Go Pro

Science Applications International (SAIC) Competitors

Science Applications International logo
$128.96 +1.38 (+1.08%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$129.16 +0.20 (+0.15%)
As of 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SAIC vs. BAH, CACI, KBR, LDOS, and J

Should you buy Science Applications International stock or one of its competitors? Science Applications International's main competitors and comparable companies include Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), CACI International (CACI), KBR (KBR), Leidos (LDOS), and Jacobs Solutions (J). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Science Applications International compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.71% beat Science Applications International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.55% 36.96% 10.32%
Booz Allen Hamilton 7.01%76.71%11.48%

Science Applications International currently has a consensus target price of $116.89, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $84.08, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Booz Allen Hamilton
4 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.93

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.75$358M$8.8814.52
Booz Allen Hamilton$11.09B0.81$851M$6.3611.76

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Science Applications International had 3 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Science Applications International and 4 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.23 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Booz Allen Hamilton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Science Applications International on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to CACI International?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and CACI International (NYSE:CACI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

CACI International has a net margin of 5.60% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat CACI International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.55% 36.96% 10.32%
CACI International 5.60%15.65%6.45%

CACI International has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CACI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.75$358M$8.8814.52
CACI International$9.57B1.46$535.81M$24.1526.22

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CACI International has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Science Applications International presently has a consensus target price of $116.89, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. CACI International has a consensus target price of $697.55, suggesting a potential upside of 10.17%. Given CACI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CACI International is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
CACI International
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, CACI International had 3 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for CACI International and 7 mentions for Science Applications International. CACI International's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.71 indicating that CACI International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CACI International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of CACI International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of CACI International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CACI International beats Science Applications International on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to KBR?

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

97.0% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of KBR shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KBR currently has a consensus target price of $46.67, indicating a potential upside of 22.22%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $116.89, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KBR
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$7.79B0.62$415M$3.3211.50
Science Applications International$7.26B0.75$358M$8.8814.52

In the previous week, KBR had 19 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for KBR and 7 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat KBR's score of 0.70 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KBR
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. KBR pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. KBR is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 5.55% compared to KBR's net margin of 5.49%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat KBR's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KBR5.49% 32.55% 7.62%
Science Applications International 5.55%36.96%10.32%

KBR has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

KBR beats Science Applications International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Leidos?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Leidos (NYSE:LDOS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Leidos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.75$358M$8.8814.52
Leidos$17.17B1.02$1.45B$10.7213.05

In the previous week, Leidos had 11 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Leidos and 7 mentions for Science Applications International. Leidos' average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.71 indicating that Leidos is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Leidos
14 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Leidos pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Leidos has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Leidos is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Leidos has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Science Applications International currently has a consensus target price of $116.89, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Leidos has a consensus target price of $162.93, suggesting a potential upside of 16.50%. Given Leidos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Leidos is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Leidos
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of Leidos shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Leidos shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Leidos has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat Leidos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.55% 36.96% 10.32%
Leidos 7.80%30.81%10.78%

Summary

Leidos beats Science Applications International on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Jacobs Solutions (NYSE:J) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Jacobs Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $153.70, suggesting a potential upside of 2.19%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $116.89, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Jacobs Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jacobs Solutions is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jacobs Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

In the previous week, Jacobs Solutions had 16 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Jacobs Solutions and 7 mentions for Science Applications International. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.71 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Jacobs Solutions
20 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Science Applications International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Science Applications International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jacobs Solutions. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jacobs Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jacobs Solutions$14.22B1.25$289.34M$2.8253.34
Science Applications International$7.26B0.75$358M$8.8814.52

Science Applications International has a net margin of 5.55% compared to Jacobs Solutions' net margin of 2.40%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat Jacobs Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jacobs Solutions2.40% 23.96% 7.02%
Science Applications International 5.55%36.96%10.32%

Jacobs Solutions pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Jacobs Solutions pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jacobs Solutions has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Science Applications International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

85.7% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jacobs Solutions beats Science Applications International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Science Applications International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SAIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SAIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SAIC vs. The Competition

MetricScience Applications InternationalProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.45B$8.04B$10.65B$12.94B
Dividend Yield1.16%3.71%97.24%11.02%
P/E Ratio14.5237.6126.5624.28
Price / Sales0.7525.90457.4292.31
Price / Cash8.8523.4024.4753.65
Price / Book3.887.424.496.26
Net Income$358M$236.65M$611.08M$348.07M
7 Day Performance2.11%-0.07%0.16%1.40%
1 Month Performance8.85%4.43%1.90%4.59%
1 Year Performance8.06%-4.42%11.17%17.05%

Science Applications International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SAIC
Science Applications International
2.8065 of 5 stars
$128.96
+1.1%
$116.89
-9.4%
+6.7%$5.45B$7.26B14.5223,000
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
3.9905 of 5 stars
$76.15
-1.2%
$84.08
+10.4%
-32.5%$9.13B$11.09B11.9431,500
CACI
CACI International
4.1776 of 5 stars
$632.08
-2.4%
$697.55
+10.4%
+28.7%$13.95B$9.57B26.1527,000
KBR
KBR
4.3355 of 5 stars
$37.86
-1.9%
$46.67
+23.3%
-26.1%$4.76B$7.79B11.379,000
LDOS
Leidos
4.7689 of 5 stars
$138.74
-1.9%
$162.93
+17.4%
-24.6%$17.40B$17.17B12.9347,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SAIC) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners