Go Pro

Tritium DCFC (DCFCQ) Competitors

DCFCQ vs. TSLA, TM, CMI, RACE, and GM

Should you buy Tritium DCFC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tritium DCFC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tritium DCFC include Tesla (TSLA), Toyota Motor (TM), Cummins (CMI), Ferrari (RACE), and General Motors (GM). These companies are all part of the "auto/tires/trucks" sector.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Tesla?

Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) and Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Tesla had 233 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 233 mentions for Tesla and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tritium DCFC Neutral
Tesla Positive

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A
Tesla$94.83B16.15$3.79B$1.09374.09

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.2% of Tesla shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Tesla shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $406.87, indicating a potential downside of 0.22%. Given Tritium DCFC's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Tritium DCFC is more favorable than Tesla.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tesla
4 Sell rating(s)
21 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

Tesla has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Tesla's return on equity of 4.89% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tritium DCFCN/A N/A N/A
Tesla 3.95%4.89%2.93%

Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tesla has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tesla beats Tritium DCFC on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Toyota Motor?

Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) and Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Toyota Motor had 14 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Toyota Motor and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Toyota Motor's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Toyota Motor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tritium DCFC Neutral
Toyota Motor Neutral

Toyota Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A
Toyota Motor$336.70B0.68$25.40B$19.589.01

Toyota Motor has a consensus price target of $290.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.38%. Given Toyota Motor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Toyota Motor is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Toyota Motor
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Toyota Motor shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Toyota Motor's return on equity of 9.74% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tritium DCFCN/A N/A N/A
Toyota Motor 7.59%9.74%3.82%

Summary

Toyota Motor beats Tritium DCFC on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Cummins?

Cummins (NYSE:CMI) and Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cummins$33.89B2.76$2.84B$19.2735.13
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A

Cummins has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Cummins presently has a consensus price target of $738.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Cummins' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cummins is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Cummins has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cummins7.89% 25.25% 9.77%
Tritium DCFC N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Cummins had 18 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cummins and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cummins Positive
Tritium DCFC Neutral

83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cummins beats Tritium DCFC on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to Ferrari?

Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) and Ferrari (NYSE:RACE) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Ferrari had 42 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ferrari and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. Ferrari's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that Ferrari is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tritium DCFC Neutral
Ferrari Neutral

Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferrari has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Ferrari has a consensus target price of $471.97, suggesting a potential upside of 25.27%. Given Ferrari's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferrari is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferrari
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

Ferrari has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. Ferrari's return on equity of 42.13% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tritium DCFCN/A N/A N/A
Ferrari 22.22%42.13%16.52%

Ferrari has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A
Ferrari$7.20B12.24$1.81B$10.4236.16

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ferrari beats Tritium DCFC on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tritium DCFC compare to General Motors?

Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) and General Motors (NYSE:GM) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, General Motors had 45 more articles in the media than Tritium DCFC. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for General Motors and 0 mentions for Tritium DCFC. General Motors' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Tritium DCFC's score of 0.00 indicating that General Motors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tritium DCFC Neutral
General Motors Positive

Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, General Motors has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of General Motors shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of General Motors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

General Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Tritium DCFC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A
General Motors$185.02B0.38$2.70B$2.4831.43

General Motors has a consensus price target of $97.32, suggesting a potential upside of 24.87%. Given General Motors' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe General Motors is more favorable than Tritium DCFC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tritium DCFC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
General Motors
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

General Motors has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Tritium DCFC's net margin of 0.00%. General Motors' return on equity of 16.68% beat Tritium DCFC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tritium DCFCN/A N/A N/A
General Motors 1.38%16.68%3.87%

Summary

General Motors beats Tritium DCFC on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tritium DCFC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DCFCQ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DCFCQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DCFCQ vs. The Competition

MetricTritium DCFCtransportation equipment IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market CapN/A$1.49M$21.56B$12.66B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A2.60%8.00%
P/E RatioN/AN/A18.9624.53
Price / SalesN/AN/A15.2896.17
Price / CashN/AN/A11.5060.03
Price / BookN/AN/A3.166.38
Net Income-$121.37MN/A$332.91M$331.87M

Tritium DCFC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DCFCQ
Tritium DCFC
N/AN/AN/AN/A$0.00$184.54MN/A818
TSLA
Tesla
2.7015 of 5 stars
$402.90
-4.0%
$408.52
+1.4%
+30.1%$1.58T$94.83B369.63134,785
TM
Toyota Motor
4.8334 of 5 stars
$179.59
-0.1%
$290.00
+61.5%
+3.6%$234.34B$336.70B9.17390,927
CMI
Cummins
4.8673 of 5 stars
$659.87
-2.7%
$738.00
+11.8%
+99.8%$93.59B$33.67B34.2467,400
RACE
Ferrari
4.6338 of 5 stars
$387.45
-1.1%
$471.97
+21.8%
-23.2%$91.67B$8.08B37.185,718

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners