Go Pro

Science Applications International (SAIC) Competitors

Science Applications International logo
$124.28 +3.98 (+3.31%)
Closing price 08/6/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$124.24 -0.05 (-0.04%)
As of 07:41 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SAIC vs. BAH, CACI, KBR, LDOS, and ULS

Should you buy Science Applications International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Science Applications International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Science Applications International include Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), CACI International (CACI), KBR (KBR), Leidos (LDOS), and UL Solutions (ULS). These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Science Applications International compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.71% beat Science Applications International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.55% 36.96% 10.32%
Booz Allen Hamilton 7.01%76.71%11.48%

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Science Applications International presently has a consensus target price of $115.22, suggesting a potential downside of 7.29%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $84.08, suggesting a potential upside of 13.72%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
Booz Allen Hamilton
4 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.93

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.8814.00
Booz Allen Hamilton$11.22B0.79$851M$6.3611.63

In the previous week, Booz Allen Hamilton had 4 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Booz Allen Hamilton's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.54 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Booz Allen Hamilton
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Science Applications International on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to CACI International?

CACI International (NYSE:CACI) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

CACI International has a net margin of 5.60% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat CACI International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CACI International5.60% 15.95% 6.79%
Science Applications International 5.55%36.96%10.32%

86.4% of CACI International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of CACI International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CACI International has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

CACI International has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CACI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CACI International$9.57B1.45$499.83M$24.2425.95
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.8814.00

In the previous week, CACI International had 14 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for CACI International and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. CACI International's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.54 indicating that CACI International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CACI International
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CACI International presently has a consensus target price of $620.64, suggesting a potential downside of 1.34%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $115.22, suggesting a potential downside of 7.29%. Given CACI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CACI International is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CACI International
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Summary

CACI International beats Science Applications International on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to KBR?

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, KBR had 12 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for KBR and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat KBR's score of 0.45 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KBR
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Science Applications International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

KBR currently has a consensus price target of $45.83, indicating a potential upside of 21.90%. Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $115.22, indicating a potential downside of 7.29%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KBR
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

KBR has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

97.0% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of KBR shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$7.72B0.61$415M$3.3211.33
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.8814.00

Science Applications International has a net margin of 5.55% compared to KBR's net margin of 5.49%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat KBR's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KBR5.49% 32.55% 7.62%
Science Applications International 5.55%36.96%10.32%

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. KBR pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. KBR is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

KBR beats Science Applications International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to Leidos?

Leidos (NYSE:LDOS) and Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Leidos currently has a consensus target price of $156.40, suggesting a potential upside of 15.74%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $115.22, suggesting a potential downside of 7.29%. Given Leidos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Leidos is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Leidos
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Leidos has a net margin of 7.80% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat Leidos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Leidos7.80% 30.81% 10.78%
Science Applications International 5.55%36.96%10.32%

76.1% of Leidos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Leidos shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Leidos had 32 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Leidos and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. Leidos' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.54 indicating that Leidos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Leidos
15 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
14 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Science Applications International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Leidos pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Leidos has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Leidos is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Leidos has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Leidos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Leidos$17.63B0.96$1.45B$10.7212.61
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.8814.00

Summary

Leidos beats Science Applications International on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Science Applications International compare to UL Solutions?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and UL Solutions (NYSE:ULS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, UL Solutions had 21 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for UL Solutions and 5 mentions for Science Applications International. UL Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Science Applications International's score of 0.54 indicating that UL Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
UL Solutions
9 Very Positive mention(s)
10 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Science Applications International has higher revenue and earnings than UL Solutions. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UL Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.72$358M$8.8814.00
UL Solutions$3.05B5.09$325M$2.4731.20

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of UL Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Science Applications International currently has a consensus price target of $115.22, indicating a potential downside of 7.29%. UL Solutions has a consensus price target of $96.78, indicating a potential upside of 25.60%. Given UL Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UL Solutions is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
UL Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UL Solutions has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

UL Solutions has a net margin of 16.02% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 5.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 36.96% beat UL Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.55% 36.96% 10.32%
UL Solutions 16.02%28.81%13.25%

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. UL Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Science Applications International pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UL Solutions pays out 23.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Science Applications International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

UL Solutions beats Science Applications International on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Science Applications International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SAIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SAIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SAIC vs. The Competition

MetricScience Applications InternationalProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.09B$7.38B$10.83B$12.87B
Dividend Yield1.23%3.84%120.63%9.93%
P/E Ratio14.0039.1728.3725.30
Price / Sales0.7225.78318.44106.23
Price / Cash8.3622.7324.9150.37
Price / Book3.745.464.516.13
Net Income$358M$236.24M$607.47M$342.95M
7 Day Performance6.10%2.89%2.94%3.19%
1 Month Performance9.33%6.41%0.53%-1.98%
1 Year Performance7.01%-4.73%13.78%21.11%

Science Applications International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SAIC
Science Applications International
2.6358 of 5 stars
$124.28
+3.3%
$115.22
-7.3%
+7.8%$5.09B$7.26B14.0023,000
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
3.8882 of 5 stars
$71.30
+2.3%
$84.08
+17.9%
-33.8%$8.57B$11.09B11.2131,500
CACI
CACI International
3.3958 of 5 stars
$505.45
+1.5%
$609.09
+20.5%
+32.4%$11.17B$9.16B20.8525,000
KBR
KBR
4.8386 of 5 stars
$37.09
+1.3%
$45.83
+23.6%
-24.2%$4.71B$7.79B11.189,000
LDOS
Leidos
4.1704 of 5 stars
$117.89
+2.0%
$163.80
+38.9%
-22.5%$14.83B$17.17B10.8047,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SAIC) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners