Do analysts prefer LCID or LOT?

Lucid Group currently has a consensus price target of $9.22, indicating a potential upside of 75.13%. Given Lucid Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lucid Group is more favorable than Lotus Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lucid Group 3 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.83 Lotus Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media refer more to LCID or LOT?

In the previous week, Lucid Group had 18 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Lucid Group and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Lucid Group's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Lucid Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lucid Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Lotus Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend LOT or PSNY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lotus Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Polestar Automotive Holding UK 2 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.33

Is LOT or PSNY more profitable?

Polestar Automotive Holding UK has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -89.43%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lotus Technology -89.43% N/A -22.29% Polestar Automotive Holding UK N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate LOT or WGO?

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $36.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.91%. Given Winnebago Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Winnebago Industries is more favorable than Lotus Technology. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lotus Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Winnebago Industries 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17

Does the media favor LOT or WGO?

In the previous week, Winnebago Industries had 10 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Winnebago Industries and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Winnebago Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Winnebago Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lotus Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Winnebago Industries 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer LOT or WKHS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lotus Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Workhorse Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media prefer LOT or WKHS?

In the previous week, Lotus Technology and Lotus Technology both had 2 articles in the media. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Workhorse Group's score of -0.50 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lotus Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Workhorse Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Lotus Technology (LOT) Competitors

$1.18 +0.04 (+3.07%)

As of 02:06 PM Eastern

Compare

LOT vs. LCID, PSNY, WGO, WKHS, and FFAI

Should you buy Lotus Technology stock or one of its competitors? Lotus Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Lucid Group (LCID), Polestar Automotive Holding UK (PSNY), Winnebago Industries (WGO), Workhorse Group (WKHS), and Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (FFAI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automobile manufacturers" industry.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Lucid Group?

Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) and Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

75.2% of Lucid Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 60.0% of Lucid Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lotus Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucid Group. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucid Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lucid Group	$1.55B	1.34	-$2.70B	-$13.69	N/A
Lotus Technology	$519.10M	1.45	-$464.22M	-$0.72	N/A

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -89.43% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -249.21%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lucid Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lucid Group	-249.21%	-1,391.51%	-47.61%
Lotus Technology	-89.43%	N/A	-22.29%

In the previous week, Lucid Group had 18 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Lucid Group and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Lucid Group's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Lucid Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lucid Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lotus Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lucid Group currently has a consensus price target of $9.22, indicating a potential upside of 75.13%. Given Lucid Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lucid Group is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lucid Group	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83
Lotus Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lucid Group beats Lotus Technology on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Polestar Automotive Holding UK?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Polestar Automotive Holding UK (NASDAQ:PSNY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Lotus Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polestar Automotive Holding UK. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polestar Automotive Holding UK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology	$519.10M	1.45	-$464.22M	-$0.72	N/A
Polestar Automotive Holding UK	$3.06B	0.38	-$2.36B	-$19.21	N/A

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Polestar Automotive Holding UK shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polestar Automotive Holding UK shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polestar Automotive Holding UK has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Polestar Automotive Holding UK had 1 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Polestar Automotive Holding UK and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Polestar Automotive Holding UK's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Polestar Automotive Holding UK is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Polestar Automotive Holding UK	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lotus Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Polestar Automotive Holding UK	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.33

Polestar Automotive Holding UK has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -89.43%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lotus Technology	-89.43%	N/A	-22.29%
Polestar Automotive Holding UK	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Polestar Automotive Holding UK beats Lotus Technology on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Winnebago Industries?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Winnebago Industries (NYSE:WGO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -89.43%. Winnebago Industries' return on equity of 4.65% beat Lotus Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lotus Technology	-89.43%	N/A	-22.29%
Winnebago Industries	1.36%	4.65%	2.74%

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Winnebago Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Winnebago Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winnebago Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology	$519.10M	1.45	-$464.22M	-$0.72	N/A
Winnebago Industries	$2.84B	0.32	$25.70M	$1.36	23.25

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $36.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.91%. Given Winnebago Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Winnebago Industries is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lotus Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Winnebago Industries	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

In the previous week, Winnebago Industries had 10 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Winnebago Industries and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Winnebago Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Winnebago Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Winnebago Industries	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Winnebago Industries beats Lotus Technology on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Workhorse Group?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

Workhorse Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workhorse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology	$519.10M	1.45	-$464.22M	-$0.72	N/A
Workhorse Group	$21.21M	1.64	-$64.09M	-$12.31	N/A

In the previous week, Lotus Technology and Lotus Technology both had 2 articles in the media. Lotus Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Workhorse Group's score of -0.50 indicating that Lotus Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Workhorse Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.57, indicating that its stock price is 157% more volatile than the broader market.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -89.43% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -357.61%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lotus Technology	-89.43%	N/A	-22.29%
Workhorse Group	-357.61%	-311.04%	-75.40%

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lotus Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Workhorse Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Lotus Technology beats Workhorse Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lotus Technology compare to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric?

Lotus Technology (NASDAQ:LOT) and Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (NASDAQ:FFAI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -89.43% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -21,837.97%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lotus Technology	-89.43%	N/A	-22.29%
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric	-21,837.97%	-2,531.03%	-100.65%

63.4% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of Faraday Future Intelligent Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lotus Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Faraday Future Intelligent Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 5.7, indicating that its share price is 470% more volatile than the broader market.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus target price of $750.00, indicating a potential upside of 26,743.24%. Given Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more favorable than Lotus Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lotus Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lotus Technology. Lotus Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lotus Technology	$519.10M	1.45	-$464.22M	-$0.72	N/A
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric	$540K	19.97	-$390.70M	-$223.10	N/A

In the previous week, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric had 12 more articles in the media than Lotus Technology. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric and 2 mentions for Lotus Technology. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Lotus Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lotus Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric beats Lotus Technology on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lotus Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LOT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LOT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lotus Technology	Automobiles Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$754.46M	$43.70B	$13.13B	$12.76B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.87%	55.79%	10.78%
P/E Ratio	-1.63	11.44	46.66	24.16
Price / Sales	1.45	28.80	92.57	128.34
Price / Cash	N/A	12.08	19.14	36.89
Price / Book	-0.57	2.26	4.32	6.51
Net Income	-$464.22M	$1.24B	$445.73M	$347.63M
7 Day Performance	14.08%	1.65%	0.35%	1.50%
1 Month Performance	34.44%	3.06%	2.13%	5.15%
1 Year Performance	-44.58%	-21.25%	-1.89%	17.73%

Lotus Technology Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LOT Lotus Technology	0.2548 of 5 stars	$1.17 +2.2%	N/A	-48.2%	$754.46M	$519.10M	N/A	1,132	Upcoming Earnings High Trading Volume
LCID Lucid Group	3.5081 of 5 stars	$5.77 -7.2%	$9.56 +65.6%	-74.9%	$2.45B	$1.55B	N/A	9,000
PSNY Polestar Automotive Holding UK	0.8716 of 5 stars	$14.59 +4.7%	N/A	-98.7%	$1.30B	$3.06B	N/A	1,686	News Coverage
WGO Winnebago Industries	4.6976 of 5 stars	$31.36 -0.7%	$36.33 +15.9%	-11.1%	$891.88M	$2.80B	23.06	5,300	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
WKHS Workhorse Group	0.3999 of 5 stars	$3.11 -6.0%	N/A	-82.1%	$33.33M	$21.21M	N/A	330	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LOT) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lotus Technology (LOT) Competitors

LOT vs. LCID, PSNY, WGO, WKHS, and FFAI

How does Lotus Technology compare to Lucid Group?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Polestar Automotive Holding UK?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Winnebago Industries?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Workhorse Group?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LOT vs. The Competition

Lotus Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lotus Technology (LOT) Competitors

LOT vs. LCID, PSNY, WGO, WKHS, and FFAI

How does Lotus Technology compare to Lucid Group?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in LCID or LOT?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LCID or LOT?

Is LCID or LOT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LCID or LOT?

Do analysts prefer LCID or LOT?

Which has more volatility and risk, LCID or LOT?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Polestar Automotive Holding UK?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LOT or PSNY?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LOT or PSNY?

Which has more volatility and risk, LOT or PSNY?

Does the media favor LOT or PSNY?

Do analysts recommend LOT or PSNY?

Is LOT or PSNY more profitable?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Winnebago Industries?

Is LOT or WGO more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in LOT or WGO?

Which has more risk and volatility, LOT or WGO?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LOT or WGO?

Do analysts rate LOT or WGO?

Does the media favor LOT or WGO?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Workhorse Group?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LOT or WKHS?

Does the media prefer LOT or WKHS?

Which has more volatility and risk, LOT or WKHS?

Is LOT or WKHS more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LOT or WKHS?

Do analysts prefer LOT or WKHS?

Summary

How does Lotus Technology compare to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric?

Is LOT or FFAI more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LOT or FFAI?

Which has more risk and volatility, LOT or FFAI?

Do analysts prefer LOT or FFAI?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LOT or FFAI?

Does the media favor LOT or FFAI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LOT vs. The Competition

Lotus Technology Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools