Dana (DAN) Competitors

Dana has a net margin of 14.55% compared to Visteon's net margin of 5.58%. Visteon's return on equity of 14.61% beat Dana's return on equity.

In the previous week, Dana had 1 more articles in the media than Visteon. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dana and 3 mentions for Visteon. Visteon's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Dana's score of 1.70 indicating that Visteon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Visteon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dana. Dana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Visteon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

96.8% of Dana shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of Visteon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Dana shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Visteon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dana pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Visteon pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Dana pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Visteon pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dana is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Dana presently has a consensus price target of $37.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.02%. Visteon has a consensus price target of $134.45, indicating a potential upside of 33.22%. Given Visteon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Visteon is more favorable than Dana.

Dana has a beta of 2.01, indicating that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Visteon has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Adient has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dana has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

Dana has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Adient. Dana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Dana had 2 more articles in the media than Adient. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dana and 2 mentions for Adient. Dana's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Adient's score of 0.79 indicating that Dana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Dana has a net margin of 14.55% compared to Adient's net margin of 0.32%. Adient's return on equity of 7.32% beat Dana's return on equity.

92.4% of Adient shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.8% of Dana shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Adient shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Dana shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Adient currently has a consensus target price of $26.60, suggesting a potential upside of 38.34%. Dana has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.02%. Given Adient's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Adient is more favorable than Dana.

Dana pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Dana pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Autoliv pays out 41.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Autoliv is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dana has a beta of 2.01, indicating that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Dana currently has a consensus target price of $37.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.02%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $135.20, indicating a potential upside of 11.49%. Given Dana's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Dana is more favorable than Autoliv.

96.8% of Dana shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Dana shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Autoliv had 2 more articles in the media than Dana. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Autoliv and 4 mentions for Dana. Dana's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Autoliv's score of 0.80 indicating that Dana is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dana has a net margin of 14.55% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 5.79%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.36% beat Dana's return on equity.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Dana. Dana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Dana had 4 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dana and 0 mentions for Avient. Dana's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Avient's score of 0.82 indicating that Dana is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dana has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Dana has a net margin of 14.55% compared to Avient's net margin of 5.10%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Dana's return on equity.

Dana has higher revenue and earnings than Avient. Dana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

96.8% of Dana shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Dana shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dana pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Dana pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Avient is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dana currently has a consensus target price of $37.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.02%. Avient has a consensus target price of $46.71, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Given Dana's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Dana is more favorable than Avient.