Quarterhill (QTRH) Competitors

In the previous week, Crawford & Company had 4 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Crawford & Company and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. Quarterhill's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.79 indicating that Quarterhill is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Crawford & Company has a net margin of 1.50% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -11.31%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 26.21% beat Quarterhill's return on equity.

Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Quarterhill pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Crawford & Company pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Quarterhill pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quarterhill is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crawford & Company has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

11.0% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tiga Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -11.31%. Quarterhill's return on equity of -6.62% beat Tiga Acquisition's return on equity.

Tiga Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quarterhill.

54.5% of Tiga Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Tiga Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tiga Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Tiga Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quarterhill'saverage media sentiment score.

Real Brokerage has a net margin of -0.41% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -11.31%. Quarterhill's return on equity of -6.62% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

Real Brokerage has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quarterhill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

10.2% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are held by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 4 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Real Brokerage and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. Real Brokerage's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Quarterhill's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Brokerage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Real Brokerage has a consensus price target of $5.69, indicating a potential upside of 180.86%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Quarterhill.

In the previous week, reAlpha Tech had 10 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for reAlpha Tech and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. reAlpha Tech's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Quarterhill's score of 0.00 indicating that reAlpha Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

reAlpha Tech currently has a consensus price target of $40.63, suggesting a potential upside of 1,308.63%. Given reAlpha Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe reAlpha Tech is more favorable than Quarterhill.

1.0% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Quarterhill shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

reAlpha Tech has a beta of -2.97, indicating that its stock price is 397% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Quarterhill has a net margin of -11.31% compared to reAlpha Tech's net margin of -430.43%. Quarterhill's return on equity of -6.62% beat reAlpha Tech's return on equity.

reAlpha Tech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than reAlpha Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.