Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

C.H. Robinson Worldwide currently has a consensus target price of $196.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.25%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus target price of $142.22, indicating a potential downside of 18.94%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

In the previous week, C.H. Robinson Worldwide had 1 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide and 8 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Expeditors International of Washington's score of 1.14 indicating that C.H. Robinson Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Expeditors International of Washington has lower revenue, but higher earnings than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 51.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.70%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity.

93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.0% of Landstar System shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Landstar System shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Landstar System had 1 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Landstar System and 8 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Landstar System's score of 0.50 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Landstar System pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Landstar System pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Landstar System has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landstar System has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus price target of $142.22, indicating a potential downside of 18.94%. Landstar System has a consensus price target of $190.09, indicating a potential downside of 10.70%. Given Landstar System's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Landstar System is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 2.62%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Landstar System's return on equity.

Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Dominion Freight Line has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Old Dominion Freight Line had 5 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line and 8 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 1.12 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Old Dominion Freight Line currently has a consensus target price of $220.74, indicating a potential downside of 5.22%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus target price of $142.22, indicating a potential downside of 18.94%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 18.46% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity.

Matson has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Matson's return on equity.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expeditors International of Washington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 1 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 7 mentions for Matson. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Matson's score of 1.03 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

84.8% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Matson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Matson has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Matson currently has a consensus price target of $181.25, indicating a potential downside of 11.56%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $142.22, indicating a potential downside of 18.94%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Matson is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Matson pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Matson pays out 10.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matson has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.