Free Trial

Sow Good (SOWG) Competitors

Sow Good logo
$1.38 -0.38 (-21.31%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.40 +0.01 (+0.72%)
As of 06:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SOWG vs. STKH, TWG, CHSN, SNAX, and BSFC

Should you be buying Sow Good stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Sow Good include Steakholder Foods (STKH), Top Wealth Group (TWG), Chanson International (CHSN), Stryve Foods (SNAX), and Blue Star Foods (BSFC). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Sow Good compare to Steakholder Foods?

Steakholder Foods (NASDAQ:STKH) and Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Steakholder Foods has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Steakholder Foods' return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Steakholder FoodsN/A N/A N/A
Sow Good -300.71%-45.33%-26.05%

In the previous week, Sow Good had 3 more articles in the media than Steakholder Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sow Good and 1 mentions for Steakholder Foods. Steakholder Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Sow Good's score of 0.00 indicating that Steakholder Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Steakholder Foods Positive
Sow Good Neutral

Steakholder Foods has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Steakholder Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Sow Good.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Steakholder Foods$10K234.60-$11.25MN/AN/A
Sow GoodN/AN/A-$40.64M-$28.34N/A

4.5% of Steakholder Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sow Good shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Steakholder Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Steakholder Foods beats Sow Good on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Top Wealth Group?

Top Wealth Group (NASDAQ:TWG) and Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Top Wealth Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Top Wealth Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Top Wealth GroupN/A N/A N/A
Sow Good -300.71%-45.33%-26.05%

In the previous week, Sow Good had 3 more articles in the media than Top Wealth Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sow Good and 1 mentions for Top Wealth Group. Top Wealth Group's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Sow Good's score of 0.00 indicating that Top Wealth Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Top Wealth Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Sow Good
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Top Wealth Group has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Top Wealth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sow Good.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Top Wealth Group$4.75M0.42-$2.02MN/AN/A
Sow GoodN/AN/A-$40.64M-$28.34N/A

10.7% of Sow Good shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Top Wealth Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Top Wealth Group beats Sow Good on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Chanson International?

Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) and Chanson International (NASDAQ:CHSN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Chanson International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Chanson International shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanson International has a beta of -4.12, meaning that its share price is 512% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Chanson International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Chanson International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sow Good-300.71% -45.33% -26.05%
Chanson International N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Sow Good had 3 more articles in the media than Chanson International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sow Good and 1 mentions for Chanson International. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chanson International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sow Good
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chanson International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Chanson International has higher revenue and earnings than Sow Good.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sow GoodN/AN/A-$40.64M-$28.34N/A
Chanson International$18.27M0.05$190KN/AN/A

Summary

Chanson International beats Sow Good on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Stryve Foods?

Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) and Stryve Foods (NASDAQ:SNAX) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stryve Foods has a beta of 22.07, meaning that its share price is 2,107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Stryve Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Stryve Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Stryve Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sow Good had 4 more articles in the media than Stryve Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sow Good and 0 mentions for Stryve Foods. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Stryve Foods'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sow Good Neutral
Stryve Foods Neutral

Stryve Foods has a net margin of -79.07% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Sow Good's return on equity of -45.33% beat Stryve Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sow Good-300.71% -45.33% -26.05%
Stryve Foods -79.07%-2,100.61%-47.85%

Stryve Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Sow Good. Sow Good is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stryve Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sow GoodN/AN/A-$40.64M-$28.34N/A
Stryve Foods$19.36M0.01-$19.04M-$5.47N/A

Summary

Stryve Foods beats Sow Good on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Blue Star Foods?

Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) and Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Blue Star Foods has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Blue Star Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sow Good had 4 more articles in the media than Blue Star Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sow Good and 0 mentions for Blue Star Foods. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blue Star Foods'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sow Good Neutral
Blue Star Foods Neutral

Blue Star Foods has a net margin of -82.34% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Sow Good's return on equity of -45.33% beat Blue Star Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sow Good-300.71% -45.33% -26.05%
Blue Star Foods -82.34%-134.60%-66.98%

Blue Star Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Sow Good. Sow Good is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Star Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sow GoodN/AN/A-$40.64M-$28.34N/A
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.01-$4.47M-$0.15N/A

Summary

Blue Star Foods beats Sow Good on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sow Good News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SOWG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SOWG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SOWG vs. The Competition

MetricSow GoodCONSM PD IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.23M$1.46B$7.12B$11.87B
Dividend YieldN/A3.97%2.87%5.21%
P/E Ratio-0.059.9816.9528.47
Price / SalesN/A5.043.7460.94
Price / CashN/A16.6913.0036.52
Price / Book-0.441.433.566.67
Net Income-$40.64M$66.99M$267.38M$332.53M
7 Day Performance-17.07%-0.54%-0.86%2.01%
1 Month Performance-75.70%5.15%5.81%9.20%
1 Year Performance-85.30%15.23%10.62%39.59%

Sow Good Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SOWG
Sow Good
0.4534 of 5 stars
$1.39
-21.3%
N/AN/A$1.23MN/AN/A201
STKH
Steakholder Foods
0.7184 of 5 stars
$1.85
+5.7%
N/AN/A$2.55M$10KN/A40
TWG
Top Wealth Group
N/A$3.44
-0.9%
N/AN/A$2.00M$4.50MN/A12
CHSN
Chanson International
0.3646 of 5 stars
$0.03
-12.2%
N/AN/A$1.29M$18.27MN/A354
SNAX
Stryve Foods
N/A$0.03
+2,900.0%
N/AN/A$121K$19.36MN/A220

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SOWG) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners