Does the media prefer PHIN or UCB?

In the previous week, United Community Banks had 2 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for United Community Banks and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat United Community Banks' score of 0.55 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive United Community Banks 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, ALV or PHIN?

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Autoliv $10.82B 0.76 $735M $8.49 13.22 PHINIA $3.62B 0.61 $130M $3.49 17.28

Is ALV or PHIN more profitable?

Autoliv has a net margin of 5.79% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Autoliv 5.79% 29.36% 8.86% PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62%

Does the media prefer ALV or PHIN?

In the previous week, Autoliv and Autoliv both had 5 articles in the media. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Autoliv's score of 0.37 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Autoliv 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MBLY or PHIN?

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 1 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mobileye Global and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Mobileye Global's score of 0.59 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mobileye Global 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PHIN or LEA?

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PHINIA $3.62B 0.61 $130M $3.49 17.28 Lear $23.26B 0.26 $436.80M $10.73 11.33

Is PHIN or LEA more profitable?

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.35%. Lear's return on equity of 14.18% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Lear 2.35% 14.18% 4.88%

Does the media prefer PHIN or LEA?

In the previous week, Lear had 10 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Lear and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Lear's score of 0.24 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lear 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, PHIN or GTX?

Garrett Motion has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PHINIA $3.62B 0.61 $130M $3.49 17.28 Garrett Motion $3.75B 1.33 $310M $1.82 14.66

Is PHIN or GTX more profitable?

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.51% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Garrett Motion 9.51% -46.50% 14.80%

Does the media refer more to PHIN or GTX?

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 1 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Garrett Motion and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.21 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Garrett Motion 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

$60.62 +0.45 (+0.74%)

As of 01:14 PM Eastern

Compare

PHIN vs. UCB, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

Should you buy PHINIA stock or one of its competitors? PHINIA's main competitors and comparable companies include United Community Banks (UCB), Autoliv (ALV), Mobileye Global (MBLY), Lear (LEA), and Garrett Motion (GTX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does PHINIA compare to United Community Banks?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and United Community Banks (NYSE:UCB) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. United Community Banks pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Community Banks pays out 34.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. United Community Banks is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PHINIA presently has a consensus price target of $86.50, suggesting a potential upside of 43.44%. United Community Banks has a consensus price target of $39.60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.92%. Given PHINIA's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PHINIA is more favorable than United Community Banks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
United Community Banks	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

90.9% of PHINIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of United Community Banks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of United Community Banks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, United Community Banks had 2 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for United Community Banks and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat United Community Banks' score of 0.55 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
United Community Banks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Community Banks has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

United Community Banks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PHINIA. United Community Banks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.61	$130M	$3.49	17.28
United Community Banks	$1.54B	2.66	$328.10M	$3.04	11.14

United Community Banks has a net margin of 24.43% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat United Community Banks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
United Community Banks	24.43%	9.61%	1.24%

Summary

PHINIA beats United Community Banks on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Autoliv has a net margin of 5.79% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Autoliv	5.79%	29.36%	8.86%
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%

69.6% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of PHINIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Autoliv shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PHINIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Autoliv	$10.82B	0.76	$735M	$8.49	13.22
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.61	$130M	$3.49	17.28

Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Autoliv pays out 41.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PHINIA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Autoliv presently has a consensus price target of $134.79, suggesting a potential upside of 20.11%. PHINIA has a consensus price target of $86.50, suggesting a potential upside of 43.44%. Given PHINIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Autoliv.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Autoliv	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.46
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, Autoliv and Autoliv both had 5 articles in the media. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Autoliv's score of 0.37 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Autoliv	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Autoliv beats PHINIA on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) and PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Mobileye Global currently has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 52.20%. PHINIA has a consensus target price of $86.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.44%. Given Mobileye Global's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Mobileye Global is more favorable than PHINIA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mobileye Global	2 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

PHINIA has higher revenue and earnings than Mobileye Global. Mobileye Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mobileye Global	$1.89B	3.36	-$392M	-$4.99	N/A
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.61	$130M	$3.49	17.28

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 1 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mobileye Global and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Mobileye Global's score of 0.59 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mobileye Global	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

13.3% of Mobileye Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of PHINIA shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Mobileye Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PHINIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -201.49%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mobileye Global	-201.49%	0.70%	0.67%
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%

Summary

PHINIA beats Mobileye Global on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Lear (NYSE:LEA) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Lear pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lear pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lear is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PHINIA presently has a consensus price target of $86.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.44%. Lear has a consensus price target of $146.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.36%. Given PHINIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Lear.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Lear	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.61	$130M	$3.49	17.28
Lear	$23.26B	0.26	$436.80M	$10.73	11.33

In the previous week, Lear had 10 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Lear and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Lear's score of 0.24 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lear	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Lear shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Lear shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lear has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.35%. Lear's return on equity of 14.18% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Lear	2.35%	14.18%	4.88%

Summary

PHINIA and Lear tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PHINIA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.51% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Garrett Motion	9.51%	-46.50%	14.80%

Garrett Motion has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.61	$130M	$3.49	17.28
Garrett Motion	$3.75B	1.33	$310M	$1.82	14.66

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

PHINIA presently has a consensus price target of $86.50, suggesting a potential upside of 43.44%. Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $38.20, suggesting a potential upside of 43.18%. Given PHINIA's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Garrett Motion	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 1 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Garrett Motion and 5 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.21 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Garrett Motion	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

PHINIA beats Garrett Motion on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PHINIA News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PHIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PHINIA	Automobile Components Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.22B	$4.79B	$12.38B	$23.00B
Dividend Yield	2.00%	2.33%	73.13%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	17.36	10.37	44.21	28.08
Price / Sales	0.61	40.60	92.32	23.06
Price / Cash	6.46	10.38	18.17	19.11
Price / Book	1.47	1.60	3.98	4.73
Net Income	$130M	$70.95M	$443.78M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.32%	-0.84%	-0.24%	1.00%
1 Month Performance	-12.29%	-7.26%	-4.60%	-4.87%
1 Year Performance	9.39%	-2.20%	-6.95%	5.84%

PHINIA Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PHIN PHINIA	4.1796 of 5 stars	$60.63 +0.7%	$86.50 +42.7%	+6.3%	$2.22B	$3.62B	17.36	12,500
UCB United Community Banks	4.2851 of 5 stars	$33.63 -1.1%	$39.60 +17.8%	+7.1%	$4.05B	$1.54B	11.06	3,070
ALV Autoliv	4.8721 of 5 stars	$113.00 -0.9%	$134.79 +19.3%	-12.2%	$8.28B	$10.82B	13.31	64,300	Gap Up
MBLY Mobileye Global	4.3432 of 5 stars	$7.59 -2.8%	$12.16 +60.3%	-48.3%	$6.37B	$1.89B	N/A	4,200	Analyst Forecast
LEA Lear	4.9578 of 5 stars	$119.17 -0.9%	$146.33 +22.8%	+17.0%	$5.88B	$23.26B	11.11	164,300	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PHIN) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

PHIN vs. UCB, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

How does PHINIA compare to United Community Banks?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PHIN vs. The Competition

PHINIA Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

PHIN vs. UCB, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

How does PHINIA compare to United Community Banks?

Is PHIN or UCB a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend PHIN or UCB?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PHIN or UCB?

Does the media prefer PHIN or UCB?

Which has more volatility and risk, PHIN or UCB?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PHIN or UCB?

Is PHIN or UCB more profitable?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

Which has more risk & volatility, ALV or PHIN?

Is ALV or PHIN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ALV or PHIN?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ALV or PHIN?

Is ALV or PHIN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend ALV or PHIN?

Does the media prefer ALV or PHIN?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

Do analysts recommend MBLY or PHIN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MBLY or PHIN?

Does the media refer more to MBLY or PHIN?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of MBLY or PHIN?

Which has more risk & volatility, MBLY or PHIN?

Is MBLY or PHIN more profitable?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

Is PHIN or LEA a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate PHIN or LEA?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PHIN or LEA?

Does the media prefer PHIN or LEA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PHIN or LEA?

Which has more volatility & risk, PHIN or LEA?

Is PHIN or LEA more profitable?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

Is PHIN or GTX a better dividend stock?

Is PHIN or GTX more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PHIN or GTX?

Which has more risk and volatility, PHIN or GTX?

Do analysts recommend PHIN or GTX?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PHIN or GTX?

Does the media refer more to PHIN or GTX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PHIN vs. The Competition

PHINIA Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools