Go Pro

Fulcrum Therapeutics (FULC) Competitors

Fulcrum Therapeutics logo
$3.82 -0.01 (-0.13%)
As of 01:37 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FULC vs. SVRA, KURA, SANA, LXRX, and FBRX

Should you buy Fulcrum Therapeutics stock or one of its competitors? Fulcrum Therapeutics's main competitors and comparable companies include Savara (SVRA), Kura Oncology (KURA), Sana Biotechnology (SANA), Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (LXRX), and Forte Biosciences (FBRX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "biotechnology" industry.

How does Fulcrum Therapeutics compare to Savara?

Savara (NASDAQ:SVRA) and Fulcrum Therapeutics (NASDAQ:FULC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Savara is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SavaraN/AN/A-$118.84M-$0.58N/A
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$74.88M-$1.21N/A

Savara has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Therapeutics has a beta of 3.05, meaning that its stock price is 205% more volatile than the broader market.

87.9% of Savara shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Savara shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Therapeutics had 5 more articles in the media than Savara. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fulcrum Therapeutics and 2 mentions for Savara. Savara's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Fulcrum Therapeutics' score of 0.18 indicating that Savara is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Savara
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fulcrum Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fulcrum Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.38% beat Savara's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SavaraN/A -90.28% -68.95%
Fulcrum Therapeutics N/A -25.38%-24.15%

Savara presently has a consensus price target of $10.14, suggesting a potential upside of 82.26%. Fulcrum Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $8.20, suggesting a potential upside of 114.38%. Given Fulcrum Therapeutics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fulcrum Therapeutics is more favorable than Savara.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Savara
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Fulcrum Therapeutics
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Summary

Fulcrum Therapeutics beats Savara on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Therapeutics compare to Kura Oncology?

Kura Oncology (NASDAQ:KURA) and Fulcrum Therapeutics (NASDAQ:FULC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

89.8% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of Kura Oncology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kura Oncology presently has a consensus target price of $25.40, indicating a potential upside of 102.92%. Fulcrum Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $8.20, indicating a potential upside of 114.38%. Given Fulcrum Therapeutics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fulcrum Therapeutics is more favorable than Kura Oncology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kura Oncology
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Fulcrum Therapeutics
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Kura Oncology has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Therapeutics has a beta of 3.05, suggesting that its share price is 205% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kura Oncology had 12 more articles in the media than Fulcrum Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Kura Oncology and 7 mentions for Fulcrum Therapeutics. Kura Oncology's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Fulcrum Therapeutics' score of 0.18 indicating that Kura Oncology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kura Oncology
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fulcrum Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fulcrum Therapeutics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kura Oncology. Kura Oncology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kura Oncology$77.23M14.42-$278.67M-$3.37N/A
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$74.88M-$1.21N/A

Fulcrum Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kura Oncology's net margin of -384.30%. Fulcrum Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.38% beat Kura Oncology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kura Oncology-384.30% -207.18% -45.17%
Fulcrum Therapeutics N/A -25.38%-24.15%

Summary

Fulcrum Therapeutics beats Kura Oncology on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Therapeutics compare to Sana Biotechnology?

Fulcrum Therapeutics (NASDAQ:FULC) and Sana Biotechnology (NASDAQ:SANA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Fulcrum Therapeutics presently has a consensus price target of $8.20, suggesting a potential upside of 114.38%. Sana Biotechnology has a consensus price target of $9.33, suggesting a potential upside of 144.01%. Given Sana Biotechnology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sana Biotechnology is more favorable than Fulcrum Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fulcrum Therapeutics
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Sana Biotechnology
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Fulcrum Therapeutics had 2 more articles in the media than Sana Biotechnology. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fulcrum Therapeutics and 5 mentions for Sana Biotechnology. Sana Biotechnology's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Fulcrum Therapeutics' score of 0.18 indicating that Sana Biotechnology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sana Biotechnology
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.8% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Sana Biotechnology shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Sana Biotechnology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sana Biotechnology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$74.88M-$1.21N/A
Sana BiotechnologyN/AN/A-$244.17M-$0.76N/A

Fulcrum Therapeutics has a beta of 3.05, indicating that its share price is 205% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sana Biotechnology has a beta of 2.16, indicating that its share price is 116% more volatile than the broader market.

Fulcrum Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.38% beat Sana Biotechnology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/A -25.38% -24.15%
Sana Biotechnology N/A -103.02%-39.16%

Summary

Fulcrum Therapeutics beats Sana Biotechnology on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Therapeutics compare to Lexicon Pharmaceuticals?

Fulcrum Therapeutics (NASDAQ:FULC) and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:LXRX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Fulcrum Therapeutics has a beta of 3.05, meaning that its stock price is 205% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Fulcrum Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -147.38%. Fulcrum Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.38% beat Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/A -25.38% -24.15%
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals -147.38%-37.53%-24.96%

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals has higher revenue and earnings than Fulcrum Therapeutics. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$74.88M-$1.21N/A
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals$49.80M20.68-$50.34M-$0.15N/A

Fulcrum Therapeutics currently has a consensus target price of $8.20, indicating a potential upside of 114.38%. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals has a consensus target price of $4.55, indicating a potential upside of 96.54%. Given Fulcrum Therapeutics' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Fulcrum Therapeutics is more favorable than Lexicon Pharmaceuticals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fulcrum Therapeutics
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

89.8% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.7% of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Therapeutics had 4 more articles in the media than Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fulcrum Therapeutics and 3 mentions for Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Fulcrum Therapeutics' score of 0.18 indicating that Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Fulcrum Therapeutics beats Lexicon Pharmaceuticals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Therapeutics compare to Forte Biosciences?

Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) and Fulcrum Therapeutics (NASDAQ:FULC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Therapeutics had 4 more articles in the media than Forte Biosciences. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fulcrum Therapeutics and 3 mentions for Forte Biosciences. Forte Biosciences' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Fulcrum Therapeutics' score of 0.18 indicating that Forte Biosciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Forte Biosciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fulcrum Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Forte Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forte BiosciencesN/AN/A-$69.38M-$4.65N/A
Fulcrum TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$74.88M-$1.21N/A

Forte Biosciences presently has a consensus target price of $71.67, indicating a potential downside of 6.84%. Fulcrum Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $8.20, indicating a potential upside of 114.38%. Given Fulcrum Therapeutics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fulcrum Therapeutics is more favorable than Forte Biosciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Forte Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Fulcrum Therapeutics
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

77.6% of Forte Biosciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Forte Biosciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Fulcrum Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Forte Biosciences has a beta of 2.62, indicating that its stock price is 162% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Therapeutics has a beta of 3.05, indicating that its stock price is 205% more volatile than the broader market.

Fulcrum Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.38% beat Forte Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Forte BiosciencesN/A -94.82% -77.68%
Fulcrum Therapeutics N/A -25.38%-24.15%

Summary

Fulcrum Therapeutics beats Forte Biosciences on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fulcrum Therapeutics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FULC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FULC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FULC vs. The Competition

MetricFulcrum TherapeuticsBiotechnology IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$291.84M$3.98B$7.28B$12.75B
Dividend YieldN/A3.64%2.54%10.79%
P/E Ratio-3.1611.63271.3524.10
Price / SalesN/A1,302.16606.0478.14
Price / CashN/A44.9429.0336.90
Price / Book0.5917.2411.196.40
Net Income-$74.88M-$22.72M$3.46B$348.28M
7 Day Performance-0.39%2.94%2.06%1.17%
1 Month Performance2.82%9.84%7.42%5.34%
1 Year Performance-44.40%54.50%24.67%16.25%

Fulcrum Therapeutics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FULC
Fulcrum Therapeutics
3.1236 of 5 stars
$3.83
-0.1%
$8.20
+114.4%
-44.3%$291.84MN/AN/A100
SVRA
Savara
2.0068 of 5 stars
$5.37
flat
$10.14
+88.9%
+76.9%$1.10BN/AN/A20
KURA
Kura Oncology
3.1566 of 5 stars
$12.33
+9.3%
$25.62
+107.7%
+55.4%$1.09B$77.23MN/A130
SANA
Sana Biotechnology
2.1964 of 5 stars
$3.63
-1.4%
$9.33
+157.1%
+9.2%$1.09BN/AN/A380
LXRX
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
1.4318 of 5 stars
$2.41
+3.0%
$4.55
+88.8%
+93.3%$1.07B$49.80MN/A140

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FULC) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners