Polar Power Competitors

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and CAE (NYSE:CAE) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CAE has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.3% of CAE shares are held by institutional investors. 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of CAE shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Polar Power and CAE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Polar Power and CAE's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CAE has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Power.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Polar Power and CAE, as reported by MarketBeat.

CAE has a consensus target price of $39.25, suggesting a potential upside of 32.02%. Given CAE's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CAE is more favorable than Polar Power.

Summary

CAE beats Polar Power on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and Novanta (NASDAQ:NOVT) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Polar Power and Novanta's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Novanta has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Power.

Risk & Volatility

Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Novanta has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Polar Power and Novanta's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Polar Power and Novanta, as reported by MarketBeat.

Novanta has a consensus target price of $99.50, suggesting a potential downside of 26.66%. Given Novanta's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Novanta is more favorable than Polar Power.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of Novanta shares are held by institutional investors. 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Novanta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Novanta beats Polar Power on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Spectrum Brands (NYSE:SPB) and Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Spectrum Brands and Polar Power's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Spectrum Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Power.

Risk and Volatility

Spectrum Brands has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Spectrum Brands and Polar Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Spectrum Brands and Polar Power, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Spectrum Brands presently has a consensus target price of $82.50, suggesting a potential downside of 7.16%. Given Spectrum Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Spectrum Brands is more favorable than Polar Power.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.6% of Spectrum Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Spectrum Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Spectrum Brands beats Polar Power on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Atkore (NYSE:ATKR) and Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Atkore and Polar Power, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Atkore presently has a consensus target price of $61.00, suggesting a potential downside of 16.32%. Given Atkore's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atkore is more favorable than Polar Power.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.4% of Atkore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Atkore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Atkore has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Atkore and Polar Power's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Atkore has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Power.

Profitability

This table compares Atkore and Polar Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Atkore beats Polar Power on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and Energizer (NYSE:ENR) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Polar Power and Energizer, as provided by MarketBeat.

Energizer has a consensus price target of $50.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 2.01%. Given Energizer's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energizer is more favorable than Polar Power.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Energizer shares are held by institutional investors. 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Energizer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energizer has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Polar Power and Energizer's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Polar Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energizer.

Profitability

This table compares Polar Power and Energizer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Energizer beats Polar Power on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Polar Power and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $9.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 7.45%. Given FuelCell Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FuelCell Energy is more favorable than Polar Power.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Polar Power and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Polar Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FuelCell Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Polar Power and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

FuelCell Energy beats Polar Power on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.