Go Pro

Massimo Group (MAMO) Competitors

Massimo Group logo
$0.95 -0.02 (-2.50%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.94 -0.01 (-0.72%)
As of 04:14 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MAMO vs. NIU, CHPT, CAAS, EMPD, and BLNK

Should you buy Massimo Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Massimo Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Massimo Group include Niu Technologies (NIU), ChargePoint (CHPT), China Automotive Systems (CAAS), Volcon (EMPD), and Blink Charging (BLNK). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does Massimo Group compare to Niu Technologies?

Niu Technologies (NASDAQ:NIU) and Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Massimo Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Niu Technologies. Niu Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Niu Technologies$616.02M0.27-$5.63M-$0.18N/A
Massimo Group$71.83M0.55$1.51M$0.0713.57

In the previous week, Niu Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Massimo Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Niu Technologies and 0 mentions for Massimo Group. Niu Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Massimo Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Niu Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Niu Technologies Positive
Massimo Group Neutral

75.1% of Niu Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Niu Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Niu Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Niu Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Niu Technologies is more favorable than Massimo Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Niu Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Massimo Group has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Niu Technologies' net margin of -2.17%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat Niu Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Niu Technologies-2.17% -10.85% -3.12%
Massimo Group 3.72%12.15%5.77%

Summary

Massimo Group beats Niu Technologies on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to ChargePoint?

Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) and ChargePoint (NYSE:CHPT) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

ChargePoint has a consensus price target of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 41.25%. Given ChargePoint's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ChargePoint is more favorable than Massimo Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
ChargePoint
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

In the previous week, ChargePoint had 4 more articles in the media than Massimo Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for ChargePoint and 0 mentions for Massimo Group. ChargePoint's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Massimo Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ChargePoint is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Massimo Group Neutral
ChargePoint Positive

Massimo Group has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ChargePoint has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Massimo Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ChargePoint. ChargePoint is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Massimo Group$71.83M0.55$1.51M$0.0713.57
ChargePoint$411.22M0.35-$220.20M-$8.68N/A

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to ChargePoint's net margin of -49.66%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat ChargePoint's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Massimo Group3.72% 12.15% 5.77%
ChargePoint -49.66%-504.42%-18.93%

37.8% of ChargePoint shares are held by institutional investors. 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of ChargePoint shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Massimo Group and ChargePoint tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to China Automotive Systems?

Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Massimo Group has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 3.72%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Massimo Group3.72% 12.15% 5.77%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Massimo Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Massimo Group. Massimo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Automotive Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Massimo Group Neutral
China Automotive Systems Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Massimo Group. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Massimo Group$71.83M0.55$1.51M$0.0713.57
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.14

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Massimo Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to Volcon?

Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) and Volcon (NASDAQ:EMPD) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Massimo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Volcon. Volcon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Massimo Group$71.83M0.55$1.51M$0.0713.57
Volcon$980K114.73-$150.05M-$8.36N/A

Massimo Group has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volcon has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Volcon had 2 more articles in the media than Massimo Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Volcon and 0 mentions for Massimo Group. Massimo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Volcon's score of -0.15 indicating that Massimo Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Massimo Group Neutral
Volcon Neutral

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Volcon's net margin of 0.00%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat Volcon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Massimo Group3.72% 12.15% 5.77%
Volcon N/A -62.90%-50.68%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Volcon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Massimo Group beats Volcon on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Massimo Group compare to Blink Charging?

Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) and Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Blink Charging had 6 more articles in the media than Massimo Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Blink Charging and 0 mentions for Massimo Group. Blink Charging's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Massimo Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Blink Charging is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Massimo Group Neutral
Blink Charging Positive

44.6% of Blink Charging shares are held by institutional investors. 77.6% of Massimo Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Blink Charging shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of -73.75%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 12.15% beat Blink Charging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Massimo Group3.72% 12.15% 5.77%
Blink Charging -73.75%-83.40%-37.65%

Massimo Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Blink Charging. Blink Charging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Massimo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Massimo Group$71.83M0.55$1.51M$0.0713.57
Blink Charging$103.52M0.82-$83.39M-$0.67N/A

Blink Charging has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 408.47%. Given Blink Charging's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Blink Charging is more favorable than Massimo Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Massimo Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Blink Charging
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Massimo Group has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blink Charging has a beta of 2.03, meaning that its share price is 103% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blink Charging beats Massimo Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Massimo Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAMO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAMO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAMO vs. The Competition

MetricMassimo GroupLEISURE&REC PRD IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$39.55M$2.39B$7.32B$12.44B
Dividend YieldN/A2.20%3.03%6.52%
P/E Ratio13.5736.7420.4624.46
Price / Sales0.551.173.9295.18
Price / Cash22.2316.5013.6049.26
Price / Book1.672.453.836.43
Net Income$1.51M$36.70M$246.94M$335.85M
7 Day Performance-1.58%-1.54%-0.43%-0.47%
1 Month Performance-1.10%0.74%1.26%3.39%
1 Year Performance-61.70%-7.37%0.11%24.90%

Massimo Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAMO
Massimo Group
1.0399 of 5 stars
$0.95
-2.5%
N/A-64.8%$39.55M$71.83M13.57126
NIU
Niu Technologies
2.32 of 5 stars
$2.07
+3.0%
$3.50
+69.1%
-38.6%$157.24M$616.02MN/A700
CHPT
ChargePoint
3.5827 of 5 stars
$5.98
+1.1%
$8.31
+39.1%
-56.4%$144.30M$411.22MN/A1,440
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
1.3857 of 5 stars
$4.49
+0.4%
N/A+7.0%$134.86M$765.74M3.164,370
EMPD
Volcon
0.5072 of 5 stars
$3.71
+4.2%
N/A-42.0%$100.07M$980KN/A80

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MAMO) was last updated on 7/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners