Go Pro

Lotus Technology (LOT) Competitors

Lotus Technology logo
$1.00 -0.09 (-8.46%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.01 +0.02 (+1.52%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LOT vs. LCID, WGO, PSNY, WKHS, and AZIO

Should you buy Lotus Technology stock or one of its competitors? Lotus Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Lucid Group (LCID), Winnebago Industries (WGO), Polestar Automotive Holding UK (PSNY), Workhorse Group (WKHS), and Envirotech Vehicles (AZIO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automobile manufacturers" industry.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Lucid Group?

Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -89.43% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -249.21%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lucid Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucid Group-249.21% -1,391.51% -47.61%
Lotus Technology -89.43%N/A -22.29%

75.2% of Lucid Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 60.0% of Lucid Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Lucid Group presently has a consensus target price of $9.22, indicating a potential upside of 121.69%. Given Lucid Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Lucid Group is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lucid Group
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Lotus Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucid Group. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucid Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucid Group$1.35B1.21-$2.70B-$13.69N/A
Lotus Technology$568.87M1.13-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

In the previous week, Lucid Group had 14 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Lucid Group and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Lucid Group's score of 0.43 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lucid Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Lucid Group beats Lotus Technology on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Winnebago Industries?

Winnebago Industries (NYSE:WGO) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -89.43%. Winnebago Industries' return on equity of 4.65% beat Lotus Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Winnebago Industries1.36% 4.65% 2.74%
Lotus Technology -89.43%N/A -22.29%

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Winnebago Industries presently has a consensus target price of $36.33, indicating a potential upside of 27.88%. Given Winnebago Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Winnebago Industries is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Winnebago Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Winnebago Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Winnebago Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winnebago Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Winnebago Industries$2.80B0.29$25.70M$1.3620.89
Lotus Technology$568.87M1.13-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

In the previous week, Winnebago Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Winnebago Industries and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Winnebago Industries' score of 0.45 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Winnebago Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Winnebago Industries beats Lotus Technology on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Polestar Automotive Holding UK?

Polestar Automotive Holding UK (NASDAQ:PSNY) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Lotus Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polestar Automotive Holding UK. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polestar Automotive Holding UK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polestar Automotive Holding UK$3.06B0.23-$2.36B-$19.21N/A
Lotus Technology$568.87M1.13-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

Polestar Automotive Holding UK has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -89.43%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polestar Automotive Holding UKN/A N/A N/A
Lotus Technology -89.43%N/A -22.29%

1.0% of Polestar Automotive Holding UK shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polestar Automotive Holding UK shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Polestar Automotive Holding UK had 4 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Polestar Automotive Holding UK and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK's score of 0.14 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Polestar Automotive Holding UK beats Lotus Technology on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Workhorse Group?

Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -89.43% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -357.61%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Workhorse Group-357.61% -311.04% -75.40%
Lotus Technology -89.43%N/A -22.29%

Workhorse Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workhorse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Workhorse Group$21.21M1.54-$64.09M-$12.31N/A
Lotus Technology$568.87M1.13-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

16.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Workhorse Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.61, suggesting that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lotus Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Workhorse Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lotus Technology and 1 mentions for Workhorse Group. Workhorse Group's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Lotus Technology's score of 1.31 indicating that Workhorse Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Workhorse Group Very Positive
Lotus Technology Positive

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Workhorse Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Envirotech Vehicles?

Envirotech Vehicles (NASDAQ:AZIO) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Envirotech Vehicles has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Envirotech Vehicles, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Envirotech Vehicles$5.94M3.19-$39.13M-$4.90N/A
Lotus Technology$568.87M1.13-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

In the previous week, Lotus Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Envirotech Vehicles. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lotus Technology and 1 mentions for Envirotech Vehicles. Envirotech Vehicles' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Lotus Technology's score of 1.31 indicating that Envirotech Vehicles is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Envirotech Vehicles Very Positive
Lotus Technology Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Envirotech Vehicles
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

5.7% of Envirotech Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of Envirotech Vehicles shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -89.43% compared to Envirotech Vehicles' net margin of -331.76%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Envirotech Vehicles' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Envirotech Vehicles-331.76% -1,284.22% -219.83%
Lotus Technology -89.43%N/A -22.29%

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Envirotech Vehicles on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lotus Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LOT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LOT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LOT vs. The Competition

MetricLotus TechnologyAutomobiles IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$699.88M$45.57B$12.71B$13.98B
Dividend YieldN/A2.80%58.24%11.70%
P/E Ratio-1.3911.6744.5925.37
Price / Sales1.1330.8993.7370.35
Price / CashN/A11.7318.4934.96
Price / Book-0.482.184.096.24
Net Income-$464.22M$1.24B$445.74M$358.08M
7 Day Performance-13.23%-2.36%-2.45%-1.43%
1 Month Performance-4.97%-0.96%-4.23%-2.71%
1 Year Performance-49.86%-21.88%-6.23%8.46%

Lotus Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LOT
Lotus Technology
0.4162 of 5 stars
$1.00
-8.5%
N/A-45.2%$699.88M$568.87MN/A1,132
LCID
Lucid Group
2.3645 of 5 stars
$4.63
-1.1%
$9.22
+99.2%
-78.1%$1.84B$1.35BN/A9,000
WGO
Winnebago Industries
4.8604 of 5 stars
$29.71
-4.2%
$36.33
+22.3%
-16.5%$877.18M$2.80B21.855,300
PSNY
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
1.2397 of 5 stars
$8.93
-3.0%
N/A-99.1%$859.64M$3.06BN/A1,686
WKHS
Workhorse Group
0.4757 of 5 stars
$3.10
+0.3%
N/A-78.2%$33.77M$21.21MN/A330

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LOT) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners