Visteon (VC) Competitors

Visteon has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Adient's net margin of 0.39%. Visteon's return on equity of 15.93% beat Adient's return on equity.

In the previous week, Visteon had 9 more articles in the media than Adient. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Visteon and 2 mentions for Adient. Adient's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Visteon's score of 0.56 indicating that Adient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.7% of Visteon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Adient shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Visteon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Adient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Visteon has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adient has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Visteon currently has a consensus target price of $125.67, suggesting a potential upside of 2.04%. Adient has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.94%. Given Adient's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Adient is more favorable than Visteon.

Visteon has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Adient. Visteon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Visteon had 8 more articles in the media than Autoliv. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Visteon and 3 mentions for Autoliv. Visteon's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Autoliv's score of 0.00 indicating that Visteon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Autoliv has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Visteon's net margin of 5.99%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.03% beat Visteon's return on equity.

99.7% of Visteon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Visteon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Autoliv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Visteon. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Visteon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Visteon has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Visteon pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Visteon pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Autoliv pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Autoliv is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Visteon currently has a consensus target price of $125.67, indicating a potential upside of 2.04%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.46%. Given Autoliv's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Visteon.

Aptiv currently has a consensus target price of $82.85, indicating a potential upside of 7.71%. Visteon has a consensus target price of $125.67, indicating a potential upside of 2.04%. Given Aptiv's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Aptiv is more favorable than Visteon.

94.2% of Aptiv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of Visteon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Aptiv shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Visteon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aptiv has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Visteon has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Visteon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aptiv. Visteon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Visteon had 8 more articles in the media than Aptiv. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Visteon and 3 mentions for Aptiv. Aptiv's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Visteon's score of 0.56 indicating that Aptiv is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Aptiv pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Visteon pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Aptiv pays out 52.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Visteon pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Visteon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Visteon has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.77%. Aptiv's return on equity of 17.83% beat Visteon's return on equity.

Visteon has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

99.7% of Visteon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Visteon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Visteon pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Visteon pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Visteon had 4 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Visteon and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Visteon's score of 0.56 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Visteon presently has a consensus price target of $125.67, indicating a potential upside of 2.04%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $87.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.69%. Given Brunswick's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Visteon.

Visteon has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Visteon's return on equity of 15.93% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

Visteon has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Visteon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.