John B. Sanfilippo & Son (JBSS) Competitors

In the previous week, John B. Sanfilippo & Son and John B. Sanfilippo & Son both had 1 articles in the media. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Tootsie Roll Industries' score of 1.74 indicating that John B. Sanfilippo & Son is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tootsie Roll Industries has a net margin of 13.14% compared to John B. Sanfilippo & Son's net margin of 5.27%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's return on equity of 16.51% beat Tootsie Roll Industries' return on equity.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son presently has a consensus price target of $100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.33%. Given John B. Sanfilippo & Son's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe John B. Sanfilippo & Son is more favorable than Tootsie Roll Industries.

70.6% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Tootsie Roll Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.2% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 46.8% of Tootsie Roll Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays an annual dividend of $0.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Tootsie Roll Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tootsie Roll Industries pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John B. Sanfilippo & Son has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Tootsie Roll Industries has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. John B. Sanfilippo & Son is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Tootsie Roll Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. John B. Sanfilippo & Son is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tootsie Roll Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tootsie Roll Industries has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

66.4% of Marzetti shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of Marzetti shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.2% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marzetti has higher revenue and earnings than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. John B. Sanfilippo & Son is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marzetti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marzetti currently has a consensus target price of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.75%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.33%. Given John B. Sanfilippo & Son's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe John B. Sanfilippo & Son is more favorable than Marzetti.

In the previous week, Marzetti had 5 more articles in the media than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Marzetti and 1 mentions for John B. Sanfilippo & Son. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Marzetti's score of 1.10 indicating that John B. Sanfilippo & Son is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Marzetti has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Marzetti pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays an annual dividend of $0.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Marzetti pays out 57.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marzetti has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and John B. Sanfilippo & Son has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Marzetti is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marzetti has a net margin of 9.93% compared to John B. Sanfilippo & Son's net margin of 5.27%. Marzetti's return on equity of 18.22% beat John B. Sanfilippo & Son's return on equity.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -2.00%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's return on equity of 16.51% beat Utz Brands' return on equity.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays an annual dividend of $0.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utz Brands pays out -75.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John B. Sanfilippo & Son has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Utz Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Utz Brands had 8 more articles in the media than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Utz Brands and 1 mentions for John B. Sanfilippo & Son. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.62 indicating that John B. Sanfilippo & Son is being referred to more favorably in the media.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Utz Brands. Utz Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than John B. Sanfilippo & Son, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son presently has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.33%. Utz Brands has a consensus target price of $13.39, suggesting a potential downside of 6.16%. Given John B. Sanfilippo & Son's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe John B. Sanfilippo & Son is more favorable than Utz Brands.

70.6% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 30.2% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays an annual dividend of $0.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Nomad Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomad Foods pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John B. Sanfilippo & Son has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Nomad Foods has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son currently has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.33%. Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 20.79%. Given John B. Sanfilippo & Son's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe John B. Sanfilippo & Son is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.20%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's return on equity of 16.51% beat Nomad Foods' return on equity.

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than John B. Sanfilippo & Son, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, John B. Sanfilippo & Son and John B. Sanfilippo & Son both had 1 articles in the media. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that John B. Sanfilippo & Son is being referred to more favorably in the media.

70.6% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.2% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.