Free Trial
Memorial Day Savings! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Claim Your Discount
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Polar Power (POLA) Competitors

Polar Power logo
$2.06 +0.01 (+0.49%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.09 +0.03 (+1.31%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:25 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

POLA vs. EFOI, DFLI, WTMA, GWH, and FLUX

Should you buy Polar Power stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Polar Power with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Polar Power include Energy Focus (EFOI), Dragonfly Energy (DFLI), Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition (WTMA), ESS Tech (GWH), and Flux Power (FLUX). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does Polar Power compare to Energy Focus?

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and Energy Focus (NASDAQ:EFOI) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

Polar Power has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Focus has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Power
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Energy Focus
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

26.1% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Energy Focus shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Polar Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.9% of Energy Focus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Polar Power had 2 more articles in the media than Energy Focus. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Polar Power and 0 mentions for Energy Focus. Polar Power's average media sentiment score of 2.04 beat Energy Focus' score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Power Very Positive
Energy Focus Neutral

Energy Focus has a net margin of -23.09% compared to Polar Power's net margin of -127.53%. Energy Focus' return on equity of -25.63% beat Polar Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Power-127.53% -259.19% -63.38%
Energy Focus -23.09%-25.63%-17.08%

Energy Focus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polar Power. Energy Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Power$6.30M1.19-$9.13M-$3.14N/A
Energy Focus$3.89M6.25-$1.03M-$0.15N/A

Summary

Energy Focus beats Polar Power on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Power compare to Dragonfly Energy?

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and Dragonfly Energy (NASDAQ:DFLI) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Polar Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dragonfly Energy. Polar Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dragonfly Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Power$6.30M1.19-$9.13M-$3.14N/A
Dragonfly Energy$58.63M0.47-$69.94M-$23.36N/A

In the previous week, Polar Power had 1 more articles in the media than Dragonfly Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Polar Power and 1 mentions for Dragonfly Energy. Polar Power's average media sentiment score of 2.04 beat Dragonfly Energy's score of 1.36 indicating that Polar Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Power
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Dragonfly Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Dragonfly Energy has a net margin of -126.90% compared to Polar Power's net margin of -127.53%. Dragonfly Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Polar Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Power-127.53% -259.19% -63.38%
Dragonfly Energy -126.90%N/A -49.27%

Polar Power has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dragonfly Energy has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Dragonfly Energy has a consensus price target of $3.25, indicating a potential upside of 51.87%. Given Dragonfly Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dragonfly Energy is more favorable than Polar Power.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Power
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Dragonfly Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

26.1% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Dragonfly Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Dragonfly Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dragonfly Energy beats Polar Power on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Power compare to Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition?

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition (NASDAQ:WTMA) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Polar Power's net margin of -127.53%. Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat Polar Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Power-127.53% -259.19% -63.38%
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Power
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polar Power.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Power$6.30M1.19-$9.13M-$3.14N/A
Welsbach Technology Metals AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

26.1% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.6% of Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.5% of Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Power has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition has a beta of -0.05, indicating that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Polar Power had 2 more articles in the media than Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Polar Power and 0 mentions for Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition. Polar Power's average media sentiment score of 2.04 beat Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Power Very Positive
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Neutral

Summary

Polar Power and Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Power compare to ESS Tech?

ESS Tech (NYSE:GWH) and Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

ESS Tech presently has a consensus price target of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 107.47%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than Polar Power.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ESS Tech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Polar Power
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Polar Power had 1 more articles in the media than ESS Tech. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Polar Power and 1 mentions for ESS Tech. Polar Power's average media sentiment score of 2.04 beat ESS Tech's score of 1.17 indicating that Polar Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ESS Tech
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Polar Power
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

ESS Tech has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Power has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Polar Power has a net margin of -127.53% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. Polar Power's return on equity of -259.19% beat ESS Tech's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ESS Tech-1,045.28% -1,251.69% -139.79%
Polar Power -127.53%-259.19%-63.38%

Polar Power has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. Polar Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ESS Tech$1.58M17.93-$63.44M-$3.37N/A
Polar Power$6.30M1.19-$9.13M-$3.14N/A

46.8% of ESS Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of ESS Tech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Polar Power beats ESS Tech on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Power compare to Flux Power?

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Power
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Flux Power
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Polar Power has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Polar Power had 1 more articles in the media than Flux Power. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Polar Power and 1 mentions for Flux Power. Polar Power's average media sentiment score of 2.04 beat Flux Power's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Power
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Flux Power
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

26.1% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Polar Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Flux Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Flux Power has a net margin of -12.48% compared to Polar Power's net margin of -127.53%. Polar Power's return on equity of -259.19% beat Flux Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Power-127.53% -259.19% -63.38%
Flux Power -12.48%-502.31%-14.32%

Flux Power has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Power$6.30M1.19-$9.13M-$3.14N/A
Flux Power$66.43M0.33-$6.67M-$0.34N/A

Summary

Flux Power beats Polar Power on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Polar Power News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for POLA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding POLA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

POLA vs. The Competition

MetricPolar PowerUTIL IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$7.50M$29.15B$19.26B$12.31B
Dividend YieldN/A3.34%3.84%5.31%
P/E Ratio-0.6622.9120.4325.66
Price / Sales1.195.3057.5383.75
Price / CashN/A9.4719.4856.72
Price / Book3.122.262.217.14
Net Income-$9.13M$1.55B$778.83M$335.72M
7 Day Performance26.38%3.41%1.84%3.03%
1 Month Performance21.18%-0.87%-0.74%2.88%
1 Year Performance14.13%22.88%19.82%35.20%

Polar Power Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
POLA
Polar Power
0.6323 of 5 stars
$2.06
+0.5%
N/A+12.6%$7.50M$6.30MN/A100
EFOI
Energy Focus
0.1184 of 5 stars
$4.04
+0.7%
N/A+89.2%$25.28M$3.56MN/A60
DFLI
Dragonfly Energy
2.8312 of 5 stars
$1.92
-4.0%
$3.25
+69.3%
-47.0%$24.30M$58.63MN/A180
WTMA
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition
N/A$9.47
-0.3%
N/A-32.0%$23.63MN/AN/A4
GWH
ESS Tech
3.0343 of 5 stars
$0.78
-4.2%
$2.25
+188.5%
-46.6%$22.13M$1.58MN/A270

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:POLA) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners