Free Trial

Nano Labs (NA) Competitors

Nano Labs logo
$1.76 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.67 -0.09 (-5.11%)
As of 06/12/2026 07:51 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NA vs. INSG, RFIL, AMPG, WATT, and CODA

Should you buy Nano Labs stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nano Labs with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nano Labs include Inseego (INSG), RF Industries (RFIL), AmpliTech Group (AMPG), Energous (WATT), and Coda Octopus Group (CODA). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Nano Labs compare to Inseego?

Nano Labs (NASDAQ:NA) and Inseego (NASDAQ:INSG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Nano Labs has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Inseego's net margin of -1.26%. Nano Labs' return on equity of 0.00% beat Inseego's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano LabsN/A N/A N/A
Inseego -1.26%-13.38%-1.58%

Nano Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Inseego.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Labs$3.84M10.77$19.27MN/AN/A
Inseego$168.85M1.07$840K$0.6217.89

50.7% of Nano Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Inseego shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of Inseego shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Inseego has a consensus target price of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 66.82%. Given Inseego's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Inseego is more favorable than Nano Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Labs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Inseego
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Nano Labs had 1 more articles in the media than Inseego. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nano Labs and 1 mentions for Inseego. Inseego's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Nano Labs' score of 0.93 indicating that Inseego is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nano Labs Positive
Inseego Very Positive

Nano Labs has a beta of 2.43, suggesting that its share price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Inseego has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nano Labs beats Inseego on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Labs compare to RF Industries?

Nano Labs (NASDAQ:NA) and RF Industries (NASDAQ:RFIL) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Nano Labs had 1 more articles in the media than RF Industries. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nano Labs and 1 mentions for RF Industries. Nano Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.93 equaled RF Industries'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nano Labs Positive
RF Industries Positive

RF Industries has a consensus target price of $11.25, indicating a potential downside of 40.00%. Given RF Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe RF Industries is more favorable than Nano Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Labs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
RF Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

RF Industries has a net margin of 0.34% compared to Nano Labs' net margin of 0.00%. RF Industries' return on equity of 10.54% beat Nano Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano LabsN/A N/A N/A
RF Industries 0.34%10.54%5.09%

Nano Labs has a beta of 2.43, meaning that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RF Industries has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Nano Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RF Industries.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Labs$3.84M10.77$19.27MN/AN/A
RF Industries$80.59M2.52$80K$0.04468.75

50.7% of Nano Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of RF Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 18.6% of RF Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RF Industries beats Nano Labs on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Labs compare to AmpliTech Group?

AmpliTech Group (NASDAQ:AMPG) and Nano Labs (NASDAQ:NA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Nano Labs has a net margin of 0.00% compared to AmpliTech Group's net margin of -24.82%. Nano Labs' return on equity of 0.00% beat AmpliTech Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AmpliTech Group-24.82% -17.50% -12.92%
Nano Labs N/A N/A N/A

Nano Labs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AmpliTech Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AmpliTech Group$25.20M8.54-$7.01M-$0.31N/A
Nano Labs$3.84M10.77$19.27MN/AN/A

AmpliTech Group has a beta of -0.19, indicating that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nano Labs has a beta of 2.43, indicating that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, AmpliTech Group had 7 more articles in the media than Nano Labs. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for AmpliTech Group and 2 mentions for Nano Labs. Nano Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat AmpliTech Group's score of 0.35 indicating that Nano Labs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AmpliTech Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nano Labs
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

11.0% of AmpliTech Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.7% of Nano Labs shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of AmpliTech Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AmpliTech Group currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.55%. Given AmpliTech Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AmpliTech Group is more favorable than Nano Labs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AmpliTech Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Nano Labs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Nano Labs beats AmpliTech Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Labs compare to Energous?

Nano Labs (NASDAQ:NA) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Nano Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energous.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Labs$3.84M10.77$19.27MN/AN/A
Energous$5.63M23.16-$9.59M-$4.10N/A

Nano Labs has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energous' net margin of -0.80%. Nano Labs' return on equity of 0.00% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano LabsN/A N/A N/A
Energous -0.80%-39.80%-33.46%

Nano Labs has a beta of 2.43, meaning that its share price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Labs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Energous
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

In the previous week, Nano Labs had 1 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nano Labs and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Nano Labs' score of 0.93 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nano Labs Positive
Energous Very Positive

50.7% of Nano Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nano Labs beats Energous on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano Labs compare to Coda Octopus Group?

Nano Labs (NASDAQ:NA) and Coda Octopus Group (NASDAQ:CODA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Coda Octopus Group had 6 more articles in the media than Nano Labs. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Coda Octopus Group and 2 mentions for Nano Labs. Nano Labs' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Coda Octopus Group's score of 0.22 indicating that Nano Labs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nano Labs
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Coda Octopus Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Nano Labs has a beta of 2.43, indicating that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coda Octopus Group has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Nano Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Coda Octopus Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Labs$3.84M10.77$19.27MN/AN/A
Coda Octopus Group$26.56M4.64$4.13M$0.3630.33

50.7% of Nano Labs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Coda Octopus Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.8% of Coda Octopus Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Labs
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Coda Octopus Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Coda Octopus Group has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Nano Labs' net margin of 0.00%. Coda Octopus Group's return on equity of 7.17% beat Nano Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano LabsN/A N/A N/A
Coda Octopus Group 14.78%7.17%6.57%

Summary

Coda Octopus Group beats Nano Labs on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nano Labs News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NA vs. The Competition

MetricNano LabsELEC COMP IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$41.36M$73.14B$38.78B$12.05B
Dividend YieldN/A1.02%3.16%5.66%
P/E RatioN/A94.3080.7624.42
Price / Sales10.77154.12636.24112.54
Price / CashN/A266.1749.0237.92
Price / Book0.3910.619.826.82
Net Income$19.27M$854.56M$1.07B$337.56M
7 Day Performance-15.79%0.60%0.12%1.16%
1 Month Performance-30.16%8.68%5.93%3.16%
1 Year Performance-83.06%222.46%160.42%30.60%

Nano Labs Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NA
Nano Labs
0.5211 of 5 stars
$1.76
flat
N/A-83.1%$41.36M$3.84MN/A157
INSG
Inseego
4.0886 of 5 stars
$10.45
-7.4%
$18.50
+77.0%
+58.9%$183.60M$166.19M16.85410
RFIL
RF Industries
1.9199 of 5 stars
$16.11
-3.4%
$11.25
-30.2%
+355.1%$180.27M$80.59M402.85340
AMPG
AmpliTech Group
0.936 of 5 stars
$6.84
+4.1%
$7.00
+2.3%
+320.3%$166.48M$25.20MN/A40
WATT
Energous
1.7657 of 5 stars
$23.92
-7.3%
N/A+194.1%$141.98M$5.63MN/A50

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NA) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners