FAT vs. FLL, GENK, STKS, CNTY, THCH, HCHL, LVO, FATBB, NDLS, and ARKR
Should you be buying FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of FAT Brands include Full House Resorts (FLL), GEN Restaurant Group (GENK), ONE Group Hospitality (STKS), Century Casinos (CNTY), TH International (THCH), Happy City (HCHL), LiveOne (LVO), FAT Brands (FATBB), Noodles & Company (NDLS), and Ark Restaurants (ARKR). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.
FAT Brands vs. Its Competitors
Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.
Full House Resorts currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 62.24%. FAT Brands has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 423.56%. Given FAT Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FAT Brands is more favorable than Full House Resorts.
Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Full House Resorts has a net margin of -13.75% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -36.77%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.
37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.4% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Full House Resorts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Full House Resorts and Full House Resorts both had 1 articles in the media. Full House Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.95 indicating that Full House Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Full House Resorts beats FAT Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
FAT Brands Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 9/17/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free FAT Stock Alerts