Do analysts rate MEHA or PURR?

Hyperliquid Strategies has a consensus target price of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 73.08%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hyperliquid Strategies 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Is MEHA or PURR more profitable?

Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Functional Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Hyperliquid Strategies N/A 35.55% 32.65%

Do analysts prefer FRMM or MEHA?

Forum Markets presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 124.22%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Forum Markets 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend MEHA or NMHI?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Nature's Miracle 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is MEHA or NMHI more profitable?

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Nature's Miracle's net margin of -127.93%. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Nature's Miracle -127.93% N/A -95.86%

Do analysts prefer MEHA or ICON?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Icon Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is MEHA or ICON more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Icon Energy N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer MEHA or LICN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Lichen International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MEHA or LICN?

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lichen International. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Functional Brands $6.67M 0.03 $760K -$0.38 N/A Lichen International $24.52M 0.02 -$21.96M N/A N/A

Is MEHA or LICN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A Lichen International N/A N/A N/A

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

$0.0048 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 03:52 PM Eastern

Compare

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, NMHI, ICON, and LICN

Should you buy Functional Brands stock or one of its competitors? Functional Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), Forum Markets (FRMM), Nature's Miracle (NMHI), Icon Energy (ICON), and Lichen International (LICN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

9.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a consensus target price of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 73.08%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hyperliquid Strategies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 13 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Hyperliquid Strategies	Positive

Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Functional Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Hyperliquid Strategies	N/A	35.55%	32.65%

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperliquid Strategies. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Hyperliquid Strategies	$1M	2,263.29	-$16.01M	-$6.42	N/A

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Functional Brands on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 1 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Forum Markets and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Forum Markets	Very Positive
Functional Brands	Neutral

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Forum Markets. Forum Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Forum Markets	$6.55M	8.99	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A

Forum Markets presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 124.22%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Forum Markets beats Functional Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Nature's Miracle?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Nature's Miracle (NASDAQ:NMHI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Nature's Miracle had 1 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nature's Miracle and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Functional Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nature's Miracle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Nature's Miracle	Neutral

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nature's Miracle. Functional Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nature's Miracle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Nature's Miracle	$9.99M	0.07	-$7.34M	-$0.47	N/A

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Nature's Miracle's net margin of -127.93%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nature's Miracle	-127.93%	N/A	-95.86%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Nature's Miracle	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

94.6% of Nature's Miracle shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Nature's Miracle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nature's Miracle beats Functional Brands on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Icon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Icon Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Icon Energy and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Icon Energy	Very Positive

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Icon Energy	$11.26M	0.05	-$4.20M	-$24.60	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Icon Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Functional Brands and Icon Energy tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Lichen International (NASDAQ:LICN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Lichen International had 1 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lichen International and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Lichen International's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Lichen International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	Neutral
Lichen International	Very Positive

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Lichen International	N/A	N/A	N/A

Functional Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lichen International.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.38	N/A
Lichen International	$24.52M	0.02	-$21.96M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Lichen International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Lichen International beats Functional Brands on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Functional Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MEHA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MEHA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Functional Brands	Medicinal Chemicals Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$205K	$205K	$10.16B	$14.92B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	97.06%	11.71%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	N/A	25.43	25.34
Price / Sales	0.03	0.03	288.47	112.39
Price / Cash	0.27	0.27	23.71	51.48
Price / Book	0.05	0.05	4.76	6.25
Net Income	$760K	$760K	$613.19M	$358.55M
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	-1.66%	-2.07%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	-5.39%	-4.80%
1 Year Performance	N/A	N/A	5.15%	5.44%

Functional Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MEHA Functional Brands	N/A	$0.00 flat	N/A	N/A	$205K	$6.67M	N/A	33	Gap Up
PURR Hyperliquid Strategies	3.8216 of 5 stars	$11.61 +5.4%	$20.40 +75.7%	N/A	$2.30B	$1M	N/A	9	Analyst Forecast
FRMM Forum Markets	2.829 of 5 stars	$4.57 +0.9%	$10.00 +118.8%	N/A	$60.32M	$6.55M	N/A	7	Positive News Gap Up
NMHI Nature's Miracle	N/A	$0.00 flat	N/A	-99.3%	$670K	$9.99M	N/A	12	News Coverage
ICON Icon Energy	N/A	$0.92 +2.2%	N/A	-91.7%	$640K	$11.26M	N/A	N/A	Positive News Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MEHA) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, NMHI, ICON, and LICN

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Nature's Miracle?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MEHA vs. The Competition

Functional Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Functional Brands (MEHA) Competitors

MEHA vs. PURR, FRMM, NMHI, ICON, and LICN

How does Functional Brands compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MEHA or PURR?

Do analysts rate MEHA or PURR?

Does the media refer more to MEHA or PURR?

Is MEHA or PURR more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MEHA or PURR?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Forum Markets?

Does the media refer more to FRMM or MEHA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FRMM or MEHA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FRMM or MEHA?

Do analysts prefer FRMM or MEHA?

Is FRMM or MEHA more profitable?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Nature's Miracle?

Does the media prefer MEHA or NMHI?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MEHA or NMHI?

Is MEHA or NMHI more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MEHA or NMHI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MEHA or NMHI?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Icon Energy?

Do analysts prefer MEHA or ICON?

Does the media prefer MEHA or ICON?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MEHA or ICON?

Is MEHA or ICON more profitable?

Summary

How does Functional Brands compare to Lichen International?

Does the media prefer MEHA or LICN?

Is MEHA or LICN more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MEHA or LICN?

Do analysts prefer MEHA or LICN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MEHA vs. The Competition

Functional Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools