Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) Competitors

C.H. Robinson Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $197.08, indicating a potential upside of 33.41%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus target price of $153.78, indicating a potential downside of 8.34%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Expeditors International of Washington has lower revenue, but higher earnings than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.73%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 38.36% beat Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity.

In the previous week, C.H. Robinson Worldwide had 24 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide and 15 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's score of 0.54 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Landstar System. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.0% of Landstar System shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Landstar System shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landstar System has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Landstar System had 13 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Landstar System and 15 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Landstar System's score of 0.85 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 2.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Landstar System's return on equity.

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus target price of $153.78, suggesting a potential downside of 8.34%. Landstar System has a consensus target price of $194.62, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Given Landstar System's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Landstar System is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Landstar System pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Landstar System pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Landstar System has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Old Dominion Freight Line had 11 more articles in the media than Expeditors International of Washington. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line and 15 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 1.11 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Dominion Freight Line has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 19.44% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity.

Old Dominion Freight Line presently has a consensus price target of $226.55, suggesting a potential upside of 6.79%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $153.78, suggesting a potential downside of 8.34%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Expeditors International of Washington. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Matson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Matson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Expeditors International of Washington presently has a consensus target price of $153.78, suggesting a potential downside of 8.34%. Matson has a consensus target price of $203.33, suggesting a potential upside of 0.51%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matson is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Matson pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matson pays out 10.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Expeditors International of Washington has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Matson has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Expeditors International of Washington is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expeditors International of Washington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 6 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 9 mentions for Matson. Expeditors International of Washington's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Matson's score of 1.01 indicating that Expeditors International of Washington is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Matson has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 7.64%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat Matson's return on equity.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matson has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.