Does the media prefer LUNR or IMOS?

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines had 8 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Intuitive Machines and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.73 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intuitive Machines 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chipmos Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer IMOS or NVTS?

Navitas Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $12.87, suggesting a potential downside of 61.64%. Given Navitas Semiconductor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Navitas Semiconductor is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Navitas Semiconductor 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to IMOS or NVTS?

In the previous week, Navitas Semiconductor had 23 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Navitas Semiconductor and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Navitas Semiconductor's score of 0.06 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chipmos Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Navitas Semiconductor 4 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor KLIC or IMOS?

In the previous week, Kulicke and Soffa Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.89 indicating that Kulicke and Soffa Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kulicke and Soffa Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chipmos Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer LPL or IMOS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score LG Display 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75 Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer LPL or IMOS?

In the previous week, LG Display and LG Display both had 2 articles in the media. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat LG Display's score of 0.00 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment LG Display 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chipmos Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer IMOS or PI?

Impinj has a consensus price target of $175.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.36%. Given Impinj's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Impinj is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Impinj 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Does the media prefer IMOS or PI?

In the previous week, Impinj had 4 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Impinj and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Impinj's score of 0.77 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chipmos Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Impinj 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Chipmos Technologies (IMOS) Competitors

$61.87 -2.74 (-4.24%)

As of 12:09 PM Eastern

Compare

IMOS vs. LUNR, NVTS, KLIC, LPL, and PI

Should you buy Chipmos Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chipmos Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chipmos Technologies include Intuitive Machines (LUNR), Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS), Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC), LG Display (LPL), and Impinj (PI). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Intuitive Machines?

Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both mid-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat Intuitive Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intuitive Machines	-32.69%	N/A	-5.41%
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Machines. Intuitive Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Machines	$210.06M	35.48	-$83.29M	-$0.88	N/A
Chipmos Technologies	$25.34B	0.09	$17.55M	$0.74	83.61

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines had 8 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Intuitive Machines and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.73 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Machines	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipmos Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Intuitive Machines presently has a consensus price target of $31.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.27%. Given Intuitive Machines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intuitive Machines	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.42
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intuitive Machines and Chipmos Technologies tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Navitas Semiconductor?

Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) and Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ:NVTS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Navitas Semiconductor. Navitas Semiconductor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chipmos Technologies	$25.34B	0.09	$17.55M	$0.74	83.61
Navitas Semiconductor	$40.50M	193.57	-$116.95M	-$0.63	N/A

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Navitas Semiconductor's net margin of -330.67%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat Navitas Semiconductor's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%
Navitas Semiconductor	-330.67%	-14.30%	-12.47%

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Navitas Semiconductor shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Navitas Semiconductor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Navitas Semiconductor has a beta of 3.75, meaning that its share price is 275% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Navitas Semiconductor had 23 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Navitas Semiconductor and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Navitas Semiconductor's score of 0.06 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chipmos Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Navitas Semiconductor	4 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Navitas Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $12.87, suggesting a potential downside of 61.64%. Given Navitas Semiconductor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Navitas Semiconductor is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Navitas Semiconductor	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Chipmos Technologies beats Navitas Semiconductor on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Kulicke and Soffa Industries (NASDAQ:KLIC) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries presently has a consensus price target of $59.25, suggesting a potential downside of 44.98%. Given Kulicke and Soffa Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kulicke and Soffa Industries is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Chipmos Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kulicke and Soffa Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	$768.22M	7.34	$210K	$1.04	103.55
Chipmos Technologies	$25.34B	0.09	$17.55M	$0.74	83.61

98.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Chipmos Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays out 78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chipmos Technologies pays out 102.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kulicke and Soffa Industries has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Kulicke and Soffa Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.89 indicating that Kulicke and Soffa Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipmos Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Chipmos Technologies' net margin of 3.05%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' return on equity of 7.29% beat Chipmos Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	7.16%	7.29%	5.38%
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%

Summary

Kulicke and Soffa Industries beats Chipmos Technologies on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to LG Display?

LG Display (NYSE:LPL) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

LG Display pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Chipmos Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. LG Display pays out -900.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chipmos Technologies pays out 102.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. LG Display is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LG Display	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

LG Display has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LG Display and LG Display both had 2 articles in the media. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat LG Display's score of 0.00 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
LG Display	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chipmos Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to LG Display's net margin of -0.18%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat LG Display's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LG Display	-0.18%	-0.68%	-0.17%
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of LG Display shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LG Display has higher revenue and earnings than Chipmos Technologies. LG Display is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LG Display	$25.28T	0.00	$212.66M	-$0.02	N/A
Chipmos Technologies	$25.34B	0.09	$17.55M	$0.74	83.61

Summary

Chipmos Technologies beats LG Display on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Impinj?

Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) and Impinj (NASDAQ:PI) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Impinj had 4 more articles in the media than Chipmos Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Impinj and 2 mentions for Chipmos Technologies. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Impinj's score of 0.77 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chipmos Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Impinj	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Impinj has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Impinj's net margin of -7.66%. Impinj's return on equity of 5.67% beat Chipmos Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%
Impinj	-7.66%	5.67%	2.18%

Impinj has a consensus price target of $175.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.36%. Given Impinj's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Impinj is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Impinj	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Impinj shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Impinj. Impinj is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chipmos Technologies	$25.34B	0.09	$17.55M	$0.74	83.61
Impinj	$361.08M	11.59	-$10.85M	-$0.92	N/A

Summary

Chipmos Technologies and Impinj tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chipmos Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMOS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

IMOS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chipmos Technologies	SEQPT Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.18B	$3.81B	$40.61B	$12.44B
Dividend Yield	0.91%	0.91%	3.10%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	84.18	75.92	173.29	24.23
Price / Sales	0.09	2.88	628.10	126.08
Price / Cash	13.15	32.99	51.77	57.88
Price / Book	2.85	2.80	10.11	6.73
Net Income	$17.55M	$55.82M	$1.06B	$336.97M
7 Day Performance	9.08%	4.57%	3.98%	0.79%
1 Month Performance	35.68%	52.98%	11.10%	5.38%
1 Year Performance	233.71%	256.94%	170.58%	34.55%

Chipmos Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
IMOS Chipmos Technologies	1.0796 of 5 stars	$61.87 -4.2%	N/A	+249.2%	$2.18B	$25.34B	84.18	5,747	Gap Down
LUNR Intuitive Machines	1.9432 of 5 stars	$34.86 -8.9%	$31.50 -9.6%	+259.4%	$7.56B	$210.06M	N/A	1	Gap Down High Trading Volume
NVTS Navitas Semiconductor	1.7767 of 5 stars	$31.79 +8.7%	$12.87 -59.5%	+368.5%	$7.43B	$45.92M	N/A	160	News Coverage Gap Up
KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries	3.5846 of 5 stars	$108.57 +4.0%	$59.25 -45.4%	+236.3%	$5.68B	$654.08M	104.39	2,592	Gap Down
LPL LG Display	0.4733 of 5 stars	$5.42 +7.3%	N/A	+84.1%	$5.42B	$18.16B	N/A	53,049

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:IMOS) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chipmos Technologies (IMOS) Competitors

IMOS vs. LUNR, NVTS, KLIC, LPL, and PI

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Intuitive Machines?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Navitas Semiconductor?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to LG Display?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Impinj?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

IMOS vs. The Competition

Chipmos Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chipmos Technologies (IMOS) Competitors

IMOS vs. LUNR, NVTS, KLIC, LPL, and PI

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Intuitive Machines?

Is LUNR or IMOS more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LUNR or IMOS?

Does the media prefer LUNR or IMOS?

Do analysts rate LUNR or IMOS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in LUNR or IMOS?

Which has more volatility & risk, LUNR or IMOS?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Navitas Semiconductor?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, IMOS or NVTS?

Is IMOS or NVTS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in IMOS or NVTS?

Which has more risk & volatility, IMOS or NVTS?

Does the media refer more to IMOS or NVTS?

Do analysts prefer IMOS or NVTS?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Which has more risk and volatility, KLIC or IMOS?

Do analysts rate KLIC or IMOS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, KLIC or IMOS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in KLIC or IMOS?

Is KLIC or IMOS a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor KLIC or IMOS?

Is KLIC or IMOS more profitable?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to LG Display?

Is LPL or IMOS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer LPL or IMOS?

Which has more volatility and risk, LPL or IMOS?

Does the media prefer LPL or IMOS?

Is LPL or IMOS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of LPL or IMOS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LPL or IMOS?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Impinj?

Does the media prefer IMOS or PI?

Which has more volatility and risk, IMOS or PI?

Is IMOS or PI more profitable?

Do analysts prefer IMOS or PI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of IMOS or PI?

Which has better earnings and valuation, IMOS or PI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

IMOS vs. The Competition

Chipmos Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools