Free Trial

Seneca Foods (SENEA) Competitors

Seneca Foods logo
$143.88 -2.91 (-1.98%)
Closing price 06/8/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$143.92 +0.04 (+0.03%)
As of 06/8/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SENEA vs. CALM, MZTI, TR, FLO, and JJSF

Should you buy Seneca Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seneca Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seneca Foods include Cal-Maine Foods (CALM), Marzetti (MZTI), Tootsie Roll Industries (TR), Flowers Foods (FLO), and J & J Snack Foods (JJSF). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods & meats" industry.

How does Seneca Foods compare to Cal-Maine Foods?

Cal-Maine Foods (NASDAQ:CALM) and Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) are both packaged foods & meats companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

84.7% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Seneca Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of 20.07% compared to Seneca Foods' net margin of 5.58%. Cal-Maine Foods' return on equity of 26.05% beat Seneca Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cal-Maine Foods20.07% 26.05% 22.13%
Seneca Foods 5.58%12.30%6.65%

Cal-Maine Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Foods. Cal-Maine Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seneca Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cal-Maine Foods$4.26B0.85$1.22B$14.355.32
Seneca Foods$1.58B0.62$41.22M$13.0011.07

Cal-Maine Foods currently has a consensus price target of $94.17, suggesting a potential upside of 23.35%. Given Cal-Maine Foods' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cal-Maine Foods is more favorable than Seneca Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cal-Maine Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Seneca Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cal-Maine Foods and Cal-Maine Foods both had 1 articles in the media. Cal-Maine Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Seneca Foods' score of -0.63 indicating that Cal-Maine Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cal-Maine Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Seneca Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Cal-Maine Foods beats Seneca Foods on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Foods compare to Marzetti?

Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) and Marzetti (NASDAQ:MZTI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Marzetti had 2 more articles in the media than Seneca Foods. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Marzetti and 1 mentions for Seneca Foods. Marzetti's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Seneca Foods' score of -0.63 indicating that Marzetti is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Seneca Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Marzetti
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marzetti has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.4% of Marzetti shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Seneca Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of Marzetti shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marzetti has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Foods. Seneca Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marzetti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seneca Foods$1.58B0.62$41.22M$13.0011.07
Marzetti$1.91B1.56$167.35M$6.3917.05

Marzetti has a consensus target price of $169.33, suggesting a potential upside of 55.41%. Given Marzetti's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marzetti is more favorable than Seneca Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seneca Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
Marzetti
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Marzetti has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Seneca Foods' net margin of 5.58%. Marzetti's return on equity of 18.12% beat Seneca Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seneca Foods5.58% 12.30% 6.65%
Marzetti 9.06%18.12%14.01%

Summary

Marzetti beats Seneca Foods on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Foods compare to Tootsie Roll Industries?

Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) and Tootsie Roll Industries (NYSE:TR) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Tootsie Roll Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Seneca Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.8% of Tootsie Roll Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tootsie Roll Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Seneca Foods. Seneca Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tootsie Roll Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seneca Foods$1.58B0.62$41.22M$13.0011.07
Tootsie Roll Industries$724.67M3.93$100.05M$1.3428.28

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seneca Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
Tootsie Roll Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Tootsie Roll Industries has a net margin of 13.70% compared to Seneca Foods' net margin of 5.58%. Seneca Foods' return on equity of 12.30% beat Tootsie Roll Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seneca Foods5.58% 12.30% 6.65%
Tootsie Roll Industries 13.70%10.77%8.12%

Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tootsie Roll Industries has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tootsie Roll Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Seneca Foods. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tootsie Roll Industries and 1 mentions for Seneca Foods. Tootsie Roll Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Seneca Foods' score of -0.63 indicating that Tootsie Roll Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Seneca Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Tootsie Roll Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Tootsie Roll Industries beats Seneca Foods on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Foods compare to Flowers Foods?

Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) and Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Foods. Seneca Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowers Foods$5.26B0.30$83.82M$0.3521.41
Seneca Foods$1.58B0.62$41.22M$13.0011.07

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, suggesting that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Seneca Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Flowers Foods had 4 more articles in the media than Seneca Foods. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Flowers Foods and 1 mentions for Seneca Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Seneca Foods' score of -0.63 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Flowers Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Seneca Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 28.09%. Given Flowers Foods' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Seneca Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flowers Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71
Seneca Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 5.58% compared to Flowers Foods' net margin of 1.38%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Seneca Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flowers Foods1.38% 15.98% 5.11%
Seneca Foods 5.58%12.30%6.65%

Summary

Flowers Foods beats Seneca Foods on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Foods compare to J & J Snack Foods?

J & J Snack Foods (NASDAQ:JJSF) and Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Seneca Foods had 1 more articles in the media than J & J Snack Foods. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seneca Foods and 0 mentions for J & J Snack Foods. J & J Snack Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Seneca Foods' score of -0.63 indicating that J & J Snack Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
J & J Snack Foods Neutral
Seneca Foods Negative

J & J Snack Foods currently has a consensus price target of $120.00, indicating a potential upside of 58.75%. Given J & J Snack Foods' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe J & J Snack Foods is more favorable than Seneca Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
J & J Snack Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Seneca Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

76.0% of J & J Snack Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of J & J Snack Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Seneca Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

J & J Snack Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Foods. Seneca Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J & J Snack Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J & J Snack Foods$1.58B0.90$65.60M$2.9825.37
Seneca Foods$1.58B0.62$41.22M$13.0011.07

J & J Snack Foods has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 5.58% compared to J & J Snack Foods' net margin of 3.75%. Seneca Foods' return on equity of 12.30% beat J & J Snack Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J & J Snack Foods3.75% 9.01% 6.18%
Seneca Foods 5.58%12.30%6.65%

Summary

J & J Snack Foods beats Seneca Foods on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seneca Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SENEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SENEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SENEA vs. The Competition

MetricSeneca FoodsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$993.30M$7.48B$16.01B$11.99B
Dividend YieldN/A4.41%3.56%5.57%
P/E Ratio11.0715.7224.9623.74
Price / Sales0.621.2047.82108.39
Price / Cash9.039.6713.0537.25
Price / Book1.562.665.526.78
Net Income$41.22M$223.97M$678.44M$337.51M
7 Day Performance2.60%-1.00%1.30%-2.34%
1 Month Performance3.96%-3.11%-2.02%1.88%
1 Year Performance56.02%-16.50%-13.55%25.55%

Seneca Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SENEA
Seneca Foods
1.5429 of 5 stars
$143.88
-2.0%
N/A+52.3%$993.30M$1.58B11.072,885
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods
2.9387 of 5 stars
$74.94
-0.3%
$94.17
+25.7%
-22.2%$3.56B$3.46B5.233,828
MZTI
Marzetti
3.82 of 5 stars
$109.57
-0.1%
$169.33
+54.5%
-35.1%$3.07B$1.91B17.083,700
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.4815 of 5 stars
$37.71
+0.6%
N/A+9.7%$2.83B$724.67M28.012,100
FLO
Flowers Foods
4.1589 of 5 stars
$7.48
-2.5%
$9.60
+28.4%
-55.2%$1.62B$5.26B21.6410,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SENEA) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners