Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SEAT or ANGI?

Angi has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Angi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.08 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A Angi $992.55M 0.22 $43.83M -$5.52 N/A

Is SEAT or ANGI more profitable?

Angi has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Angi's return on equity of 1.52% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% Angi -22.35% 1.52% 0.84%

Does the media favor SEAT or ANGI?

In the previous week, Vivid Seats and Vivid Seats both had 3 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Angi's score of -0.14 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vivid Seats 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Angi 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, SEAT or SSTK?

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.08 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A Shutterstock $989.92M 0.17 $45.50M -$5.65 N/A

Is SEAT or SSTK more profitable?

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 13.61% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% Shutterstock -22.87% 13.61% 5.49%

Does the media favor SEAT or SSTK?

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than Shutterstock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Shutterstock. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Shutterstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vivid Seats 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Shutterstock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, GETY or SEAT?

Getty Images has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Getty Images is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Getty Images $981.29M 0.10 -$206.12M -$0.39 N/A Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.08 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A

Is GETY or SEAT more profitable?

Getty Images has a net margin of -16.24% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Getty Images' return on equity of -26.82% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Getty Images -16.24% -26.82% -5.25% Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91%

Does the media refer more to GETY or SEAT?

In the previous week, Getty Images had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Getty Images and 3 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Getty Images' score of 0.40 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Getty Images 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Vivid Seats 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SEAT or BZFD?

BuzzFeed has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. BuzzFeed is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.08 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A BuzzFeed $185.27M 0.50 -$57.72M -$1.54 N/A

Is SEAT or BZFD more profitable?

BuzzFeed has a net margin of -35.83% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. BuzzFeed's return on equity of -113.86% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91% BuzzFeed -35.83% -113.86% -34.00%

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TZOO or SEAT?

Travelzoo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelzoo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Travelzoo $91.72M 0.63 $4.70M $0.03 189.27 Vivid Seats $570.78M 0.08 -$429.30M -$45.51 N/A

Is TZOO or SEAT more profitable?

Travelzoo has a net margin of 0.51% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Travelzoo's return on equity of -9.35% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Travelzoo 0.51% -9.35% 1.00% Vivid Seats -60.26% -211.26% 0.91%

Does the media prefer TZOO or SEAT?

In the previous week, Travelzoo and Travelzoo both had 3 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Travelzoo's score of 0.23 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Travelzoo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Vivid Seats 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

$3.92 +0.07 (+1.82%)

As of 12:54 PM Eastern

Compare

SEAT vs. ANGI, SSTK, GETY, BZFD, and TZOO

Should you buy Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? Vivid Seats's main competitors and comparable companies include Angi (ANGI), Shutterstock (SSTK), Getty Images (GETY), BuzzFeed (BZFD), and Travelzoo (TZOO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "interactive media & services" industry.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Angi?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Angi (NASDAQ:ANGI) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Angi has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Angi's return on equity of 1.52% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
Angi	-22.35%	1.52%	0.84%

In the previous week, Vivid Seats and Vivid Seats both had 3 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Angi's score of -0.14 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Angi	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 161.90%. Angi has a consensus price target of $9.29, suggesting a potential upside of 71.70%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Angi.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Angi	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Angi has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Angi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.08	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
Angi	$992.55M	0.22	$43.83M	-$5.52	N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Angi shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Angi shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Angi has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Angi beats Vivid Seats on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Shutterstock (NYSE:SSTK) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Shutterstock has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Shutterstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.08	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
Shutterstock	$989.92M	0.17	$45.50M	-$5.65	N/A

Shutterstock has a net margin of -22.87% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Shutterstock's return on equity of 13.61% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
Shutterstock	-22.87%	13.61%	5.49%

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than Shutterstock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Shutterstock. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Shutterstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Shutterstock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shutterstock has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $10.27, indicating a potential upside of 161.90%. Shutterstock has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 55.21%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Shutterstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Shutterstock	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Shutterstock shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.3% of Shutterstock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Shutterstock beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Getty Images?

Getty Images (NYSE:GETY) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Getty Images has a beta of 2.07, indicating that its share price is 107% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Getty Images presently has a consensus price target of $3.93, suggesting a potential upside of 1,542.26%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 161.90%. Given Getty Images' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Getty Images is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Getty Images	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Getty Images has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Getty Images is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Getty Images	$981.29M	0.10	-$206.12M	-$0.39	N/A
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.08	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

45.8% of Getty Images shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Getty Images shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Getty Images had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Getty Images and 3 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Getty Images' score of 0.40 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Getty Images	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vivid Seats	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Getty Images has a net margin of -16.24% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Getty Images' return on equity of -26.82% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Getty Images	-16.24%	-26.82%	-5.25%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

Summary

Getty Images beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to BuzzFeed?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and BuzzFeed (NASDAQ:BZFD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 3 more articles in the media than BuzzFeed. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for BuzzFeed. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat BuzzFeed's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Neutral
BuzzFeed	Neutral

BuzzFeed has a net margin of -35.83% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. BuzzFeed's return on equity of -113.86% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%
BuzzFeed	-35.83%	-113.86%	-34.00%

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 161.90%. BuzzFeed has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.31%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than BuzzFeed.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
BuzzFeed	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

BuzzFeed has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. BuzzFeed is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.08	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A
BuzzFeed	$185.27M	0.50	-$57.72M	-$1.54	N/A

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BuzzFeed has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of BuzzFeed shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of BuzzFeed shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats BuzzFeed on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vivid Seats compare to Travelzoo?

Travelzoo (NASDAQ:TZOO) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Travelzoo has a net margin of 0.51% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Travelzoo's return on equity of -9.35% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Travelzoo	0.51%	-9.35%	1.00%
Vivid Seats	-60.26%	-211.26%	0.91%

Travelzoo currently has a consensus target price of $13.83, suggesting a potential upside of 143.63%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 161.90%. Given Vivid Seats' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Travelzoo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Travelzoo	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

27.4% of Travelzoo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 45.3% of Travelzoo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Travelzoo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelzoo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Travelzoo	$91.72M	0.63	$4.70M	$0.03	189.27
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.08	-$429.30M	-$45.51	N/A

Travelzoo has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Travelzoo and Travelzoo both had 3 articles in the media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Travelzoo's score of 0.23 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Travelzoo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vivid Seats	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Travelzoo beats Vivid Seats on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SEAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Vivid Seats	Interactive Media & Services Industry	Communication Services Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$44.06M	$102.07B	$34.67B	$13.27B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.88%	5.43%	12.80%
P/E Ratio	-0.09	28.28	23.19	25.72
Price / Sales	0.08	108.19	62.75	115.72
Price / Cash	0.95	17.57	21.01	34.72
Price / Book	-0.54	27.29	11.99	6.40
Net Income	-$429.30M	$3.59B	$1.10B	$358.40M
7 Day Performance	-11.71%	-0.13%	-0.25%	1.86%
1 Month Performance	-43.11%	-2.26%	-1.22%	-2.80%
1 Year Performance	-75.44%	-19.54%	-8.32%	6.09%

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SEAT Vivid Seats	2.3525 of 5 stars	$3.92 +1.8%	$10.27 +161.9%	-76.1%	$44.06M	$570.78M	N/A	565
ANGI Angi	3.6228 of 5 stars	$4.96 +5.1%	$9.29 +87.2%	-69.7%	$190.91M	$1.03B	N/A	2,300
SSTK Shutterstock	2.9044 of 5 stars	$5.27 +4.5%	$7.00 +32.9%	-79.0%	$186.22M	$989.92M	N/A	1,565
GETY Getty Images	3.3107 of 5 stars	$0.24 -7.7%	$3.93 +1,535.4%	-88.8%	$107.85M	$978.00M	N/A	1,650	News Coverage Gap Down
BZFD BuzzFeed	0.4438 of 5 stars	$1.11 +2.8%	$1.00 -9.9%	-39.5%	$90M	$185.27M	N/A	1,520

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. ANGI, SSTK, GETY, BZFD, and TZOO

How does Vivid Seats compare to Angi?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Getty Images?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to BuzzFeed?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Travelzoo?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Vivid Seats (SEAT) Competitors

SEAT vs. ANGI, SSTK, GETY, BZFD, and TZOO

How does Vivid Seats compare to Angi?

Is SEAT or ANGI more profitable?

Does the media favor SEAT or ANGI?

Do analysts prefer SEAT or ANGI?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SEAT or ANGI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SEAT or ANGI?

Which has more risk and volatility, SEAT or ANGI?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Shutterstock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SEAT or SSTK?

Is SEAT or SSTK more profitable?

Does the media favor SEAT or SSTK?

Which has more volatility & risk, SEAT or SSTK?

Do analysts prefer SEAT or SSTK?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SEAT or SSTK?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Getty Images?

Which has more volatility & risk, GETY or SEAT?

Do analysts rate GETY or SEAT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GETY or SEAT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GETY or SEAT?

Does the media refer more to GETY or SEAT?

Is GETY or SEAT more profitable?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to BuzzFeed?

Does the media prefer SEAT or BZFD?

Is SEAT or BZFD more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SEAT or BZFD?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SEAT or BZFD?

Which has more volatility & risk, SEAT or BZFD?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SEAT or BZFD?

Summary

How does Vivid Seats compare to Travelzoo?

Is TZOO or SEAT more profitable?

Do analysts rate TZOO or SEAT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TZOO or SEAT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TZOO or SEAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, TZOO or SEAT?

Does the media prefer TZOO or SEAT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEAT vs. The Competition

Vivid Seats Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools