Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher earnings, but lower revenue than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and C.H. Robinson Worldwide has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 4 more articles in the media than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 9 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's score of 0.56 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Expeditors International of Washington currently has a consensus target price of $173.09, suggesting a potential downside of 9.96%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus target price of $196.56, suggesting a potential upside of 24.78%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.73%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 38.36% beat Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity.

98.0% of Landstar System shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Landstar System shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Landstar System presently has a consensus price target of $196.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.23%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $173.09, indicating a potential downside of 9.96%. Given Landstar System's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Landstar System is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 2.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Landstar System's return on equity.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Landstar System pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Landstar System pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Landstar System has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 11 more articles in the media than Landstar System. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 2 mentions for Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Landstar System's score of 0.00 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 4 more articles in the media than Old Dominion Freight Line. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 9 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 0.26 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Dominion Freight Line has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 19.44% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity.

Old Dominion Freight Line presently has a consensus price target of $226.35, indicating a potential upside of 24.63%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $173.09, indicating a potential downside of 9.96%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Old Dominion Freight Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matson has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Matson presently has a consensus price target of $239.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.65%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $173.09, suggesting a potential downside of 9.96%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Matson is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 8 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 5 mentions for Matson. Matson's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Expeditors International of Washington's score of 0.64 indicating that Matson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expeditors International of Washington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

84.8% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Matson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Matson has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Matson's return on equity.

Matson pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Matson pays out 10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matson has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.