Quarterhill (QTRH) Competitors

Crawford & Company has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crawford & Company has a net margin of 1.50% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -11.31%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 26.21% beat Quarterhill's return on equity.

10.2% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.0% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crawford & Company had 3 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Crawford & Company and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. Quarterhill's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.79 indicating that Quarterhill is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Quarterhill pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Quarterhill pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crawford & Company pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Quarterhill is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tiga Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quarterhill.

Tiga Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -11.31%. Quarterhill's return on equity of -6.62% beat Tiga Acquisition's return on equity.

54.5% of Tiga Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Tiga Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tiga Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quarterhill'saverage media sentiment score.

Tiga Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, indicating that its share price is 102% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Real Brokerage has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quarterhill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus target price of $5.69, suggesting a potential upside of 178.80%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Quarterhill.

Real Brokerage has a net margin of -0.41% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -11.31%. Quarterhill's return on equity of -6.62% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Quarterhill shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 4 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Real Brokerage and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. Real Brokerage's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Quarterhill's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Brokerage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

reAlpha Tech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than reAlpha Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

reAlpha Tech presently has a consensus target price of $40.63, suggesting a potential upside of 1,305.71%. Given reAlpha Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe reAlpha Tech is more favorable than Quarterhill.

Quarterhill has a net margin of -11.31% compared to reAlpha Tech's net margin of -430.43%. Quarterhill's return on equity of -6.62% beat reAlpha Tech's return on equity.

reAlpha Tech has a beta of -2.97, meaning that its stock price is 397% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

1.0% of reAlpha Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of reAlpha Tech shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, reAlpha Tech had 10 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for reAlpha Tech and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. reAlpha Tech's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Quarterhill's score of 0.00 indicating that reAlpha Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.