Which has higher earnings and valuation, GOLF or BC?

Acushnet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Acushnet $2.56B 1.96 $188.54M $3.67 23.46 Brunswick $5.63B 0.83 -$137.30M -$1.31 N/A

Is GOLF or BC more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Brunswick's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60% Brunswick -1.53% 15.28% 4.60%

Does the media refer more to GOLF or BC?

In the previous week, Brunswick had 4 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Brunswick and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Acushnet's score of 1.55 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Acushnet 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Brunswick 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HAS or GOLF?

Acushnet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hasbro $4.70B 2.78 -$322.40M $5.56 16.65 Acushnet $2.56B 1.96 $188.54M $3.67 23.46

Is HAS or GOLF more profitable?

Hasbro has a net margin of 15.97% compared to Acushnet's net margin of 8.12%. Hasbro's return on equity of 141.11% beat Acushnet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hasbro 15.97% 141.11% 14.72% Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60%

Does the media favor HAS or GOLF?

In the previous week, Hasbro had 13 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Hasbro and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Hasbro's score of 1.02 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hasbro 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Acushnet 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, GOLF or DOO?

BRP has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Acushnet $2.56B 1.96 $188.54M $3.67 23.46 BRP $6.06B 0.76 $209.49M $2.65 23.78

Is GOLF or DOO more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 3.01%. BRP's return on equity of 81.22% beat Acushnet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60% BRP 3.01% 81.22% 7.48%

Does the media favor GOLF or DOO?

In the previous week, BRP had 3 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for BRP and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat BRP's score of 0.16 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Acushnet 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive BRP 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GOLF or DOOO?

Acushnet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BRP. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Acushnet $2.56B 1.96 $188.54M $3.67 23.46 BRP $8.03B 0.58 -$154.60M $0.37 171.08

Is GOLF or DOOO more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 0.45%. BRP's return on equity of 67.30% beat Acushnet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60% BRP 0.45% 67.30% 4.72%

Does the media refer more to GOLF or DOOO?

In the previous week, Acushnet had 5 more articles in the media than BRP. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Acushnet and 1 mentions for BRP. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat BRP's score of 0.00 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Acushnet 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive BRP 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, MAT or GOLF?

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Mattel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mattel $5.35B 0.76 $397.58M $1.36 10.51 Acushnet $2.56B 1.96 $188.54M $3.67 23.46

Is MAT or GOLF more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Mattel's net margin of 7.79%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Mattel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mattel 7.79% 16.20% 5.37% Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60%

Does the media refer more to MAT or GOLF?

In the previous week, Mattel had 7 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Mattel and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Mattel's score of 1.01 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mattel 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Acushnet 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Acushnet (GOLF) Competitors

$86.08 -0.79 (-0.91%)

As of 01:21 PM Eastern

Compare

GOLF vs. BC, HAS, DOO, DOOO, and MAT

Should you buy Acushnet stock or one of its competitors? Acushnet's main competitors and comparable companies include Brunswick (BC), Hasbro (HAS), BRP (DOO), BRP (DOOO), and Mattel (MAT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "leisure products" industry.

How does Acushnet compare to Brunswick?

Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%

53.1% of Acushnet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Acushnet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.96	$188.54M	$3.67	23.46
Brunswick	$5.63B	0.83	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A

Acushnet has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acushnet has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 4 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Brunswick and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Acushnet's score of 1.55 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Acushnet	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Brunswick	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Acushnet presently has a consensus target price of $99.17, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.06%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Brunswick beats Acushnet on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to Hasbro?

Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) and Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Hasbro currently has a consensus target price of $109.43, indicating a potential upside of 18.20%. Acushnet has a consensus target price of $99.17, indicating a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Hasbro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Hasbro is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hasbro	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Acushnet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hasbro	$4.70B	2.78	-$322.40M	$5.56	16.65
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.96	$188.54M	$3.67	23.46

In the previous week, Hasbro had 13 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Hasbro and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Hasbro's score of 1.02 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hasbro	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Acushnet	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

91.8% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.1% of Acushnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Hasbro shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.3% of Acushnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hasbro has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acushnet has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Hasbro has a net margin of 15.97% compared to Acushnet's net margin of 8.12%. Hasbro's return on equity of 141.11% beat Acushnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hasbro	15.97%	141.11%	14.72%
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%

Hasbro pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Hasbro pays out 50.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acushnet has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Summary

Hasbro beats Acushnet on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to BRP?

Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOO) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. BRP pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BRP pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acushnet has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Acushnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 3.01%. BRP's return on equity of 81.22% beat Acushnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%
BRP	3.01%	81.22%	7.48%

BRP has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.96	$188.54M	$3.67	23.46
BRP	$6.06B	0.76	$209.49M	$2.65	23.78

Acushnet has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Acushnet currently has a consensus price target of $99.17, indicating a potential upside of 15.20%. BRP has a consensus price target of $83.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.71%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BRP is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
BRP	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36

53.1% of Acushnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BRP had 3 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for BRP and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat BRP's score of 0.16 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Acushnet	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
BRP	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

BRP beats Acushnet on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to BRP?

Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 0.45%. BRP's return on equity of 67.30% beat Acushnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%
BRP	0.45%	67.30%	4.72%

Acushnet presently has a consensus price target of $99.17, indicating a potential upside of 15.20%. BRP has a consensus price target of $91.33, indicating a potential upside of 44.29%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BRP is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
BRP	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

53.1% of Acushnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Acushnet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BRP. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.96	$188.54M	$3.67	23.46
BRP	$8.03B	0.58	-$154.60M	$0.37	171.08

In the previous week, Acushnet had 5 more articles in the media than BRP. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Acushnet and 1 mentions for BRP. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat BRP's score of 0.00 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Acushnet	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
BRP	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Acushnet has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. BRP pays an annual dividend of $0.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BRP pays out 164.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acushnet has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and BRP has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Acushnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Acushnet beats BRP on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to Mattel?

Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) and Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Mattel's net margin of 7.79%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Mattel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mattel	7.79%	16.20%	5.37%
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%

Mattel presently has a consensus target price of $17.80, suggesting a potential upside of 24.52%. Acushnet has a consensus target price of $99.17, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Mattel's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mattel is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mattel	3 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

In the previous week, Mattel had 7 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Mattel and 6 mentions for Acushnet. Acushnet's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Mattel's score of 1.01 indicating that Acushnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mattel	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Acushnet	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Mattel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mattel	$5.35B	0.76	$397.58M	$1.36	10.51
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.96	$188.54M	$3.67	23.46

Mattel has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acushnet has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

97.2% of Mattel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.1% of Acushnet shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Mattel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.3% of Acushnet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Acushnet beats Mattel on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Acushnet News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GOLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GOLF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Acushnet	Leisure Products Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.03B	$3.16B	$12.98B	$23.60B
Dividend Yield	1.19%	2.50%	50.03%	3.75%
P/E Ratio	23.46	593.54	46.77	29.36
Price / Sales	1.96	37.14	92.06	16.80
Price / Cash	19.19	18.58	28.78	31.92
Price / Book	5.43	3.27	5.77	7.60
Net Income	$188.54M	$81.88M	$445.07M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.19%	-1.88%	-0.96%	-0.58%
1 Month Performance	-15.67%	-1.12%	-1.69%	0.67%
1 Year Performance	15.42%	-3.00%	-2.88%	13.92%

Acushnet Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GOLF Acushnet	4.0653 of 5 stars	$86.08 -0.9%	$99.17 +15.2%	+16.3%	$5.03B	$2.56B	23.46	7,300	Positive News
BC Brunswick	4.5697 of 5 stars	$81.31 +0.6%	$88.00 +8.2%	+17.6%	$5.24B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Positive News
HAS Hasbro	4.8017 of 5 stars	$95.41 +2.0%	$109.43 +14.7%	+17.2%	$13.19B	$4.70B	17.16	4,520	Positive News Insider Trade
DOO BRP	4.8198 of 5 stars	$63.77 -6.3%	$83.00 +30.2%	N/A	$4.99B	$6.06B	24.06	17,000	News Coverage Gap Up
DOOO BRP	N/A	$68.04 +1.9%	$94.75 +39.3%	-7.5%	$4.97B	$8.03B	183.89	16,500	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GOLF) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Acushnet (GOLF) Competitors