Do analysts rate PURR or MEHA?

Hyperliquid Strategies currently has a consensus price target of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hyperliquid Strategies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is PURR or MEHA more profitable?

Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Functional Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hyperliquid Strategies N/A 35.55% 32.65% Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate MEHA or FRMM?

Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 106.19%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Forum Markets 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Do analysts prefer MEHA or LGCL?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Lucas GC 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MEHA or LGCL?

Lucas GC has higher revenue and earnings than Functional Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Functional Brands $6.67M 0.03 $760K -$0.38 N/A Lucas GC $1.04B 0.00 $1.40M N/A N/A

Is MEHA or LGCL more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Lucas GC N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer ICON or MEHA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Icon Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is ICON or MEHA more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Icon Energy N/A N/A N/A Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend MEHA or LICN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Lichen International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, MEHA or LICN?

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lichen International. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Functional Brands $6.67M 0.03 $760K -$0.38 N/A Lichen International $24.52M 0.02 -$21.96M N/A N/A

Is MEHA or LICN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Lichen International N/A N/A N/A

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

$0.0048 +0.00 (+4.35%)

As of 10/6/2026 03:56 PM Eastern

Compare

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, LGCL, ICON, and LICN

Should you buy Functional Brands stock or one of its competitors? Functional Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), Forum Markets (FRMM), Lucas GC (LGCL), Icon Energy (ICON), and Lichen International (LICN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Hyperliquid Strategies currently has a consensus price target of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hyperliquid Strategies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Functional Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hyperliquid Strategies	N/A	35.55%	32.65%
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Hyperliquid Strategies has higher revenue and earnings than Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hyperliquid Strategies	$9.46M	314.38	$305.54M	-$6.42	N/A
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 7 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hyperliquid Strategies	Neutral
Functional Brands	Neutral

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Functional Brands on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Forum Markets. Forum Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Forum Markets	$6.55M	9.77	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 5 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Forum Markets and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Functional Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Forum Markets'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Forum Markets	Neutral

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 106.19%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%

Summary

Forum Markets beats Functional Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Lucas GC?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Lucas GC (NASDAQ:LGCL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Lucas GC has higher revenue and earnings than Functional Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Lucas GC	$1.04B	0.00	$1.40M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Lucas GC	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Lucas GC had 2 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lucas GC and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Functional Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lucas GC's score of -0.99 indicating that Functional Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Lucas GC	Negative

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Lucas GC	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Lucas GC beats Functional Brands on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Icon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Icon Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Functional Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Icon Energy	$11.26M	0.06	-$4.20M	-$24.60	N/A
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A

In the previous week, Icon Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Icon Energy and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Icon Energy	Positive
Functional Brands	Neutral

Summary

Icon Energy beats Functional Brands on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Lichen International (NASDAQ:LICN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Lichen International	N/A	N/A	N/A

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lichen International.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Lichen International	$24.52M	0.02	-$21.96M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Lichen International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Lichen International had 3 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lichen International and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Lichen International's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Lichen International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Lichen International	Neutral

Summary

Lichen International beats Functional Brands on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Functional Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MEHA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MEHA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Functional Brands	Medicinal Chemicals Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$205K	$205K	$10.23B	$13.39B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	96.74%	17.39%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	N/A	26.81	26.47
Price / Sales	0.03	0.03	270.83	114.58
Price / Cash	0.27	0.27	24.09	53.24
Price / Book	0.05	0.05	4.84	6.33
Net Income	$760K	$760K	$614.52M	$381.96M
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	-0.05%	-0.41%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	-2.94%	-4.85%
1 Year Performance	N/A	N/A	2.77%	1.42%

Functional Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MEHA Functional Brands	N/A	$0.00 +4.3%	N/A	N/A	$205K	$6.67M	N/A	33	Gap Up
PURR Hyperliquid Strategies	4.0341 of 5 stars	$11.89 -1.2%	$19.80 +66.5%	N/A	$2.83B	$9.46M	N/A	9
FRMM Forum Markets	1.8384 of 5 stars	$4.83 +3.0%	$10.00 +107.0%	N/A	$63.75M	$6.55M	N/A	2	News Coverage Positive News Gap Up
LGCL Lucas GC	0.8025 of 5 stars	$2.52 -3.8%	N/A	-99.7%	$860K	$149.04M	N/A	311	News Coverage Positive News
ICON Icon Energy	1.6345 of 5 stars	$0.97 +3.2%	N/A	-91.0%	$670K	$11.26M	N/A	N/A	Positive News Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MEHA) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, LGCL, ICON, and LICN

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Lucas GC?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MEHA vs. The Competition

Functional Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, LGCL, ICON, and LICN

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Do analysts rate PURR or MEHA?

Is PURR or MEHA more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PURR or MEHA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PURR or MEHA?

Does the media prefer PURR or MEHA?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MEHA or FRMM?

Does the media prefer MEHA or FRMM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MEHA or FRMM?

Do analysts rate MEHA or FRMM?

Is MEHA or FRMM more profitable?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Lucas GC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MEHA or LGCL?

Do analysts prefer MEHA or LGCL?

Does the media refer more to MEHA or LGCL?

Is MEHA or LGCL more profitable?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Do analysts prefer ICON or MEHA?

Is ICON or MEHA more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ICON or MEHA?

Does the media refer more to ICON or MEHA?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Is MEHA or LICN more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MEHA or LICN?

Do analysts recommend MEHA or LICN?

Does the media refer more to MEHA or LICN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MEHA vs. The Competition

Functional Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools