Magna International Competitors

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and Aptiv (NYSE:APTV) are both large-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Magna International has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aptiv has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Magna International and Aptiv, as provided by MarketBeat.

Magna International currently has a consensus target price of $76.2667, indicating a potential downside of 14.79%. Aptiv has a consensus target price of $127.3810, indicating a potential downside of 10.57%. Given Aptiv's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Aptiv is more favorable than Magna International.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

59.5% of Magna International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Aptiv shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Aptiv shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Magna International and Aptiv's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Aptiv. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Magna International and Aptiv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Aptiv beats Magna International on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Icahn Enterprises (NASDAQ:IEP) and Magna International (NYSE:MGA) are both large-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Icahn Enterprises has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Icahn Enterprises and Magna International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Icahn Enterprises and Magna International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $76.2667, indicating a potential downside of 14.79%. Given Magna International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Magna International is more favorable than Icahn Enterprises.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Icahn Enterprises and Magna International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Icahn Enterprises. Icahn Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.9% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. 90.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Icahn Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.2%. Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Icahn Enterprises pays out -153.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magna International pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magna International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Icahn Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Magna International beats Icahn Enterprises on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) are both large-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Magna International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of BorgWarner shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of BorgWarner shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. BorgWarner pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Magna International pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 16.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magna International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and BorgWarner has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Magna International and BorgWarner's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Magna International and BorgWarner's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than BorgWarner. BorgWarner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BorgWarner has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Magna International and BorgWarner, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Magna International currently has a consensus price target of $76.2667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.79%. BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $46.5333, suggesting a potential upside of 0.11%. Given BorgWarner's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BorgWarner is more favorable than Magna International.

Summary

BorgWarner beats Magna International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and Lear (NYSE:LEA) are both large-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Magna International and Lear, as reported by MarketBeat.

Magna International currently has a consensus price target of $76.2667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.79%. Lear has a consensus price target of $167.1333, suggesting a potential downside of 6.63%. Given Lear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lear is more favorable than Magna International.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Lear shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lear has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Magna International and Lear's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Magna International and Lear's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Lear. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Lear pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Magna International pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lear pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magna International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lear has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Lear beats Magna International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gentex (NASDAQ:GNTX) and Magna International (NYSE:MGA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Dividends

Gentex pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Gentex pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magna International pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gentex has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Magna International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Magna International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.5% of Gentex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Magna International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Gentex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Gentex and Magna International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Gentex currently has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.25%. Magna International has a consensus price target of $76.2667, indicating a potential downside of 14.79%. Given Magna International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Magna International is more favorable than Gentex.

Profitability

This table compares Gentex and Magna International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gentex and Magna International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Gentex. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gentex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Gentex has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Magna International beats Gentex on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) and Magna International (NYSE:MGA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Autoliv and Magna International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Autoliv. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autoliv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Autoliv has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

35.3% of Autoliv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Autoliv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Autoliv and Magna International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Autoliv and Magna International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Autoliv currently has a consensus target price of $90.1333, suggesting a potential downside of 3.00%. Magna International has a consensus target price of $76.2667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.79%. Given Autoliv's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Magna International.