Go Pro

Science Applications International (SAIC) Competitors

Science Applications International logo
$133.97 +1.35 (+1.02%)
As of 10:37 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SAIC vs. BAH, CACI, KBR, LDOS, and EFX

Should you buy Science Applications International stock or one of its competitors? Science Applications International's main competitors and comparable companies include Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), CACI International (CACI), KBR (KBR), Leidos (LDOS), and Equifax (EFX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Science Applications International compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Science Applications International currently has a consensus target price of $125.22, suggesting a potential downside of 6.08%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $83.69, suggesting a potential upside of 5.96%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Booz Allen Hamilton
4 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.93

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.71% beat Science Applications International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.13% 34.68% 9.45%
Booz Allen Hamilton 7.01%76.71%11.48%

In the previous week, Booz Allen Hamilton had 4 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.57 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Booz Allen Hamilton
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.77$358M$8.5515.59
Booz Allen Hamilton$11.22B0.85$851M$6.3612.42

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Science Applications International on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to CACI International?

CACI International (NYSE:CACI) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, CACI International had 1 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for CACI International and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat CACI International's score of 0.97 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CACI International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CACI International has a net margin of 5.60% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat CACI International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CACI International5.60% 15.65% 6.45%
Science Applications International 5.13%34.68%9.45%

CACI International has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CACI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CACI International$9.57B1.47$535.81M$24.1526.37
Science Applications International$7.26B0.77$358M$8.5515.59

CACI International currently has a consensus target price of $697.55, suggesting a potential upside of 9.53%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $125.22, suggesting a potential downside of 6.08%. Given CACI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CACI International is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CACI International
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

CACI International has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

86.4% of CACI International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CACI International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CACI International beats Science Applications International on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to KBR?

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

KBR has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$7.79B0.60$415M$3.3211.11
Science Applications International$7.26B0.77$358M$8.5515.59

KBR has a net margin of 5.49% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat KBR's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KBR5.49% 32.55% 7.62%
Science Applications International 5.13%34.68%9.45%

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. KBR pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. KBR is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KBR currently has a consensus target price of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 26.50%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $125.22, suggesting a potential downside of 6.08%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KBR
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

In the previous week, KBR had 1 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for KBR and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. KBR's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Science Applications International's score of 1.04 indicating that KBR is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KBR
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of KBR shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

KBR beats Science Applications International on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Leidos?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Leidos (NYSE:LDOS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Leidos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.77$358M$8.5515.59
Leidos$17.17B0.95$1.45B$10.7212.18

Science Applications International presently has a consensus target price of $125.22, suggesting a potential downside of 6.08%. Leidos has a consensus target price of $162.93, suggesting a potential upside of 24.80%. Given Leidos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Leidos is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Leidos
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of Leidos shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Leidos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Leidos has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat Leidos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.13% 34.68% 9.45%
Leidos 7.80%30.81%10.78%

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Leidos pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Leidos has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Leidos is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Leidos had 10 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Leidos and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Leidos' score of 0.73 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Leidos
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Leidos has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Leidos beats Science Applications International on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Equifax?

Equifax (NYSE:EFX) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Equifax has a net margin of 10.73% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.13%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat Equifax's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Equifax10.73% 21.61% 8.41%
Science Applications International 5.13%34.68%9.45%

Equifax currently has a consensus price target of $215.16, suggesting a potential upside of 31.84%. Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.22, suggesting a potential downside of 6.08%. Given Equifax's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Equifax is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Equifax
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

In the previous week, Equifax had 3 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Equifax and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Equifax's score of 0.99 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Equifax
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.2% of Equifax shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Equifax has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Equifax is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Equifax has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equifax$6.07B3.16$660.30M$5.6928.68
Science Applications International$7.26B0.77$358M$8.5515.59

Summary

Equifax beats Science Applications International on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Science Applications International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SAIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SAIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SAIC vs. The Competition

MetricScience Applications InternationalProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.58B$7.97B$10.18B$14.93B
Dividend Yield1.11%3.77%97.16%12.31%
P/E Ratio15.5837.4225.4525.33
Price / Sales0.7724.83288.3087.33
Price / Cash9.3021.8923.6750.90
Price / Book3.896.764.766.24
Net Income$358M$236.73M$613.19M$358.55M
7 Day Performance3.55%0.58%-0.84%-1.20%
1 Month Performance7.23%-3.07%-5.21%-4.26%
1 Year Performance29.71%-11.07%4.42%5.47%

Science Applications International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SAIC
Science Applications International
3.1297 of 5 stars
$133.97
+1.0%
$125.22
-6.5%
+28.6%$5.61B$7.26B15.6723,000
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
3.4578 of 5 stars
$72.94
+0.2%
$83.69
+14.7%
-23.1%$8.77B$11.22B11.4731,500
CACI
CACI International
3.6541 of 5 stars
$622.51
-0.2%
$697.55
+12.1%
+28.6%$13.76B$9.57B25.7827,000
KBR
KBR
4.0882 of 5 stars
$36.77
-0.1%
$46.67
+26.9%
-24.1%$4.64B$7.79B11.089,000
LDOS
Leidos
4.8996 of 5 stars
$133.19
+0.1%
$162.93
+22.3%
-29.1%$16.71B$17.17B12.4247,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SAIC) was last updated on 9/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners