Go Pro

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

Vivid Seats logo
$7.35 -0.25 (-3.29%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

SEAT vs. ZH, ANGI, TRUE, SSTK, and SY

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? Vivid Seats's main competitors and comparable companies include Zhihu (ZH), Angi (ANGI), TrueCar (TRUE), Shutterstock (SSTK), and So-Young International (SY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "interactive media & services" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Zhihu?

Zhihu (NYSE:ZH) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Zhihu has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.21, indicating a potential upside of 38.93%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Zhihu.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zhihu
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Zhihu has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Zhihu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zhihu$393.10M0.74-$27.58M-$0.36N/A
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.14-$429.30M-$45.51N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 14 more articles in the media than Zhihu. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for Zhihu. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Zhihu's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zhihu Neutral
Vivid Seats Neutral

Zhihu has a net margin of -7.25% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Zhihu's return on equity of -4.83% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zhihu-7.25% -4.83% -3.60%
Vivid Seats -60.26%-211.26%0.91%

28.9% of Zhihu shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Zhihu shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Zhihu on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Angi?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Angi (NASDAQ:ANGI) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Angi shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Angi shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than Angi. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Vivid Seats and 12 mentions for Angi. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Angi's score of -0.05 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Angi
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Angi has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus price target of $10.21, suggesting a potential upside of 38.93%. Angi has a consensus price target of $9.29, suggesting a potential upside of 102.30%. Given Angi's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Angi is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Angi
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.10

Angi has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Angi's return on equity of 1.52% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-60.26% -211.26% 0.91%
Angi -22.35%1.52%0.84%

Angi has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Angi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.14-$429.30M-$45.51N/A
Angi$992.55M0.19$43.83M-$5.52N/A

Summary

Angi beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to TrueCar?

TrueCar (NASDAQ:TRUE) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

TrueCar has a net margin of -10.27% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. TrueCar's return on equity of -23.76% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TrueCar-10.27% -23.76% -18.02%
Vivid Seats -60.26%-211.26%0.91%

TrueCar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. TrueCar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TrueCar$181.22M1.25-$31.05M-$0.22N/A
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.14-$429.30M-$45.51N/A

TrueCar has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

TrueCar presently has a consensus target price of $2.55, indicating a potential upside of 0.39%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.21, indicating a potential upside of 38.93%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than TrueCar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TrueCar
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 14 more articles in the media than TrueCar. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for TrueCar. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat TrueCar's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TrueCar Neutral
Vivid Seats Neutral

79.4% of TrueCar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of TrueCar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats TrueCar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Shutterstock (NYSE:SSTK) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Shutterstock currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.25%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.21, suggesting a potential upside of 38.93%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Shutterstock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shutterstock
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shutterstock$989.92M0.22$45.50M-$5.65N/A
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.14-$429.30M-$45.51N/A

Shutterstock has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 8 more articles in the media than Shutterstock. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Vivid Seats and 6 mentions for Shutterstock. Shutterstock's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.04 indicating that Shutterstock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shutterstock
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vivid Seats
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

82.8% of Shutterstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 32.3% of Shutterstock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 12.38% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shutterstock-22.87% 12.38% 5.23%
Vivid Seats -60.26%-211.26%0.91%

Summary

Shutterstock beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to So-Young International?

So-Young International (NASDAQ:SY) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $10.21, suggesting a potential upside of 38.93%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than So-Young International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
So-Young International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

So-Young International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. So-Young International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
So-Young International$217.84M1.06-$34.65M-$0.36N/A
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.14-$429.30M-$45.51N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 12 more articles in the media than So-Young International. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for So-Young International. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat So-Young International's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
So-Young International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Vivid Seats
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

35.3% of So-Young International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of So-Young International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

So-Young International has a net margin of -15.59% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. So-Young International's return on equity of -13.95% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
So-Young International-15.59% -13.95% -9.10%
Vivid Seats -60.26%-211.26%0.91%

So-Young International has a beta of 2, meaning that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats So-Young International on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEAT vs. The Competition

MetricVivid SeatsInteractive Media & Services IndustryCommunication Services SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$81.82M$98.00B$33.34B$12.98B
Dividend YieldN/A3.79%5.31%10.20%
P/E Ratio-0.16987.37227.3324.71
Price / Sales0.14115.4460.9897.69
Price / Cash1.8318.2820.0437.42
Price / Book-1.0127.1610.746.42
Net Income-$429.30M$3.55B$1.09B$347.03M
7 Day Performance-7.66%-0.06%1.59%2.49%
1 Month Performance5.30%0.38%0.14%-1.04%
1 Year Performance-56.15%-10.02%5.11%23.22%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEAT
Vivid Seats
2.4032 of 5 stars
$7.35
-3.3%
$10.21
+38.9%
-54.7%$81.82M$570.78MN/A430
ZH
Zhihu
0.6814 of 5 stars
$3.31
+1.1%
N/A-24.8%$290.09M$393.10MN/A1,154
ANGI
Angi
3.666 of 5 stars
$5.93
+4.6%
$10.43
+75.9%
-73.4%$229.34M$1.03B14.462,300
TRUE
TrueCar
N/A$2.54
flat
$2.55
+0.4%
N/A$225.91M$181.22MN/A440
SSTK
Shutterstock
3.7382 of 5 stars
$6.06
+12.2%
$7.00
+15.5%
-70.4%$198.39M$946.48MN/A1,565

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners