Free Trial
→ My top 3 AI picks for the next decade (From The Oxford Club) (Ad)tc pixel Free SAIC Stock Alerts

Science Applications International (SAIC) Competitors

Science Applications International logo
$122.08 -2.51 (-2.01%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$121.94 -0.14 (-0.12%)
As of 04:15 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

SAIC vs. BAH, CACI, KBR, LDOS, and VRSK

Should you buy Science Applications International stock or one of its competitors? Science Applications International's main competitors and comparable companies include Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), CACI International (CACI), KBR (KBR), Leidos (LDOS), and Verisk Analytics (VRSK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Science Applications International compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Booz Allen Hamilton$11.22B0.73$851M$6.3610.72
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.5514.57

In the previous week, Science Applications International had 4 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Science Applications International and 2 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.53 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Booz Allen Hamilton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.71% beat Science Applications International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Booz Allen Hamilton7.01% 76.71% 11.48%
Science Applications International 5.13%34.68%9.45%

Booz Allen Hamilton presently has a consensus target price of $84.23, suggesting a potential upside of 23.57%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $125.22, suggesting a potential upside of 0.51%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Booz Allen Hamilton
4 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.93
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Science Applications International on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to CACI International?

CACI International (NYSE:CACI) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

CACI International has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CACI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CACI International$9.57B1.39$535.81M$24.1524.89
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.5514.57

CACI International has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CACI International and CACI International both had 6 articles in the media. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat CACI International's score of 0.18 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CACI International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CACI International presently has a consensus price target of $696.64, suggesting a potential upside of 15.90%. Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.22, suggesting a potential upside of 0.51%. Given CACI International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CACI International is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CACI International
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

CACI International has a net margin of 5.60% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat CACI International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CACI International5.60% 15.65% 6.45%
Science Applications International 5.13%34.68%9.45%

86.4% of CACI International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CACI International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CACI International beats Science Applications International on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to KBR?

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. KBR pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. KBR is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KBR has a net margin of 5.49% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat KBR's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KBR5.49% 32.55% 7.62%
Science Applications International 5.13%34.68%9.45%

97.0% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of KBR shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KBR currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.04%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $125.22, indicating a potential upside of 0.51%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KBR
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

KBR has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$7.72B0.56$415M$3.3210.42
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.5514.57

In the previous week, KBR had 10 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for KBR and 6 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat KBR's score of 0.49 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KBR
3 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

KBR beats Science Applications International on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Leidos?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Leidos (NYSE:LDOS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Leidos pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Leidos has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Leidos is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of Leidos shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Leidos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Leidos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.5514.57
Leidos$17.63B0.83$1.45B$10.7210.89

Science Applications International currently has a consensus target price of $125.22, indicating a potential upside of 0.51%. Leidos has a consensus target price of $158.86, indicating a potential upside of 36.08%. Given Leidos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Leidos is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Leidos
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

Leidos has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat Leidos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.13% 34.68% 9.45%
Leidos 7.80%30.81%10.78%

In the previous week, Leidos had 7 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Leidos and 6 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Leidos' score of 0.47 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Leidos
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Leidos has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Leidos beats Science Applications International on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Verisk Analytics?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 2 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 6 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Verisk Analytics' score of 0.50 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Verisk Analytics
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Verisk Analytics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.5514.57
Verisk Analytics$3.07B7.00$908.30M$6.5125.38

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Science Applications International currently has a consensus target price of $125.22, indicating a potential upside of 0.51%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus target price of $226.71, indicating a potential upside of 37.24%. Given Verisk Analytics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Verisk Analytics
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 28.24% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.13% 34.68% 9.45%
Verisk Analytics 28.24%-239.55%18.56%

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Verisk Analytics has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Verisk Analytics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Science Applications International on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Science Applications International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SAIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SAIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SAIC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricScience Applications InternationalProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.12B$7.50B$10.11B$13.38B
Dividend Yield1.17%3.75%96.74%17.39%
P/E Ratio14.2836.3326.5126.15
Price / Sales0.7023.97269.33106.70
Price / Cash8.8221.9524.0953.24
Price / Book3.676.824.786.27
Net Income$358M$236.73M$614.99M$382.03M
7 Day Performance-4.30%0.31%-0.82%-0.85%
1 Month Performance-3.68%-4.93%-3.77%-5.29%
1 Year Performance20.61%-12.24%1.87%0.73%

Science Applications International Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SAIC
Science Applications International
3.8452 of 5 stars		$122.08
-2.0%		$125.22
+2.6%		+21.2%$5.12B$7.26B14.2823,000
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
4.0451 of 5 stars		$70.08
-3.9%		$83.69
+19.4%		-34.3%$8.45B$11.22B11.0431,500
CACI
CACI International
3.9911 of 5 stars		$607.55
-1.7%		$697.55
+14.8%		+13.6%$13.47B$9.57B25.2327,000
KBR
KBR
4.25 of 5 stars		$34.49
-0.1%		$45.00
+30.5%		-27.1%$4.34B$7.72B10.389,000
LDOS
Leidos
4.6502 of 5 stars		$121.72
-1.5%		$160.29
+31.7%		-41.1%$15.27B$17.17B11.3547,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SAIC) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel