S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NYSE:ALV

Autoliv Competitors

$90.00
+0.76 (+0.85 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$87.86
Now: $90.00
$90.59
50-Day Range
$86.94
MA: $91.48
$94.98
52-Week Range
$38.16
Now: $90.00
$95.93
Volume737,838 shs
Average Volume501,014 shs
Market Capitalization$7.86 billion
P/E Ratio51.14
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.91

Competitors

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) Vs. MGA, IEP, BWA, LEA, LAZR, and LAZR

Should you be buying ALV stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "motor vehicle parts & accessories" are considered alternatives and competitors to Autoliv, including Magna International (MGA), Icahn Enterprises (IEP), BorgWarner (BWA), Lear (LEA), Luminar Technologies (LAZR), and Luminar Technologies (LAZR).

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Magna International and Autoliv's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magna International$39.43 billion0.64$1.77 billion$6.0513.92
Autoliv$8.55 billion0.92$461.50 million$5.7215.73

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Magna International and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Magna International1.46%7.31%3.02%
Autoliv2.16%11.87%3.40%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Magna International and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Magna International13902.62
Autoliv29502.19

Magna International presently has a consensus price target of $74.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 11.10%. Autoliv has a consensus price target of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Magna International.

Icahn Enterprises (NASDAQ:IEP) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Icahn Enterprises has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Icahn Enterprises and Autoliv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icahn Enterprises$8.99 billion1.65$-1,098,000,000.00($5.23)-12.21
Autoliv$8.55 billion0.92$461.50 million$5.7215.73

Autoliv has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icahn Enterprises. Icahn Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.9% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 90.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Icahn Enterprises and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Icahn Enterprises-24.19%-19.30%-7.90%
Autoliv2.16%11.87%3.40%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Icahn Enterprises and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Icahn Enterprises0000N/A
Autoliv29502.19

Autoliv has a consensus target price of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Icahn Enterprises.

Summary

Autoliv beats Icahn Enterprises on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares BorgWarner and Autoliv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BorgWarner$10.17 billion1.06$746 million$4.1310.90
Autoliv$8.55 billion0.92$461.50 million$5.7215.73

BorgWarner has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. BorgWarner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.3% of BorgWarner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BorgWarner shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BorgWarner and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BorgWarner4.11%11.48%5.50%
Autoliv2.16%11.87%3.40%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for BorgWarner and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BorgWarner15602.42
Autoliv29502.19

BorgWarner presently has a consensus target price of $43.8462, suggesting a potential downside of 2.56%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given BorgWarner's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe BorgWarner is more favorable than Autoliv.

Summary

BorgWarner beats Autoliv on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lear (NYSE:LEA) and Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) are both mid-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Lear and Autoliv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lear0.50%6.17%2.06%
Autoliv2.16%11.87%3.40%

Volatility and Risk

Lear has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Lear and Autoliv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lear161202.58
Autoliv29502.19

Lear presently has a consensus target price of $147.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 11.27%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $86.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.07%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Lear.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Lear and Autoliv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lear$19.81 billion0.50$753.60 million$13.9911.87
Autoliv$8.55 billion0.92$461.50 million$5.7215.73

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.8% of Lear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lear beats Autoliv on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and Luminar Technologies (NASDAQ:LAZR) are both mid-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Autoliv2.16%11.87%3.40%
Luminar TechnologiesN/A-38.58%-0.54%

Volatility and Risk

Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Autoliv and Luminar Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Autoliv29502.19
Luminar Technologies02402.67

Autoliv currently has a consensus target price of $86.3333, indicating a potential downside of 4.07%. Luminar Technologies has a consensus target price of $37.1667, indicating a potential upside of 36.99%. Given Luminar Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Luminar Technologies is more favorable than Autoliv.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Autoliv$8.55 billion0.92$461.50 million$5.7215.73
Luminar TechnologiesN/AN/A$5.45 millionN/AN/A

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Luminar Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Luminar Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Autoliv beats Luminar Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and Luminar Technologies (NASDAQ:LAZR) are both mid-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Autoliv2.16%11.87%3.40%
Luminar TechnologiesN/A-38.58%-0.54%

Volatility and Risk

Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Autoliv and Luminar Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Autoliv29502.19
Luminar Technologies02402.67

Autoliv currently has a consensus target price of $86.3333, indicating a potential downside of 4.07%. Luminar Technologies has a consensus target price of $37.1667, indicating a potential upside of 36.99%. Given Luminar Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Luminar Technologies is more favorable than Autoliv.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Autoliv and Luminar Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Autoliv$8.55 billion0.92$461.50 million$5.7215.73
Luminar TechnologiesN/AN/A$5.45 millionN/AN/A

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Luminar Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Luminar Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Autoliv beats Luminar Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Autoliv Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Magna International logo
MGA
Magna International
2.1$84.20+2.2%$25.33 billion$39.43 billion57.28Dividend Increase
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
Icahn Enterprises logo
IEP
Icahn Enterprises
1.8$63.88+4.9%$14.83 billion$8.99 billion-7.21Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
BorgWarner logo
BWA
BorgWarner
2.1$45.00+0.1%$10.76 billion$10.17 billion25.71Analyst Report
Lear logo
LEA
Lear
2.2$166.09+1.5%$9.98 billion$19.81 billion94.37
Luminar Technologies logo
LAZR
Luminar Technologies
1.5$27.13+3.8%$8.79 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Luminar Technologies logo
LAZR
Luminar Technologies
1.3$27.13+3.8%$8.79 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Gentex logo
GNTX
Gentex
2.3$35.38+0.7%$8.62 billion$1.86 billion29.00Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Allison Transmission logo
ALSN
Allison Transmission
2.4$37.92+0.4%$4.24 billion$2.70 billion12.72Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Visteon logo
VC
Visteon
1.4$127.17+1.8%$3.55 billion$2.95 billion-89.56Analyst Report
LCI Industries logo
LCII
LCI Industries
2.4$140.94+1.4%$3.55 billion$2.37 billion25.72Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
Adient logo
ADNT
Adient
1.9$37.08+0.3%$3.49 billion$12.67 billion-6.37
Dana logo
DAN
Dana
1.4$23.81+0.7%$3.44 billion$8.62 billion-476.10Analyst Report
News Coverage
Dorman Products logo
DORM
Dorman Products
1.5$99.71+0.2%$3.21 billion$991.33 million36.52Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Veoneer logo
VNE
Veoneer
1.0$27.48+0.6%$3.07 billion$1.90 billion-5.56
Gentherm logo
THRM
Gentherm
1.5$70.79+0.4%$2.31 billion$971.68 million64.94Upcoming Earnings
Meritor logo
MTOR
Meritor
1.6$30.37+2.0%$2.20 billion$3.04 billion9.52Insider Selling
Patrick Industries logo
PATK
Patrick Industries
2.0$78.93+1.7%$1.84 billion$2.34 billion23.08Dividend Announcement
Insider Selling
News Coverage
American Axle & Manufacturing logo
AXL
American Axle & Manufacturing
1.1$9.77+1.4%$1.11 billion$6.53 billion-1.04
Standard Motor Products logo
SMP
Standard Motor Products
2.1$42.01+1.1%$942.96 million$1.14 billion16.03Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Stoneridge logo
SRI
Stoneridge
1.2$30.66+4.0%$827.97 million$834.29 million-109.50Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Modine Manufacturing logo
MOD
Modine Manufacturing
1.4$13.87+0.1%$713.21 million$1.98 billion-126.09Analyst Upgrade
Tenneco logo
TEN
Tenneco
1.3$11.14+1.0%$680.91 million$17.45 billion-0.46Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$34.83+4.0%$622.06 million$837.40 million-4.18Earnings Announcement
Gap Up
Cooper-Standard logo
CPS
Cooper-Standard
1.2$35.82+0.3%$605.25 million$3.11 billion-1.97
Canoo logo
GOEV
Canoo
0.1$12.86+5.1%$479.77 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Motorcar Parts of America logo
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
1.2$21.28+0.7%$405.51 million$535.83 million141.87
Commercial Vehicle Group logo
CVGI
Commercial Vehicle Group
1.3$9.19+1.2%$297.99 million$901.24 million-7.02
Horizon Global logo
HZN
Horizon Global
0.7$9.40+2.0%$246.46 million$690.45 million-3.79Decrease in Short Interest
Strattec Security logo
STRT
Strattec Security
1.2$51.52+2.8%$199.33 million$385.30 million-198.15
China Automotive Systems logo
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
1.0$5.46+1.5%$168.45 million$431.43 million546.00Gap Down
Superior Industries International logo
SUP
Superior Industries International
1.0$5.71+1.6%$146.13 million$1.37 billion-0.41Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.