Do analysts prefer SBDS or TRNR?

Interactive Strength has a consensus price target of $157.50, indicating a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Solo Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Solo Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Interactive Strength 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Do analysts recommend VEEE or TRNR?

Interactive Strength has a consensus price target of $157.50, indicating a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Twin Vee PowerCats. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Twin Vee PowerCats 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Interactive Strength 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media favor VEEE or TRNR?

In the previous week, Twin Vee PowerCats had 4 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Twin Vee PowerCats and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Twin Vee PowerCats' score of 0.20 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Twin Vee PowerCats 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Interactive Strength 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate NWTG or TRNR?

Interactive Strength has a consensus target price of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Newton Golf. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Newton Golf 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Interactive Strength 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media favor NWTG or TRNR?

In the previous week, Newton Golf had 3 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Newton Golf and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Newton Golf's score of 0.00 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Newton Golf 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Interactive Strength 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend YMAT or TRNR?

Interactive Strength has a consensus price target of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than J-Star. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score J-Star 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Interactive Strength 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has higher valuation and earnings, YMAT or TRNR?

J-Star has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Strength. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio J-Star $9.93M 0.42 -$20.17M N/A N/A Interactive Strength $20.74M 0.16 -$23.97M -$306.87 N/A

Does the media prefer YMAT or TRNR?

In the previous week, J-Star had 2 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for J-Star and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat J-Star's score of 0.00 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment J-Star 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Interactive Strength 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate TRUG or TRNR?

Interactive Strength has a consensus target price of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than TruGolf. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score TruGolf 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Interactive Strength 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer TRUG or TRNR?

In the previous week, TruGolf had 4 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TruGolf and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat TruGolf's score of 0.34 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TruGolf 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Interactive Strength 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Interactive Strength (TRNR) Competitors

$2.09 -0.01 (-0.48%)

Closing price 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.07 -0.02 (-0.96%)

As of 10/9/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

TRNR vs. SBDS, VEEE, NWTG, YMAT, and TRUG

Should you buy Interactive Strength stock or one of its competitors? Interactive Strength's main competitors and comparable companies include Solo Brands (SBDS), Twin Vee PowerCats (VEEE), Newton Golf (NWTG), J-Star (YMAT), and TruGolf (TRUG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "leisure products" industry.

How does Interactive Strength compare to Solo Brands?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Interactive Strength has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Solo Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands	$316.58M	0.02	-$101.32M	-$48.15	N/A
Interactive Strength	$20.74M	0.16	-$23.97M	-$306.87	N/A

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Interactive Strength's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Solo Brands	-32.01%	-8.67%	-2.30%
Interactive Strength	-159.24%	-469.40%	-52.97%

In the previous week, Interactive Strength had 2 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Interactive Strength and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Solo Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands	Neutral
Interactive Strength	Positive

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.68, meaning that its stock price is 368% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Interactive Strength has a consensus price target of $157.50, indicating a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Solo Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Solo Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Interactive Strength	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Solo Brands and Interactive Strength tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Strength compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Twin Vee PowerCats (NASDAQ:VEEE) and Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

15.6% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Vee PowerCats has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Strength. Twin Vee PowerCats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Twin Vee PowerCats	$14.82M	0.39	-$8.61M	-$106.89	N/A
Interactive Strength	$20.74M	0.16	-$23.97M	-$306.87	N/A

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -76.31% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. Twin Vee PowerCats' return on equity of -67.71% beat Interactive Strength's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Twin Vee PowerCats	-76.31%	-67.71%	-52.33%
Interactive Strength	-159.24%	-469.40%	-52.97%

In the previous week, Twin Vee PowerCats had 4 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Twin Vee PowerCats and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Twin Vee PowerCats' score of 0.20 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Twin Vee PowerCats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Interactive Strength	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Twin Vee PowerCats	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Interactive Strength	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Twin Vee PowerCats beats Interactive Strength on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Strength compare to Newton Golf?

Newton Golf (NASDAQ:NWTG) and Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

0.5% of Newton Golf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Newton Golf shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Interactive Strength has a consensus target price of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Newton Golf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Newton Golf	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Interactive Strength	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Newton Golf has a net margin of -124.42% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. Interactive Strength's return on equity of -469.40% beat Newton Golf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Newton Golf	-124.42%	-476.84%	-260.68%
Interactive Strength	-159.24%	-469.40%	-52.97%

In the previous week, Newton Golf had 3 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Newton Golf and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Newton Golf's score of 0.00 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Newton Golf	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Interactive Strength	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Newton Golf has a beta of 2.47, suggesting that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Newton Golf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Strength. Newton Golf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Newton Golf	$8.14M	0.61	-$6.02M	-$1.93	N/A
Interactive Strength	$20.74M	0.16	-$23.97M	-$306.87	N/A

Summary

Interactive Strength beats Newton Golf on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Strength compare to J-Star?

J-Star (NASDAQ:YMAT) and Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Interactive Strength has a consensus price target of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than J-Star.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
J-Star	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Interactive Strength	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

J-Star has a beta of 12.54, indicating that its stock price is 1,154% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, J-Star had 2 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for J-Star and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat J-Star's score of 0.00 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
J-Star	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Interactive Strength	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

J-Star has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. J-Star's return on equity of 0.00% beat Interactive Strength's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
J-Star	N/A	N/A	N/A
Interactive Strength	-159.24%	-469.40%	-52.97%

0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

J-Star has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Strength.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
J-Star	$9.93M	0.42	-$20.17M	N/A	N/A
Interactive Strength	$20.74M	0.16	-$23.97M	-$306.87	N/A

Summary

J-Star and Interactive Strength tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interactive Strength compare to TruGolf?

TruGolf (NASDAQ:TRUG) and Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

TruGolf has a net margin of -55.27% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. TruGolf's return on equity of -132.15% beat Interactive Strength's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TruGolf	-55.27%	-132.15%	-24.75%
Interactive Strength	-159.24%	-469.40%	-52.97%

TruGolf has a beta of -1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 208% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

3.2% of TruGolf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of TruGolf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Interactive Strength has a consensus target price of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than TruGolf.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TruGolf	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Interactive Strength	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

TruGolf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interactive Strength. TruGolf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TruGolf	$18.88M	0.02	-$15.23M	-$108.20	N/A
Interactive Strength	$20.74M	0.16	-$23.97M	-$306.87	N/A

In the previous week, TruGolf had 4 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TruGolf and 2 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat TruGolf's score of 0.34 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TruGolf	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Interactive Strength	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

TruGolf and Interactive Strength tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Interactive Strength News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRNR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Interactive Strength	Leisure Products Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$3.40M	$3.01B	$12.41B	$13.21B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.61%	70.37%	16.37%
P/E Ratio	-0.01	577.22	44.99	26.16
Price / Sales	0.16	37.71	87.76	94.54
Price / Cash	N/A	18.43	31.63	53.09
Price / Book	0.02	3.34	3.98	6.34
Net Income	-$23.97M	$80.91M	$444.34M	$381.90M
7 Day Performance	-7.03%	-2.81%	-0.04%	-1.41%
1 Month Performance	-30.01%	-3.59%	-2.35%	-3.48%
1 Year Performance	-99.04%	-3.57%	-4.16%	1.16%

Interactive Strength Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRNR Interactive Strength	2.3385 of 5 stars	$2.09 -0.5%	$157.50 +7,435.9%	-99.1%	$3.40M	$20.74M	N/A	72	News Coverage Positive News
SBDS Solo Brands	N/A	$3.00 +7.5%	N/A	N/A	$7.70M	$316.58M	N/A	300	Gap Down
VEEE Twin Vee PowerCats	0.6753 of 5 stars	$10.87 -3.5%	N/A	-89.5%	$6.35M	$13.54M	N/A	70	News Coverage Short Interest Increase Gap Down
NWTG Newton Golf	0.3379 of 5 stars	$1.22 +15.1%	N/A	-43.2%	$5.60M	$7.16M	N/A	39	Short Interest Increase
YMAT J-Star	N/A	$1.45 -2.4%	N/A	-79.0%	$4.63M	$9.93M	N/A	65	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Short Interest Increase

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TRNR) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Interactive Strength (TRNR) Competitors

TRNR vs. SBDS, VEEE, NWTG, YMAT, and TRUG

How does Interactive Strength compare to Solo Brands?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to Newton Golf?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to J-Star?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to TruGolf?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRNR vs. The Competition

Interactive Strength Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Interactive Strength (TRNR) Competitors

TRNR vs. SBDS, VEEE, NWTG, YMAT, and TRUG

How does Interactive Strength compare to Solo Brands?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SBDS or TRNR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SBDS or TRNR?

Is SBDS or TRNR more profitable?

Does the media favor SBDS or TRNR?

Which has more risk & volatility, SBDS or TRNR?

Do analysts prefer SBDS or TRNR?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in VEEE or TRNR?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, VEEE or TRNR?

Is VEEE or TRNR more profitable?

Does the media favor VEEE or TRNR?

Do analysts recommend VEEE or TRNR?

Which has more risk & volatility, VEEE or TRNR?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to Newton Golf?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NWTG or TRNR?

Do analysts rate NWTG or TRNR?

Is NWTG or TRNR more profitable?

Does the media favor NWTG or TRNR?

Which has more risk & volatility, NWTG or TRNR?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NWTG or TRNR?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to J-Star?

Do analysts recommend YMAT or TRNR?

Which has more volatility and risk, YMAT or TRNR?

Does the media prefer YMAT or TRNR?

Is YMAT or TRNR more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of YMAT or TRNR?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, YMAT or TRNR?

Summary

How does Interactive Strength compare to TruGolf?

Is TRUG or TRNR more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, TRUG or TRNR?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TRUG or TRNR?

Do analysts rate TRUG or TRNR?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TRUG or TRNR?

Does the media prefer TRUG or TRNR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRNR vs. The Competition

Interactive Strength Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools