Go Pro

Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) Competitors

Clean Energy Technologies logo
$1.03 +0.01 (+0.98%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.04 +0.01 (+1.17%)
As of 09/11/2026 05:37 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CETY vs. OPTT, PPSI, GEV, BE, and INIO

Should you buy Clean Energy Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Clean Energy Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Ocean Power Technologies (OPTT), Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI), GE Vernova (GEV), Bloom Energy (BE), and Innio (INIO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "heavy electrical equipment" industry.

How does Clean Energy Technologies compare to Ocean Power Technologies?

Ocean Power Technologies (NASDAQ:OPTT) and Clean Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:CETY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.6, suggesting that its stock price is 160% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 247% less volatile than the broader market.

Clean Energy Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ocean Power Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Power Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Power Technologies$3.74M7.70-$27.48M-$0.22N/A
Clean Energy Technologies$2.16M5.80-$6.81M-$1.20N/A

In the previous week, Ocean Power Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ocean Power Technologies and 1 mentions for Clean Energy Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Ocean Power Technologies' score of 0.11 indicating that Clean Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Power Technologies Neutral
Clean Energy Technologies Very Positive

11.9% of Ocean Power Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Ocean Power Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Clean Energy Technologies has a net margin of -262.61% compared to Ocean Power Technologies' net margin of -304.91%. Clean Energy Technologies' return on equity of -80.91% beat Ocean Power Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Power Technologies-304.91% -97.03% -72.36%
Clean Energy Technologies -262.61%-80.91%-37.54%

Ocean Power Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $1.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1,308.45%. Given Ocean Power Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ocean Power Technologies is more favorable than Clean Energy Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ocean Power Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Clean Energy Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Ocean Power Technologies beats Clean Energy Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Technologies compare to Pioneer Power Solutions?

Clean Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:CETY) and Pioneer Power Solutions (NASDAQ:PPSI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Pioneer Power Solutions has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 128.76%. Given Pioneer Power Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pioneer Power Solutions is more favorable than Clean Energy Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clean Energy Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Pioneer Power Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Pioneer Power Solutions has a net margin of -38.11% compared to Clean Energy Technologies' net margin of -262.61%. Pioneer Power Solutions' return on equity of -27.64% beat Clean Energy Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clean Energy Technologies-262.61% -80.91% -37.54%
Pioneer Power Solutions -38.11%-27.64%-22.42%

0.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Pioneer Power Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Pioneer Power Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pioneer Power Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Technologies. Pioneer Power Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Technologies$2.16M5.80-$6.81M-$1.20N/A
Pioneer Power Solutions$27.63M1.23-$6M-$0.58N/A

In the previous week, Pioneer Power Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pioneer Power Solutions and 1 mentions for Clean Energy Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Pioneer Power Solutions' score of 0.44 indicating that Clean Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clean Energy Technologies Very Positive
Pioneer Power Solutions Neutral

Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -1.47, meaning that its share price is 247% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pioneer Power Solutions has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pioneer Power Solutions beats Clean Energy Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Technologies compare to GE Vernova?

GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV) and Clean Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:CETY) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 23.03% compared to Clean Energy Technologies' net margin of -262.61%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 42.42% beat Clean Energy Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GE Vernova23.03% 42.42% 7.78%
Clean Energy Technologies -262.61%-80.91%-37.54%

GE Vernova currently has a consensus price target of $1,154.28, indicating a potential upside of 20.70%. Given GE Vernova's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe GE Vernova is more favorable than Clean Energy Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GE Vernova
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Clean Energy Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

GE Vernova has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -1.47, meaning that its stock price is 247% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GE Vernova had 28 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for GE Vernova and 1 mentions for Clean Energy Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat GE Vernova's score of 1.16 indicating that Clean Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GE Vernova Positive
Clean Energy Technologies Very Positive

0.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of GE Vernova shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

GE Vernova has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GE Vernova, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GE Vernova$38.07B6.69$4.88B$34.9427.37
Clean Energy Technologies$2.16M5.80-$6.81M-$1.20N/A

Summary

GE Vernova beats Clean Energy Technologies on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Technologies compare to Bloom Energy?

Clean Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:CETY) and Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $249.18, suggesting a potential downside of 9.55%. Given Bloom Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bloom Energy is more favorable than Clean Energy Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clean Energy Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bloom Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Bloom Energy has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Clean Energy Technologies' net margin of -262.61%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 35.45% beat Clean Energy Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clean Energy Technologies-262.61% -80.91% -37.54%
Bloom Energy 7.87%35.45%8.30%

0.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.0% of Bloom Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Bloom Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Clean Energy Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bloom Energy. Clean Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bloom Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Technologies$2.16M5.80-$6.81M-$1.20N/A
Bloom Energy$2.02B40.09-$88.43M$0.75367.33

In the previous week, Bloom Energy had 98 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 99 mentions for Bloom Energy and 1 mentions for Clean Energy Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Bloom Energy's score of 0.67 indicating that Clean Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clean Energy Technologies Very Positive
Bloom Energy Positive

Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -1.47, indicating that its share price is 247% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.8, indicating that its share price is 280% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bloom Energy beats Clean Energy Technologies on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Technologies compare to Innio?

Innio (NASDAQ:INIO) and Clean Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:CETY) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Innio currently has a consensus target price of $42.90, suggesting a potential upside of 110.81%. Given Innio's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Innio is more favorable than Clean Energy Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Innio
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Clean Energy Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Innio has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Clean Energy Technologies' net margin of -262.61%. Innio's return on equity of 0.00% beat Clean Energy Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InnioN/A N/A N/A
Clean Energy Technologies -262.61%-80.91%-37.54%

Innio has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Clean Energy Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InnioN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Clean Energy Technologies$2.16M5.80-$6.81M-$1.20N/A

In the previous week, Innio had 8 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Innio and 1 mentions for Clean Energy Technologies. Clean Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Innio's score of 1.15 indicating that Clean Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Innio Positive
Clean Energy Technologies Very Positive

0.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.5% of Clean Energy Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Innio beats Clean Energy Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Clean Energy Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CETY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CETY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CETY vs. The Competition

MetricClean Energy TechnologiesElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$12.53M$10.17B$10.25B$12.85B
Dividend YieldN/A2.33%97.06%11.17%
P/E Ratio-0.8646.3225.7925.36
Price / Sales5.801,638.79332.54116.78
Price / CashN/A32.7123.9051.52
Price / Book1.567.524.846.20
Net Income-$6.81M$139.36M$613.14M$358.50M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.14%-1.55%-2.35%
1 Month Performance11.96%-6.26%-4.17%-3.23%
1 Year Performance-73.81%10.66%6.24%8.79%

Clean Energy Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CETY
Clean Energy Technologies
0.7899 of 5 stars
$1.03
+1.0%
N/A-73.8%$12.53M$2.16MN/A10
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
2.1741 of 5 stars
$0.16
-1.7%
$1.50
+844.6%
-81.4%$42.90M$3.74MN/A50
PPSI
Pioneer Power Solutions
2.5053 of 5 stars
$3.14
+7.5%
$7.00
+122.9%
-32.5%$34.85M$27.63MN/A90
GEV
GE Vernova
4.5396 of 5 stars
$951.90
-2.0%
$1,155.28
+21.4%
+52.8%$253.52B$41.37B27.2475,000
BE
Bloom Energy
2.432 of 5 stars
$269.42
-2.8%
$249.18
-7.5%
+310.4%$79.35B$2.02B359.232,214

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CETY) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners