Free Trial
Final Hours! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access Before 11:59 PM
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149 Tonight
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Sow Good (SOWG) Competitors

Sow Good logo
$1.76 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.70 -0.06 (-3.30%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:40 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SOWG vs. STKH, TWG, CHSN, BSFC, and TTCFQ

Should you buy Sow Good stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sow Good with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sow Good include Steakholder Foods (STKH), Top Wealth Group (TWG), Chanson International (CHSN), Blue Star Foods (BSFC), and Tattooed Chef (TTCFQ). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Sow Good compare to Steakholder Foods?

Steakholder Foods (NASDAQ:STKH) and Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Steakholder Foods has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Steakholder Foods had 1 more articles in the media than Sow Good. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Steakholder Foods and 1 mentions for Sow Good. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Steakholder Foods' score of 0.34 indicating that Sow Good is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Steakholder Foods Neutral
Sow Good Neutral

Steakholder Foods has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Steakholder Foods' return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Steakholder FoodsN/A N/A N/A
Sow Good -300.71%-78.61%-41.65%

4.5% of Steakholder Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Steakholder Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Steakholder Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sow Good.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Steakholder Foods$10K215.28-$11.25MN/AN/A
Sow Good$31.99M0.05-$40.64M-$30.59N/A

Summary

Steakholder Foods beats Sow Good on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Top Wealth Group?

Top Wealth Group (NASDAQ:TWG) and Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Top Wealth Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Top Wealth Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sow Good.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Top Wealth Group$9.13M0.18$3.19MN/AN/A
Sow Good$31.99M0.05-$40.64M-$30.59N/A

In the previous week, Sow Good had 1 more articles in the media than Top Wealth Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sow Good and 0 mentions for Top Wealth Group. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Top Wealth Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Sow Good is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Top Wealth Group Neutral
Sow Good Neutral

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Top Wealth Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Top Wealth Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Top Wealth GroupN/A N/A N/A
Sow Good -300.71%-78.61%-41.65%

Top Wealth Group has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sow Good beats Top Wealth Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Chanson International?

Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) and Chanson International (NASDAQ:CHSN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Chanson International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chanson International has a beta of -4.12, suggesting that its share price is 512% less volatile than the broader market.

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Chanson International shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sow Good and Sow Good both had 1 articles in the media. Chanson International's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Sow Good's score of 0.44 indicating that Chanson International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sow Good Neutral
Chanson International Positive

Chanson International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sow Good.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sow Good$31.99M0.05-$40.64M-$30.59N/A
Chanson International$18.27M0.03$190KN/AN/A

Chanson International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Chanson International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sow Good-300.71% -78.61% -41.65%
Chanson International N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Sow Good and Chanson International tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Blue Star Foods?

Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) and Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Blue Star Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sow Good. Sow Good is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Star Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sow Good$31.99M0.05-$40.64M-$30.59N/A
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.01-$4.47M-$0.15N/A

In the previous week, Sow Good had 1 more articles in the media than Blue Star Foods. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sow Good and 0 mentions for Blue Star Foods. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Blue Star Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Sow Good is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sow Good Neutral
Blue Star Foods Neutral

Blue Star Foods has a net margin of -82.34% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Sow Good's return on equity of -78.61% beat Blue Star Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sow Good-300.71% -78.61% -41.65%
Blue Star Foods -82.34%-134.60%-66.98%

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Blue Star Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Star Foods has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sow Good and Blue Star Foods tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sow Good compare to Tattooed Chef?

Tattooed Chef (NASDAQ:TTCFQ) and Sow Good (NASDAQ:SOWG) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Tattooed Chef has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -300.71%. Tattooed Chef's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sow Good's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tattooed ChefN/A N/A N/A
Sow Good -300.71%-78.61%-41.65%

Given Tattooed Chef's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tattooed Chef is more favorable than Sow Good.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tattooed Chef
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Sow Good
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

10.7% of Sow Good shares are held by institutional investors. 41.2% of Tattooed Chef shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 50.7% of Sow Good shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tattooed Chef has a beta of 19.67, meaning that its stock price is 1,867% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sow Good has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Sow Good has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tattooed Chef. Sow Good is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tattooed Chef, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tattooed Chef$230.93M0.00-$141.75M-$0.23N/A
Sow Good$31.99M0.05-$40.64M-$30.59N/A

In the previous week, Sow Good had 1 more articles in the media than Tattooed Chef. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sow Good and 0 mentions for Tattooed Chef. Sow Good's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Tattooed Chef's score of 0.00 indicating that Sow Good is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tattooed Chef Neutral
Sow Good Neutral

Summary

Tattooed Chef beats Sow Good on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sow Good News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SOWG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SOWG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SOWG vs. The Competition

MetricSow GoodCONSM PD IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.56M$1.43B$7.24B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A4.07%2.94%5.28%
P/E Ratio-0.068.8118.5225.65
Price / Sales0.051.933.4286.28
Price / CashN/A14.7414.7756.67
Price / Book-1.081.383.717.14
Net Income-$40.64M$66.99M$238.79M$335.98M
7 Day Performance-1.12%-1.09%1.38%3.56%
1 Month Performance-1.12%-7.21%14.65%2.54%
1 Year Performance-83.72%5.17%18.59%35.05%

Sow Good Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SOWG
Sow Good
0.6903 of 5 stars
$1.76
flat
N/A-83.7%$1.56M$31.99MN/A201
STKH
Steakholder Foods
1.1075 of 5 stars
$1.41
+0.7%
N/A-92.9%$1.93M$10KN/A40
TWG
Top Wealth Group
0.1748 of 5 stars
$2.95
+6.9%
N/A-78.4%$1.60M$4.50MN/A12
CHSN
Chanson International
0.5234 of 5 stars
$1.27
+2.4%
N/A-100.0%$480K$18.27MN/A354
BSFC
Blue Star Foods
N/A$0.00
flat
N/A-99.1%$45K$5.93MN/A20

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SOWG) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners