Cyabra (CYAB) Competitors

Smith Micro Software has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cyabra has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Cyabra has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Smith Micro Software. Smith Micro Software is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cyabra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Smith Micro Software presently has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 382.63%. Cyabra has a consensus target price of $1.00, indicating a potential upside of 222.58%. Given Smith Micro Software's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Smith Micro Software is more favorable than Cyabra.

In the previous week, Cyabra had 1 more articles in the media than Smith Micro Software. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Cyabra and 1 mentions for Smith Micro Software. Cyabra's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Smith Micro Software's score of 0.21 indicating that Cyabra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cyabra has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Smith Micro Software's net margin of -165.35%. Cyabra's return on equity of 0.00% beat Smith Micro Software's return on equity.

20.8% of Smith Micro Software shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Cyabra shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Smith Micro Software shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 86.4% of Cyabra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alarum Technologies has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Cyabra's net margin of 0.00%. Alarum Technologies' return on equity of 17.11% beat Cyabra's return on equity.

Alarum Technologies has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cyabra has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Alarum Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Cyabra. Cyabra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alarum Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alarum Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 733.33%. Cyabra has a consensus target price of $1.00, indicating a potential upside of 222.58%. Given Alarum Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Alarum Technologies is more favorable than Cyabra.

3.2% of Alarum Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Cyabra shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Alarum Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 86.4% of Cyabra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alarum Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Cyabra. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alarum Technologies and 2 mentions for Cyabra. Cyabra's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Alarum Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Cyabra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

6.6% of Pintec Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Cyabra shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Pintec Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 86.4% of Cyabra shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pintec Technology has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cyabra has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Cyabra has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential upside of 222.58%. Given Cyabra's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cyabra is more favorable than Pintec Technology.

Pintec Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Cyabra.

In the previous week, Cyabra had 2 more articles in the media than Pintec Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Cyabra and 0 mentions for Pintec Technology. Cyabra's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Pintec Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Cyabra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cyabra has a net margin of 0.00% compared to authID's net margin of -616.91%. Cyabra's return on equity of 0.00% beat authID's return on equity.

Cyabra has higher earnings, but lower revenue than authID. authID is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cyabra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cyabra presently has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential upside of 222.58%. Given Cyabra's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cyabra is more favorable than authID.

77.1% of Cyabra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of authID shares are owned by institutional investors. 86.4% of Cyabra shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of authID shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cyabra and Cyabra both had 2 articles in the media. authID's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Cyabra's score of 0.40 indicating that authID is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cyabra has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, authID has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.