Skip to main content
NASDAQ:INTZ

Intrusion Competitors

$10.84
+1.95 (+21.93 %)
(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$8.99
$11.66
50-Day Range
$8.89
$28.25
52-Week Range
$3.59
$29.90
Volume731,300 shs
Average Volume357,100 shs
Market Capitalization$190.95 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.25

Competitors

Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) Vs. CSCO, IBM, HPQ, ANET, FFIV, and JNPR

Should you be buying INTZ stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "computer & office equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to Intrusion, including Cisco Systems (CSCO), International Business Machines (IBM), HP (HPQ), Arista Networks (ANET), F5 Networks (FFIV), and Juniper Networks (JNPR).

Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

70.6% of Cisco Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Cisco Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cisco Systems and Intrusion's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cisco Systems$49.30 billion4.53$11.21 billion$2.9218.12
Intrusion$13.64 million14.00$4.47 million$0.2838.71

Cisco Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Cisco Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Cisco Systems and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cisco Systems091102.55
Intrusion01102.50

Cisco Systems presently has a consensus price target of $52.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.70%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Cisco Systems.

Volatility & Risk

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cisco Systems and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cisco Systems21.76%32.64%12.94%
Intrusion-30.12%-179.98%-38.71%

Summary

Cisco Systems beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares International Business Machines and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
International Business Machines10.53%48.69%6.59%
Intrusion-30.12%-179.98%-38.71%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares International Business Machines and Intrusion's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Business Machines$77.15 billion1.68$9.43 billion$12.8111.29
Intrusion$13.64 million14.00$4.47 million$0.2838.71

International Business Machines has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. International Business Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of International Business Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Business Machines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for International Business Machines and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
International Business Machines06402.40
Intrusion01102.50

International Business Machines presently has a consensus price target of $148.4444, suggesting a potential upside of 2.60%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than International Business Machines.

Volatility & Risk

International Business Machines has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

International Business Machines beats Intrusion on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

HP (NYSE:HPQ) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares HP and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HP5.02%-196.27%9.63%
Intrusion-30.12%-179.98%-38.71%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares HP and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HP$56.64 billion0.72$2.84 billion$2.2814.44
Intrusion$13.64 million14.00$4.47 million$0.2838.71

HP has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. HP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.6% of HP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for HP and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
HP25602.31
Intrusion01102.50

HP currently has a consensus price target of $24.4643, suggesting a potential downside of 25.69%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than HP.

Risk and Volatility

HP has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

HP beats Intrusion on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arista Networks (NYSE:ANET) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Arista Networks and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Arista Networks32.06%20.37%14.19%
Intrusion-30.12%-179.98%-38.71%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arista Networks and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arista Networks$2.41 billion10.33$859.87 million$8.6937.56
Intrusion$13.64 million14.00$4.47 million$0.2838.71

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Arista Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

61.8% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.8% of Arista Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Arista Networks and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Arista Networks071302.65
Intrusion01102.50

Arista Networks currently has a consensus price target of $338.5263, suggesting a potential upside of 3.72%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Risk and Volatility

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Arista Networks beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

F5 Networks (NASDAQ:FFIV) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares F5 Networks and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
F5 Networks13.08%19.72%9.33%
Intrusion-30.12%-179.98%-38.71%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares F5 Networks and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F5 Networks$2.35 billion4.60$307.44 million$6.6627.22
Intrusion$13.64 million14.00$4.47 million$0.2838.71

F5 Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. F5 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.7% of F5 Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of F5 Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for F5 Networks and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
F5 Networks04902.69
Intrusion01102.50

F5 Networks currently has a consensus price target of $203.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 12.46%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than F5 Networks.

Risk and Volatility

F5 Networks has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

F5 Networks beats Intrusion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Juniper Networks and Intrusion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Juniper Networks22302.14
Intrusion01102.50

Juniper Networks currently has a consensus price target of $25.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.06%. Intrusion has a consensus price target of $19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 77.58%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Juniper Networks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.3% of Juniper Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Juniper Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Juniper Networks and Intrusion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Juniper Networks8.92%8.30%4.29%
Intrusion-30.12%-179.98%-38.71%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Juniper Networks and Intrusion's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Juniper Networks$4.45 billion1.96$345 million$1.2121.97
Intrusion$13.64 million14.00$4.47 million$0.2838.71

Juniper Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Intrusion. Juniper Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Juniper Networks beats Intrusion on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Intrusion Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Cisco Systems logo
CSCO
Cisco Systems
2.4$52.90+0.8%$223.33 billion$49.30 billion21.50Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
International Business Machines logo
IBM
International Business Machines
2.5$144.68+0.4%$129.27 billion$77.15 billion16.39
HP logo
HPQ
HP
2.0$32.92+1.6%$41.04 billion$56.64 billion16.46
Arista Networks logo
ANET
Arista Networks
1.6$326.38+2.6%$24.89 billion$2.41 billion36.55Analyst Report
Insider Selling
F5 Networks logo
FFIV
F5 Networks
1.7$181.27+1.1%$10.81 billion$2.35 billion36.11Insider Selling
Juniper Networks logo
JNPR
Juniper Networks
1.9$26.58+0.9%$8.71 billion$4.45 billion22.91Insider Selling
Extreme Networks logo
EXTR
Extreme Networks
1.5$10.14+3.4%$1.28 billion$948.02 million-12.37Gap Down
A10 Networks logo
ATEN
A10 Networks
1.9$9.20+2.9%$711.49 million$212.63 million70.77Gap Down
Digi International logo
DGII
Digi International
1.5$18.17+3.0%$618.33 million$279.27 million62.66Analyst Upgrade
Allot Communications logo
ALLT
Allot Communications
1.6$17.08+4.9%$604.34 million$110.10 million-63.26Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Silicom logo
SILC
Silicom
1.6$40.49+2.3%$279.34 million$105.24 million40.49News Coverage
Gap Down
Lantronix logo
LTRX
Lantronix
0.9$5.07+2.2%$146.49 million$59.88 million-15.84Gap Down
BIO-key International logo
BKYI
BIO-key International
1.2$3.35+7.5%$26.19 million$2.27 million-0.40Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions logo
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
0.5$3.13+1.3%$16.24 million$33.82 million-8.45
This page was last updated on 5/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.