Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

$155.68 +1.26 (+0.81%)

Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$155.80 +0.12 (+0.08%)

As of 08:05 AM Eastern

EXPD vs. ARCB, CHRW, LSTR, ODFL, and MATX

Should you buy Expeditors International of Washington stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Expeditors International of Washington with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Expeditors International of Washington include ArcBest (ARCB), C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW), Landstar System (LSTR), Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), and Matson (MATX). These companies are all part of the "transportation" sector.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to ArcBest?

ArcBest (NASDAQ:ARCB) and Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

ArcBest has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 10 more articles in the media than ArcBest. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 6 mentions for ArcBest. ArcBest's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Expeditors International of Washington's score of 0.90 indicating that ArcBest is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ArcBest	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Expeditors International of Washington	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to ArcBest's net margin of 1.38%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat ArcBest's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ArcBest	1.38%	6.15%	3.24%
Expeditors International of Washington	7.64%	36.16%	16.88%

99.3% of ArcBest shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of ArcBest shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ArcBest currently has a consensus price target of $123.42, suggesting a potential upside of 10.71%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $137.30, suggesting a potential downside of 11.81%. Given ArcBest's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ArcBest is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ArcBest	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Expeditors International of Washington	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than ArcBest. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ArcBest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ArcBest	$4.04B	0.61	$60.10M	$2.43	45.88
Expeditors International of Washington	$11.19B	1.82	$752.88M	$6.18	25.19

ArcBest pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. ArcBest pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats ArcBest on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to C.H. Robinson Worldwide?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington and Expeditors International of Washington both had 16 articles in the media. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Expeditors International of Washington's score of 0.90 indicating that C.H. Robinson Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
C.H. Robinson Worldwide	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.70%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington	7.64%	36.16%	16.88%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide	3.70%	35.49%	12.25%

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Expeditors International of Washington currently has a consensus price target of $137.30, suggesting a potential downside of 11.81%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $192.27, suggesting a potential upside of 17.77%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
C.H. Robinson Worldwide	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

Expeditors International of Washington has higher earnings, but lower revenue than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington	$11.19B	1.82	$752.88M	$6.18	25.19
C.H. Robinson Worldwide	$16.23B	1.19	$587.08M	$4.94	33.05

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 51.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and C.H. Robinson Worldwide has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats C.H. Robinson Worldwide on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Landstar System?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and Landstar System (NASDAQ:LSTR) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 1 more articles in the media than Landstar System. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 15 mentions for Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Landstar System's score of 0.61 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Landstar System	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landstar System has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Landstar System pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Landstar System pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Landstar System has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington	$11.19B	1.82	$752.88M	$6.18	25.19
Landstar System	$4.74B	1.25	$115.01M	$3.62	48.34

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 2.62%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Landstar System's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington	7.64%	36.16%	16.88%
Landstar System	2.62%	19.49%	10.06%

Expeditors International of Washington currently has a consensus price target of $137.30, suggesting a potential downside of 11.81%. Landstar System has a consensus price target of $179.36, suggesting a potential upside of 2.50%. Given Landstar System's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Landstar System is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Landstar System	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.0% of Landstar System shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Landstar System shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats Landstar System on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Old Dominion Freight Line?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and Old Dominion Freight Line (NASDAQ:ODFL) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Old Dominion Freight Line has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 18.46% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington	7.64%	36.16%	16.88%
Old Dominion Freight Line	18.46%	23.42%	18.15%

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Old Dominion Freight Line has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington	$11.19B	1.82	$752.88M	$6.18	25.19
Old Dominion Freight Line	$5.50B	7.16	$1.02B	$4.78	39.58

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus target price of $137.30, suggesting a potential downside of 11.81%. Old Dominion Freight Line has a consensus target price of $206.29, suggesting a potential upside of 9.05%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Old Dominion Freight Line	2 Sell rating(s)	16 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.23

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 3 more articles in the media than Old Dominion Freight Line. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 13 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 0.86 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Old Dominion Freight Line	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Old Dominion Freight Line beats Expeditors International of Washington on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Matson?

Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) and Matson (NYSE:MATX) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 8 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 8 mentions for Matson. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Matson's score of -0.38 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Expeditors International of Washington	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Matson	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus target price of $137.30, suggesting a potential downside of 11.81%. Matson has a consensus target price of $181.25, suggesting a potential downside of 0.10%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matson is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Expeditors International of Washington	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Matson	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Matson has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Matson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Expeditors International of Washington	7.64%	36.16%	16.88%
Matson	12.92%	15.90%	9.38%

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matson has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Matson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expeditors International of Washington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Expeditors International of Washington	$11.19B	1.82	$752.88M	$6.18	25.19
Matson	$3.32B	1.65	$444.80M	$13.61	13.33

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Matson pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matson pays out 10.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Matson has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Expeditors International of Washington beats Matson on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Expeditors International of Washington News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EXPD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EXPD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Expeditors International of Washington	Freight transportation arrangement Industry	Transportation Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$20.36B	$20.36B	$8.18B	$12.28B
Dividend Yield	1.01%	1.01%	964.99%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	27.22	27.22	22.52	25.58
Price / Sales	1.82	1.82	4.44	78.22
Price / Cash	18.84	18.84	8.16	55.34
Price / Book	9.79	9.79	2.12	6.66
Net Income	$752.88M	$752.88M	$533.83M	$333.63M
7 Day Performance	2.61%	2.61%	-1.75%	-0.12%
1 Month Performance	7.45%	7.45%	1.49%	3.93%
1 Year Performance	36.23%	36.23%	34.24%	36.07%

Expeditors International of Washington Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EXPD Expeditors International of Washington	2.844 of 5 stars	$155.69 +0.8%	$137.30 -11.8%	+35.0%	$20.36B	$11.19B	27.22	19,900
ARCB ArcBest	4.5167 of 5 stars	$115.72 -8.0%	$123.42 +6.7%	+59.3%	$2.81B	$4.01B	47.62	14,000
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide	4.8437 of 5 stars	$161.24 -9.1%	$192.27 +19.2%	+69.6%	$20.89B	$16.23B	32.64	11,855	Positive News Dividend Announcement High Trading Volume
LSTR Landstar System	3.7119 of 5 stars	$176.89 -2.6%	$178.45 +0.9%	+24.8%	$6.16B	$4.74B	48.86	1,378	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line	4.2712 of 5 stars	$192.18 -6.6%	$203.96 +6.1%	+10.4%	$42.87B	$5.50B	40.21	20,591	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:EXPD) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

EXPD vs. ARCB, CHRW, LSTR, ODFL, and MATX

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to ArcBest?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to C.H. Robinson Worldwide?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Landstar System?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Old Dominion Freight Line?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Matson?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EXPD vs. The Competition

Expeditors International of Washington Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

EXPD vs. ARCB, CHRW, LSTR, ODFL, and MATX

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to ArcBest?

Which has more risk & volatility, ARCB or EXPD?

Does the media prefer ARCB or EXPD?

Is ARCB or EXPD more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ARCB or EXPD?

Do analysts prefer ARCB or EXPD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ARCB or EXPD?

Is ARCB or EXPD a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to C.H. Robinson Worldwide?

Which has more volatility & risk, EXPD or CHRW?

Does the media prefer EXPD or CHRW?

Is EXPD or CHRW more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in EXPD or CHRW?

Do analysts recommend EXPD or CHRW?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, EXPD or CHRW?

Is EXPD or CHRW a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Landstar System?

Does the media prefer EXPD or LSTR?

Which has more volatility & risk, EXPD or LSTR?

Is EXPD or LSTR a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, EXPD or LSTR?

Is EXPD or LSTR more profitable?

Do analysts recommend EXPD or LSTR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in EXPD or LSTR?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Old Dominion Freight Line?

Is EXPD or ODFL a better dividend stock?

Is EXPD or ODFL more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EXPD or ODFL?

Which has better valuation and earnings, EXPD or ODFL?

Which has more volatility and risk, EXPD or ODFL?

Do analysts prefer EXPD or ODFL?

Does the media prefer EXPD or ODFL?

Summary

How does Expeditors International of Washington compare to Matson?

Does the media prefer EXPD or MATX?

Do analysts prefer EXPD or MATX?

Is EXPD or MATX more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, EXPD or MATX?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EXPD or MATX?

Which has better valuation and earnings, EXPD or MATX?

Is EXPD or MATX a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EXPD vs. The Competition

Expeditors International of Washington Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools