Intrusion Competitors

Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

70.6% of Cisco Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Cisco Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cisco Systems and Intrusion's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cisco Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Cisco Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Cisco Systems and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cisco Systems presently has a consensus price target of $52.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.70%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Cisco Systems.

Volatility & Risk

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cisco Systems and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cisco Systems beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares International Business Machines and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares International Business Machines and Intrusion's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

International Business Machines has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. International Business Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of International Business Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Business Machines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for International Business Machines and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.

International Business Machines presently has a consensus price target of $148.4444, suggesting a potential upside of 2.60%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than International Business Machines.

Volatility & Risk

International Business Machines has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

International Business Machines beats Intrusion on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

HP (NYSE:HPQ) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares HP and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares HP and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

HP has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. HP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.6% of HP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for HP and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

HP currently has a consensus price target of $24.4643, suggesting a potential downside of 25.69%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than HP.

Risk and Volatility

HP has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

HP beats Intrusion on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arista Networks (NYSE:ANET) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Arista Networks and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arista Networks and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Arista Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

61.8% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.8% of Arista Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Arista Networks and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Arista Networks currently has a consensus price target of $338.5263, suggesting a potential upside of 3.72%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Risk and Volatility

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Arista Networks beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

F5 Networks (NASDAQ:FFIV) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares F5 Networks and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares F5 Networks and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

F5 Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. F5 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.7% of F5 Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of F5 Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for F5 Networks and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

F5 Networks currently has a consensus price target of $203.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 12.46%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than F5 Networks.

Risk and Volatility

F5 Networks has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

F5 Networks beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Juniper Networks and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Juniper Networks currently has a consensus price target of $25.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.06%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Juniper Networks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.3% of Juniper Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Juniper Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Juniper Networks and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Juniper Networks and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Juniper Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Juniper Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Juniper Networks beats Intrusion on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.