realities and 2 mentions for U-BX Technology. Creative Realities' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat U-BX Technology's score of 0.94 indicating that Creative Realities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U-BX Technology Positive
Creative Realities Positive

Summary

Creative Realities beats U-BX Technology on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get U-BX Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricU-BX TechnologyMedia IndustryCommunication Services SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$25.85M$2.87B$33.75B$13.05B
Dividend YieldN/A5.67%5.53%14.40%
P/E RatioN/A28.76231.6625.69
Price / Sales0.8434.7762.2292.53
Price / CashN/A17.2320.3752.21
Price / Book0.3412.2012.086.29
Net Income-$2.72M-$11.62M$1.12B$360.55M
7 Day Performance23.61%-1.30%-1.49%-1.85%
1 Month Performance-15.39%-4.14%-3.69%-4.37%
1 Year Performance-62.09%-10.15%-9.00%3.56%

U-BX Technology Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MF
U-BX Technology
0.9739 of 5 stars		$16.49
-3.6%		N/A-59.0%$25.85M$29.67MN/A40
SCOR
comScore
2.5016 of 5 stars		$4.81
-2.6%		N/A-47.2%$73.49M$357.47M1.171,200
GRSD
Gambling.com Group
3.7232 of 5 stars		$1.57
+2.6%		$6.43
+309.5%		-81.7%$55.45M$165.45MN/A230
IZEA
Izea Worldwide
1.3231 of 5 stars		$2.54
-1.2%		N/A-35.1%$45.63M$31.24MN/A75
GAME
GameSquare
2.3003 of 5 stars		$3.13
+2.3%		N/A-43.5%$42.32M$45MN/A144

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MF) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI Stock Reminds One Analyst of Early Nvidia
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before shares surged 37,800 percent. Now he's identified another AI company ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end of AI data centers coming?
Marc Chaikin's Power Gauge system flagged Micron before it soared 970 percent, Celestica before a 6,600 percen...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel