Free Trial

Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR) Competitors

Hyperliquid Strategies logo
$12.50 -0.42 (-3.25%)
Closing price 10/6/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$12.05 -0.45 (-3.63%)
As of 07:21 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PURR vs. FRMM, MEHA, FPS, ZTO, and PAC

Should you buy Hyperliquid Strategies stock or one of its competitors? Hyperliquid Strategies's main competitors and comparable companies include Forum Markets (FRMM), Functional Brands (MEHA), Forgent Power Solutions (FPS), ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO), and Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico (PAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Hyperliquid Strategies compare to Forum Markets?

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) and Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperliquid StrategiesN/A 35.55% 32.65%
Forum Markets -4,971.75%-216.23%-126.06%

Hyperliquid Strategies has higher revenue and earnings than Forum Markets. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forum Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperliquid Strategies$9.46M314.38$305.54M-$6.42N/A
Forum Markets$6.55M9.77-$450.52M-$33.82N/A

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Forum Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Forum Markets has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Hyperliquid Strategies presently has a consensus target price of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 106.19%. Given Forum Markets' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Hyperliquid Strategies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperliquid Strategies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Forum Markets
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 4 more articles in the media than Forum Markets. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 3 mentions for Forum Markets. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Forum Markets' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hyperliquid Strategies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Forum Markets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Forum Markets on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperliquid Strategies compare to Functional Brands?

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) and Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Hyperliquid Strategies currently has a consensus price target of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperliquid Strategies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Functional Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 7 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 0 mentions for Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hyperliquid Strategies Neutral
Functional Brands Neutral

Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Functional Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperliquid StrategiesN/A 35.55% 32.65%
Functional Brands N/A N/A N/A

Hyperliquid Strategies has higher revenue and earnings than Functional Brands. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperliquid Strategies$9.46M314.38$305.54M-$6.42N/A
Functional Brands$6.67M0.03$760K-$0.38N/A

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Functional Brands on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperliquid Strategies compare to Forgent Power Solutions?

Forgent Power Solutions (NYSE:FPS) and Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Forgent Power Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than Hyperliquid Strategies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Forgent Power Solutions and 7 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies. Forgent Power Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Hyperliquid Strategies' score of 0.37 indicating that Forgent Power Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Forgent Power Solutions
4 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hyperliquid Strategies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Forgent Power Solutions has a net margin of 5.76% compared to Hyperliquid Strategies' net margin of 0.00%. Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Forgent Power Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Forgent Power Solutions5.76% 24.59% 8.12%
Hyperliquid Strategies N/A 35.55%32.65%

Forgent Power Solutions currently has a consensus target price of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 33.85%. Hyperliquid Strategies has a consensus target price of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Forgent Power Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Forgent Power Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Hyperliquid Strategies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hyperliquid Strategies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forgent Power Solutions. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forgent Power Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forgent Power Solutions$1.42B8.88$81.85M$0.39106.18
Hyperliquid Strategies$9.46M314.38$305.54M-$6.42N/A

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Forgent Power Solutions on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperliquid Strategies compare to ZTO Express (Cayman)?

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (NYSE:ZTO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 6 more articles in the media than ZTO Express (Cayman). MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 1 mentions for ZTO Express (Cayman). Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat ZTO Express (Cayman)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hyperliquid Strategies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ZTO Express (Cayman)
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hyperliquid Strategies has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZTO Express (Cayman) has a beta of -0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the broader market.

ZTO Express (Cayman) has a net margin of 19.03% compared to Hyperliquid Strategies' net margin of 0.00%. Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat ZTO Express (Cayman)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperliquid StrategiesN/A 35.55% 32.65%
ZTO Express (Cayman) 19.03%15.90%10.89%

Hyperliquid Strategies presently has a consensus price target of $19.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. ZTO Express (Cayman) has a consensus price target of $26.05, suggesting a potential upside of 32.21%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than ZTO Express (Cayman).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperliquid Strategies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
ZTO Express (Cayman)
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of ZTO Express (Cayman) shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.3% of ZTO Express (Cayman) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ZTO Express (Cayman) has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperliquid Strategies. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZTO Express (Cayman), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperliquid Strategies$9.46M314.38$305.54M-$6.42N/A
ZTO Express (Cayman)$7.02B1.56$1.30B$1.8610.59

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats ZTO Express (Cayman) on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperliquid Strategies compare to Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico?

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) and Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico (NYSE:PAC) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperliquid Strategies. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperliquid Strategies$9.46M314.38$305.54M-$6.42N/A
Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico$2.16B4.91$499.30M$11.2618.64

In the previous week, Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico had 3 more articles in the media than Hyperliquid Strategies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico and 7 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies. Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Hyperliquid Strategies' score of 0.37 indicating that Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hyperliquid Strategies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico has a net margin of 25.36% compared to Hyperliquid Strategies' net margin of 0.00%. Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of 35.55% beat Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperliquid StrategiesN/A 35.55% 32.65%
Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico 25.36%32.44%10.41%

Hyperliquid Strategies presently has a consensus target price of $19.80, indicating a potential upside of 58.40%. Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico has a consensus target price of $259.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.38%. Given Hyperliquid Strategies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperliquid Strategies is more favorable than Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperliquid Strategies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Summary

Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico beats Hyperliquid Strategies on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hyperliquid Strategies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PURR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PURR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PURR vs. The Competition

MetricHyperliquid Strategies IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.07B$3.00B$10.23B$13.39B
Dividend YieldN/A13.77%96.74%17.39%
P/E Ratio-1.9513.3526.8126.47
Price / Sales314.384,016.76270.46114.13
Price / Cash11.77129.9124.0953.24
Price / Book8.2215.124.846.33
Net Income$305.54M-$16.13M$614.52M$381.96M
7 Day Performance1.87%0.73%-0.05%-0.41%
1 Month Performance2.63%-1.08%-2.95%-4.85%
1 Year PerformanceN/A5.83%2.77%1.42%

Hyperliquid Strategies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PURR
Hyperliquid Strategies
4.0341 of 5 stars
$12.50
-3.3%
$19.80
+58.4%
N/A$3.07B$9.46MN/A9
FRMM
Forum Markets
1.8384 of 5 stars
$4.86
+0.6%
$10.00
+105.8%
N/A$64.17M$6.55MN/A2
MEHA
Functional Brands
N/A$0.01
flat
N/AN/A$214K$6.67MN/A33
FPS
Forgent Power Solutions
4.6981 of 5 stars
$37.71
+1.4%
$56.00
+48.5%
N/A$11.34B$1.42B95.523,450
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman)
4.3226 of 5 stars
$19.47
-0.7%
$26.05
+33.8%
+2.3%$10.87B$54.21B10.4823,888

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PURR) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners