Free Trial

PowerBank (PBK) Competitors

PowerBank logo
$0.86 -0.06 (-6.51%)
As of 06/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

PBK vs. NFE, OPTT, SLNG, SPRU, and WAVE

Should you buy PowerBank stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PowerBank with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PowerBank include New Fortress Energy (NFE), Ocean Power Technologies (OPTT), Stabilis Solutions (SLNG), Spruce Power (SPRU), and Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does PowerBank compare to New Fortress Energy?

New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ:NFE) and PowerBank (NASDAQ:PBK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

New Fortress Energy presently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,273.90%. PowerBank has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 365.12%. Given New Fortress Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe New Fortress Energy is more favorable than PowerBank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Fortress Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
PowerBank
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, PowerBank had 8 more articles in the media than New Fortress Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for PowerBank and 3 mentions for New Fortress Energy. New Fortress Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat PowerBank's score of 0.84 indicating that New Fortress Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Fortress Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PowerBank
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PowerBank has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Fortress Energy. PowerBank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Fortress Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Fortress Energy$1.50B0.10-$1.84B-$2.24N/A
PowerBank$29.76M1.37-$22.25M-$0.19N/A

PowerBank has a net margin of -21.31% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of -164.16%. PowerBank's return on equity of -32.68% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Fortress Energy-164.16% -253.73% -15.46%
PowerBank -21.31%-32.68%-5.90%

58.6% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerBank has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PowerBank beats New Fortress Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerBank compare to Ocean Power Technologies?

Ocean Power Technologies (NASDAQ:OPTT) and PowerBank (NASDAQ:PBK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Ocean Power Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $1.50, suggesting a potential upside of 426.50%. PowerBank has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 365.12%. Given Ocean Power Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ocean Power Technologies is more favorable than PowerBank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ocean Power Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
PowerBank
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

PowerBank has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Power Technologies. PowerBank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Power Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Power Technologies$3.44M18.91-$27.48M-$0.20N/A
PowerBank$29.76M1.37-$22.25M-$0.19N/A

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.52, suggesting that its stock price is 152% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerBank has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PowerBank had 5 more articles in the media than Ocean Power Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for PowerBank and 6 mentions for Ocean Power Technologies. PowerBank's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ocean Power Technologies' score of 0.66 indicating that PowerBank is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ocean Power Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PowerBank
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

11.9% of Ocean Power Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Ocean Power Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PowerBank has a net margin of -21.31% compared to Ocean Power Technologies' net margin of -304.91%. PowerBank's return on equity of -32.68% beat Ocean Power Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Power Technologies-304.91% -97.03% -72.36%
PowerBank -21.31%-32.68%-5.90%

Summary

PowerBank beats Ocean Power Technologies on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerBank compare to Stabilis Solutions?

Stabilis Solutions (NASDAQ:SLNG) and PowerBank (NASDAQ:PBK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Stabilis Solutions has a beta of -0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerBank has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

3.8% of Stabilis Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 72.2% of Stabilis Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Stabilis Solutions has a net margin of -6.25% compared to PowerBank's net margin of -21.31%. Stabilis Solutions' return on equity of -5.85% beat PowerBank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stabilis Solutions-6.25% -5.85% -4.16%
PowerBank -21.31%-32.68%-5.90%

Stabilis Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 108.77%. PowerBank has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 365.12%. Given PowerBank's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PowerBank is more favorable than Stabilis Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stabilis Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
PowerBank
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Stabilis Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than PowerBank. Stabilis Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PowerBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stabilis Solutions$68.25M1.31-$1.35M-$0.20N/A
PowerBank$29.76M1.37-$22.25M-$0.19N/A

In the previous week, PowerBank had 9 more articles in the media than Stabilis Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for PowerBank and 2 mentions for Stabilis Solutions. PowerBank's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Stabilis Solutions' score of 0.82 indicating that PowerBank is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stabilis Solutions
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PowerBank
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

PowerBank beats Stabilis Solutions on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerBank compare to Spruce Power?

PowerBank (NASDAQ:PBK) and Spruce Power (NYSE:SPRU) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

20.8% of Spruce Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Spruce Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PowerBank had 10 more articles in the media than Spruce Power. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for PowerBank and 1 mentions for Spruce Power. PowerBank's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Spruce Power's score of 0.00 indicating that PowerBank is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PowerBank
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Spruce Power
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PowerBank has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Spruce Power. PowerBank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spruce Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerBank$29.76M1.37-$22.25M-$0.19N/A
Spruce Power$111.81M0.49-$26.03M-$0.76N/A

PowerBank presently has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 365.12%. Given PowerBank's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe PowerBank is more favorable than Spruce Power.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PowerBank
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Spruce Power
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

PowerBank has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spruce Power has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Spruce Power has a net margin of -12.22% compared to PowerBank's net margin of -21.31%. Spruce Power's return on equity of -10.95% beat PowerBank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerBank-21.31% -32.68% -5.90%
Spruce Power -12.22%-10.95%-1.60%

Summary

PowerBank beats Spruce Power on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerBank compare to Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)?

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (NASDAQ:WAVE) and PowerBank (NASDAQ:PBK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PowerBank's net margin of -21.31%. PowerBank's return on equity of -32.68% beat Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)N/A -66.77% -46.75%
PowerBank -21.31%-32.68%-5.90%

0.6% of Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) has a beta of -0.38, meaning that its stock price is 138% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerBank has a beta of 2.23, meaning that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PowerBank. Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PowerBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)$40K1,096.13-$3.70M-$0.68N/A
PowerBank$29.76M1.37-$22.25M-$0.19N/A

In the previous week, PowerBank had 6 more articles in the media than Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ). MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for PowerBank and 5 mentions for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ). PowerBank's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)'s score of 0.20 indicating that PowerBank is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PowerBank
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PowerBank has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 365.12%. Given PowerBank's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PowerBank is more favorable than Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PowerBank
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

PowerBank beats Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PowerBank News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PBK vs. The Competition

MetricPowerBankSolar IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$43.56M$3.21B$10.18B$12.06B
Dividend YieldN/A3.75%10.41%5.55%
P/E Ratio-4.5314.4620.0623.76
Price / Sales1.3787.54754.28105.22
Price / CashN/A12.5937.7656.09
Price / Book2.154.534.246.72
Net Income-$22.25M$24.30M$4.23B$337.35M
7 Day Performance-38.35%-17.19%-2.72%-1.21%
1 Month Performance26.92%3.11%-1.18%1.41%
1 Year Performance-35.34%77.28%41.05%23.64%

PowerBank Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PBK
PowerBank
4.4366 of 5 stars
$0.86
-6.5%
$4.00
+365.1%
-36.3%$43.56M$29.76MN/A15
NFE
New Fortress Energy
2.6859 of 5 stars
$0.52
-5.9%
$7.00
+1,238.4%
-82.3%$160.18M$1.26BN/A670
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
2.6169 of 5 stars
$0.42
+8.5%
$1.50
+254.6%
-51.2%$88.93M$3.44MN/A50
SLNG
Stabilis Solutions
3.0131 of 5 stars
$3.74
+0.5%
$10.00
+167.4%
-10.0%$68.43M$61.29MN/A250
SPRU
Spruce Power
0.1378 of 5 stars
$2.92
-0.6%
N/A+57.3%$52.33M$111.81MN/A180

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PBK) was last updated on 6/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners