Go Pro

Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

Expeditors International of Washington logo
$192.65 +3.33 (+1.76%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$192.58 -0.07 (-0.04%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

EXPD vs. ARCB, CHRW, LSTR, ODFL, and MATX

Should you buy Expeditors International of Washington stock or one of its competitors? Expeditors International of Washington's main competitors and comparable companies include ArcBest (ARCB), C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW), Landstar System (LSTR), Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), and Matson (MATX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to ArcBest?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and ArcBest (NASDAQ:ARCB) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ArcBest has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington currently has a consensus price target of $168.78, suggesting a potential downside of 12.39%. ArcBest has a consensus price target of $154.23, suggesting a potential upside of 14.36%. Given ArcBest's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ArcBest is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
ArcBest
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. ArcBest pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ArcBest pays out 69.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to ArcBest's net margin of 0.39%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat ArcBest's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington7.64% 36.16% 16.88%
ArcBest 0.39%7.92%4.15%

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of ArcBest shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of ArcBest shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 7 more articles in the media than ArcBest. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 7 mentions for ArcBest. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat ArcBest's score of 1.17 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ArcBest
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than ArcBest. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ArcBest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington$12.04B2.08$752.88M$6.8728.04
ArcBest$4.01B0.75$60.10M$0.69195.45

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats ArcBest on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to C.H. Robinson Worldwide?

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW) and Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.73%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 38.36% beat Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
C.H. Robinson Worldwide3.73% 38.36% 12.63%
Expeditors International of Washington 7.64%36.16%16.88%

Expeditors International of Washington has lower revenue, but higher earnings than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
C.H. Robinson Worldwide$17.00B1.05$587.08M$5.2429.16
Expeditors International of Washington$12.04B2.08$752.88M$6.8728.04

C.H. Robinson Worldwide currently has a consensus price target of $196.56, indicating a potential upside of 28.66%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $168.78, indicating a potential downside of 12.39%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72
Expeditors International of Washington
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23

In the previous week, C.H. Robinson Worldwide had 6 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide and 14 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's score of 0.94 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
10 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Expeditors International of Washington
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats C.H. Robinson Worldwide on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Landstar System?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and Landstar System (NASDAQ:LSTR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus price target of $168.78, indicating a potential downside of 12.39%. Landstar System has a consensus price target of $196.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Given Landstar System's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Landstar System is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Landstar System
2 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.18

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landstar System has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Landstar System shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Landstar System shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Landstar System pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Landstar System pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Landstar System has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington$12.04B2.08$752.88M$6.8728.04
Landstar System$4.98B1.18$115.01M$3.8644.76

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 2.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Landstar System's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington7.64% 36.16% 16.88%
Landstar System 2.64%20.84%10.42%

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 10 more articles in the media than Landstar System. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 4 mentions for Landstar System. Landstar System's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Expeditors International of Washington's score of 1.50 indicating that Landstar System is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Landstar System
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats Landstar System on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Old Dominion Freight Line?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and Old Dominion Freight Line (NASDAQ:ODFL) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 19.44% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington7.64% 36.16% 16.88%
Old Dominion Freight Line 19.44%24.87%19.47%

In the previous week, Old Dominion Freight Line had 4 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line and 14 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 1.28 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Old Dominion Freight Line
10 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Old Dominion Freight Line has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington$12.04B2.08$752.88M$6.8728.04
Old Dominion Freight Line$5.60B6.65$1.02B$5.1934.64

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus target price of $168.78, suggesting a potential downside of 12.39%. Old Dominion Freight Line has a consensus target price of $227.65, suggesting a potential upside of 26.62%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Old Dominion Freight Line
2 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Old Dominion Freight Line has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Old Dominion Freight Line beats Expeditors International of Washington on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Matson?

Matson (NYSE:MATX) and Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Matson currently has a consensus price target of $232.33, indicating a potential upside of 0.94%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $168.78, indicating a potential downside of 12.39%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matson is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20
Expeditors International of Washington
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23

Matson pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Matson pays out 10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matson has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 11 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 3 mentions for Matson. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Matson's score of 0.90 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matson
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Expeditors International of Washington
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Matson has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Matson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matson13.41% 16.94% 10.01%
Expeditors International of Washington 7.64%36.16%16.88%

84.8% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Matson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matson has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expeditors International of Washington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matson$3.34B2.06$444.80M$14.9615.39
Expeditors International of Washington$12.04B2.08$752.88M$6.8728.04

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats Matson on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Expeditors International of Washington News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EXPD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EXPD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EXPD vs. The Competition

MetricExpeditors International of WashingtonAir Freight & Logistics IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$24.61B$9.41B$10.21B$12.73B
Dividend Yield0.86%3.10%97.17%11.15%
P/E Ratio33.6811.5725.7625.29
Price / Sales2.0810.07459.5099.10
Price / Cash18.8424.0523.7151.44
Price / Book12.122.084.846.20
Net Income$752.88M$624.60M$612.22M$358.50M
7 Day Performance2.15%-0.61%-1.55%-2.35%
1 Month Performance4.68%-5.85%-3.84%-2.77%
1 Year Performance55.86%-13.41%6.35%7.64%

Expeditors International of Washington Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
2.5684 of 5 stars
$192.65
+1.8%
$168.78
-12.4%
+56.1%$24.61B$12.04B33.6819,800
ARCB
ArcBest
4.1924 of 5 stars
$137.97
+1.0%
$154.23
+11.8%
+83.9%$3.05B$4.01B199.9614,000
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
4.9474 of 5 stars
$149.66
-0.5%
$197.00
+31.6%
+16.6%$17.57B$16.23B28.5611,855
LSTR
Landstar System
4.3748 of 5 stars
$180.63
+0.3%
$196.00
+8.5%
+30.5%$6.11B$4.74B46.801,378
ODFL
Old Dominion Freight Line
4.642 of 5 stars
$199.96
+0.7%
$226.55
+13.3%
+20.3%$41.19B$5.50B38.5320,591

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:EXPD) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners