SEAT vs. IGT, RSI, PRKS, SGHC, GENI, MSGE, EVRI, FBYD, GDEN, and XPOF
Should you be buying Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Vivid Seats include International Game Technology (IGT), Rush Street Interactive (RSI), United Parks & Resorts (PRKS), Super Group (SGHC), Genius Sports (GENI), Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE), Everi (EVRI), Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD), Golden Entertainment (GDEN), and Xponential Fitness (XPOF). These companies are all part of the "miscellaneous amusement & recreation services" industry.
Vivid Seats vs.
International Game Technology (NYSE:IGT) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, community ranking, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.
Vivid Seats has a net margin of 4.56% compared to International Game Technology's net margin of 4.17%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 21.29% beat International Game Technology's return on equity.
International Game Technology received 486 more outperform votes than Vivid Seats when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 63.26% of users gave International Game Technology an outperform vote while only 47.22% of users gave Vivid Seats an outperform vote.
In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 11 more articles in the media than International Game Technology. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Vivid Seats and 5 mentions for International Game Technology. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat International Game Technology's score of 0.22 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
44.3% of International Game Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of International Game Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 57.2% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
International Game Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats.
International Game Technology has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.
International Game Technology presently has a consensus target price of $28.60, suggesting a potential upside of 65.32%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $6.63, suggesting a potential upside of 52.30%. Given International Game Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe International Game Technology is more favorable than Vivid Seats.
Summary
International Game Technology beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Vivid Seats Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 1/14/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
