Ceragon Networks (CRNT) Competitors

$2.53 +0.02 (+0.80%)

Closing price 05/19/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.70 +0.17 (+6.72%)

As of 04:19 AM Eastern

CRNT vs. LPTH, MRAM, KE, LAES, and CLFD

Should you buy Ceragon Networks stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ceragon Networks with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ceragon Networks include LightPath Technologies (LPTH), Everspin Tech (MRAM), Kimball Electronics (KE), SEALSQ (LAES), and Clearfield (CLFD). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Ceragon Networks compare to LightPath Technologies?

Ceragon Networks (NASDAQ:CRNT) and LightPath Technologies (NASDAQ:LPTH) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

13.3% of Ceragon Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.3% of LightPath Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Ceragon Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.8% of LightPath Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ceragon Networks has a net margin of -0.62% compared to LightPath Technologies' net margin of -37.38%. Ceragon Networks' return on equity of 3.52% beat LightPath Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ceragon Networks	-0.62%	3.52%	1.82%
LightPath Technologies	-37.38%	-15.55%	-6.87%

Ceragon Networks has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LightPath Technologies has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Ceragon Networks presently has a consensus price target of $3.67, suggesting a potential upside of 44.93%. LightPath Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.13, suggesting a potential upside of 1.77%. Given Ceragon Networks' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ceragon Networks is more favorable than LightPath Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ceragon Networks	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
LightPath Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, LightPath Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Ceragon Networks. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for LightPath Technologies and 9 mentions for Ceragon Networks. Ceragon Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat LightPath Technologies' score of 0.22 indicating that Ceragon Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ceragon Networks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
LightPath Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ceragon Networks has higher revenue and earnings than LightPath Technologies. Ceragon Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LightPath Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ceragon Networks	$338.73M	0.68	-$2.09M	-$0.02	N/A
LightPath Technologies	$62.77M	13.88	-$14.87M	-$0.50	N/A

Summary

Ceragon Networks beats LightPath Technologies on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Everspin Tech?

Everspin Tech (NASDAQ:MRAM) and Ceragon Networks (NASDAQ:CRNT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Everspin Tech had 8 more articles in the media than Ceragon Networks. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Everspin Tech and 9 mentions for Ceragon Networks. Ceragon Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Everspin Tech's score of 0.25 indicating that Ceragon Networks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Everspin Tech	3 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ceragon Networks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Everspin Tech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ceragon Networks. Ceragon Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everspin Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Everspin Tech	$55.20M	13.48	-$590K	$0.01	3,172.00
Ceragon Networks	$338.73M	0.68	-$2.09M	-$0.02	N/A

44.7% of Everspin Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Ceragon Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 6.3% of Everspin Tech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Ceragon Networks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Everspin Tech presently has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential downside of 41.68%. Ceragon Networks has a consensus target price of $3.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.93%. Given Ceragon Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ceragon Networks is more favorable than Everspin Tech.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Everspin Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ceragon Networks	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Everspin Tech has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ceragon Networks has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Everspin Tech has a net margin of 0.50% compared to Ceragon Networks' net margin of -0.62%. Everspin Tech's return on equity of 4.78% beat Ceragon Networks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Everspin Tech	0.50%	4.78%	3.93%
Ceragon Networks	-0.62%	3.52%	1.82%

Summary

Everspin Tech beats Ceragon Networks on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Kimball Electronics?

Ceragon Networks (NASDAQ:CRNT) and Kimball Electronics (NASDAQ:KE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

13.3% of Ceragon Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Kimball Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Ceragon Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Kimball Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ceragon Networks currently has a consensus price target of $3.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.93%. Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.69%. Given Ceragon Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ceragon Networks is more favorable than Kimball Electronics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ceragon Networks	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Kimball Electronics	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Ceragon Networks' net margin of -0.62%. Kimball Electronics' return on equity of 6.22% beat Ceragon Networks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ceragon Networks	-0.62%	3.52%	1.82%
Kimball Electronics	1.81%	6.22%	3.30%

Ceragon Networks has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ceragon Networks had 7 more articles in the media than Kimball Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ceragon Networks and 2 mentions for Kimball Electronics. Ceragon Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Kimball Electronics' score of 0.00 indicating that Ceragon Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ceragon Networks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kimball Electronics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Kimball Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Ceragon Networks. Ceragon Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimball Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ceragon Networks	$338.73M	0.68	-$2.09M	-$0.02	N/A
Kimball Electronics	$1.49B	0.38	$16.98M	$1.04	22.51

Summary

Ceragon Networks and Kimball Electronics tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ceragon Networks compare to SEALSQ?

SEALSQ (NASDAQ:LAES) and Ceragon Networks (NASDAQ:CRNT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

1.3% of SEALSQ shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Ceragon Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Ceragon Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SEALSQ has a beta of -8.33, suggesting that its share price is 933% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ceragon Networks has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

SEALSQ currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 121.40%. Ceragon Networks has a consensus target price of $3.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.93%. Given SEALSQ's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SEALSQ is more favorable than Ceragon Networks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SEALSQ	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ceragon Networks	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

In the previous week, Ceragon Networks had 5 more articles in the media than SEALSQ. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ceragon Networks and 4 mentions for SEALSQ. Ceragon Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat SEALSQ's score of 0.17 indicating that Ceragon Networks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SEALSQ	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ceragon Networks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ceragon Networks has higher revenue and earnings than SEALSQ.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SEALSQ	$18.25M	28.66	-$34.19M	N/A	N/A
Ceragon Networks	$338.73M	0.68	-$2.09M	-$0.02	N/A

SEALSQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ceragon Networks' net margin of -0.62%. Ceragon Networks' return on equity of 3.52% beat SEALSQ's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SEALSQ	N/A	N/A	N/A
Ceragon Networks	-0.62%	3.52%	1.82%

Summary

Ceragon Networks beats SEALSQ on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Clearfield?

Ceragon Networks (NASDAQ:CRNT) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Ceragon Networks has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ceragon Networks had 4 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ceragon Networks and 5 mentions for Clearfield. Ceragon Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Clearfield's score of 0.05 indicating that Ceragon Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ceragon Networks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

13.3% of Ceragon Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Ceragon Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ceragon Networks has a net margin of -0.62% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -5.41%. Ceragon Networks' return on equity of 3.52% beat Clearfield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ceragon Networks	-0.62%	3.52%	1.82%
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%

Ceragon Networks presently has a consensus price target of $3.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.93%. Clearfield has a consensus price target of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 4.99%. Given Ceragon Networks' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ceragon Networks is more favorable than Clearfield.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ceragon Networks	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Ceragon Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Clearfield. Ceragon Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clearfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ceragon Networks	$338.73M	0.68	-$2.09M	-$0.02	N/A
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.77	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A

Summary

Ceragon Networks beats Clearfield on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ceragon Networks News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRNT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ceragon Networks	Wireless Non Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$228.14M	$30.45B	$38.64B	$12.23B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.79%	3.21%	5.32%
P/E Ratio	-126.50	15.06	167.08	25.05
Price / Sales	0.68	6.55	626.13	72.66
Price / Cash	9.90	8.98	46.83	54.25
Price / Book	1.30	2.85	10.09	6.83
Net Income	-$2.09M	$2.66B	$1.06B	$335.69M
7 Day Performance	0.40%	-1.15%	-0.85%	-2.15%
1 Month Performance	-1.17%	0.54%	2.69%	-2.47%
1 Year Performance	5.86%	47.30%	159.23%	27.13%

Ceragon Networks Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRNT Ceragon Networks	3.9123 of 5 stars	$2.53 +0.8%	$3.67 +44.9%	+4.1%	$228.14M	$338.73M	N/A	1,741	News Coverage Earnings Report Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
LPTH LightPath Technologies	1.9148 of 5 stars	$12.81 +11.3%	$14.13 +10.3%	+464.2%	$664.23M	$37.20M	N/A	330	Analyst Downgrade
MRAM Everspin Tech	1.2181 of 5 stars	$39.86 +47.7%	$18.50 -53.6%	+424.3%	$632.85M	$55.20M	3,989.99	90	Options Volume Gap Down High Trading Volume
KE Kimball Electronics	2.948 of 5 stars	$25.81 -1.3%	$32.00 +24.0%	+33.2%	$628.64M	$1.49B	24.82	5,700	Gap Up
LAES SEALSQ	2.2498 of 5 stars	$3.06 +4.8%	$6.00 +96.1%	-12.6%	$563.63M	$18.25M	N/A	61	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CRNT) was last updated on 5/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ceragon Networks (CRNT) Competitors

CRNT vs. LPTH, MRAM, KE, LAES, and CLFD

How does Ceragon Networks compare to LightPath Technologies?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Everspin Tech?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Kimball Electronics?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to SEALSQ?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Clearfield?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRNT vs. The Competition

Ceragon Networks Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ceragon Networks (CRNT) Competitors

CRNT vs. LPTH, MRAM, KE, LAES, and CLFD

How does Ceragon Networks compare to LightPath Technologies?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CRNT or LPTH?

Is CRNT or LPTH more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CRNT or LPTH?

Do analysts prefer CRNT or LPTH?

Does the media favor CRNT or LPTH?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CRNT or LPTH?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Everspin Tech?

Does the media prefer MRAM or CRNT?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MRAM or CRNT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of MRAM or CRNT?

Do analysts recommend MRAM or CRNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, MRAM or CRNT?

Is MRAM or CRNT more profitable?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Kimball Electronics?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CRNT or KE?

Do analysts prefer CRNT or KE?

Is CRNT or KE more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRNT or KE?

Does the media favor CRNT or KE?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CRNT or KE?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to SEALSQ?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LAES or CRNT?

Which has more risk and volatility, LAES or CRNT?

Do analysts recommend LAES or CRNT?

Does the media refer more to LAES or CRNT?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, LAES or CRNT?

Is LAES or CRNT more profitable?

Summary

How does Ceragon Networks compare to Clearfield?

Which has more volatility and risk, CRNT or CLFD?

Does the media prefer CRNT or CLFD?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CRNT or CLFD?

Is CRNT or CLFD more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CRNT or CLFD?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CRNT or CLFD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRNT vs. The Competition

Ceragon Networks Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools