Free Trial

Massimo Group (MAMO) Competitors

Massimo Group logo
$1.01 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.99 -0.02 (-1.68%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:27 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MAMO vs. INVZ, CHPT, CAAS, EMPD, and BLNK

Should you buy Massimo Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Massimo Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Massimo Group include Innoviz Technologies (INVZ), ChargePoint (CHPT), China Automotive Systems (CAAS), Volcon (EMPD), and Blink Charging (BLNK). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does Massimo Group compare to Innoviz Technologies?

Innoviz Technologies (NASDAQ:INVZ) and Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Massimo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Innoviz Technologies. Innoviz Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Innoviz Technologies$55.09M2.76-$67.79M-$0.39N/A
Massimo Group$71.83M0.59$1.51M$0.0714.43

Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Massimo Group has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

63.3% of Innoviz Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 11.2% of Innoviz Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Innoviz Technologies' net margin of -181.46%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat Innoviz Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Innoviz Technologies-181.46% -101.64% -57.82%
Massimo Group 3.72%12.15%5.77%

In the previous week, Massimo Group had 2 more articles in the media than Innoviz Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Massimo Group and 0 mentions for Innoviz Technologies. Innoviz Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Massimo Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Innoviz Technologies Neutral
Massimo Group Neutral

Innoviz Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 273.50%. Given Innoviz Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Innoviz Technologies is more favorable than Massimo Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Innoviz Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Massimo Group beats Innoviz Technologies on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to ChargePoint?

Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) and ChargePoint (NYSE:CHPT) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Massimo Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ChargePoint. ChargePoint is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Massimo Group$71.83M0.59$1.51M$0.0714.43
ChargePoint$411.22M0.40-$220.20M-$9.33N/A

Massimo Group has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ChargePoint has a beta of 1.69, suggesting that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

ChargePoint has a consensus target price of $8.63, suggesting a potential upside of 22.92%. Given ChargePoint's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ChargePoint is more favorable than Massimo Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
ChargePoint
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to ChargePoint's net margin of -53.55%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat ChargePoint's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Massimo Group3.72% 12.15% 5.77%
ChargePoint -53.55%-276.06%-20.17%

In the previous week, ChargePoint had 4 more articles in the media than Massimo Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ChargePoint and 2 mentions for Massimo Group. ChargePoint's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Massimo Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ChargePoint is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Massimo Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ChargePoint
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

37.8% of ChargePoint shares are owned by institutional investors. 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of ChargePoint shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Massimo Group and ChargePoint tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to China Automotive Systems?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Massimo Group. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.26
Massimo Group$71.83M0.59$1.51M$0.0714.43

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 3.72%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Massimo Group 3.72%12.15%5.77%

In the previous week, Massimo Group had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Massimo Group and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Massimo Group's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Massimo Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Massimo Group has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Massimo Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to Volcon?

Volcon (NASDAQ:EMPD) and Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Volcon's net margin of -1,795.76%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat Volcon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Volcon-1,795.76% -62.90% -50.68%
Massimo Group 3.72%12.15%5.77%

In the previous week, Massimo Group had 2 more articles in the media than Volcon. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Massimo Group and 0 mentions for Volcon. Volcon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Massimo Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Volcon Neutral
Massimo Group Neutral

Massimo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Volcon. Volcon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Volcon$980K142.56-$150.05M-$8.36N/A
Massimo Group$71.83M0.59$1.51M$0.0714.43

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Volcon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Volcon has a beta of -0.45, meaning that its stock price is 145% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Massimo Group has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Massimo Group beats Volcon on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to Blink Charging?

Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) and Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Blink Charging has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Massimo Group has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Massimo Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blink Charging. Blink Charging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blink Charging$103.52M1.14-$83.39M-$0.67N/A
Massimo Group$71.83M0.59$1.51M$0.0714.43

44.6% of Blink Charging shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Blink Charging shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of -73.75%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat Blink Charging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blink Charging-73.75% -83.40% -37.65%
Massimo Group 3.72%12.15%5.77%

Blink Charging presently has a consensus target price of $2.33, suggesting a potential upside of 184.48%. Given Blink Charging's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blink Charging is more favorable than Massimo Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blink Charging
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Massimo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Blink Charging. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Massimo Group and 1 mentions for Blink Charging. Blink Charging's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Massimo Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Blink Charging is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blink Charging
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Massimo Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Blink Charging and Massimo Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Massimo Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAMO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAMO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAMO vs. The Competition

MetricMassimo GroupLEISURE&REC PRD IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$42.06M$2.30B$7.24B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A2.26%2.94%5.28%
P/E Ratio14.4336.0818.5225.65
Price / Sales0.591.123.4286.31
Price / Cash23.5315.5814.7756.67
Price / Book1.872.093.717.14
Net Income$1.51M$36.85M$238.79M$335.98M
7 Day Performance3.08%4.36%2.31%4.15%
1 Month Performance1.50%-2.92%14.65%2.54%
1 Year Performance-53.67%-2.93%18.59%35.06%

Massimo Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAMO
Massimo Group
0.5362 of 5 stars
$1.01
flat
N/A-53.7%$42.06M$71.83M14.43126
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies
1.6351 of 5 stars
$0.71
+1.4%
$2.65
+273.2%
-18.1%$150.17M$55.09MN/A400
CHPT
ChargePoint
3.6088 of 5 stars
$6.25
+1.9%
$8.63
+38.0%
-51.5%$144.99M$411.22MN/A1,440
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
1.4973 of 5 stars
$4.76
-0.2%
N/A+14.9%$143.91M$765.74M3.354,370
EMPD
Volcon
1.01 of 5 stars
$5.03
+4.4%
N/A+9.0%$135.49M$980KN/A80

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MAMO) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners