Which has higher earnings and valuation, HAS or GOLF?

Acushnet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hasbro $4.70B 2.88 -$322.40M $5.56 17.26 Acushnet $2.56B 1.86 $188.54M $3.67 22.18

Is HAS or GOLF more profitable?

Hasbro has a net margin of 15.97% compared to Acushnet's net margin of 8.12%. Hasbro's return on equity of 141.11% beat Acushnet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hasbro 15.97% 141.11% 14.72% Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60%

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GOLF or MAT?

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Mattel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Acushnet $2.56B 1.86 $188.54M $3.67 22.18 Mattel $5.35B 0.90 $397.58M $1.36 12.35

Is GOLF or MAT more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Mattel's net margin of 7.79%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Mattel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60% Mattel 7.79% 16.20% 5.37%

Which has better valuation & earnings, GOLF or BC?

Acushnet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Acushnet $2.56B 1.86 $188.54M $3.67 22.18 Brunswick $5.36B 0.76 -$137.30M -$1.31 N/A

Is GOLF or BC more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Brunswick's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60% Brunswick -1.53% 15.28% 4.60%

Which has better earnings and valuation, DOOO or GOLF?

Acushnet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BRP. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio BRP $8.03B 0.48 -$154.60M $0.37 141.62 Acushnet $2.56B 1.86 $188.54M $3.67 22.18

Is DOOO or GOLF more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 0.45%. BRP's return on equity of 67.30% beat Acushnet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets BRP 0.45% 67.30% 4.72% Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60%

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GOLF or DOO?

BRP has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Acushnet $2.56B 1.86 $188.54M $3.67 22.18 BRP $6.06B 0.62 $209.49M $1.10 48.23

Is GOLF or DOO more profitable?

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 1.24%. BRP's return on equity of 72.91% beat Acushnet's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acushnet 8.12% 27.98% 9.60% BRP 1.24% 72.91% 6.20%

Acushnet (GOLF) Competitors

$81.39 +0.91 (+1.13%)

Closing price 10/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$81.31 -0.08 (-0.10%)

As of 10/13/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

GOLF vs. HAS, MAT, BC, DOOO, and DOO

Should you buy Acushnet stock or one of its competitors? Acushnet's main competitors and comparable companies include Hasbro (HAS), Mattel (MAT), Brunswick (BC), BRP (DOOO), and BRP (DOO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "leisure products" industry.

How does Acushnet compare to Hasbro?

Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) and Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Hasbro pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Hasbro pays out 50.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acushnet has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

91.8% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.1% of Acushnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Hasbro shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.3% of Acushnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Acushnet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hasbro	$4.70B	2.88	-$322.40M	$5.56	17.26
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.86	$188.54M	$3.67	22.18

Hasbro presently has a consensus price target of $110.64, suggesting a potential upside of 15.33%. Acushnet has a consensus price target of $97.57, suggesting a potential upside of 19.88%. Given Acushnet's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acushnet is more favorable than Hasbro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hasbro	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

In the previous week, Hasbro had 24 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Hasbro and 0 mentions for Acushnet. Hasbro's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Acushnet's score of 0.00 indicating that Hasbro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hasbro	Neutral
Acushnet	Neutral

Hasbro has a net margin of 15.97% compared to Acushnet's net margin of 8.12%. Hasbro's return on equity of 141.11% beat Acushnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hasbro	15.97%	141.11%	14.72%
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%

Hasbro has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acushnet has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hasbro beats Acushnet on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to Mattel?

Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) and Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Mattel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.86	$188.54M	$3.67	22.18
Mattel	$5.35B	0.90	$397.58M	$1.36	12.35

Acushnet has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattel has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Acushnet presently has a consensus price target of $97.57, indicating a potential upside of 19.88%. Mattel has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.14%. Given Acushnet's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Acushnet is more favorable than Mattel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
Mattel	3 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

In the previous week, Mattel had 24 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Mattel and 0 mentions for Acushnet. Mattel's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Acushnet's score of 0.00 indicating that Mattel is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Acushnet	Neutral
Mattel	Neutral

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Mattel's net margin of 7.79%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Mattel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%
Mattel	7.79%	16.20%	5.37%

53.1% of Acushnet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Mattel shares are held by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mattel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Acushnet beats Mattel on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to Brunswick?

Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Acushnet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acushnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.86	$188.54M	$3.67	22.18
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.76	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A

53.1% of Acushnet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 4 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brunswick and 0 mentions for Acushnet. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Acushnet's score of 0.00 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Acushnet	Neutral
Brunswick	Positive

Acushnet has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Acushnet's return on equity of 27.98% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%

Acushnet currently has a consensus target price of $97.57, indicating a potential upside of 19.88%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.78%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acushnet has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Brunswick beats Acushnet on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to BRP?

BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) and Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

BRP has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acushnet has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 0.45%. BRP's return on equity of 67.30% beat Acushnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BRP	0.45%	67.30%	4.72%
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%

53.1% of Acushnet shares are held by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Acushnet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BRP. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BRP	$8.03B	0.48	-$154.60M	$0.37	141.62
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.86	$188.54M	$3.67	22.18

BRP pays an annual dividend of $0.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. BRP pays out 164.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BRP has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Acushnet has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Acushnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

BRP currently has a consensus price target of $131.00, suggesting a potential upside of 150.00%. Acushnet has a consensus price target of $97.57, suggesting a potential upside of 19.88%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe BRP is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
BRP	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

In the previous week, BRP's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Acushnet'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
BRP	Neutral
Acushnet	Neutral

Summary

Acushnet beats BRP on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acushnet compare to BRP?

Acushnet (NYSE:GOLF) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOO) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, BRP had 6 more articles in the media than Acushnet. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for BRP and 0 mentions for Acushnet. BRP's average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat Acushnet's score of 0.00 indicating that BRP is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Acushnet	Neutral
BRP	Neutral

53.1% of Acushnet shares are held by institutional investors. 53.3% of Acushnet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Acushnet currently has a consensus target price of $97.57, indicating a potential upside of 19.88%. BRP has a consensus target price of $84.00, indicating a potential upside of 58.34%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BRP is more favorable than Acushnet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acushnet	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
BRP	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36

Acushnet has a net margin of 8.12% compared to BRP's net margin of 1.24%. BRP's return on equity of 72.91% beat Acushnet's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acushnet	8.12%	27.98%	9.60%
BRP	1.24%	72.91%	6.20%

Acushnet pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. BRP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Acushnet pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BRP pays out 65.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acushnet has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Acushnet has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

BRP has higher revenue and earnings than Acushnet. Acushnet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acushnet	$2.56B	1.86	$188.54M	$3.67	22.18
BRP	$6.06B	0.62	$209.49M	$1.10	48.23

Summary

BRP beats Acushnet on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Acushnet News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GOLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GOLF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Acushnet	Leisure Products Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.70B	$3.01B	$12.52B	$23.13B
Dividend Yield	1.27%	2.62%	87.68%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	20.38	520.59	41.99	22.30
Price / Sales	1.86	36.89	85.58	21.54
Price / Cash	17.98	18.68	31.65	37.05
Price / Book	6.09	3.33	3.98	4.73
Net Income	$188.54M	$79.35M	$443.94M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.18%	-0.90%	0.15%	0.52%
1 Month Performance	-3.70%	-3.40%	-2.54%	-3.15%
1 Year Performance	0.05%	-5.40%	-5.29%	6.80%

Acushnet Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GOLF Acushnet	2.9988 of 5 stars	$81.39 +1.1%	$97.57 +19.9%	+1.8%	$4.70B	$2.56B	20.38	7,300
HAS Hasbro	3.8728 of 5 stars	$92.38 +3.2%	$109.50 +18.5%	+32.5%	$12.63B	$4.97B	16.62	4,520	Trending News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
MAT Mattel	3.3639 of 5 stars	$16.05 +5.1%	$17.80 +10.9%	-2.9%	$4.36B	$5.49B	11.80	31,000	Analyst Upgrade High Trading Volume
BC Brunswick	3.8947 of 5 stars	$64.96 -0.7%	$88.00 +35.5%	+3.7%	$4.24B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000
DOOO BRP	N/A	$56.01 +2.5%	$131.00 +133.9%	-19.6%	$4.09B	$8.03B	151.36	16,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GOLF) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Acushnet (GOLF) Competitors