Autoliv Competitors

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Magna International and Autoliv's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Magna International and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Magna International and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.

Magna International presently has a consensus price target of $74.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 11.10%. Autoliv has a consensus price target of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Magna International.

Icahn Enterprises (NASDAQ:IEP) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Icahn Enterprises has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Icahn Enterprises and Autoliv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Autoliv has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icahn Enterprises. Icahn Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.9% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 90.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Icahn Enterprises and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Icahn Enterprises and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Autoliv has a consensus target price of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Icahn Enterprises.

Summary

Autoliv beats Icahn Enterprises on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares BorgWarner and Autoliv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BorgWarner has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. BorgWarner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.3% of BorgWarner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BorgWarner shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BorgWarner and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for BorgWarner and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

BorgWarner presently has a consensus target price of $43.8462, suggesting a potential downside of 2.56%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given BorgWarner's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe BorgWarner is more favorable than Autoliv.

Summary

BorgWarner beats Autoliv on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lear (NYSE:LEA) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both mid-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Lear and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Lear has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Lear and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Lear presently has a consensus target price of $147.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 11.27%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Lear.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Lear and Autoliv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.8% of Lear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lear beats Autoliv on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and Luminar Technologies (NASDAQ:LAZR) are both mid-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Autoliv and Luminar Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Autoliv currently has a consensus target price of $86.3333, indicating a potential downside of 4.07%. Luminar Technologies has a consensus target price of $37.1667, indicating a potential upside of 36.99%. Given Luminar Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Luminar Technologies is more favorable than Autoliv.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Luminar Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Luminar Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Autoliv beats Luminar Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and Luminar Technologies (NASDAQ:LAZR) are both mid-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Autoliv and Luminar Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Autoliv currently has a consensus target price of $86.3333, indicating a potential downside of 4.07%. Luminar Technologies has a consensus target price of $37.1667, indicating a potential upside of 36.99%. Given Luminar Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Luminar Technologies is more favorable than Autoliv.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Luminar Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Luminar Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Autoliv beats Luminar Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.