Go Pro

Guardant Health (GH) Competitors

Guardant Health logo
$160.82 -1.17 (-0.72%)
As of 01:36 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GH vs. NTRA, BTSG, FMS, PACS, and HIMS

Should you buy Guardant Health stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Guardant Health with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Guardant Health include Natera (NTRA), BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG), Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS), PACS Group (PACS), and Hims & Hers Health (HIMS).

How does Guardant Health compare to Natera?

Natera (NASDAQ:NTRA) and Guardant Health (NASDAQ:GH) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Natera has higher revenue and earnings than Guardant Health. Natera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Guardant Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natera$2.31B16.79-$208.16M-$1.63N/A
Guardant Health$1.18B18.02-$416.28M-$3.49N/A

Natera has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Guardant Health has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Guardant Health had 3 more articles in the media than Natera. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Guardant Health and 34 mentions for Natera. Guardant Health's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Natera's score of 0.67 indicating that Guardant Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Natera
23 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Guardant Health
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Natera currently has a consensus target price of $267.83, suggesting a potential downside of 0.96%. Guardant Health has a consensus target price of $179.82, suggesting a potential upside of 11.81%. Given Guardant Health's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Guardant Health is more favorable than Natera.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Natera
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Guardant Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96

Natera has a net margin of -9.05% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -38.33%. Guardant Health's return on equity of 0.00% beat Natera's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Natera-9.05% -14.74% -10.27%
Guardant Health -38.33%N/A -25.40%

99.9% of Natera shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Guardant Health shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Natera shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Guardant Health shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Guardant Health beats Natera on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Guardant Health compare to BrightSpring Health Services?

Guardant Health (NASDAQ:GH) and BrightSpring Health Services (NASDAQ:BTSG) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

92.6% of Guardant Health shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Guardant Health shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of BrightSpring Health Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BrightSpring Health Services has a net margin of 2.55% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -38.33%. BrightSpring Health Services' return on equity of 16.73% beat Guardant Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Guardant Health-38.33% N/A -25.40%
BrightSpring Health Services 2.55%16.73%5.24%

BrightSpring Health Services has higher revenue and earnings than Guardant Health. Guardant Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BrightSpring Health Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Guardant Health$1.18B18.02-$416.28M-$3.49N/A
BrightSpring Health Services$14.37B0.83$190.67M$1.6636.51

Guardant Health presently has a consensus target price of $179.82, indicating a potential upside of 11.81%. BrightSpring Health Services has a consensus target price of $70.71, indicating a potential upside of 16.68%. Given BrightSpring Health Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BrightSpring Health Services is more favorable than Guardant Health.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Guardant Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
BrightSpring Health Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BrightSpring Health Services has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Guardant Health had 14 more articles in the media than BrightSpring Health Services. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Guardant Health and 23 mentions for BrightSpring Health Services. Guardant Health's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat BrightSpring Health Services' score of 0.91 indicating that Guardant Health is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Guardant Health
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BrightSpring Health Services
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

BrightSpring Health Services beats Guardant Health on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Guardant Health compare to Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA?

Guardant Health (NASDAQ:GH) and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (NYSE:FMS) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Guardant Health had 33 more articles in the media than Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Guardant Health and 4 mentions for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Guardant Health's score of 0.97 indicating that Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Guardant Health
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Guardant Health presently has a consensus price target of $179.82, indicating a potential upside of 11.81%. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has a consensus price target of $23.95, indicating a potential downside of 5.38%. Given Guardant Health's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Guardant Health is more favorable than Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Guardant Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
5 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.55

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has higher revenue and earnings than Guardant Health. Guardant Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Guardant Health$1.18B18.02-$416.28M-$3.49N/A
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA$22.20B0.61$1.11B$1.9013.32

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has a net margin of 4.88% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -38.33%. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's return on equity of 8.90% beat Guardant Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Guardant Health-38.33% N/A -25.40%
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA 4.88%8.90%4.05%

92.6% of Guardant Health shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Guardant Health shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Guardant Health beats Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Guardant Health compare to PACS Group?

Guardant Health (NASDAQ:GH) and PACS Group (NYSE:PACS) are both healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

PACS Group has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -38.33%. PACS Group's return on equity of 26.47% beat Guardant Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Guardant Health-38.33% N/A -25.40%
PACS Group 4.49%26.47%4.36%

92.6% of Guardant Health shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Guardant Health shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 70.1% of PACS Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Guardant Health presently has a consensus target price of $179.82, indicating a potential upside of 11.81%. PACS Group has a consensus target price of $50.60, indicating a potential upside of 12.74%. Given PACS Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PACS Group is more favorable than Guardant Health.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Guardant Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
PACS Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Guardant Health had 29 more articles in the media than PACS Group. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Guardant Health and 8 mentions for PACS Group. PACS Group's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Guardant Health's score of 0.97 indicating that PACS Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Guardant Health
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PACS Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PACS Group has higher revenue and earnings than Guardant Health. Guardant Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PACS Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Guardant Health$1.18B18.02-$416.28M-$3.49N/A
PACS Group$5.43B1.31$191.54M$1.5628.77

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PACS Group has a beta of -0.08, meaning that its share price is 108% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PACS Group beats Guardant Health on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Guardant Health compare to Hims & Hers Health?

Guardant Health (NASDAQ:GH) and Hims & Hers Health (NYSE:HIMS) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Guardant Health currently has a consensus price target of $179.82, indicating a potential upside of 11.81%. Hims & Hers Health has a consensus price target of $31.43, indicating a potential upside of 2.40%. Given Guardant Health's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Guardant Health is more favorable than Hims & Hers Health.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Guardant Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
Hims & Hers Health
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hims & Hers Health has a beta of 2.35, meaning that its stock price is 135% more volatile than the broader market.

Hims & Hers Health has a net margin of -0.56% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -38.33%. Hims & Hers Health's return on equity of 6.10% beat Guardant Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Guardant Health-38.33% N/A -25.40%
Hims & Hers Health -0.56%6.10%1.52%

Hims & Hers Health has higher revenue and earnings than Guardant Health. Hims & Hers Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Guardant Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Guardant Health$1.18B18.02-$416.28M-$3.49N/A
Hims & Hers Health$2.37B3.00$128.37M-$0.09N/A

92.6% of Guardant Health shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of Hims & Hers Health shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Guardant Health shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.8% of Hims & Hers Health shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Guardant Health had 10 more articles in the media than Hims & Hers Health. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Guardant Health and 27 mentions for Hims & Hers Health. Guardant Health's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Hims & Hers Health's score of 0.22 indicating that Guardant Health is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Guardant Health
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hims & Hers Health
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Guardant Health beats Hims & Hers Health on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Guardant Health News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GH vs. The Competition

MetricGuardant HealthHealthcare Providers & Services IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$21.33B$9.97B$6.80B$12.67B
Dividend YieldN/A2.54%2.59%10.03%
P/E Ratio-46.0825.65282.1525.05
Price / Sales18.025.52571.1979.42
Price / CashN/A26.4428.6434.82
Price / Book-203.585.2411.036.18
Net Income-$416.28M$312.25M$3.49B$347.72M
7 Day Performance10.56%-0.04%0.31%0.64%
1 Month Performance-4.26%-0.70%-4.41%-3.82%
1 Year Performance288.28%27.42%62.76%20.08%

Guardant Health Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GH
Guardant Health
3.0582 of 5 stars
$160.83
-0.7%
$179.82
+11.8%
+291.1%$21.33B$1.18BN/A2,506
NTRA
Natera
2.7492 of 5 stars
$258.03
-1.5%
$267.83
+3.8%
+99.0%$37.52B$2.31BN/A6,140
BTSG
BrightSpring Health Services
4.9027 of 5 stars
$71.98
-1.3%
$70.12
-2.6%
+204.0%$14.38B$12.91B51.0523,500
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
3.842 of 5 stars
$24.90
+1.3%
$28.00
+12.4%
+2.2%$13.21B$22.20B13.111,488
PACS
PACS Group
3.5397 of 5 stars
$46.95
+0.2%
$50.60
+7.8%
+334.3%$7.42B$5.29B30.0947,455

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GH) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners