Do analysts recommend SEAT or ZH?

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $10.27, indicating a potential upside of 75.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Zhihu. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Zhihu 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, SEAT or ZH?

Zhihu has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Zhihu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.12 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A Zhihu $393.10M 0.61 -$27.58M -$0.55 N/A

Is SEAT or ZH more profitable?

Zhihu has a net margin of -11.33% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Zhihu's return on equity of -7.71% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% Zhihu -11.33% -7.71% -5.75%

Do analysts rate SY or SEAT?

Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 75.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than So-Young International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score So-Young International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TRUE or SEAT?

TrueCar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. TrueCar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TrueCar $181.22M 1.25 -$31.05M -$0.22 N/A Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.12 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A

Is TRUE or SEAT more profitable?

TrueCar has a net margin of -10.27% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. TrueCar's return on equity of -23.76% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TrueCar -10.27% -23.76% -18.02% Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91%

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, SEAT or ANGI?

Angi has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Angi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.12 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A Angi $992.55M 0.19 $43.83M -$5.52 N/A

Is SEAT or ANGI more profitable?

Angi has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Angi's return on equity of 1.52% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% Angi -22.35% 1.52% 0.84%

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SEAT or SSTK?

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.12 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A Shutterstock $989.92M 0.21 $45.50M -$5.65 N/A

Is SEAT or SSTK more profitable?

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 13.61% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% Shutterstock -22.87% 13.61% 5.49%

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

$5.86 -0.16 (-2.66%)

Closing price 08/31/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$5.86 0.00 (-0.09%)

As of 05:23 AM Eastern

Compare

SEAT vs. ZH, SY, TRUE, ANGI, and SSTK

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? Vivid Seats's main competitors and comparable companies include Zhihu (ZH), So-Young International (SY), TrueCar (TRUE), Angi (ANGI), and Shutterstock (SSTK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "interactive media & services" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Zhihu?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Zhihu (NYSE:ZH) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Zhihu has a net margin of -11.33% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Zhihu's return on equity of -7.71% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
Zhihu	-11.33%	-7.71%	-5.75%

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Zhihu shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Zhihu shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zhihu has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $10.27, indicating a potential upside of 75.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Zhihu.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Zhihu	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Zhihu has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Zhihu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.12	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
Zhihu	$393.10M	0.61	-$27.58M	-$0.55	N/A

In the previous week, Zhihu had 6 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Zhihu and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Zhihu's score of -0.23 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Very Positive
Zhihu	Neutral

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Zhihu on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to So-Young International?

So-Young International (NASDAQ:SY) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

So-Young International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. So-Young International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
So-Young International	$217.84M	1.36	-$34.65M	-$0.36	N/A
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.12	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

So-Young International has a beta of 2, indicating that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

So-Young International has a net margin of -15.59% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. So-Young International's return on equity of -13.95% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
So-Young International	-15.59%	-13.95%	-9.10%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 75.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than So-Young International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
So-Young International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, So-Young International had 5 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for So-Young International and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat So-Young International's score of 0.69 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
So-Young International	Positive
Vivid Seats	Very Positive

35.3% of So-Young International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of So-Young International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats So-Young International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to TrueCar?

TrueCar (NASDAQ:TRUE) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

TrueCar has a net margin of -10.27% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. TrueCar's return on equity of -23.76% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TrueCar	-10.27%	-23.76%	-18.02%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

In the previous week, TrueCar had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for TrueCar and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat TrueCar's score of 0.04 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
TrueCar	Neutral
Vivid Seats	Very Positive

TrueCar has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

TrueCar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. TrueCar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TrueCar	$181.22M	1.25	-$31.05M	-$0.22	N/A
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.12	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

79.4% of TrueCar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of TrueCar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TrueCar currently has a consensus target price of $2.55, suggesting a potential upside of 0.39%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 75.20%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than TrueCar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TrueCar	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

TrueCar and Vivid Seats tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Angi?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Angi (NASDAQ:ANGI) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Angi has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Angi's return on equity of 1.52% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
Angi	-22.35%	1.52%	0.84%

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Angi has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Angi shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Angi shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $10.27, indicating a potential upside of 75.20%. Angi has a consensus target price of $9.29, indicating a potential upside of 99.69%. Given Angi's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Angi is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Angi	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.10

Angi has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Angi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.12	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
Angi	$992.55M	0.19	$43.83M	-$5.52	N/A

In the previous week, Angi had 3 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Angi and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Angi's score of 0.32 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Very Positive
Angi	Neutral

Summary

Angi beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Shutterstock (NYSE:SSTK) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.12	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
Shutterstock	$989.92M	0.21	$45.50M	-$5.65	N/A

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $10.27, indicating a potential upside of 75.20%. Shutterstock has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.90%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Shutterstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Shutterstock	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Shutterstock had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Shutterstock and 1 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Shutterstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Very Positive
Shutterstock	Neutral

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shutterstock has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 13.61% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
Shutterstock	-22.87%	13.61%	5.49%

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Shutterstock shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.3% of Shutterstock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Shutterstock beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SEAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Vivid Seats	Interactive Media & Services Industry	Communication Services Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$67.67M	$95.42B	$33.47B	$12.89B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.57%	5.33%	11.27%
P/E Ratio	-0.13	30.84	24.27	25.50
Price / Sales	0.12	118.71	64.66	97.13
Price / Cash	1.45	18.11	20.53	36.03
Price / Book	-0.81	27.10	11.18	6.34
Net Income	-$429.30M	$3.55B	$1.10B	$349.45M
7 Day Performance	-19.51%	-0.42%	-0.56%	-0.67%
1 Month Performance	-23.90%	1.06%	2.44%	4.48%
1 Year Performance	-66.99%	-14.62%	-2.72%	14.94%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SEAT Vivid Seats	2.5468 of 5 stars	$5.86 -2.7%	$10.27 +75.2%	-67.0%	$67.67M	$570.78M	N/A	430	Positive News
ZH Zhihu	0.2656 of 5 stars	$3.15 -2.0%	N/A	-42.3%	$278.69M	$393.10M	N/A	1,154	Earnings Report
SY So-Young International	0.3535 of 5 stars	$2.35 +2.6%	N/A	-24.2%	$232.66M	$217.84M	N/A	2,348	News Coverage Earnings Report Gap Up High Trading Volume
TRUE TrueCar	0.2942 of 5 stars	$2.54 flat	$2.55 +0.4%	N/A	$225.91M	$181.22M	N/A	440
ANGI Angi	3.3183 of 5 stars	$4.94 +0.4%	$9.29 +88.0%	-73.8%	$199M	$1.03B	N/A	2,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors