Go Pro

Intrusion (INTZ) Competitors

Intrusion logo
$0.94 +0.07 (+7.81%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.89 -0.04 (-4.49%)
As of 07/10/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

INTZ vs. WATT, INVE, TACT, BOSC, and FOXX

Should you buy Intrusion stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intrusion with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intrusion include Energous (WATT), Identiv (INVE), TransAct Technologies (TACT), B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (BOSC), and Foxx Development (FOXX).

How does Intrusion compare to Energous?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energous-0.80% -39.80% -33.46%
Intrusion -169.48%-129.84%-87.05%

Intrusion has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 460.90%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energous
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Intrusion
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energous$5.63M17.57-$9.59M-$4.10N/A
Intrusion$7.09M3.00-$9.06M-$0.52N/A

In the previous week, Intrusion had 1 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intrusion and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Intrusion's score of 0.25 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Energous Very Positive
Intrusion Neutral

Energous has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, suggesting that its share price is 266% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intrusion beats Energous on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intrusion compare to Identiv?

Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) and Identiv (NASDAQ:INVE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Identiv has a net margin of -70.52% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Identiv's return on equity of -11.74% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intrusion-169.48% -129.84% -87.05%
Identiv -70.52%-11.74%-11.04%

19.4% of Intrusion shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of Identiv shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Intrusion shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Identiv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intrusion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Identiv. Identiv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intrusion$7.09M3.00-$9.06M-$0.52N/A
Identiv$21.48M3.28-$18M-$0.72N/A

Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, meaning that its share price is 266% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Identiv has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Identiv had 4 more articles in the media than Intrusion. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Identiv and 3 mentions for Intrusion. Identiv's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Intrusion's score of 0.25 indicating that Identiv is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intrusion Neutral
Identiv Neutral

Intrusion currently has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 460.90%. Identiv has a consensus target price of $4.05, suggesting a potential upside of 38.23%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Identiv.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intrusion
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Identiv
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Identiv beats Intrusion on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intrusion compare to TransAct Technologies?

TransAct Technologies (NASDAQ:TACT) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

TransAct Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. TransAct Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TransAct Technologies$51.48M1.04-$1.24M-$0.05N/A
Intrusion$7.09M3.00-$9.06M-$0.52N/A

TransAct Technologies has a net margin of -0.93% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. TransAct Technologies' return on equity of -1.56% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TransAct Technologies-0.93% -1.56% -1.08%
Intrusion -169.48%-129.84%-87.05%

74.5% of TransAct Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of Intrusion shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of TransAct Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Intrusion shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 460.90%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than TransAct Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TransAct Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Intrusion
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

TransAct Technologies has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, indicating that its stock price is 266% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TransAct Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Intrusion. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for TransAct Technologies and 3 mentions for Intrusion. Intrusion's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat TransAct Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Intrusion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TransAct Technologies Neutral
Intrusion Neutral

Summary

TransAct Technologies beats Intrusion on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intrusion compare to B.O.S. Better Online Solutions?

Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) and B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (NASDAQ:BOSC) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

19.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Intrusion and Intrusion both had 3 articles in the media. B.O.S. Better Online Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Intrusion's score of 0.25 indicating that B.O.S. Better Online Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intrusion Neutral
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Neutral

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Intrusion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.O.S. Better Online Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intrusion$7.09M3.00-$9.06M-$0.52N/A
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions$50.57M0.59$3.61M$0.459.42

Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, suggesting that its share price is 266% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Intrusion currently has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 460.90%. B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 88.68%. Given Intrusion's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than B.O.S. Better Online Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intrusion
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. B.O.S. Better Online Solutions' return on equity of 13.85% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intrusion-169.48% -129.84% -87.05%
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions 6.45%13.85%8.99%

Summary

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intrusion compare to Foxx Development?

Foxx Development (NASDAQ:FOXX) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 460.90%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Foxx Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Foxx Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Intrusion
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Foxx Development has a net margin of -79.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Foxx Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foxx Development-79.80% N/A -59.35%
Intrusion -169.48%-129.84%-87.05%

Foxx Development has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Intrusion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foxx Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foxx Development$65.92M0.32-$9.02M-$6.87N/A
Intrusion$7.09M3.00-$9.06M-$0.52N/A

In the previous week, Intrusion had 1 more articles in the media than Foxx Development. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intrusion and 2 mentions for Foxx Development. Intrusion's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Foxx Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Intrusion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foxx Development Neutral
Intrusion Neutral

Foxx Development has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, indicating that its share price is 266% less volatile than the broader market.

60.4% of Foxx Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.6% of Foxx Development shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Foxx Development beats Intrusion on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intrusion News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INTZ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INTZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INTZ vs. The Competition

MetricIntrusionCOMP IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$19.76M$34.14B$39.06B$12.61B
Dividend YieldN/A1.42%3.19%7.83%
P/E Ratio-1.8057.78170.3424.56
Price / Sales3.002.74599.76121.71
Price / CashN/A26.8046.3760.04
Price / Book2.609.709.606.39
Net Income-$9.06M$733.86M$1.07B$331.44M
7 Day Performance17.68%3.58%-0.26%0.37%
1 Month Performance28.01%3.40%0.84%2.17%
1 Year Performance-55.22%43.14%141.15%20.90%

Intrusion Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INTZ
Intrusion
4.2356 of 5 stars
$0.94
+7.8%
$5.25
+460.9%
-59.5%$19.76M$7.09MN/A60
WATT
Energous
1.4057 of 5 stars
$24.05
+1.3%
N/A+62.1%$132.28M$5.63MN/A50
INVE
Identiv
2.747 of 5 stars
$2.52
-3.1%
$4.05
+60.7%
-16.3%$60.51M$21.48MN/A330
TACT
TransAct Technologies
0.4619 of 5 stars
$5.84
+10.8%
N/A+37.3%$60.04M$51.48MN/A120
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
3.9962 of 5 stars
$4.49
-0.2%
$8.00
+78.2%
-14.0%$31.65M$50.57M9.9880

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:INTZ) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners