Go Pro

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

Functional Brands logo
$0.0046 0.00 (-8.00%)
As of 03:23 PM Eastern

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, LICN, ICON, and NVVE

Should you buy Functional Brands stock or one of its competitors? Functional Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), Forum Markets (FRMM), Lichen International (LICN), Icon Energy (ICON), and Nuvve (NVVE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperliquid Strategies. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands$6.67M0.03$760K-$0.38N/A
Hyperliquid Strategies$1M1,853.29-$16.01M-$7.37N/A

Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Functional BrandsN/A N/A N/A
Hyperliquid Strategies N/A -56.04%-52.22%

Hyperliquid Strategies has a consensus price target of $12.72, suggesting a potential downside of 0.88%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Functional Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Hyperliquid Strategies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 18 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands Neutral
Hyperliquid Strategies Positive

9.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Functional Brands on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 9 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Forum Markets and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands Neutral
Forum Markets Positive

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Forum Markets. Forum Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands$6.67M0.03$760K-$0.38N/A
Forum Markets$6.55M11.41-$450.52M-$33.82N/A

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 76.68%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Functional Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Forum Markets
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Functional BrandsN/A N/A N/A
Forum Markets -4,971.75%-216.23%-126.06%

Summary

Forum Markets beats Functional Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Lichen International (NASDAQ:LICN) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lichen International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Functional Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Functional Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lichen International.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lichen International$24.52M0.03-$21.96MN/AN/A
Functional Brands$6.67M0.03$760K-$0.38N/A

In the previous week, Lichen International had 2 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lichen International and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Lichen International's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Lichen International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lichen International Positive
Functional Brands Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lichen InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Lichen International beats Functional Brands on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Functional Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Functional Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon Energy$11.26M0.06-$4.20M-$23.98N/A
Functional Brands$6.67M0.03$760K-$0.38N/A

In the previous week, Icon Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Icon Energy and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Icon Energy Positive
Functional Brands Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Icon Energy and Functional Brands tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Nuvve?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Nuvve (NASDAQ:NVVE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

19.0% of Nuvve shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Nuvve shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Nuvve. Functional Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuvve, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands$6.67M0.03$760K-$0.38N/A
Nuvve$4.55M0.15-$30.82M-$330.82N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Functional Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Nuvve
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Nuvve had 2 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nuvve and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Nuvve's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Nuvve is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands Neutral
Nuvve Positive

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Nuvve's net margin of -552.28%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Functional BrandsN/A N/A N/A
Nuvve -552.28%N/A -161.20%

Summary

Functional Brands beats Nuvve on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Functional Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MEHA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MEHA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MEHA vs. The Competition

MetricFunctional BrandsMedicinal Chemicals IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$197K$197K$10.74B$12.94B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A97.24%11.02%
P/E Ratio-0.01N/A26.5624.28
Price / Sales0.030.03338.5279.34
Price / Cash0.270.2724.4753.65
Price / Book0.050.054.506.26
Net Income$760K$760K$611.08M$348.07M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/A0.56%1.39%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A2.36%4.59%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A11.45%17.04%

Functional Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MEHA
Functional Brands
N/A$0.00
-8.0%
N/AN/A$197K$6.67MN/A33
PURR
Hyperliquid Strategies
1.0096 of 5 stars
$10.58
+5.0%
$12.72
+20.2%
N/A$1.53B$1MN/AN/A
FRMM
Forum Markets
2.4838 of 5 stars
$5.48
-6.3%
$10.00
+82.5%
N/A$72.33M$6.55MN/A7
LICN
Lichen International
1.1309 of 5 stars
$1.25
-2.3%
N/A-73.0%$750K$24.52MN/A390
ICON
Icon Energy
1.756 of 5 stars
$1.01
-1.0%
N/A-91.0%$700K$11.26MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MEHA) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners