Does the media favor FRMM or YARW?

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 5 more articles in the media than Yarrow Bioscience. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Forum Markets and 1 mentions for Yarrow Bioscience. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Yarrow Bioscience's score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Forum Markets 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Yarrow Bioscience 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate MEHA or FRMM?

Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 82.48%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Functional Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Forum Markets 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media refer more to MEHA or FRMM?

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 5 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Forum Markets and 1 mentions for Functional Brands. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Functional Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Forum Markets 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PURR or FRMM?

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 10 more articles in the media than Forum Markets. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 6 mentions for Forum Markets. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Forum Markets' score of 0.40 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hyperliquid Strategies 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Forum Markets 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Is FRMM or PDYN more profitable?

Palladyne AI has a net margin of -254.75% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Palladyne AI's return on equity of -53.29% beat Forum Markets' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Forum Markets -4,971.75% -216.23% -126.06% Palladyne AI -254.75% -53.29% -40.05%

Does the media favor FRMM or PDYN?

In the previous week, Palladyne AI had 4 more articles in the media than Forum Markets. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Palladyne AI and 6 mentions for Forum Markets. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Palladyne AI's score of 0.34 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Forum Markets 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Palladyne AI 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate SZZL or FRMM?

Forum Markets has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 82.48%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Forum Markets 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SZZL or FRMM?

Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Forum Markets. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forum Markets $6.55M 11.04 -$450.52M -$33.82 N/A

Forum Markets (FRMM) Competitors

$5.48 -0.37 (-6.32%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

FRMM vs. YARW, MEHA, PURR, PDYN, and SZZL

Should you buy Forum Markets stock or one of its competitors? Forum Markets's main competitors and comparable companies include Yarrow Bioscience (YARW), Functional Brands (MEHA), Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), Palladyne AI (PDYN), and Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II (SZZL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Forum Markets compare to Yarrow Bioscience?

Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) and Yarrow Bioscience (NASDAQ:YARW) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Yarrow Bioscience has a net margin of -4,726.21% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Yarrow Bioscience's return on equity of -84.40% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%
Yarrow Bioscience	-4,726.21%	-84.40%	-77.68%

Forum Markets presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 82.48%. Yarrow Bioscience has a consensus price target of $58.00, indicating a potential upside of 59.25%. Given Forum Markets' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Yarrow Bioscience.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Yarrow Bioscience	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 5 more articles in the media than Yarrow Bioscience. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Forum Markets and 1 mentions for Yarrow Bioscience. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Yarrow Bioscience's score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Forum Markets	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Yarrow Bioscience	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Yarrow Bioscience has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forum Markets. Yarrow Bioscience is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forum Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Forum Markets	$6.55M	11.04	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A
Yarrow Bioscience	$570K	170.60	-$26.48M	-$14.64	N/A

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Yarrow Bioscience shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Yarrow Bioscience shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Forum Markets has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yarrow Bioscience has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Yarrow Bioscience beats Forum Markets on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Forum Markets compare to Functional Brands?

Functional Brands (NASDAQ:MEHA) and Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 5 more articles in the media than Functional Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Forum Markets and 1 mentions for Functional Brands. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Functional Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Functional Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Forum Markets	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Functional Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Forum Markets. Forum Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Functional Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Functional Brands	$6.67M	0.03	$760K	-$0.32	N/A
Forum Markets	$6.55M	11.04	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Functional Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Functional Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Functional Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Functional Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%

Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 82.48%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Functional Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Functional Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Forum Markets beats Functional Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Forum Markets compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) and Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Hyperliquid Strategies' return on equity of -56.04% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hyperliquid Strategies	N/A	-56.04%	-52.22%
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%

9.4% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Forum Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Hyperliquid Strategies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hyperliquid Strategies has a beta of 1.71, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Forum Markets has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Hyperliquid Strategies presently has a consensus target price of $12.72, suggesting a potential upside of 20.20%. Forum Markets has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 82.48%. Given Forum Markets' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Hyperliquid Strategies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hyperliquid Strategies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Hyperliquid Strategies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Forum Markets. Hyperliquid Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forum Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hyperliquid Strategies	$1M	1,528.26	-$16.01M	-$7.37	N/A
Forum Markets	$6.55M	11.04	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A

In the previous week, Hyperliquid Strategies had 10 more articles in the media than Forum Markets. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Hyperliquid Strategies and 6 mentions for Forum Markets. Hyperliquid Strategies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Forum Markets' score of 0.40 indicating that Hyperliquid Strategies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hyperliquid Strategies	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Forum Markets	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hyperliquid Strategies beats Forum Markets on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Forum Markets compare to Palladyne AI?

Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) and Palladyne AI (NASDAQ:PDYN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Forum Markets has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palladyne AI has a beta of 3.65, indicating that its share price is 265% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Palladyne AI had 4 more articles in the media than Forum Markets. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Palladyne AI and 6 mentions for Forum Markets. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Palladyne AI's score of 0.34 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Forum Markets	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Palladyne AI	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.0% of Palladyne AI shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Palladyne AI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Palladyne AI has a net margin of -254.75% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Palladyne AI's return on equity of -53.29% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%
Palladyne AI	-254.75%	-53.29%	-40.05%

Palladyne AI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forum Markets. Palladyne AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forum Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Forum Markets	$6.55M	11.04	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A
Palladyne AI	$5.25M	57.61	$10.04M	-$0.68	N/A

Forum Markets presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 82.48%. Palladyne AI has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 79.45%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Palladyne AI.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Palladyne AI	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Palladyne AI beats Forum Markets on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Forum Markets compare to Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II?

Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:SZZL) and Forum Markets (NASDAQ:FRMM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Forum Markets' net margin of -4,971.75%. Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity of 0.00% beat Forum Markets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II	N/A	N/A	N/A
Forum Markets	-4,971.75%	-216.23%	-126.06%

Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Forum Markets.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Forum Markets	$6.55M	11.04	-$450.52M	-$33.82	N/A

Forum Markets has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 82.48%. Given Forum Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Forum Markets is more favorable than Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Forum Markets	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

4.1% of Forum Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 65.7% of Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Forum Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Forum Markets had 6 more articles in the media than Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Forum Markets and 0 mentions for Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II. Forum Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II's score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Markets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II	Neutral
Forum Markets	Neutral

Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Forum Markets has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Forum Markets beats Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Forum Markets News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRMM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FRMM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Forum Markets	Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$77.21M	$2.95B	$10.65B	$12.77B
Dividend Yield	N/A	13.66%	97.24%	11.08%
P/E Ratio	-0.16	13.46	26.67	24.24
Price / Sales	11.04	4,611.44	327.59	129.21
Price / Cash	N/A	137.12	24.41	53.23
Price / Book	0.57	41.50	4.50	6.38
Net Income	-$450.52M	$3.66M	$612.35M	$348.73M
7 Day Performance	-10.02%	0.30%	-1.42%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	-3.86%	1.94%	2.16%	2.91%
1 Year Performance	N/A	10.28%	13.13%	17.19%

Forum Markets Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FRMM Forum Markets	3.0939 of 5 stars	$5.48 -6.3%	$10.00 +82.5%	N/A	$77.21M	$6.55M	N/A	7	News Coverage Analyst Downgrade Analyst Revision
YARW Yarrow Bioscience	2.4275 of 5 stars	$42.49 -0.5%	$58.00 +36.5%	N/A	$28.37M	$570K	N/A	30	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade Gap Down
MEHA Functional Brands	0.0236 of 5 stars	$0.00 +6.5%	N/A	N/A	$209K	$6.67M	N/A	33	Gap Up
PURR Hyperliquid Strategies	2.0626 of 5 stars	$6.68 -2.1%	$12.72 +90.4%	N/A	$964.91M	$1M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Options Volume Gap Up
PDYN Palladyne AI	2.8403 of 5 stars	$6.61 +5.1%	$11.00 +66.4%	-17.6%	$326.13M	$5.25M	N/A	70	News Coverage Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FRMM) was last updated on 8/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Forum Markets (FRMM) Competitors

FRMM vs. YARW, MEHA, PURR, PDYN, and SZZL

How does Forum Markets compare to Yarrow Bioscience?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Functional Brands?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Palladyne AI?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRMM vs. The Competition

Forum Markets Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Forum Markets (FRMM) Competitors

FRMM vs. YARW, MEHA, PURR, PDYN, and SZZL

How does Forum Markets compare to Yarrow Bioscience?

Is FRMM or YARW more profitable?

Do analysts rate FRMM or YARW?

Does the media favor FRMM or YARW?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FRMM or YARW?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FRMM or YARW?

Which has more volatility and risk, FRMM or YARW?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Functional Brands?

Does the media refer more to MEHA or FRMM?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MEHA or FRMM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MEHA or FRMM?

Is MEHA or FRMM more profitable?

Do analysts rate MEHA or FRMM?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Hyperliquid Strategies?

Is PURR or FRMM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PURR or FRMM?

Which has more risk and volatility, PURR or FRMM?

Do analysts rate PURR or FRMM?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PURR or FRMM?

Does the media refer more to PURR or FRMM?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Palladyne AI?

Which has more volatility and risk, FRMM or PDYN?

Does the media favor FRMM or PDYN?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FRMM or PDYN?

Is FRMM or PDYN more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FRMM or PDYN?

Do analysts rate FRMM or PDYN?

Summary

How does Forum Markets compare to Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II?

Is SZZL or FRMM more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SZZL or FRMM?

Do analysts rate SZZL or FRMM?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SZZL or FRMM?

Does the media favor SZZL or FRMM?

Which has more volatility & risk, SZZL or FRMM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRMM vs. The Competition

Forum Markets Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools