Free Trial

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

Vivid Seats logo
$8.58 -0.42 (-4.67%)
Closing price 06/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.62 +0.04 (+0.52%)
As of 06/5/2026 07:52 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SEAT vs. SEG, BUUU, FUBO, XPOF, and CURI

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Vivid Seats with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Vivid Seats include Seaport Entertainment Gr (SEG), BUUU Group (BUUU), fuboTV (FUBO), Xponential Fitness (XPOF), and CuriosityStream (CURI). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Seaport Entertainment Gr?

Seaport Entertainment Gr (NYSE:SEG) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Seaport Entertainment Gr currently has a consensus price target of $27.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.21%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, indicating a potential upside of 8.00%. Given Seaport Entertainment Gr's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Seaport Entertainment Gr is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seaport Entertainment Gr
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

Vivid Seats has a net margin of -82.25% compared to Seaport Entertainment Gr's net margin of -100.93%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Seaport Entertainment Gr's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seaport Entertainment Gr-100.93% -10.45% -7.67%
Vivid Seats -82.25%68.65%5.92%

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 4 more articles in the media than Seaport Entertainment Gr. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for Seaport Entertainment Gr. Seaport Entertainment Gr's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.00 indicating that Seaport Entertainment Gr is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seaport Entertainment Gr Positive
Vivid Seats Neutral

Seaport Entertainment Gr has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Seaport Entertainment Gr is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seaport Entertainment Gr$130.41M2.36-$115.34M-$10.13N/A
Vivid Seats$532.54M0.17-$429.30M-$69.61N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Seaport Entertainment Gr shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seaport Entertainment Gr has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Seaport Entertainment Gr on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to BUUU Group?

BUUU Group (NASDAQ:BUUU) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, indicating a potential upside of 8.00%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than BUUU Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BUUU Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

BUUU Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BUUU Group$6.33M43.54$790KN/AN/A
Vivid Seats$532.54M0.17-$429.30M-$69.61N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 4 more articles in the media than BUUU Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for BUUU Group. BUUU Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vivid Seats'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BUUU Group Neutral
Vivid Seats Neutral

BUUU Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat BUUU Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BUUU GroupN/A N/A N/A
Vivid Seats -82.25%68.65%5.92%

Summary

Vivid Seats beats BUUU Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to fuboTV?

fuboTV (NYSE:FUBO) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

39.3% of fuboTV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 74.3% of fuboTV shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

fuboTV currently has a consensus target price of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 72.68%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $9.27, indicating a potential upside of 8.00%. Given fuboTV's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe fuboTV is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
fuboTV
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

fuboTV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. fuboTV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
fuboTV$377.20M0.75-$18.87M-$1.27N/A
Vivid Seats$532.54M0.17-$429.30M-$69.61N/A

fuboTV has a beta of 2.41, suggesting that its stock price is 141% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, fuboTV had 3 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for fuboTV and 4 mentions for Vivid Seats. fuboTV's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.00 indicating that fuboTV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
fuboTV
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vivid Seats
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

fuboTV has a net margin of -0.90% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat fuboTV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
fuboTV-0.90% -5.52% -0.99%
Vivid Seats -82.25%68.65%5.92%

Summary

fuboTV beats Vivid Seats on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Xponential Fitness?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Xponential Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Xponential Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$532.54M0.17-$429.30M-$69.61N/A
Xponential Fitness$314.88M0.83-$33.79M-$1.38N/A

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential upside of 8.00%. Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of $8.44, suggesting a potential upside of 58.48%. Given Xponential Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Xponential Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats and Vivid Seats both had 4 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Xponential Fitness' score of -0.08 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Xponential Fitness
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -11.28% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Xponential Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-82.25% 68.65% 5.92%
Xponential Fitness -11.28%-3.40%3.29%

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Xponential Fitness on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to CuriosityStream?

CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

CuriosityStream has a net margin of -11.26% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CuriosityStream-11.26% -18.46% -10.83%
Vivid Seats -82.25%68.65%5.92%

CuriosityStream has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

CuriosityStream presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 115.83%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $9.27, indicating a potential upside of 8.00%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

CuriosityStream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CuriosityStream$71.66M2.29-$6.43M-$0.13N/A
Vivid Seats$532.54M0.17-$429.30M-$69.61N/A

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than CuriosityStream. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Vivid Seats and 3 mentions for CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.00 indicating that CuriosityStream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CuriosityStream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vivid Seats
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEAT vs. The Competition

MetricVivid SeatsINTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$96.89M$17.86B$40.78B$12.45B
Dividend YieldN/A3.00%3.10%5.34%
P/E Ratio-0.1264.41171.1923.63
Price / Sales0.1740.28642.27120.49
Price / Cash2.1777.0652.1657.17
Price / Book-1.186.259.806.37
Net Income-$429.30M$386.39M$1.06B$337.36M
7 Day Performance-1.04%-4.56%-0.90%-2.39%
1 Month Performance12.45%2.34%4.64%-0.58%
1 Year Performance-75.06%-9.04%158.46%25.53%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEAT
Vivid Seats
1.644 of 5 stars
$8.58
-4.7%
$9.27
+8.0%
-73.8%$96.89M$532.54MN/A430
SEG
Seaport Entertainment Gr
1.1532 of 5 stars
$24.58
-2.7%
$27.00
+9.8%
+19.8%$323.25M$127.08MN/AN/A
BUUU
BUUU Group
0.1898 of 5 stars
$19.37
+0.9%
N/AN/A$316.64M$6.33MN/A14
FUBO
fuboTV
3.8724 of 5 stars
$11.57
+14.6%
$16.50
+42.7%
-76.3%$297.01M$377.20MN/A510
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
3.0495 of 5 stars
$5.70
+3.7%
$8.44
+48.2%
-44.0%$269.97M$314.88MN/A400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners