Which has better valuation and earnings, SSTK or SEAT?

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Shutterstock $989.92M 0.15 $45.50M -$5.65 N/A Vivid Seats $518.83M 0.06 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A

Is SSTK or SEAT more profitable?

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 13.61% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Shutterstock -22.87% 13.61% 5.49% Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91%

Does the media favor SSTK or SEAT?

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than Shutterstock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Shutterstock. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Shutterstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Shutterstock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Vivid Seats 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SEAT or BZFD?

BuzzFeed has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. BuzzFeed is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $518.83M 0.06 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A BuzzFeed $170.71M 0.57 -$57.72M -$1.54 N/A

Is SEAT or BZFD more profitable?

BuzzFeed has a net margin of -35.83% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. BuzzFeed's return on equity of -113.86% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% BuzzFeed -35.83% -113.86% -34.00%

Which has better valuation & earnings, TEAD or SEAT?

Vivid Seats has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teads. Teads is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Teads $1.30B 0.04 -$517.07M -$5.53 N/A Vivid Seats $518.83M 0.06 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A

Is TEAD or SEAT more profitable?

Teads has a net margin of -43.32% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Teads' return on equity of -49.37% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Teads -43.32% -49.37% -6.14% Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91%

Does the media prefer TEAD or SEAT?

In the previous week, Teads and Teads both had 3 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Teads' score of 0.33 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Teads 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Vivid Seats 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SEAT or TZOO?

Travelzoo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelzoo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $518.83M 0.06 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A Travelzoo $91.72M 0.59 $4.70M $0.03 178.33

Is SEAT or TZOO more profitable?

Travelzoo has a net margin of 0.51% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Travelzoo's return on equity of -9.35% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% Travelzoo 0.51% -9.35% 1.00%

Does the media refer more to SEAT or TZOO?

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than Travelzoo. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Travelzoo. Travelzoo's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.46 indicating that Travelzoo is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vivid Seats 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Travelzoo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend SJ or SEAT?

Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 261.50%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Scienjoy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Scienjoy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SJ or SEAT?

Scienjoy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Scienjoy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Scienjoy $177.55M 0.23 -$83.95M -$1.95 N/A Vivid Seats $518.83M 0.06 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A

Is SJ or SEAT more profitable?

Scienjoy has a net margin of -46.33% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Scienjoy's return on equity of -63.91% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Scienjoy -46.33% -63.91% -54.20% Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91%

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

$2.84 -0.37 (-11.53%)

Closing price 10/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.90 +0.06 (+2.25%)

As of 08:29 AM Eastern

Compare

SEAT vs. SSTK, BZFD, TEAD, TZOO, and SJ

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? Vivid Seats's main competitors and comparable companies include Shutterstock (SSTK), BuzzFeed (BZFD), Teads (TEAD), Travelzoo (TZOO), and Scienjoy (SJ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "interactive media & services" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Shutterstock (NYSE:SSTK) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

82.8% of Shutterstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 32.3% of Shutterstock shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shutterstock has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Shutterstock	$989.92M	0.15	$45.50M	-$5.65	N/A
Vivid Seats	$518.83M	0.06	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than Shutterstock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Shutterstock. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Shutterstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Shutterstock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 13.61% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Shutterstock	-22.87%	13.61%	5.49%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

Shutterstock currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.96%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $10.27, indicating a potential upside of 261.50%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Shutterstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Shutterstock	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Shutterstock beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to BuzzFeed?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and BuzzFeed (NASDAQ:BZFD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of BuzzFeed shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of BuzzFeed shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BuzzFeed has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. BuzzFeed is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$518.83M	0.06	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
BuzzFeed	$170.71M	0.57	-$57.72M	-$1.54	N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than BuzzFeed. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for BuzzFeed. BuzzFeed's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.46 indicating that BuzzFeed is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Neutral
BuzzFeed	Very Positive

BuzzFeed has a net margin of -35.83% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. BuzzFeed's return on equity of -113.86% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
BuzzFeed	-35.83%	-113.86%	-34.00%

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 261.50%. BuzzFeed has a consensus price target of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.53%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than BuzzFeed.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
BuzzFeed	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BuzzFeed has a beta of 3.88, indicating that its share price is 288% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats BuzzFeed on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Teads?

Teads (NASDAQ:TEAD) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Teads currently has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential upside of 100.80%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 261.50%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Teads.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Teads	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Teads has a net margin of -43.32% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Teads' return on equity of -49.37% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Teads	-43.32%	-49.37%	-6.14%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

Vivid Seats has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teads. Teads is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Teads	$1.30B	0.04	-$517.07M	-$5.53	N/A
Vivid Seats	$518.83M	0.06	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

60.4% of Teads shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 12.0% of Teads shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Teads has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Teads and Teads both had 3 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Teads' score of 0.33 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Teads	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Teads on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Travelzoo?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Travelzoo (NASDAQ:TZOO) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Travelzoo shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.3% of Travelzoo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Travelzoo has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 261.50%. Travelzoo has a consensus price target of $13.83, suggesting a potential upside of 158.57%. Given Vivid Seats' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Travelzoo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Travelzoo	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than Travelzoo. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Travelzoo. Travelzoo's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.46 indicating that Travelzoo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Travelzoo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Travelzoo has a net margin of 0.51% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Travelzoo's return on equity of -9.35% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
Travelzoo	0.51%	-9.35%	1.00%

Travelzoo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelzoo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$518.83M	0.06	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
Travelzoo	$91.72M	0.59	$4.70M	$0.03	178.33

Summary

Travelzoo beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Scienjoy?

Scienjoy (NASDAQ:SJ) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Scienjoy has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than Scienjoy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Scienjoy. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Scienjoy's score of 0.41 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Scienjoy	Neutral
Vivid Seats	Neutral

Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 261.50%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Scienjoy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Scienjoy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Scienjoy has a net margin of -46.33% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Scienjoy's return on equity of -63.91% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Scienjoy	-46.33%	-63.91%	-54.20%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

Scienjoy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Scienjoy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Scienjoy	$177.55M	0.23	-$83.95M	-$1.95	N/A
Vivid Seats	$518.83M	0.06	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

0.3% of Scienjoy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 33.6% of Scienjoy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Scienjoy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SEAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Vivid Seats	Interactive Media & Services Industry	Communication Services Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$36.08M	$99.28B	$34.23B	$13.27B
Dividend Yield	N/A	4.04%	5.54%	20.72%
P/E Ratio	-0.06	26.88	20.54	25.82
Price / Sales	0.06	302.04	108.43	109.99
Price / Cash	0.77	17.31	20.58	36.12
Price / Book	-0.39	27.19	12.33	6.10
Net Income	-$429.30M	$3.55B	$1.11B	$380.59M
7 Day Performance	-7.49%	1.39%	-1.29%	-2.04%
1 Month Performance	-42.63%	-0.74%	-4.53%	-4.24%
1 Year Performance	-75.81%	-15.63%	-7.91%	-1.55%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SEAT Vivid Seats	2.4796 of 5 stars	$2.84 -11.5%	$10.27 +261.5%	-74.8%	$36.08M	$518.83M	N/A	565
SSTK Shutterstock	2.2687 of 5 stars	$4.00 +5.1%	$7.00 +74.8%	-80.6%	$140.77M	$989.92M	N/A	1,565	News Coverage
BZFD BuzzFeed	1.1102 of 5 stars	$1.16 +4.5%	$1.00 -13.8%	-26.9%	$92.50M	$185.27M	N/A	507	High Trading Volume
TEAD Teads	2.3668 of 5 stars	$0.57 +1.3%	$1.00 +76.6%	-67.0%	$54.82M	$1.30B	N/A	1,700
TZOO Travelzoo	2.2194 of 5 stars	$5.38 +3.3%	$13.83 +157.1%	-46.0%	$53.15M	$91.72M	179.33	249

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. SSTK, BZFD, TEAD, TZOO, and SJ

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to BuzzFeed?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Teads?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Travelzoo?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Scienjoy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. SSTK, BZFD, TEAD, TZOO, and SJ

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SSTK or SEAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, SSTK or SEAT?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SSTK or SEAT?

Does the media favor SSTK or SEAT?

Is SSTK or SEAT more profitable?

Do analysts rate SSTK or SEAT?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to BuzzFeed?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SEAT or BZFD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SEAT or BZFD?

Does the media refer more to SEAT or BZFD?

Is SEAT or BZFD more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SEAT or BZFD?

Which has more risk and volatility, SEAT or BZFD?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Teads?

Do analysts prefer TEAD or SEAT?

Is TEAD or SEAT more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TEAD or SEAT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TEAD or SEAT?

Which has more risk and volatility, TEAD or SEAT?

Does the media prefer TEAD or SEAT?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Travelzoo?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SEAT or TZOO?

Which has more volatility and risk, SEAT or TZOO?

Do analysts prefer SEAT or TZOO?

Does the media refer more to SEAT or TZOO?

Is SEAT or TZOO more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SEAT or TZOO?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Scienjoy?

Which has more volatility & risk, SJ or SEAT?

Does the media prefer SJ or SEAT?

Do analysts recommend SJ or SEAT?

Is SJ or SEAT more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SJ or SEAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SJ or SEAT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools