Do analysts rate IMOS or AAOI?

Applied Optoelectronics has a consensus target price of $113.80, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Applied Optoelectronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Optoelectronics is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Applied Optoelectronics 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media prefer IMOS or AAOI?

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Applied Optoelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 5 mentions for Applied Optoelectronics. Applied Optoelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Applied Optoelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chipmos Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Optoelectronics 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer QRVO or IMOS?

Qorvo presently has a consensus price target of $97.07, suggesting a potential upside of 15.08%. Given Qorvo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Qorvo is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Qorvo 1 Sell rating(s) 16 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.10 Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, QRVO or IMOS?

Qorvo has higher revenue and earnings than Chipmos Technologies. Qorvo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Qorvo $3.68B 2.02 $338.99M $3.62 23.30 Chipmos Technologies $762.90M 3.19 $17.55M $0.74 93.43

Does the media favor QRVO or IMOS?

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Qorvo. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 4 mentions for Qorvo. Qorvo's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Qorvo is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Qorvo 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chipmos Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate IMOS or KLIC?

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a consensus price target of $59.25, suggesting a potential downside of 44.36%. Given Kulicke and Soffa Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kulicke and Soffa Industries is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Kulicke and Soffa Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media favor IMOS or KLIC?

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 8 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Kulicke and Soffa Industries' score of 0.58 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chipmos Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kulicke and Soffa Industries 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate PI or IMOS?

Impinj currently has a consensus target price of $175.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.85%. Given Impinj's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Impinj is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Impinj 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44 Chipmos Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor PI or IMOS?

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Impinj. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 2 mentions for Impinj. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Impinj's score of 0.51 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Impinj 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chipmos Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer LUNR or IMOS?

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines and Intuitive Machines both had 9 articles in the media. Intuitive Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Intuitive Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intuitive Machines 2 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chipmos Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Chipmos Technologies (IMOS) Competitors

$69.14 -6.65 (-8.77%)

Closing price 07/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$67.27 -1.87 (-2.70%)

As of 07/13/2026 07:11 PM Eastern

Compare

IMOS vs. AAOI, QRVO, KLIC, PI, and LUNR

Should you buy Chipmos Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chipmos Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chipmos Technologies include Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI), Qorvo (QRVO), Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC), Impinj (PI), and Intuitive Machines (LUNR). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Applied Optoelectronics?

Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) and Applied Optoelectronics (NASDAQ:AAOI) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Optoelectronics has a beta of 3.69, meaning that its share price is 269% more volatile than the broader market.

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Applied Optoelectronics' net margin of -8.55%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat Applied Optoelectronics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%
Applied Optoelectronics	-8.55%	-4.64%	-2.90%

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Applied Optoelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Applied Optoelectronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Applied Optoelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 5 mentions for Applied Optoelectronics. Applied Optoelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Applied Optoelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chipmos Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Optoelectronics	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Optoelectronics. Applied Optoelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chipmos Technologies	$762.90M	3.19	$17.55M	$0.74	93.43
Applied Optoelectronics	$455.71M	19.70	-$38.23M	-$0.66	N/A

Applied Optoelectronics has a consensus target price of $113.80, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Applied Optoelectronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Optoelectronics is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Applied Optoelectronics	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Chipmos Technologies beats Applied Optoelectronics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Qorvo?

Qorvo (NASDAQ:QRVO) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Qorvo presently has a consensus price target of $97.07, suggesting a potential upside of 15.08%. Given Qorvo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Qorvo is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Qorvo	1 Sell rating(s)	16 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.10
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Qorvo has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Qorvo. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 4 mentions for Qorvo. Qorvo's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Qorvo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Qorvo	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipmos Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Qorvo has higher revenue and earnings than Chipmos Technologies. Qorvo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Qorvo	$3.68B	2.02	$338.99M	$3.62	23.30
Chipmos Technologies	$762.90M	3.19	$17.55M	$0.74	93.43

88.6% of Qorvo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Qorvo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Qorvo has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Chipmos Technologies' net margin of 3.05%. Qorvo's return on equity of 15.32% beat Chipmos Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Qorvo	9.22%	15.32%	8.90%
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%

Summary

Qorvo beats Chipmos Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) and Kulicke and Soffa Industries (NASDAQ:KLIC) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 8 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Kulicke and Soffa Industries' score of 0.58 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chipmos Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Chipmos Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Chipmos Technologies pays out 102.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays out 78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kulicke and Soffa Industries has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a consensus price target of $59.25, suggesting a potential downside of 44.36%. Given Kulicke and Soffa Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kulicke and Soffa Industries is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Chipmos Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kulicke and Soffa Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chipmos Technologies	$762.90M	3.19	$17.55M	$0.74	93.43
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	$654.08M	8.52	$210K	$1.04	102.39

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Chipmos Technologies' net margin of 3.05%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' return on equity of 7.29% beat Chipmos Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries	7.16%	7.29%	5.38%

Summary

Kulicke and Soffa Industries beats Chipmos Technologies on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Impinj?

Impinj (NASDAQ:PI) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Impinj has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Impinj currently has a consensus target price of $175.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.85%. Given Impinj's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Impinj is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Impinj	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Impinj. Impinj is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Impinj	$361.08M	12.32	-$10.85M	-$0.92	N/A
Chipmos Technologies	$762.90M	3.19	$17.55M	$0.74	93.43

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Impinj's net margin of -7.66%. Impinj's return on equity of 5.67% beat Chipmos Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Impinj	-7.66%	5.67%	2.18%
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Impinj. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 2 mentions for Impinj. Chipmos Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Impinj's score of 0.51 indicating that Chipmos Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Impinj	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipmos Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of Impinj shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chipmos Technologies beats Impinj on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Intuitive Machines?

Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both mid-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Machines. Intuitive Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Machines	$210.06M	15.65	-$83.29M	-$0.88	N/A
Chipmos Technologies	$762.90M	3.19	$17.55M	$0.74	93.43

72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat Intuitive Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intuitive Machines	-32.69%	N/A	-5.41%
Chipmos Technologies	3.05%	3.28%	1.76%

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines and Intuitive Machines both had 9 articles in the media. Intuitive Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.67 indicating that Intuitive Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Machines	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipmos Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Intuitive Machines presently has a consensus target price of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 107.92%. Given Intuitive Machines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intuitive Machines	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.42
Chipmos Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intuitive Machines beats Chipmos Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chipmos Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMOS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

IMOS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chipmos Technologies	SEQPT Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.67B	$4.49B	$39.25B	$12.61B
Dividend Yield	1.01%	1.01%	3.19%	8.00%
P/E Ratio	94.07	82.94	170.03	24.26
Price / Sales	3.19	4.79	597.79	117.88
Price / Cash	14.96	40.65	45.82	49.36
Price / Book	3.18	3.05	9.49	6.29
Net Income	$17.55M	$55.82M	$1.07B	$330.66M
7 Day Performance	5.00%	2.19%	-0.51%	-1.32%
1 Month Performance	11.61%	5.87%	-1.38%	-0.64%
1 Year Performance	290.18%	257.69%	140.11%	19.08%

Chipmos Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
IMOS Chipmos Technologies	1.1919 of 5 stars	$69.14 -8.8%	N/A	+277.6%	$2.67B	$762.90M	94.07	5,747	News Coverage Gap Down
AAOI Applied Optoelectronics	1.8374 of 5 stars	$114.41 -7.3%	$113.80 -0.5%	+293.9%	$9.18B	$507M	N/A	4,691	Gap Down
QRVO Qorvo	3.2943 of 5 stars	$85.13 -2.3%	$96.63 +13.5%	-4.4%	$7.51B	$3.68B	23.52	5,200	Analyst Upgrade
KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries	3.1904 of 5 stars	$105.87 -11.5%	$59.25 -44.0%	+193.7%	$5.54B	$654.08M	101.80	2,592	Gap Down
PI Impinj	3.3179 of 5 stars	$138.14 -6.7%	$175.00 +26.7%	+25.0%	$4.21B	$361.08M	N/A	390	Positive News Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:IMOS) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chipmos Technologies (IMOS) Competitors

IMOS vs. AAOI, QRVO, KLIC, PI, and LUNR

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Applied Optoelectronics?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Qorvo?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Impinj?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Intuitive Machines?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

IMOS vs. The Competition

Chipmos Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chipmos Technologies (IMOS) Competitors

IMOS vs. AAOI, QRVO, KLIC, PI, and LUNR

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Applied Optoelectronics?

Which has more risk and volatility, IMOS or AAOI?

Is IMOS or AAOI more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in IMOS or AAOI?

Does the media prefer IMOS or AAOI?

Which has better earnings & valuation, IMOS or AAOI?

Do analysts rate IMOS or AAOI?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Qorvo?

Do analysts prefer QRVO or IMOS?

Which has more risk & volatility, QRVO or IMOS?

Does the media favor QRVO or IMOS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, QRVO or IMOS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in QRVO or IMOS?

Is QRVO or IMOS more profitable?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Does the media favor IMOS or KLIC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IMOS or KLIC?

Which has more risk & volatility, IMOS or KLIC?

Is IMOS or KLIC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate IMOS or KLIC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, IMOS or KLIC?

Is IMOS or KLIC more profitable?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Impinj?

Which has more risk & volatility, PI or IMOS?

Do analysts rate PI or IMOS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PI or IMOS?

Is PI or IMOS more profitable?

Does the media favor PI or IMOS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PI or IMOS?

Summary

How does Chipmos Technologies compare to Intuitive Machines?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LUNR or IMOS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LUNR or IMOS?

Is LUNR or IMOS more profitable?

Does the media prefer LUNR or IMOS?

Do analysts recommend LUNR or IMOS?

Which has more volatility and risk, LUNR or IMOS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

IMOS vs. The Competition

Chipmos Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools