Free Trial

Lotus Technology (LOT) Competitors

Lotus Technology logo
$0.85 0.00 (-0.33%)
As of 11:05 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LOT vs. LCID, WGO, PSNY, WKHS, and CENN

Should you buy Lotus Technology stock or one of its competitors? Lotus Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Lucid Group (LCID), Winnebago Industries (WGO), Polestar Automotive Holding UK (PSNY), Workhorse Group (WKHS), and Cenntro (CENN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automobile manufacturers" industry.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Lucid Group?

Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -249.21%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lucid Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucid Group-249.21% -1,391.51% -47.61%
Lotus Technology N/A N/A N/A

Lotus Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucid Group. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucid Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucid Group$1.35B1.20-$2.70B-$13.69N/A
Lotus Technology$519.10M1.05-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

75.2% of Lucid Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 60.0% of Lucid Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lucid Group has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Lucid Group currently has a consensus price target of $9.22, indicating a potential upside of 123.30%. Given Lucid Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lucid Group is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lucid Group
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Lucid Group had 10 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Lucid Group and 1 mentions for Lotus Technology. Lucid Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Lucid Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lucid Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Lucid Group beats Lotus Technology on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Winnebago Industries?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Winnebago Industries (NYSE:WGO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Winnebago Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winnebago Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology$519.10M1.05-$464.22M-$0.72N/A
Winnebago Industries$2.80B0.27$25.70M$1.3619.34

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $36.22, indicating a potential upside of 37.75%. Given Winnebago Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Winnebago Industries is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Winnebago Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of 0.00%. Winnebago Industries' return on equity of 4.65% beat Lotus Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lotus TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Winnebago Industries 1.36%4.65%2.74%

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Winnebago Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Winnebago Industries had 6 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Winnebago Industries and 1 mentions for Lotus Technology. Winnebago Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Winnebago Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Winnebago Industries
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Winnebago Industries beats Lotus Technology on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Polestar Automotive Holding UK?

Polestar Automotive Holding UK (NASDAQ:PSNY) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polestar Automotive Holding UKN/A N/A N/A
Lotus Technology N/A N/A N/A

1.0% of Polestar Automotive Holding UK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polestar Automotive Holding UK shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lotus Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polestar Automotive Holding UK. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polestar Automotive Holding UK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polestar Automotive Holding UK$3.06B0.19-$2.36B-$19.21N/A
Lotus Technology$519.10M1.05-$464.22M-$0.72N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Polestar Automotive Holding UK and Polestar Automotive Holding UK both had 1 articles in the media. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK's score of -0.52 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Polestar Automotive Holding UK on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Workhorse Group?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -357.61%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lotus TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Workhorse Group -357.61%-311.04%-75.40%

Workhorse Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workhorse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology$519.10M1.05-$464.22M-$0.72N/A
Workhorse Group$21.21M1.53-$64.09M-$12.31N/A

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.62, meaning that its stock price is 162% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Workhorse Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Workhorse Group had 3 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Workhorse Group and 1 mentions for Lotus Technology. Workhorse Group's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Workhorse Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Workhorse Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Workhorse Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Cenntro?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Cenntro (NASDAQ:CENN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Lotus Technology and Lotus Technology both had 1 articles in the media. Cenntro's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Cenntro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cenntro
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cenntro has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenntro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology$519.10M1.05-$464.22M-$0.72N/A
Cenntro$18.08M0.31-$72.98M-$14.26N/A

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenntro has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Cenntro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cenntro's net margin of -424.20%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cenntro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lotus TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Cenntro -424.20%-142.57%-81.57%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lotus Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cenntro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Cenntro on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lotus Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LOT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LOT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LOT vs. The Competition

MetricLotus TechnologyAutomobiles IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$525.23M$42.97B$12.27B$13.32B
Dividend YieldN/A3.08%73.14%17.32%
P/E Ratio-1.1411.0844.2326.04
Price / Sales1.0528.6992.9293.14
Price / CashN/A11.3018.1734.69
Price / Book-0.412.123.956.35
Net Income-$464.22M$1.24B$444.73M$381.35M
7 Day Performance-2.31%-3.15%-0.81%-0.70%
1 Month Performance-26.09%-8.63%-5.09%-4.58%
1 Year Performance-60.09%-27.05%-7.81%1.51%

Lotus Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LOT
Lotus Technology
0.6351 of 5 stars
$0.85
-0.3%
N/A-60.0%$545.78M$519.10MN/A1,132
LCID
Lucid Group
2.6354 of 5 stars
$4.07
+4.4%
$9.22
+126.6%
-83.3%$1.54B$1.35BN/A9,000
WGO
Winnebago Industries
4.674 of 5 stars
$26.70
-1.2%
$36.22
+35.7%
-24.4%$763.54M$2.80B19.635,300
PSNY
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
0.4623 of 5 stars
$6.65
+0.2%
N/A-99.3%$619.76M$3.06BN/A1,686
WKHS
Workhorse Group
0.2332 of 5 stars
$2.90
flat
N/A-78.5%$31.69M$27.21MN/A148

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LOT) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners