Resources Connection (RECN) Competitors

Resources Connection has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Odyssey Marine Exploration has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Odyssey Marine Exploration's net margin of -12,170.90%. Resources Connection's return on equity of 11.74% beat Odyssey Marine Exploration's return on equity.

In the previous week, Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Odyssey Marine Exploration'saverage media sentiment score.

Resources Connection has higher revenue and earnings than Odyssey Marine Exploration. Odyssey Marine Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resources Connection, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

84.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.0% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 10.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 29.34% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of 4.52%. Resources Connection's return on equity of 11.74% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Verisk Analytics currently has a consensus target price of $238.20, indicating a potential upside of 32.00%. Given Verisk Analytics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than Resources Connection.

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 41 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Resources Connection's score of 0.00 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Resources Connection pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.9%. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Verisk Analytics has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Equifax has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Equifax has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of 4.52%. Equifax's return on equity of 20.41% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Equifax currently has a consensus target price of $228.88, indicating a potential upside of 34.54%. Given Equifax's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Equifax is more favorable than Resources Connection.

In the previous week, Equifax had 8 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Equifax and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Resources Connection's score of 0.00 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Resources Connection pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.9%. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Equifax has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

96.2% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTI Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

FTI Consulting has a consensus target price of $180.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.71%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Resources Connection.

84.5% of Resources Connection shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.5% of Resources Connection shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of 4.52%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 18 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for FTI Consulting and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Resources Connection's score of 0.00 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.