BRP Competitors

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of BRP shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Magna International and BRP, as reported by MarketBeat.

Magna International currently has a consensus price target of $74.8571, indicating a potential downside of 13.78%. BRP has a consensus price target of $69.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BRP is more favorable than Magna International.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Magna International and BRP's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than BRP. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 3.04, indicating that its share price is 204% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Magna International and BRP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. BRP pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Magna International pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BRP pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magna International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Magna International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Magna International beats BRP on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

7.5% of Li Auto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of BRP shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Li Auto and BRP, as reported by MarketBeat.

Li Auto currently has a consensus price target of $39.1889, indicating a potential upside of 36.64%. BRP has a consensus price target of $69.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given Li Auto's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Li Auto is more favorable than BRP.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Li Auto and BRP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BRP has higher revenue and earnings than Li Auto.

Profitability

This table compares Li Auto and BRP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

CNH Industrial (NYSE:CNHI) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

CNH Industrial has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its share price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 3.04, indicating that its share price is 204% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

21.7% of CNH Industrial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of BRP shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for CNH Industrial and BRP, as reported by MarketBeat.

CNH Industrial currently has a consensus price target of $13.2857, indicating a potential downside of 12.82%. BRP has a consensus price target of $69.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BRP is more favorable than CNH Industrial.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CNH Industrial and BRP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CNH Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than BRP. CNH Industrial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CNH Industrial and BRP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

BRP beats CNH Industrial on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Genuine Parts (NYSE:GPC) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Genuine Parts pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. BRP pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Genuine Parts pays out 55.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BRP pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Genuine Parts has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years. Genuine Parts is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Genuine Parts has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 3.04, meaning that its stock price is 204% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.9% of Genuine Parts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of BRP shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Genuine Parts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Genuine Parts and BRP, as reported by MarketBeat.

Genuine Parts currently has a consensus price target of $100.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.94%. BRP has a consensus price target of $69.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given Genuine Parts' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Genuine Parts is more favorable than BRP.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Genuine Parts and BRP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Genuine Parts has higher revenue and earnings than BRP. Genuine Parts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Genuine Parts and BRP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Genuine Parts beats BRP on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tata Motors (NYSE:TTM) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Tata Motors has a beta of 2.3, indicating that its stock price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 3.04, indicating that its stock price is 204% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.1% of Tata Motors shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of BRP shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Tata Motors and BRP, as reported by MarketBeat.

BRP has a consensus price target of $69.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given BRP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BRP is more favorable than Tata Motors.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tata Motors and BRP's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BRP has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tata Motors. Tata Motors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Tata Motors and BRP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

BRP beats Tata Motors on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) and BRP (NASDAQ:DOOO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares LKQ and BRP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

LKQ has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRP has a beta of 3.04, indicating that its stock price is 204% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares LKQ and BRP's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

LKQ has higher revenue and earnings than BRP. LKQ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for LKQ and BRP, as reported by MarketBeat.

LKQ currently has a consensus price target of $41.1667, indicating a potential upside of 2.97%. BRP has a consensus price target of $69.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given LKQ's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe LKQ is more favorable than BRP.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.9% of LKQ shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of BRP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of LKQ shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

LKQ beats BRP on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.