Lulu's Fashion Lounge (LVLU) Competitors

In the previous week, Lulu's Fashion Lounge had 1 more articles in the media than Tile Shop Hldgs. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lulu's Fashion Lounge and 0 mentions for Tile Shop Hldgs. Lulu's Fashion Lounge's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tile Shop Hldgs'average media sentiment score.

Lulu's Fashion Lounge has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tile Shop Hldgs has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Tile Shop Hldgs has a net margin of -0.50% compared to Lulu's Fashion Lounge's net margin of -4.86%. Tile Shop Hldgs' return on equity of -1.36% beat Lulu's Fashion Lounge's return on equity.

Tile Shop Hldgs has higher revenue and earnings than Lulu's Fashion Lounge. Tile Shop Hldgs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lulu's Fashion Lounge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

73.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.7% of Tile Shop Hldgs shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.9% of Tile Shop Hldgs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

73.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Vroom shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Vroom shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lulu's Fashion Lounge has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vroom has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Lulu's Fashion Lounge and Lulu's Fashion Lounge both had 1 articles in the media. Lulu's Fashion Lounge's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Vroom's score of -0.71 indicating that Lulu's Fashion Lounge is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vroom has a net margin of -4.45% compared to Lulu's Fashion Lounge's net margin of -4.86%. Vroom's return on equity of -4.47% beat Lulu's Fashion Lounge's return on equity.

Vroom has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lulu's Fashion Lounge. Lulu's Fashion Lounge is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vroom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, BARK had 9 more articles in the media than Lulu's Fashion Lounge. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for BARK and 1 mentions for Lulu's Fashion Lounge. BARK's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Lulu's Fashion Lounge's score of 0.00 indicating that BARK is being referred to more favorably in the media.

BARK has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lulu's Fashion Lounge has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Lulu's Fashion Lounge has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BARK. BARK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lulu's Fashion Lounge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lulu's Fashion Lounge has a net margin of -4.86% compared to BARK's net margin of -7.65%. BARK's return on equity of -25.73% beat Lulu's Fashion Lounge's return on equity.

BARK currently has a consensus price target of $35.00, suggesting a potential upside of 279.40%. Given BARK's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe BARK is more favorable than Lulu's Fashion Lounge.

28.8% of BARK shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of BARK shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hour Loop and Hour Loop both had 1 articles in the media. Hour Loop's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Lulu's Fashion Lounge's score of 0.00 indicating that Hour Loop is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hour Loop has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lulu's Fashion Lounge. Lulu's Fashion Lounge is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hour Loop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hour Loop has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lulu's Fashion Lounge has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

0.3% of Hour Loop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are held by institutional investors. 95.0% of Hour Loop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Lulu's Fashion Lounge shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hour Loop has a net margin of 1.20% compared to Lulu's Fashion Lounge's net margin of -4.86%. Hour Loop's return on equity of 24.69% beat Lulu's Fashion Lounge's return on equity.