Do analysts rate MEHA or PURR?

Hyperliquid Strategies has a consensus price target of $12.72, indicating a potential upside of 90.65%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hyperliquid Strategies 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Is MEHA or PURR more profitable?

Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Hyperliquid Strategies N/A -56.04% -52.22%

Do analysts prefer FRMM or MEHA?

Forum Markets presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 63.93%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Forum Markets 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is FRMM or MEHA more profitable?

Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Forum Markets N/A -242.09% -135.46% Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate YARW or MEHA?

Yarrow Bioscience presently has a consensus price target of $58.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.32%. Given Yarrow Bioscience's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yarrow Bioscience is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yarrow Bioscience 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts prefer MEHA or ALP?

Portage Biotech has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 997.69%. Given Portage Biotech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Portage Biotech is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Portage Biotech 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Is MEHA or ALP more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Portage Biotech N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend MEHA or ICON?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Icon Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is MEHA or ICON more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Icon Energy N/A N/A N/A

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

$0.0042 0.00 (-4.55%)

As of 08/6/2026 01:18 PM Eastern

Compare

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, YARW, ALP, and ICON

Should you buy Functional Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Functional Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Functional Brands include Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), Forum Markets (FRMM), Yarrow Bioscience (YARW), Portage Biotech (ALP), and Icon Energy (ICON). These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a consensus price target of $12.72, indicating a potential upside of 90.65%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hyperliquid Strategies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperliquid Strategies. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.32	N/A
Hyperliquid Strategies	$1M	963.47	-$16.01M	-$7.37	N/A

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 2 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Hyperliquid Strategies	Positive

Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Hyperliquid Strategies	N/A	-56.04%	-52.22%

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Functional Brands on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Forum Markets. Forum Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Forum Markets	$6.55M	12.47	-$450.52M	-$36.07	N/A
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.32	N/A

In the previous week, Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Functional Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Forum Markets	Neutral
Functional Brands	Neutral

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Forum Markets	N/A	-242.09%	-135.46%
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Forum Markets presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 63.93%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Forum Markets beats Functional Brands on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Yarrow Bioscience?

Yarrow Bioscience (NASDAQ:YARW) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Yarrow Bioscience's net margin of -4,726.21%. Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Yarrow Bioscience's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yarrow Bioscience	-4,726.21%	-70.42%	-63.46%
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Yarrow Bioscience. Yarrow Bioscience is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yarrow Bioscience	$570K	48.93	-$26.48M	-$19.00	N/A
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.32	N/A

In the previous week, Yarrow Bioscience had 2 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Yarrow Bioscience and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Yarrow Bioscience's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Yarrow Bioscience is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yarrow Bioscience	Positive
Functional Brands	Neutral

83.8% of Yarrow Bioscience shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Yarrow Bioscience shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Yarrow Bioscience presently has a consensus price target of $58.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.32%. Given Yarrow Bioscience's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yarrow Bioscience is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yarrow Bioscience	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Yarrow Bioscience and Functional Brands tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Portage Biotech?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Portage Biotech (NASDAQ:ALP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

13.4% of Portage Biotech shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Portage Biotech	N/A	N/A	N/A

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Portage Biotech. Portage Biotech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.32	N/A
Portage Biotech	$100K	42.76	-$38.63M	-$8.18	N/A

Portage Biotech has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 997.69%. Given Portage Biotech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Portage Biotech is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Portage Biotech	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Portage Biotech had 1 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Portage Biotech and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Functional Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Portage Biotech'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Portage Biotech	Neutral

Summary

Portage Biotech beats Functional Brands on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Icon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.32	N/A
Icon Energy	$11.26M	0.06	-$4.20M	-$23.98	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Icon Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Functional Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Icon Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Icon Energy	Neutral

Summary

Functional Brands beats Icon Energy on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Functional Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MEHA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MEHA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Functional Brands	Medicinal Chemicals Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$180K	$180K	$10.83B	$12.87B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	120.63%	9.93%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	N/A	28.36	25.30
Price / Sales	0.03	0.03	317.83	106.23
Price / Cash	0.27	0.27	24.91	50.37
Price / Book	0.05	0.05	4.51	6.13
Net Income	$760K	$760K	$607.47M	$342.95M
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	2.89%	3.19%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	0.48%	-1.98%
1 Year Performance	N/A	N/A	13.75%	21.11%

Functional Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MEHA Functional Brands	N/A	$0.00 -4.5%	N/A	N/A	$180K	$6.67M	N/A	33	Gap Down
PURR Hyperliquid Strategies	2.0564 of 5 stars	$6.21 -1.4%	$12.72 +104.8%	N/A	$897.02M	$1M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
FRMM Forum Markets	2.9122 of 5 stars	$5.16 -3.9%	$10.00 +93.8%	N/A	$69.10M	$6.55M	N/A	7
YARW Yarrow Bioscience	2.4808 of 5 stars	$35.02 +6.2%	N/A	N/A	$23.38M	$570K	N/A	30
ALP Portage Biotech	1.3565 of 5 stars	$0.20 -1.4%	$2.00 +918.8%	N/A	$4.61M	$100K	N/A	6	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MEHA) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, YARW, ALP, and ICON

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Yarrow Bioscience?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Portage Biotech?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MEHA vs. The Competition

Functional Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, YARW, ALP, and ICON

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MEHA or PURR?

Do analysts rate MEHA or PURR?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MEHA or PURR?

Does the media prefer MEHA or PURR?

Is MEHA or PURR more profitable?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, FRMM or MEHA?

Does the media refer more to FRMM or MEHA?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FRMM or MEHA?

Is FRMM or MEHA more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FRMM or MEHA?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Yarrow Bioscience?

Is YARW or MEHA more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, YARW or MEHA?

Does the media refer more to YARW or MEHA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in YARW or MEHA?

Do analysts rate YARW or MEHA?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Portage Biotech?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MEHA or ALP?

Is MEHA or ALP more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MEHA or ALP?

Do analysts prefer MEHA or ALP?

Does the media refer more to MEHA or ALP?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Do analysts recommend MEHA or ICON?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MEHA or ICON?

Is MEHA or ICON more profitable?

Does the media prefer MEHA or ICON?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MEHA vs. The Competition

Functional Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools