Which has stronger valuation & earnings, APTV or PHIN?

Aptiv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. PHINIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aptiv $20.40B 0.47 $165M $1.06 43.73 PHINIA $3.48B 0.74 $130M $3.49 20.05

Is APTV or PHIN more profitable?

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.17%. Aptiv's return on equity of 17.10% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aptiv 1.17% 17.10% 7.03% PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62%

Does the media favor APTV or PHIN?

In the previous week, Aptiv and Aptiv both had 3 articles in the media. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Aptiv's score of 0.24 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aptiv 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ALV or PHIN?

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Autoliv $11.08B 0.81 $735M $8.49 14.51 PHINIA $3.48B 0.74 $130M $3.49 20.05

Is ALV or PHIN more profitable?

Autoliv has a net margin of 5.79% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Autoliv 5.79% 29.36% 8.86% PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62%

Does the media prefer ALV or PHIN?

In the previous week, Autoliv had 6 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Autoliv and 3 mentions for PHINIA. Autoliv's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat PHINIA's score of 1.04 indicating that Autoliv is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Autoliv 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MBLY or PHIN?

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 4 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Mobileye Global and 3 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Mobileye Global's score of 0.57 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mobileye Global 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PHIN or LEA?

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PHINIA $3.48B 0.74 $130M $3.49 20.05 Lear $23.26B 0.26 $436.80M $10.73 11.57

Is PHIN or LEA more profitable?

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.35%. Lear's return on equity of 14.18% beat PHINIA's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Lear 2.35% 14.18% 4.88%

Does the media favor PHIN or LEA?

In the previous week, Lear had 29 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Lear and 3 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Lear's score of 0.49 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lear 9 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PHIN or GTX?

Garrett Motion has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PHINIA $3.48B 0.74 $130M $3.49 20.05 Garrett Motion $3.58B 1.41 $310M $1.82 14.87

Is PHIN or GTX more profitable?

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.51% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PHINIA 3.73% 13.86% 5.62% Garrett Motion 9.51% -46.50% 14.80%

Does the media favor PHIN or GTX?

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 12 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Garrett Motion and 3 mentions for PHINIA. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat PHINIA's score of 1.04 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PHINIA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Garrett Motion 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors

$69.98 -0.94 (-1.33%)

As of 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

PHIN vs. APTV, ALV, MBLY, LEA, and GTX

Should you buy PHINIA stock or one of its competitors? PHINIA's main competitors and comparable companies include Aptiv (APTV), Autoliv (ALV), Mobileye Global (MBLY), Lear (LEA), and Garrett Motion (GTX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does PHINIA compare to Aptiv?

Aptiv (NYSE:APTV) and PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Aptiv presently has a consensus target price of $76.50, indicating a potential upside of 65.05%. PHINIA has a consensus target price of $82.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.18%. Given Aptiv's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Aptiv is more favorable than PHINIA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aptiv	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
PHINIA	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Aptiv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. PHINIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aptiv	$20.40B	0.47	$165M	$1.06	43.73
PHINIA	$3.48B	0.74	$130M	$3.49	20.05

Aptiv has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHINIA has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.17%. Aptiv's return on equity of 17.10% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aptiv	1.17%	17.10%	7.03%
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%

In the previous week, Aptiv and Aptiv both had 3 articles in the media. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Aptiv's score of 0.24 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aptiv	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

94.2% of Aptiv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Aptiv shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aptiv beats PHINIA on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Autoliv?

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Autoliv had 6 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Autoliv and 3 mentions for PHINIA. Autoliv's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat PHINIA's score of 1.04 indicating that Autoliv is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Autoliv	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Autoliv	$11.08B	0.81	$735M	$8.49	14.51
PHINIA	$3.48B	0.74	$130M	$3.49	20.05

Autoliv has a net margin of 5.79% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Autoliv	5.79%	29.36%	8.86%
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%

69.6% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of PHINIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PHINIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Autoliv pays out 41.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PHINIA has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHINIA has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Autoliv presently has a consensus target price of $135.93, suggesting a potential upside of 10.34%. PHINIA has a consensus target price of $82.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.18%. Given PHINIA's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Autoliv.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Autoliv	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
PHINIA	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Summary

Autoliv beats PHINIA on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Mobileye Global?

Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) and PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHINIA has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 4 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Mobileye Global and 3 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Mobileye Global's score of 0.57 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mobileye Global	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -201.49%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mobileye Global	-201.49%	0.70%	0.67%
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%

13.3% of Mobileye Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.0% of Mobileye Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mobileye Global presently has a consensus price target of $12.65, indicating a potential upside of 48.07%. PHINIA has a consensus price target of $82.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.18%. Given Mobileye Global's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Mobileye Global is more favorable than PHINIA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mobileye Global	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
PHINIA	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

PHINIA has higher revenue and earnings than Mobileye Global. Mobileye Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mobileye Global	$1.89B	3.79	-$392M	-$4.99	N/A
PHINIA	$3.48B	0.74	$130M	$3.49	20.05

Summary

PHINIA beats Mobileye Global on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Lear?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Lear (NYSE:LEA) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

90.9% of PHINIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Lear shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Lear shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lear had 29 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Lear and 3 mentions for PHINIA. PHINIA's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Lear's score of 0.49 indicating that PHINIA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lear	9 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.48B	0.74	$130M	$3.49	20.05
Lear	$23.26B	0.26	$436.80M	$10.73	11.57

PHINIA has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lear has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Lear pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lear pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lear is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PHINIA has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.35%. Lear's return on equity of 14.18% beat PHINIA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Lear	2.35%	14.18%	4.88%

PHINIA presently has a consensus target price of $82.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.18%. Lear has a consensus target price of $145.23, suggesting a potential upside of 16.94%. Given PHINIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe PHINIA is more favorable than Lear.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Lear	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

Summary

PHINIA and Lear tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PHINIA compare to Garrett Motion?

PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

PHINIA pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. PHINIA pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PHINIA has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PHINIA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 12 more articles in the media than PHINIA. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Garrett Motion and 3 mentions for PHINIA. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat PHINIA's score of 1.04 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PHINIA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Garrett Motion	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PHINIA has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Garrett Motion has higher revenue and earnings than PHINIA. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHINIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PHINIA	$3.48B	0.74	$130M	$3.49	20.05
Garrett Motion	$3.58B	1.41	$310M	$1.82	14.87

90.9% of PHINIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of PHINIA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.51% compared to PHINIA's net margin of 3.73%. PHINIA's return on equity of 13.86% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PHINIA	3.73%	13.86%	5.62%
Garrett Motion	9.51%	-46.50%	14.80%

PHINIA currently has a consensus price target of $82.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.18%. Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $38.60, suggesting a potential upside of 42.65%. Given Garrett Motion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Garrett Motion is more favorable than PHINIA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PHINIA	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Garrett Motion	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Summary

Garrett Motion beats PHINIA on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PHINIA News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PHIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PHINIA	Automobile Components Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.56B	$5.07B	$13.04B	$24.27B
Dividend Yield	1.68%	2.25%	55.69%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	20.05	10.97	46.73	30.21
Price / Sales	0.74	23.76	92.69	19.96
Price / Cash	7.69	10.99	29.14	32.63
Price / Book	1.66	1.82	6.02	7.69
Net Income	$130M	$72.28M	$445.86M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.41%	-0.93%	-0.40%	-0.21%
1 Month Performance	-10.54%	0.70%	1.92%	2.85%
1 Year Performance	18.48%	5.30%	-1.99%	14.58%

PHINIA Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PHIN PHINIA	4.1051 of 5 stars	$69.98 -1.3%	$82.00 +17.2%	+20.0%	$2.56B	$3.48B	20.05	12,500	Positive News
APTV Aptiv	4.9376 of 5 stars	$49.13 -1.8%	$76.50 +55.7%	-41.0%	$10.20B	$20.40B	46.33	140,000
ALV Autoliv	4.3958 of 5 stars	$120.34 -0.3%	$135.93 +13.0%	-0.2%	$8.81B	$10.82B	14.17	64,300
MBLY Mobileye Global	4.494 of 5 stars	$8.65 -6.3%	$12.65 +46.3%	-37.1%	$7.27B	$1.89B	N/A	4,200
LEA Lear	4.8185 of 5 stars	$123.93 -0.8%	$145.23 +17.2%	+12.5%	$6.11B	$23.70B	11.55	164,300	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PHIN) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PHINIA (PHIN) Competitors