MICS vs. SGBX, CASA, NFTG, TRNR, HPCO, NVFY, BON, SBET, CLEU, and IDW
Should you be buying Singing Machine stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Singing Machine include Safe & Green (SGBX), Casa Systems (CASA), NFT Gaming (NFTG), Interactive Strength (TRNR), Hempacco (HPCO), Nova LifeStyle (NVFY), Bon Natural Life (BON), SharpLink Gaming (SBET), China Liberal Education (CLEU), and IDW Media (IDW). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.
Singing Machine (NASDAQ:MICS) and Safe & Green (NASDAQ:SGBX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and community ranking.
3.5% of Safe & Green shares are held by institutional investors. 47.5% of Singing Machine shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Safe & Green shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Singing Machine currently has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 277.36%. Given Singing Machine's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Singing Machine is more favorable than Safe & Green.
Safe & Green received 1 more outperform votes than Singing Machine when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 66.67% of users gave Safe & Green an outperform vote while only 50.00% of users gave Singing Machine an outperform vote.
Singing Machine has a net margin of -25.06% compared to Safe & Green's net margin of -85.63%. Singing Machine's return on equity of -66.86% beat Safe & Green's return on equity.
Singing Machine has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its share price is 103% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Safe & Green has a beta of -2.6, meaning that its share price is 360% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Singing Machine had 4 more articles in the media than Safe & Green. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Singing Machine and 4 mentions for Safe & Green. Safe & Green's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Singing Machine's score of 0.09 indicating that Safe & Green is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Safe & Green has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Singing Machine. Singing Machine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe & Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Singing Machine beats Safe & Green on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Singing Machine News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MICS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MICS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Singing Machine Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
