Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and FuboTV (NYSE:FUBO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, community ranking, institutional ownership and profitability.

Does the media favor SEAT or FUBO?

In the previous week, FuboTV had 5 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for FuboTV and 31 mentions for Vivid Seats. FuboTV's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.29 indicating that FuboTV is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	22 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FuboTV	10 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	18 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has more volatility and risk, SEAT or FUBO?

Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuboTV has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SEAT or FUBO?

Vivid Seats has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FuboTV.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$748.76M	0.49	$74.54M	N/A	N/A
FuboTV	$1.64B	0.71	-$287.45M	$0.20	17.10

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SEAT or FUBO?

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.3% of FuboTV shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.2% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of FuboTV shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor SEAT or FUBO?

FuboTV received 35 more outperform votes than Vivid Seats when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 61.67% of users gave FuboTV an outperform vote while only 46.99% of users gave Vivid Seats an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Vivid Seats	Outperform Votes 39 46.99%	Underperform Votes 44 53.01%
FuboTV	Outperform Votes 74 61.67%	Underperform Votes 46 38.33%

Do analysts recommend SEAT or FUBO?

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $4.49, suggesting a potential upside of 150.63%. FuboTV has a consensus target price of $4.06, suggesting a potential upside of 18.79%. Given Vivid Seats' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than FuboTV.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
FuboTV	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Is SEAT or FUBO more profitable?

Vivid Seats has a net margin of 4.56% compared to FuboTV's net margin of -12.83%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 21.29% beat FuboTV's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	4.56%	21.29%	2.43%
FuboTV	-12.83%	-69.26%	-15.04%

Summary

FuboTV beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.