Does the media prefer UCB or PHIN?

In the previous week, United Community Banks and United Community Banks both had 1 articles in the media. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat United Community Banks' score of 0.72 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment United Community Banks 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PHINIA 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, PHIN or ALV?

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PHINIA $3.62B 0.59 $130M $3.49 16.75 Autoliv $10.82B 0.75 $735M $8.49 13.05

Is PHIN or ALV more profitable?

Autoliv has a net margin of 5.79% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Autoliv 5.79% 29.36% 8.86%

Does the media favor PHIN or ALV?

In the previous week, Autoliv had 4 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Autoliv and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Autoliv's score of 0.20 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Autoliv 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor PHIN or MBLY?

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 6 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Mobileye Global and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Mobileye Global's score of -0.11 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mobileye Global 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PHIN or LEA?

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PHINIA $3.62B 0.59 $130M $3.49 16.75 Lear $23.26B 0.25 $436.80M $10.73 11.03

Is PHIN or LEA more profitable?

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.35%. Lear's return on equity of 14.18% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Lear 2.35% 14.18% 4.88%

Does the media favor PHIN or LEA?

In the previous week, Lear had 16 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lear and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Lear's score of 0.37 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lear 5 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Is PHIN or GTX more profitable?

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.51% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Garrett Motion 9.51% -46.50% 14.80%

Does the media prefer PHIN or GTX?

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 7 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Garrett Motion and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.49 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Garrett Motion 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

$57.74 -0.72 (-1.23%)

As of 03:43 PM Eastern

Compare

PHIN vs. UCB, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

Should you buy PHINIA stock or one of its competitors? PHINIA's main competitors and comparable companies include United Community Banks (UCB), Autoliv (ALV), Mobileye Global (MBLY), Lear (LEA), and Garrett Motion (GTX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does PHINIA compare to United Community Banks?

United Community Banks (NYSE:UCB) and PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, United Community Banks and United Community Banks both had 1 articles in the media. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat United Community Banks' score of 0.72 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
United Community Banks	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PHINIA	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

United Community Banks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PHINIA. United Community Banks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United Community Banks	$1.54B	2.63	$328.10M	$3.04	11.04
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.59	$130M	$3.49	16.75

United Community Banks presently has a consensus target price of $39.60, indicating a potential upside of 18.02%. PHINIA has a consensus target price of $83.50, indicating a potential upside of 42.85%. Given PHINIA's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PHINIA is more favorable than United Community Banks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United Community Banks	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

United Community Banks has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

United Community Banks pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. United Community Banks pays out 34.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. United Community Banks is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

United Community Banks has a net margin of 24.43% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat United Community Banks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United Community Banks	24.43%	9.61%	1.24%
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%

82.3% of United Community Banks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of PHINIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of United Community Banks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PHINIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PHINIA beats United Community Banks on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.59	$130M	$3.49	16.75
Autoliv	$10.82B	0.75	$735M	$8.49	13.05

In the previous week, Autoliv had 4 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Autoliv and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Autoliv's score of 0.20 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Autoliv	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Autoliv pays out 41.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Autoliv has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

PHINIA currently has a consensus target price of $83.50, indicating a potential upside of 42.85%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $134.79, indicating a potential upside of 21.64%. Given PHINIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Autoliv.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Autoliv	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.46

Autoliv has a net margin of 5.79% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Autoliv	5.79%	29.36%	8.86%

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Autoliv beats PHINIA on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -201.49%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Mobileye Global	-201.49%	0.70%	0.67%

PHINIA presently has a consensus price target of $83.50, indicating a potential upside of 42.85%. Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $11.41, indicating a potential upside of 61.55%. Given Mobileye Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mobileye Global is more favorable than PHINIA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Mobileye Global	2 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 6 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Mobileye Global and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Mobileye Global's score of -0.11 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mobileye Global	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

PHINIA has higher revenue and earnings than Mobileye Global. Mobileye Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.59	$130M	$3.49	16.75
Mobileye Global	$1.89B	3.13	-$392M	-$4.99	N/A

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Mobileye Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Mobileye Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobileye Global has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PHINIA beats Mobileye Global on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Lear (NYSE:LEA) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

PHINIA presently has a consensus price target of $83.50, indicating a potential upside of 42.85%. Lear has a consensus price target of $144.75, indicating a potential upside of 22.31%. Given PHINIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Lear.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Lear	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.59	$130M	$3.49	16.75
Lear	$23.26B	0.25	$436.80M	$10.73	11.03

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.35%. Lear's return on equity of 14.18% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Lear	2.35%	14.18%	4.88%

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lear has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Lear shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Lear shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lear had 16 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lear and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Lear's score of 0.37 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lear	5 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Lear pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lear pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lear is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

PHINIA and Lear tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.51% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Garrett Motion	9.51%	-46.50%	14.80%

Garrett Motion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PHINIA. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.62B	0.59	$130M	$3.49	16.75
Garrett Motion	$3.58B	1.34	$310M	$1.82	14.15

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 7 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Garrett Motion and 1 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.49 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Garrett Motion	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PHINIA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

PHINIA presently has a consensus price target of $83.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.85%. Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $38.20, suggesting a potential upside of 48.35%. Given Garrett Motion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Garrett Motion is more favorable than PHINIA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Garrett Motion	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

PHINIA has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PHINIA beats Garrett Motion on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PHINIA News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PHIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PHINIA	Automobile Components Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.11B	$4.67B	$12.53B	$22.99B
Dividend Yield	1.98%	2.34%	70.37%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	16.53	10.25	45.03	28.65
Price / Sales	0.59	40.29	88.17	23.57
Price / Cash	6.31	10.30	31.54	36.46
Price / Book	1.40	1.58	3.98	4.72
Net Income	$130M	$70.95M	$444.34M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.07%	-1.30%	-0.10%	0.47%
1 Month Performance	-13.26%	-6.94%	-3.02%	-3.68%
1 Year Performance	9.81%	-1.72%	-5.76%	6.66%

PHINIA Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PHIN PHINIA	3.4072 of 5 stars	$57.74 -1.2%	$83.50 +44.6%	+9.1%	$2.11B	$3.62B	16.53	12,500	Analyst Forecast
UCB United Community Banks	4.3545 of 5 stars	$33.63 -1.1%	$39.60 +17.8%	+4.8%	$4.05B	$1.54B	11.06	3,070
ALV Autoliv	4.9 of 5 stars	$113.00 -0.9%	$134.79 +19.3%	-10.1%	$8.28B	$10.82B	13.31	64,300
MBLY Mobileye Global	4.0595 of 5 stars	$7.59 -2.8%	$12.16 +60.3%	-54.6%	$6.37B	$1.89B	N/A	4,200	Analyst Forecast
LEA Lear	4.9472 of 5 stars	$119.17 -0.9%	$146.33 +22.8%	+17.2%	$5.88B	$23.26B	11.11	164,300	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PHIN) was last updated on 10/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

PHIN vs. UCB, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

How does PHINIA compare to United Community Banks?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PHIN vs. The Competition

PHINIA Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

PHIN vs. UCB, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

How does PHINIA compare to United Community Banks?

Does the media prefer UCB or PHIN?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, UCB or PHIN?

Do analysts recommend UCB or PHIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, UCB or PHIN?

Is UCB or PHIN a better dividend stock?

Is UCB or PHIN more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of UCB or PHIN?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PHIN or ALV?

Does the media favor PHIN or ALV?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PHIN or ALV?

Is PHIN or ALV a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend PHIN or ALV?

Is PHIN or ALV more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PHIN or ALV?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

Is PHIN or MBLY more profitable?

Do analysts rate PHIN or MBLY?

Does the media favor PHIN or MBLY?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PHIN or MBLY?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PHIN or MBLY?

Which has more volatility and risk, PHIN or MBLY?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

Do analysts rate PHIN or LEA?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PHIN or LEA?

Is PHIN or LEA more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, PHIN or LEA?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PHIN or LEA?

Does the media favor PHIN or LEA?

Is PHIN or LEA a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

Is PHIN or GTX more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PHIN or GTX?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PHIN or GTX?

Does the media prefer PHIN or GTX?

Is PHIN or GTX a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer PHIN or GTX?

Which has more volatility and risk, PHIN or GTX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PHIN vs. The Competition

PHINIA Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools