Which has higher valuation and earnings, BGS or MED?

Medifast has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B&G Foods. Medifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B&G Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio B&G Foods $1.83B 0.18 -$43.26M -$0.96 N/A Medifast $385.79M 0.36 -$18.67M -$1.83 N/A

Is BGS or MED more profitable?

B&G Foods has a net margin of -4.23% compared to Medifast's net margin of -5.78%. B&G Foods' return on equity of 9.67% beat Medifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets B&G Foods -4.23% 9.67% 1.53% Medifast -5.78% -4.80% -3.83%

Does the media favor BGS or MED?

In the previous week, Medifast had 5 more articles in the media than B&G Foods. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Medifast and 8 mentions for B&G Foods. Medifast's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Medifast is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment B&G Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Medifast 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer SENEA or BGS?

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $4.88, indicating a potential upside of 20.22%. Given B&G Foods' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe B&G Foods is more favorable than Seneca Foods. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Seneca Foods 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50 B&G Foods 2 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.60

Is SENEA or BGS more profitable?

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 5.58% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. Seneca Foods' return on equity of 12.30% beat B&G Foods' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Seneca Foods 5.58% 12.30% 6.65% B&G Foods -4.23% 9.67% 1.53%

Does the media prefer BGS or JBSS?

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 5 more articles in the media than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 3 mentions for John B. Sanfilippo & Son. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that John B. Sanfilippo & Son is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment B&G Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral John B. Sanfilippo & Son 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Is BGS or CVGW more profitable?

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 2.61% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. Calavo Growers' return on equity of 12.81% beat B&G Foods' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets B&G Foods -4.23% 9.67% 1.53% Calavo Growers 2.61% 12.81% 8.77%

Does the media prefer BGS or CVGW?

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 2 more articles in the media than Calavo Growers. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 6 mentions for Calavo Growers. Calavo Growers' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Calavo Growers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment B&G Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Calavo Growers 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is LWAY or BGS more profitable?

Lifeway Foods has a net margin of 6.54% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. Lifeway Foods' return on equity of 17.76% beat B&G Foods' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lifeway Foods 6.54% 17.76% 13.82% B&G Foods -4.23% 9.67% 1.53%

Does the media favor LWAY or BGS?

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 5 more articles in the media than Lifeway Foods. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 3 mentions for Lifeway Foods. Lifeway Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Lifeway Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lifeway Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive B&G Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

B&G Foods (BGS) Competitors

$4.06 +0.07 (+1.63%)

Closing price 06/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.08 +0.02 (+0.49%)

As of 09:03 AM Eastern

Compare

BGS vs. MED, SENEA, JBSS, CVGW, and LWAY

Should you buy B&G Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares B&G Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with B&G Foods include Medifast (MED), Seneca Foods (SENEA), John B. Sanfilippo & Son (JBSS), Calavo Growers (CVGW), and Lifeway Foods (LWAY). These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does B&G Foods compare to Medifast?

B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) and Medifast (NYSE:MED) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

B&G Foods has a net margin of -4.23% compared to Medifast's net margin of -5.78%. B&G Foods' return on equity of 9.67% beat Medifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
B&G Foods	-4.23%	9.67%	1.53%
Medifast	-5.78%	-4.80%	-3.83%

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medifast has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

B&G Foods presently has a consensus target price of $4.88, suggesting a potential upside of 20.22%. Medifast has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.05%. Given B&G Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe B&G Foods is more favorable than Medifast.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
B&G Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60
Medifast	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, Medifast had 5 more articles in the media than B&G Foods. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Medifast and 8 mentions for B&G Foods. Medifast's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Medifast is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
B&G Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Medifast	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

66.2% of B&G Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Medifast shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of B&G Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Medifast shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Medifast has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B&G Foods. Medifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B&G Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
B&G Foods	$1.83B	0.18	-$43.26M	-$0.96	N/A
Medifast	$385.79M	0.36	-$18.67M	-$1.83	N/A

Summary

B&G Foods beats Medifast on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B&G Foods compare to Seneca Foods?

Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) and B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 5.58% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. Seneca Foods' return on equity of 12.30% beat B&G Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seneca Foods	5.58%	12.30%	6.65%
B&G Foods	-4.23%	9.67%	1.53%

42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.2% of B&G Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Seneca Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of B&G Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $4.88, indicating a potential upside of 20.22%. Given B&G Foods' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe B&G Foods is more favorable than Seneca Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Seneca Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50
B&G Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 7 more articles in the media than Seneca Foods. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 1 mentions for Seneca Foods. Seneca Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Seneca Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Seneca Foods	Positive
B&G Foods	Neutral

Seneca Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B&G Foods. B&G Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seneca Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seneca Foods	$1.58B	0.60	$41.22M	$13.00	10.79
B&G Foods	$1.83B	0.18	-$43.26M	-$0.96	N/A

Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B&G Foods has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Seneca Foods beats B&G Foods on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B&G Foods compare to John B. Sanfilippo & Son?

B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) and John B. Sanfilippo & Son (NASDAQ:JBSS) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

B&G Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. B&G Foods pays out -79.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John B. Sanfilippo & Son pays out 15.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John B. Sanfilippo & Son has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. B&G Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a net margin of 5.76% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's return on equity of 18.11% beat B&G Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
B&G Foods	-4.23%	9.67%	1.53%
John B. Sanfilippo & Son	5.76%	18.11%	10.88%

John B. Sanfilippo & Son has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B&G Foods. B&G Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than John B. Sanfilippo & Son, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
B&G Foods	$1.83B	0.18	-$43.26M	-$0.96	N/A
John B. Sanfilippo & Son	$1.11B	0.78	$58.93M	$5.70	13.00

B&G Foods presently has a consensus price target of $4.88, suggesting a potential upside of 20.22%. John B. Sanfilippo & Son has a consensus price target of $109.00, suggesting a potential upside of 47.12%. Given John B. Sanfilippo & Son's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe John B. Sanfilippo & Son is more favorable than B&G Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
B&G Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60
John B. Sanfilippo & Son	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 5 more articles in the media than John B. Sanfilippo & Son. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 3 mentions for John B. Sanfilippo & Son. John B. Sanfilippo & Son's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that John B. Sanfilippo & Son is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
B&G Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
John B. Sanfilippo & Son	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

66.2% of B&G Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of B&G Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.2% of John B. Sanfilippo & Son shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

John B. Sanfilippo & Son beats B&G Foods on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B&G Foods compare to Calavo Growers?

B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) and Calavo Growers (NASDAQ:CVGW) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 2 more articles in the media than Calavo Growers. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 6 mentions for Calavo Growers. Calavo Growers' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Calavo Growers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
B&G Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Calavo Growers	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

66.2% of B&G Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.3% of Calavo Growers shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of B&G Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Calavo Growers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B&G Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. Calavo Growers pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. B&G Foods pays out -79.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Calavo Growers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. B&G Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 2.61% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. Calavo Growers' return on equity of 12.81% beat B&G Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
B&G Foods	-4.23%	9.67%	1.53%
Calavo Growers	2.61%	12.81%	8.77%

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

B&G Foods presently has a consensus target price of $4.88, indicating a potential upside of 20.22%. Calavo Growers has a consensus target price of $33.50, indicating a potential upside of 28.40%. Given Calavo Growers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Calavo Growers is more favorable than B&G Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
B&G Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60
Calavo Growers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Calavo Growers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B&G Foods. B&G Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calavo Growers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
B&G Foods	$1.83B	0.18	-$43.26M	-$0.96	N/A
Calavo Growers	$616.25M	0.76	$19.80M	$0.89	29.31

Summary

Calavo Growers beats B&G Foods on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B&G Foods compare to Lifeway Foods?

Lifeway Foods (NASDAQ:LWAY) and B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Lifeway Foods has a net margin of 6.54% compared to B&G Foods' net margin of -4.23%. Lifeway Foods' return on equity of 17.76% beat B&G Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lifeway Foods	6.54%	17.76%	13.82%
B&G Foods	-4.23%	9.67%	1.53%

Lifeway Foods presently has a consensus target price of $34.33, suggesting a potential upside of 51.98%. B&G Foods has a consensus target price of $4.88, suggesting a potential upside of 20.22%. Given Lifeway Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lifeway Foods is more favorable than B&G Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lifeway Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
B&G Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60

36.4% of Lifeway Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.2% of B&G Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 18.9% of Lifeway Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of B&G Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifeway Foods has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B&G Foods has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Lifeway Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B&G Foods. B&G Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifeway Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lifeway Foods	$212.50M	1.62	$13.86M	$0.97	23.29
B&G Foods	$1.83B	0.18	-$43.26M	-$0.96	N/A

In the previous week, B&G Foods had 5 more articles in the media than Lifeway Foods. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for B&G Foods and 3 mentions for Lifeway Foods. Lifeway Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat B&G Foods' score of 0.05 indicating that Lifeway Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lifeway Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
B&G Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Lifeway Foods beats B&G Foods on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B&G Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	B&G Foods	FOOD Industry	Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$323.86M	$7.40B	$15.82B	$23.17B
Dividend Yield	19.05%	4.36%	3.53%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	-4.22	15.64	25.94	31.31
Price / Sales	0.18	1.20	46.94	24.49
Price / Cash	1.64	9.62	16.95	24.80
Price / Book	0.72	2.64	5.63	4.74
Net Income	-$43.26M	$223.87M	$676.04M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.19%	-1.04%	-0.83%	0.62%
1 Month Performance	-26.87%	-3.68%	-2.26%	1.54%
1 Year Performance	-1.93%	-13.89%	-11.84%	26.87%

B&G Foods Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BGS B&G Foods	3.0852 of 5 stars	$4.06 +1.6%	$4.88 +20.2%	-2.2%	$328.73M	$1.81B	N/A	2,497
MED Medifast	1.4904 of 5 stars	$12.60 +0.1%	$12.00 -4.8%	-6.9%	$139.99M	$385.79M	N/A	870
SENEA Seneca Foods	1.6949 of 5 stars	$139.04 flat	N/A	+45.7%	$940.86M	$1.58B	10.70	2,885
JBSS John B. Sanfilippo & Son	4.716 of 5 stars	$76.71 flat	$109.00 +42.1%	+20.2%	$896.74M	$1.11B	13.46	1,900	News Coverage Positive News
CVGW Calavo Growers	2.1768 of 5 stars	$26.45 flat	$33.50 +26.7%	-5.0%	$472.77M	$648.43M	29.72	1,969	Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BGS) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

B&G Foods (BGS) Competitors

BGS vs. MED, SENEA, JBSS, CVGW, and LWAY

How does B&G Foods compare to Medifast?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to Seneca Foods?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to John B. Sanfilippo & Son?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to Calavo Growers?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to Lifeway Foods?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BGS vs. The Competition

B&G Foods Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

B&G Foods (BGS) Competitors

BGS vs. MED, SENEA, JBSS, CVGW, and LWAY

How does B&G Foods compare to Medifast?

Is BGS or MED more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BGS or MED?

Do analysts rate BGS or MED?

Does the media favor BGS or MED?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BGS or MED?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BGS or MED?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to Seneca Foods?

Is SENEA or BGS more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SENEA or BGS?

Do analysts prefer SENEA or BGS?

Does the media prefer SENEA or BGS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SENEA or BGS?

Which has more risk and volatility, SENEA or BGS?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to John B. Sanfilippo & Son?

Is BGS or JBSS a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, BGS or JBSS?

Is BGS or JBSS more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BGS or JBSS?

Do analysts prefer BGS or JBSS?

Does the media prefer BGS or JBSS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BGS or JBSS?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to Calavo Growers?

Does the media prefer BGS or CVGW?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BGS or CVGW?

Is BGS or CVGW a better dividend stock?

Is BGS or CVGW more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, BGS or CVGW?

Do analysts rate BGS or CVGW?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BGS or CVGW?

Summary

How does B&G Foods compare to Lifeway Foods?

Is LWAY or BGS more profitable?

Do analysts rate LWAY or BGS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LWAY or BGS?

Which has more risk and volatility, LWAY or BGS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LWAY or BGS?

Does the media favor LWAY or BGS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BGS vs. The Competition

B&G Foods Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools