Which has higher valuation and earnings, FUBO or SEAT?

fuboTV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. fuboTV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio fuboTV $377.20M 0.80 -$18.87M -$1.27 N/A Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.14 -$429.30M -$69.61 N/A

Is FUBO or SEAT more profitable?

fuboTV has a net margin of -0.90% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat fuboTV's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets fuboTV -0.90% -5.52% -0.99% Vivid Seats -82.25% 68.65% 5.92%

Do analysts rate SEAT or PUSA?

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus price target of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Aureus Greenway. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Aureus Greenway 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate SEAT or AHMA?

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SEAT or AHMA?

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.14 -$429.30M -$69.61 N/A Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C $20.23M 2.51 $1.22M N/A N/A

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

$7.19 -0.55 (-7.11%)

Closing price 07/16/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$7.22 +0.02 (+0.35%)

As of 07/16/2026 05:49 PM Eastern

Compare

SEAT vs. FUBO, CURI, PUSA, AHMA, and GAMB

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Vivid Seats with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Vivid Seats include fuboTV (FUBO), CuriosityStream (CURI), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA), and Gambling.com Group (GAMB). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

fuboTV (NYSE:FUBO) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

fuboTV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. fuboTV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
fuboTV	$377.20M	0.80	-$18.87M	-$1.27	N/A
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.14	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

fuboTV presently has a consensus price target of $16.83, suggesting a potential upside of 64.04%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.43, suggesting a potential upside of 31.20%. Given fuboTV's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe fuboTV is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
fuboTV	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

fuboTV has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, fuboTV had 3 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for fuboTV and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. fuboTV's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.63 indicating that fuboTV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
fuboTV	Positive
Vivid Seats	Positive

fuboTV has a net margin of -0.90% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat fuboTV's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
fuboTV	-0.90%	-5.52%	-0.99%
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

39.3% of fuboTV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of fuboTV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

fuboTV beats Vivid Seats on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to CuriosityStream?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CuriosityStream and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat CuriosityStream's score of 0.57 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Positive
CuriosityStream	Positive

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CuriosityStream has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

CuriosityStream has a net margin of -11.26% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%
CuriosityStream	-11.26%	-18.46%	-10.83%

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus target price of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. CuriosityStream has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 126.42%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
CuriosityStream	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

CuriosityStream has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.14	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A
CuriosityStream	$71.66M	2.18	-$6.43M	-$0.13	N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Aureus Greenway?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Aureus Greenway has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.14	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A
Aureus Greenway	$3.11M	23.72	-$3.68M	-$0.31	N/A

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aureus Greenway has a beta of 4.86, indicating that its stock price is 386% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats and Vivid Seats both had 1 articles in the media. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.63 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Positive
Aureus Greenway	Very Positive

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.6% of Aureus Greenway shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Vivid Seats has a net margin of -82.25% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%
Aureus Greenway	-167.57%	-17.49%	-16.56%

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus price target of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Aureus Greenway.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Aureus Greenway	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Aureus Greenway on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (NASDAQ:AHMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats and Vivid Seats both had 1 articles in the media. Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.63 indicating that Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Positive
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	Very Positive

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.14	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	$20.23M	2.51	$1.22M	N/A	N/A

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -27.44% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Gambling.com Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group	-27.44%	27.61%	11.20%
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

Gambling.com Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Gambling.com Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group	$165.45M	0.38	-$32.93M	-$1.29	N/A
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.14	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Gambling.com Group presently has a consensus target price of $7.38, indicating a potential upside of 316.67%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gambling.com Group	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 4 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.63 indicating that Gambling.com Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group	Positive
Vivid Seats	Positive

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Vivid Seats on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SEAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Vivid Seats	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$83.33M	$18.46B	$39.20B	$12.67B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.71%	3.14%	8.87%
P/E Ratio	-0.10	68.55	168.81	24.05
Price / Sales	0.14	35.04	595.15	112.08
Price / Cash	1.87	82.33	45.98	59.89
Price / Book	-0.99	6.71	9.38	6.23
Net Income	-$429.30M	$385.08M	$1.07B	$331.94M
7 Day Performance	3.01%	-0.90%	-2.05%	-1.65%
1 Month Performance	-5.64%	6.84%	-1.68%	-1.03%
1 Year Performance	-78.85%	-13.78%	136.29%	17.10%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SEAT Vivid Seats	1.963 of 5 stars	$7.19 -7.1%	$9.43 +31.2%	-78.7%	$83.33M	$570.78M	N/A	430
FUBO fuboTV	3.322 of 5 stars	$10.20 0.0%	$16.83 +65.1%	-75.7%	$300.33M	$377.20M	N/A	510
CURI CuriosityStream	4.6572 of 5 stars	$2.82 -3.1%	$6.00 +112.8%	-38.7%	$171.62M	$71.66M	N/A	90
PUSA Aureus Greenway	0.2858 of 5 stars	$3.94 +2.3%	N/A	+458.1%	$83.18M	$2.96M	N/A	40	Positive News
AHMA Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	0.9128 of 5 stars	$2.32 -6.1%	N/A	N/A	$72.86M	$20.23M	N/A	43	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. FUBO, CURI, PUSA, AHMA, and GAMB

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to CuriosityStream?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Aureus Greenway?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Gambling.com Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. FUBO, CURI, PUSA, AHMA, and GAMB

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FUBO or SEAT?

Do analysts recommend FUBO or SEAT?

Which has more volatility and risk, FUBO or SEAT?

Does the media prefer FUBO or SEAT?

Is FUBO or SEAT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FUBO or SEAT?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to CuriosityStream?

Does the media favor SEAT or CURI?

Which has more risk and volatility, SEAT or CURI?

Is SEAT or CURI more profitable?

Do analysts rate SEAT or CURI?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, SEAT or CURI?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SEAT or CURI?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Aureus Greenway?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SEAT or PUSA?

Which has more volatility and risk, SEAT or PUSA?

Does the media refer more to SEAT or PUSA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SEAT or PUSA?

Is SEAT or PUSA more profitable?

Do analysts rate SEAT or PUSA?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Do analysts rate SEAT or AHMA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in SEAT or AHMA?

Does the media refer more to SEAT or AHMA?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SEAT or AHMA?

Is SEAT or AHMA more profitable?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Gambling.com Group?

Is GAMB or SEAT more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GAMB or SEAT?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GAMB or SEAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, GAMB or SEAT?

Do analysts rate GAMB or SEAT?

Does the media refer more to GAMB or SEAT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools