Free Trial

Tritium DCFC (DCFCQ) Competitors

DCFCQ vs. TSLA, TM, CMI, RACE, and GM

Should you buy Tritium DCFC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tritium DCFC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tritium DCFC include Tesla (TSLA), Toyota Motor (TM), Cummins (CMI), Ferrari (RACE), and General Motors (GM). These companies are all part of the "auto/tires/trucks" sector.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Tesla?

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$94.83B16.47$3.79B$1.09381.54
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A

Tesla has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Tesla's return on equity of 4.89% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tesla3.95% 4.89% 2.93%
Tritium DCFC N/A N/A N/A

Tesla has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tesla had 236 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 236 mentions for Tesla and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tesla Positive
Tritium DCFC Neutral

Tesla currently has a consensus target price of $395.20, suggesting a potential downside of 4.97%. Given Tritium DCFC's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tritium DCFC is more favorable than Tesla.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tesla
5 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.34
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

66.2% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tesla beats Tritium DCFC on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Toyota Motor?

Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Toyota Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Toyota Motor$336.70B0.71$25.40B$19.589.34
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A

Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

1.5% of Toyota Motor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Toyota Motor's return on equity of 9.74% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Toyota Motor7.59% 9.74% 3.82%
Tritium DCFC N/A N/A N/A

Toyota Motor presently has a consensus price target of $290.00, suggesting a potential upside of 58.55%. Given Toyota Motor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Toyota Motor is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Toyota Motor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Toyota Motor had 12 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Toyota Motor and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Toyota Motor's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Toyota Motor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Toyota Motor Neutral
Tritium DCFC Neutral

Summary

Toyota Motor beats Tritium DCFC on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Cummins?

Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) and Cummins (NYSE:CMI) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cummins has a consensus target price of $705.79, indicating a potential upside of 9.57%. Given Cummins' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cummins is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A
Cummins$33.67B2.64$2.84B$19.2733.43

In the previous week, Cummins had 22 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Cummins and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tritium DCFC Neutral
Cummins Positive

Cummins has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tritium DCFCN/A N/A N/A
Cummins 7.89%25.25%9.77%

Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cummins beats Tritium DCFC on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Ferrari?

Ferrari (NYSE:RACE) and Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Ferrari has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferrari$8.08B10.11$1.81B$10.4233.51
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A

In the previous week, Ferrari had 60 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Ferrari and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Tritium DCFC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ferrari's score of -0.05 indicating that Tritium DCFC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ferrari Neutral
Tritium DCFC Neutral

Ferrari has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Ferrari's return on equity of 42.13% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferrari22.22% 42.13% 16.52%
Tritium DCFC N/A N/A N/A

Ferrari presently has a consensus price target of $469.06, suggesting a potential upside of 34.33%. Given Ferrari's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ferrari is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferrari
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ferrari has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ferrari beats Tritium DCFC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to General Motors?

General Motors (NYSE:GM) and Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

General Motors currently has a consensus target price of $95.65, suggesting a potential upside of 15.68%. Given General Motors' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe General Motors is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
General Motors
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, General Motors had 72 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 72 mentions for General Motors and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. General Motors' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that General Motors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
General Motors Positive
Tritium DCFC Neutral

General Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
General Motors$185.02B0.40$2.70B$2.4833.34
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A

General Motors has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. General Motors' return on equity of 16.68% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
General Motors1.38% 16.68% 3.87%
Tritium DCFC N/A N/A N/A

92.7% of General Motors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of General Motors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

General Motors has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

General Motors beats Tritium DCFC on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tritium DCFC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DCFCQ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DCFCQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DCFCQ vs. The Competition

MetricTritium DCFCtransportation equipment IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market CapN/A$1.49M$22.14B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A2.47%5.22%
P/E RatioN/AN/A20.4326.63
Price / SalesN/AN/A19.79114.76
Price / CashN/AN/A12.2037.60
Price / BookN/AN/A3.646.88
Net Income-$121.37MN/A$335.44M$336.73M

Tritium DCFC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DCFCQ
Tritium DCFC
N/AN/AN/AN/A$0.00$184.54MN/A818
TSLA
Tesla
3.0087 of 5 stars
$404.11
-1.4%
$395.20
-2.2%
+24.8%$1.52T$94.83B370.74134,785
TM
Toyota Motor
4.9673 of 5 stars
$185.29
-1.1%
$290.00
+56.5%
-0.4%$241.49B$50.68T9.46383,853
CMI
Cummins
4.8263 of 5 stars
$658.67
-2.8%
$677.87
+2.9%
+101.5%$90.89B$33.67B34.1867,400
RACE
Ferrari
4.3327 of 5 stars
$329.52
+1.5%
$469.06
+42.3%
-28.8%$77.09B$8.08B31.625,718

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) was last updated on 6/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners