CVD Equipment Competitors

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and CVD Equipment (NASDAQ:CVV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

17.9% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of CVD Equipment shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of CVD Equipment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ASML and CVD Equipment's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than CVD Equipment.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for ASML and CVD Equipment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

ASML presently has a consensus price target of $580.50, suggesting a potential downside of 8.63%. Given ASML's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe ASML is more favorable than CVD Equipment.

Volatility & Risk

ASML has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares ASML and CVD Equipment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

ASML beats CVD Equipment on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and CVD Equipment (NASDAQ:CVV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

84.0% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of CVD Equipment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of CVD Equipment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lam Research and CVD Equipment's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than CVD Equipment.

Volatility & Risk

Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Lam Research and CVD Equipment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Lam Research presently has a consensus price target of $670.8095, suggesting a potential upside of 13.30%. Given Lam Research's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Lam Research is more favorable than CVD Equipment.

Profitability

This table compares Lam Research and CVD Equipment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lam Research beats CVD Equipment on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brooks Automation (NASDAQ:BRKS) and CVD Equipment (NASDAQ:CVV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Brooks Automation and CVD Equipment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Brooks Automation presently has a consensus target price of $91.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.78%. Given Brooks Automation's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brooks Automation is more favorable than CVD Equipment.

Profitability

This table compares Brooks Automation and CVD Equipment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Brooks Automation has a beta of 1.97, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.71, suggesting that its share price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Brooks Automation and CVD Equipment's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Brooks Automation has higher revenue and earnings than CVD Equipment.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.3% of Brooks Automation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of CVD Equipment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Brooks Automation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of CVD Equipment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brooks Automation beats CVD Equipment on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Axcelis Technologies (NASDAQ:ACLS) and CVD Equipment (NASDAQ:CVV) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Axcelis Technologies and CVD Equipment, as provided by MarketBeat.

Axcelis Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $47.3333, indicating a potential upside of 24.04%. Given Axcelis Technologies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Axcelis Technologies is more favorable than CVD Equipment.

Volatility & Risk

Axcelis Technologies has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Axcelis Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of CVD Equipment shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Axcelis Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of CVD Equipment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Axcelis Technologies and CVD Equipment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Axcelis Technologies and CVD Equipment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Axcelis Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than CVD Equipment.

Summary

Axcelis Technologies beats CVD Equipment on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

CVD Equipment (NASDAQ:CVV) and Veeco Instruments (NASDAQ:VECO) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for CVD Equipment and Veeco Instruments, as provided by MarketBeat.

Veeco Instruments has a consensus target price of $24.60, suggesting a potential upside of 10.41%. Given Veeco Instruments' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Veeco Instruments is more favorable than CVD Equipment.

Risk & Volatility

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.71, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Veeco Instruments has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CVD Equipment and Veeco Instruments' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CVD Equipment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Veeco Instruments.

Profitability

This table compares CVD Equipment and Veeco Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

11.7% of CVD Equipment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Veeco Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of CVD Equipment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Veeco Instruments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Veeco Instruments beats CVD Equipment on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

CVD Equipment (NASDAQ:CVV) and ACM Research (NASDAQ:ACMR) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for CVD Equipment and ACM Research, as reported by MarketBeat.

ACM Research has a consensus target price of $126.00, suggesting a potential upside of 95.80%. Given ACM Research's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ACM Research is more favorable than CVD Equipment.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CVD Equipment and ACM Research's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ACM Research has higher revenue and earnings than CVD Equipment.

Risk and Volatility

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ACM Research has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CVD Equipment and ACM Research's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

11.7% of CVD Equipment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.2% of ACM Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.4% of CVD Equipment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.0% of ACM Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ACM Research beats CVD Equipment on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.