Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

$9.96 +0.71 (+7.68%)

Closing price 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$9.98 +0.02 (+0.25%)

As of 05/15/2026 05:56 PM Eastern

SEAT vs. STRZ, FUBO, SEG, BUUU, and XPOF

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Vivid Seats with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Vivid Seats include Starz Entertainment (STRZ), fuboTV (FUBO), Seaport Entertainment Gr (SEG), BUUU Group (BUUU), and Xponential Fitness (XPOF). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Starz Entertainment?

Starz Entertainment (NASDAQ:STRZ) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

Starz Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $26.40, suggesting a potential upside of 14.19%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 6.96%. Given Starz Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Starz Entertainment is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Starz Entertainment	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.6% of Starz Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Starz Entertainment had 8 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Starz Entertainment and 10 mentions for Vivid Seats. Starz Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.25 indicating that Starz Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Starz Entertainment	5 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Starz Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Starz Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Starz Entertainment	$963.40M	0.40	-$115.80M	-$16.76	N/A
Vivid Seats	$532.54M	0.20	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

Starz Entertainment has a net margin of -22.10% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Starz Entertainment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Starz Entertainment	-22.10%	-18.50%	-6.26%
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

Summary

Starz Entertainment beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

fuboTV (NYSE:FUBO) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

fuboTV has a beta of 2.5, suggesting that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

fuboTV has a net margin of -0.90% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat fuboTV's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
fuboTV	-0.90%	-5.52%	-0.99%
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

fuboTV currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 71.64%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 6.96%. Given fuboTV's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe fuboTV is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
fuboTV	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

39.3% of fuboTV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 74.3% of fuboTV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 6 more articles in the media than fuboTV. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vivid Seats and 4 mentions for fuboTV. fuboTV's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.25 indicating that fuboTV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
fuboTV	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

fuboTV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. fuboTV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
fuboTV	$377.20M	0.75	-$18.87M	-$1.27	N/A
Vivid Seats	$532.54M	0.20	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

Summary

fuboTV beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Seaport Entertainment Gr?

Seaport Entertainment Gr (NYSE:SEG) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

Seaport Entertainment Gr has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats has a net margin of -82.25% compared to Seaport Entertainment Gr's net margin of -100.93%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Seaport Entertainment Gr's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seaport Entertainment Gr	-100.93%	-10.45%	-7.67%
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

Seaport Entertainment Gr presently has a consensus price target of $27.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.42%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 6.96%. Given Seaport Entertainment Gr's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Seaport Entertainment Gr is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Seaport Entertainment Gr	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Seaport Entertainment Gr shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 8 more articles in the media than Seaport Entertainment Gr. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Seaport Entertainment Gr. Seaport Entertainment Gr's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.25 indicating that Seaport Entertainment Gr is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Seaport Entertainment Gr	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Seaport Entertainment Gr has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Seaport Entertainment Gr is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seaport Entertainment Gr	$130.41M	2.24	-$115.34M	-$10.13	N/A
Vivid Seats	$532.54M	0.20	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Seaport Entertainment Gr on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to BUUU Group?

BUUU Group (NASDAQ:BUUU) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

BUUU Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BUUU Group	$6.33M	54.74	$790K	N/A	N/A
Vivid Seats	$532.54M	0.20	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BUUU Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat BUUU Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BUUU Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 6.96%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than BUUU Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
BUUU Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 7 more articles in the media than BUUU Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vivid Seats and 3 mentions for BUUU Group. BUUU Group's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.25 indicating that BUUU Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
BUUU Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Vivid Seats beats BUUU Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Xponential Fitness?

Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Xponential Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Xponential Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Xponential Fitness	$314.88M	0.75	-$33.79M	-$1.38	N/A
Vivid Seats	$532.54M	0.20	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -11.28% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Xponential Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Xponential Fitness	-11.28%	-3.40%	3.29%
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

Xponential Fitness presently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 77.27%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 6.96%. Given Xponential Fitness' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Xponential Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

In the previous week, Xponential Fitness had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Xponential Fitness and 10 mentions for Vivid Seats. Xponential Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.25 indicating that Xponential Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Xponential Fitness	1 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Xponential Fitness beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SEAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Vivid Seats	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$99.59M	$16.50B	$39.49B	$12.48B
Dividend Yield	N/A	4.90%	3.21%	5.25%
P/E Ratio	-0.14	60.99	167.67	25.24
Price / Sales	0.20	38.44	633.14	82.25
Price / Cash	2.23	64.53	48.70	56.04
Price / Book	-1.12	8.78	10.25	6.90
Net Income	-$429.30M	$379.18M	$1.03B	$334.66M
7 Day Performance	10.54%	-4.30%	-1.51%	0.13%
1 Month Performance	28.68%	-0.35%	5.39%	1.11%
1 Year Performance	-74.59%	-9.60%	161.29%	30.62%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SEAT Vivid Seats	0.869 of 5 stars	$9.96 +7.7%	$9.27 -7.0%	-74.6%	$99.59M	$532.54M	N/A	430	Trending News Gap Down
STRZ Starz Entertainment	3.4048 of 5 stars	$21.15 +6.9%	$26.40 +24.8%	+89.2%	$331.11M	$963.40M	N/A	1,450	News Coverage Insider Trade
FUBO fuboTV	3.7403 of 5 stars	$9.89 -3.8%	$16.50 +66.8%	-72.7%	$302.60M	$377.20M	N/A	510	Analyst Downgrade
SEG Seaport Entertainment Gr	1.3192 of 5 stars	$21.94 -1.3%	$27.00 +23.1%	+20.6%	$284.46M	$130.41M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage
BUUU BUUU Group	N/A	$17.60 +2.9%	N/A	N/A	$282.15M	$6.68M	N/A	14	Earnings Report Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. STRZ, FUBO, SEG, BUUU, and XPOF

How does Vivid Seats compare to Starz Entertainment?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Seaport Entertainment Gr?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to BUUU Group?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Xponential Fitness?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. STRZ, FUBO, SEG, BUUU, and XPOF

How does Vivid Seats compare to Starz Entertainment?

Do analysts recommend STRZ or SEAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in STRZ or SEAT?

Does the media refer more to STRZ or SEAT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, STRZ or SEAT?

Is STRZ or SEAT more profitable?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

Which has more risk and volatility, FUBO or SEAT?

Is FUBO or SEAT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend FUBO or SEAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FUBO or SEAT?

Does the media favor FUBO or SEAT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FUBO or SEAT?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Seaport Entertainment Gr?

Which has more volatility & risk, SEG or SEAT?

Is SEG or SEAT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SEG or SEAT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SEG or SEAT?

Does the media favor SEG or SEAT?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SEG or SEAT?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to BUUU Group?

Which has better valuation and earnings, BUUU or SEAT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BUUU or SEAT?

Is BUUU or SEAT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BUUU or SEAT?

Does the media favor BUUU or SEAT?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Xponential Fitness?

Which has more risk & volatility, XPOF or SEAT?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, XPOF or SEAT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in XPOF or SEAT?

Is XPOF or SEAT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer XPOF or SEAT?

Does the media refer more to XPOF or SEAT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools